Skip to main content
Log in

Chemistry of male dominance in the house mouse,Mus domesticus

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Two terpenic constituents, E,E,-α-farnesene and E-β-farnesene, were found to be elevated in dominant male urine when compared to subordinate or control males. These two urinary compounds were absent in the bladder urine of males; however, they were the most prominent constituents of the preputial gland's aliquots. The results of a two-choice preference test, conducted on ICR/Alb subordinate males, gave a strong indication that these two terpenic constituents introduced into the previously attractive stimulus significantly discouraged prolonged investigations by male mice. The compounds, whether present in the urine matrix or water, rendered the stimulus with a quality behaviorally similar to the urine of dominant males. It appears that they may be synonymous with the previously described aversion signal produced by dominant males. We suggest that these compounds may play a wide-ranging role in the territorial marking behavior of male mice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeFries, J. C., and McClearn, G. E., Am. Nat.104 (1970) 408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oakeshott, J. G., Oecologia15 (1974) 143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huck, U. W., Banks, E. M., and Wang, S. C., Behav. Neural Biol.33 (1981) 364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Christian, J. J., Lloyd, J. A., and Davis, D. E., Rec. Progr. Horm. Res.21 (1965) 501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bronson, F. H., Bull. ecol. Soc. Am.47 (1966) 182.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bronson, F. H., Stetson, M. H., and Stiff, M. E., Physiol. Behav.10 (1973) 369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chapman, V. H., Desjardins, C., and Bronson, F. H., Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med.130 (1969) 624.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bronson, F. H., Q. Rev. Biol.54 (1979) 265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lombardi, J. R., and Vandenbergh, J. G., Science196 (1977) 545.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, R. B., and Nowell, N. W., Physiol. Behav.11 (1973) 35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones, R. B., and Nowell, N. W., J. Endocr.59 (1973) 302.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mugford, R. A., and Nowell, N. W., Nature226 (1970) 967.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rose, R. N., Bernstein, I. S., and Gordon, T. P., Psychosom. Med.37 (1975) 50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McKinney, T. D., and Desjardins, C., Biol. Reprod.9 (1973) 370.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harvey, S., Jemiolo, B., and Novotny, M., J. chem. Ecol.15 (1989) 2061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Novotny, M., Harvey, S., Jemiolo, B., and Alberts, J., Proc. natl Acad. Sci. USA82 (1985) 2059.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jemiolo, B., Alberts, J., Sochinski-Wiggins, S., Harvey, S., and Novotny, M., Anim. Behav.33 (1985) 1114.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jemiolo, B., Harvey, S., and Novotny, M., Proc. natl Acad. Sci. USA83 (1986) 4576.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. E,E-α-farnesene and E-β-farnesene were identified from their mass spectra and retention of authentic compounds through capillary gas chromatography. E,E-α-farnesene was synthesized (Negishi and Matushita, Org. Synth.62 (1984) 31–36) and E-β-farnesene was isolated from the oil of chamomile (Murray, K. E., Aust. J. Chem.22 (1969) 197–204; Sorn, F. et al., Coll. Trav. Chim. Tchec.14 (1959) 699–715; Sorn, F. et al. Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun.16 (1959) 626–638.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jones, J. B., and Nowell, N. W., J. Endocr.60 (1974) 19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Novotny, M., Lee, M. L., and Bartle, K. D., Chromatographia7 (1974) 333.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schwende, F. J., Wiesler, D., Jorgenson, J. W., Carmack, M., and Novotny, M., J. chem. Ecol.12 (1986) 277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Caroom, D., and Bronson, F. H., Physiol. Behav.7 (1971) 659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Aron, C., Physiol. Rev.59 (1976) 229.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lehninger, A. L., Biochemistry, 2nd edn, pp. 679–684. Worth Publishers, Inc., New York 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cavill, G. W. K., Williams, P. J., and Whitfield, F. B., Tetrahedron Lett.23 (1967) 2201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bowers, W. S., Nault, L. R., Webb, R. E., and Dutky, S. R., Science177 (1972) 1121.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pickett, J. A., and Griffiths, D. C., J. chem. Ecol.6 (1980) 349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gibson, R. W., and Pickett, J. A., Nature302 (1983) 608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bailey, N. T. J., Statistical Methods in Biology, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Novotny, M., Harvey, S. & Jemiolo, B. Chemistry of male dominance in the house mouse,Mus domesticus . Experientia 46, 109–113 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01955433

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01955433

Key words

Navigation