Abstract
I discuss the difference between models, simulations, and experiments from an epistemological and an ontological perspective. I first distinguish between “static” models (like a map) and “dynamic” models endowed with the capacity to generate processes. Only the latter can be used to simulate. I then criticize the view according to which the difference between models/simulations and experiments is fundamentally epistemic in character. Following Herbert Simon, I argue that the difference is ontological. Simulations merely require the existence of an abstract correspondence between the simulating and the simulated system. In experiments, in contrast, the causal relations governing the experimental and the target systems are grounded in the same material. Simulations can produce new knowledge just as experiments do, but the prior knowledge needed to run a good simulation is not the same as that needed to run a good experiment. I conclude by discussing “hybrid” cases of “experimental simulations” or “simulating experiments”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boumans, M., 2001, Calibration of models in experiments, in this volume, pp. 75–93.
Bunge, M., 1969, Analogy, simulation, representation, Revue internationale de philosophie 87:16–33.
Fischhoff, B., 1996, The real world: What good is it?, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 65:232–248.
Giere, R., 1999, Using models to represent reality, in: Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery, L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian, and P. Thagard, eds., Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp.41–57.
Guala, F., 1998, Experiments as mediators in the non-laboratory sciences, Philosophica 62:901–918.
Hartmann, S., 1996, The world as a process: Simulations in the natural and social sciences, in: Modelling and Simulation in the Social Sciences from the Philosophy of Science Point of View, R. Hegselmann, U. Mueller, and K. Troitzsch, eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 77–100.
Hesse, M.B., 1963, Models and Analogies in Science, Sheed and Ward, London.
Longworth, F., 1998, Computer modeling in the earth sciences, working paper, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine.
Morgan, M.S., 2001, Model experiments and models in experiments, in this volume, pp 41–58.
Morrison, M. and Morgan, M.S., 1999, Models as mediating instruments, in:Models as Mediators, M.S. Morgan and M. Morrison, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 10–37.
Nagel, E., 1961, The Structure of Science, Hackett, Indianapolis.
Simon, H.A., 1969, The Sciences of the Artificial, MIT Press, Boston.
Smith, V.L., 1991, Papers in Experimental Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guala, F. (2002). Models, Simulations, and Experiments. In: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N.J. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0605-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0605-8_4
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5154-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0605-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive