Abstract
Virtual worlds and immersive simulations are designed to create a compelling, Âcollaborative, and participatory experience for the user, and often contain a variety of features not possible in the real world to enhance users’ engagement and learning. Over the past several years, an increasing number of immersive virtual environment experiences have become available for both educational and entertainment purposes. Participants in entertainment experiences now number hundreds of millions, yet adoption in educational settings has been limited thus far. In this chapter, we review examples of virtual worlds and immersive simulations that are designed, or adapted, to support situated learning experiences, analyze their use for a variety of educational purposes, explore theoretical foundations, identify learning affordances and limitations, and examine instructional design considerations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akilli, G. K. (2008). Games and simulations: A new approach in education. In V. Sugumaran (Ed.), Intelligent information technologies: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 1398–1415). doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-941-0.ch078
Aldrich, C. (2005). Learning by doing: A comprehensive guide to simulations, computer games, and pedagogy in e-learning and other educational experiences. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Barab, S. A., Dodge, T., Thomas, M., Jackson, C., & Tuzun, H. (2007). Our designs and the social agendas they carry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 263–305.
Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M. S., Dodge, T., & Ingram-Goble, A. (2010). Narratizing disciplines and disciplinizing narratives: Games as 21st century curriculum. International Journal of Gaming and Computer: Mediated Simulations, 2(1), 17–30.
Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M. S., & Ingram-Goble, A. (2010). Transformational play: Using games to position person, content, and context. Educational Researcher, 39(7), 525–536.
*Barab, S., Zuiker, S., Warren, S., Hickey, D., Ingram-Goble, A., Kwon, E., et al. (2007). Situationally embodied curriculum: Relating formalisms and contexts. Science Education, 91(5), 750–782
Bartle, R. (2003). Designing virtual worlds. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
Bell, M. (2008). Toward a definition of “virtual worlds”. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1(1), 1–5.
Brophy, J. (1999). Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education: Developing appreciation for particular learning domains and activities. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 75–85.
Castronova, E. (2006). Synthetic worlds: The business and culture of online games. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Clarke-Midura, J., & Dede, C. (2010). Assessment, technology, and change. Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 42(3), 309–328.
Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience and human psychology. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience (pp. 15–35). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Dawley, L. (2009). Social network knowledge construction: Emerging virtual world pedagogy. On The Horizon, 17(2), 109–121.
Dede, C. (2005). Why design-based research is both important and difficult. Educational Technology, 45(1), 5–8.
Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69. doi:10.1126/science.1167311.
*Dede, C. (2012). Customization in immersive learning environments: Implications for digital teaching platforms. In C. Dede & J. Richards, (Eds.), Digital teaching platforms. New York: Teacher’s College Press
*deFreitas, S., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Liarokapis, F., Majoulas, G., & Poulovassilis, A. (2010). Learning as immersive experiences: Using the four-dimensional framework for designing and evaluating immersive learning experiences in a virtual world. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 69–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01024.x
Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.
Dickey, M. (2011). The pragmatics of virtual worlds for K-12 educators: Investigating the affordances and constraints of ActiveWorlds and SecondLife with K-12 in-service teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(1), 1–20. doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9163-4.
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7–22.
Dweck, C. S. (2002). Messages that motivate: How praise molds students’ beliefs, motivation, and performance (in surprising ways). In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement (pp. 37–60). San Diego: Elsevier Science.
*Feldon, D. F., & Kafai, Y.B. (2008). Mixed methods for mixed reality: Understanding users’ avatar activities in virtual worlds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(5–6), 575–593
Fiorella, L., Vogel-Walcutt, J. J., & Schatz, S. (2011). Applying the modality principle of real-time feedback and the acquisition of higher-order cognitive skills. Educational Technology Research and Development. doi: 10.1007/s11423-011-9218-1
Gibson, D. (2010). Living virtually: Researching new worlds. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 2(1), 59–61. doi:10.4018/jgcms.2010010106.
Gibson, D., Aldrich, M., & Presnsky, M. (2007). Games and simulations in online learning: Research and development frameworks. Hershey, PA: Idea Group, Inc.
Habgood, M. P. J., & Ainsworth, S. E. (2011). Motivating children to learn effectively: Exploring the value of intrinsic integration in educational games. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 169–206.
*Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2010). Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: A review of the research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 33–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00900.x
Johnson, L. F., Levine, A., & Smith, R. S. (2007). The 2007 Horizon report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
Kafai, Y. B. (2010). World of Whyville: An introduction to tween virtual life. Games and Culture, 5(1), 3–22. doi:10.1177/15554120009351264.
Kahn, S. (2007). The case in case-based design of education software: A methodological interrogation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 423–447. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9028-z.
Ketelhut, D. J., Nelson, B. C., Clarke, J. E., & Dede, C. (2010). A multi-user virtual environment for building and assessing higher order inquiry skills in science. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 56–68.
KZero Inc. (2011). Virtual worlds 2011+. Available at http://www.kzero.co.uk
Laurel, B. (1993). Computers as theatre. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Lepper, M. R., & Henderlong, J. (2000). Turning “play” into “work” and “work” into “play”: 25 years of research on intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 257–307). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
Loh, S. (2007). Designing online games assessment as “information trails.” In D. Gibson, C. Aldrich, & M. Prensky (Eds.), Games and simulations in online learning: Research and development frameworks. IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-59904-304-3.ch016
Messinger, P., Stroulia, E., & Lyons, K. (2008). A typology of virtual worlds: Historical overview and future directions. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1(1), 1–18.
Murray, J. H. (1997). Hamlet on the holodeck: The future of narrative in cyberspace. New York: Free Press.
National Research Council. (2011). Learning science through computer games and simulations. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nelson, B. (2007). Exploring the use of individualized, reflective guidance in an educational multi-user virtual environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 83–97.
Nelson, B. C., & Erlandson, B. E. (2008). Managing cognitive load in educational multi-user virtual environments: Reflection on design practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(5–6), 619–641. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9082-1.
Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345–375.
Przybylski, A. K., Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 154–166.
Richter, J., & Dawley, L. (2010). Creating context for educational research in virtual worlds: An invitation to dialogue. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 2(1), i–xi.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Schuh, K. L., & Barab, S. A. (2008). Philosophical perspectives. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. V. Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 67–82). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
Slater, M. (2009). Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behavior in immersive virtual environments. Philosophic Transactions of the Royal Society, 364, 3549–3557.
Smart, E. J., Cascio, J., & Paffendorf, J. (2007). Metaverse roadmap overview. Retrieved from www.metaverseroadmap.org/MetaverseRoadmapOverview.pdf
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
*Warburton, S. (2009). Second Life in higher education: Assessing the potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), 414–426
Winn, W. (2003). Learning in artificial environments: Embodiment, embeddedness, and dynamic adaptation. Technology, Instruction, Cognition, and Learning, 1, 87–114.
Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N., Urbanek, M., Chang, F., & Merget, D. (2007). The unbearable likeness of being digital: The persistence of nonverbal social norms in online virtual environments. The Journal of CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10, 115–121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dawley, L., Dede, C. (2014). Situated Learning in Virtual Worlds and Immersive Simulations. In: Spector, J., Merrill, M., Elen, J., Bishop, M. (eds) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_58
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_58
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-3184-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-3185-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)