Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The pragmatics of virtual worlds for K-12 educators: investigating the affordances and constraints of Active Worlds and Second Life with K-12 in-service teachers

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to address the pragmatics of integrating virtual worlds for teaching and learning for K-12 education. Specifically this qualitative investigation focuses on a reflective dialogue gathered from a group of K-12 (primary and secondary school) educators about their experiences using both Active Worlds Educational Universe and Second Life. Reflections consist of both their experiences as (a) a learner within both applications, (b) developing instructional content in both applications, and (c) perceptions of value of each application for teaching and learning. The goal of this research is to investigate how K-12 teachers’ perceptions of virtual worlds may impact the integration of new tools for teaching and learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. AWEDU is an educational universe supported by Active Worlds. All of the worlds within this universe are devoted to educational initiatives including K-12, higher education, and beyond.

  2. Second Life does not currently offer an educational “grid”, but does offer a “Teen Grid” for teenagers age 13–17. Adults may apply for permission to participate in the Teen Grid.

Abbreviations

AWEDU:

Active Worlds Educational Universe

AW:

Active Worlds

SL:

Second Life

K-12:

Kindergarder through 12 Grade (primary and secondary school)

References

  • Bailey, F., & Moar, M. (2001). Walking with avatars. Paper presented at CADE 2001 (Computers in Art and Design Education), Glasgow School of Art, April 9–11.

  • Baker, S. C., Wentz, R. K., & Woods, M. M. (2009). Using virtual worlds in education: Second Life (R) as an educational tool. Teaching of Psychology, 36(1), 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Dodge, T., Thomas, M., Jackson, C., & Tuzun, H. (2007). Our designs and the social agendas they carry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 263–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M. G., & Squire, K. (2001). Constructing virtual worlds: Tracing the historical development of learner practices/understandings. Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), 47–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Squire, K., Barnett, M., Schmidt, R., Karrigan, K., et al. (2000). Virtual solar system project: Learning through a technology-rich, inquiry- based, participatory learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9, 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bers, M. (1999). Zora: A graphical multi-user environment to share stories about the self. In Proceedings of computer support for collaborative learning (CSCL’99), pp. 33–40.

  • Bers, M., & Cassell, J. (1999). Interactive storytelling systems for children: Using technology to explore language and identity. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 9(2), 603–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bers, M., Gonzalez-Heydrich, G., DeMaso, D., Corsini, E., & Harmon, W. (2001). Zora: A pilot virtual community in the pediatric dialysis unit. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 84(Pt 1), 800–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockbank, A., & McGill, I. (2007). Facilitating reflective learning in higher education. New York: McGraw Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvin, A. (2008). Case closed for Julie Amero. Learning.Now. Retrieved January 22, 2009, from http://www.pbs.org/teachers/learning.now/2008/11/case_closed_for_julie_amero.html.

  • Corbit, M., & DeVarco, B. (2000). SciCentr and BioLearn: Two 3-D implementations of CVE science museums. In E. Churchill & M. Reddy (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international conference on collaborative virtual environments (pp. 65–71). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Lucia, A., Francese, R., Passero, I., & Tortora, G. (2009). Development and evaluation of a virtual campus on Second Life: The case of SecondDMI. Computers & Education, 52(1), 220–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. D. (1910). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • deWinter, J., & Vie, S. (2008). Press Enter to “Say”: Using Second Life to teach critical media literacy. Computers and Composition, 25(3), 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, M. D. (2003). Teaching IN 3D: Affordances and constraints of 3D virtual worlds for synchronous distance learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, M. D. (2005). Three-dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: Two case studies of active worlds as a medium for distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 439–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, M. D. (2007). Virtual worlds for educators (beyond Second Life). Virtual worlds: A three part webinar. TeachU Online Webinar Series. Ohio Learning Network. Retrieved December 18, 2009 from http://wiki.teachuohio.org/page/2006-2007+Series.

  • Eisner, E. (1997). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York: MacMillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M. (1994). Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and others in qualitative research. In N. K. Denizen & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 170–182). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, T., Mayles, J., Lui, C., & Chelburg, D. (2008). Games and engineers in the middle school science classroom: A case study. In C. Crawford, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2007 (pp. 1207–1212). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillian, J. (2009). Literacy practices in Schome Park: A virtual literacy ethnography. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(1), 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, J., Howland, K., & Thackray, L. (2008). Problem-based learning spanning real and virtual worlds: A case study in Second Life. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 16(3), 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M. J., Hall, C., Land, S., & Hill, J. (1994). Learning in open environments: Assumptions, methods, and implications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 34(8), 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M. J., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarmon, L., Traphagan, T., & Mayrath, M. (2008). Understanding project-based learning in Second Life with a pedagogy, training, and assessment trio. Educational Media International, 45(3), 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketelhut, D. J., Dede, C., Clarke, J., Nelson, B., & Bowman, C. (2008). Studying situated learning in a multi-user virtual environment. In E. Baker, J. Dickieson, W. Wulfeck, & H. O’Neil (Eds.), Assessment of problem solving using simulations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D. (1997). Organization theory in the age of deconstruction: Dualism, gender and postmodernism revisited. Organization Studies, 18(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (1996). A conceptual framework for the development of theories-in-action with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 44(3), 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, G. (2009). Literacy in virtual worlds. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(1), 38–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molly, W. (2008). Manon of Second Life: Teaching in the virtual world. Technology and Culture, 49(2), 430–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peshkin, A. (1988). In search of subjectivity—one’s own. Educational Researcher, 17(7), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quest Atlantis. http://atlantis.crlt.indiana.edu/.

  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • The River City Project: A multi-user virtual environment for learning scientific inquiry and 21st century skills. http://muve.gse.harvard.edu/rivercityproject/.

  • Warren, S. J., Dondlinger, M. J., & Barab, S. A. (2008). A MUVE towards PBL writing: Effects of a digital learning environment designed to improve elementary student writing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(1), 113–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn, W. (2002). Current trends in educational technology research: The study of learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 14(3), 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee, N., Bailenson, J. N., Urbanek, B. S., Chang, F., & Merget, D. (2007). The unbearable likeness of being digital: The persistence of nonverbal social norms in online virtual environments. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(1), 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA

    Michele D. Dickey

Authors
  1. Michele D. Dickey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele D. Dickey.

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Professor John C. Belland a beloved mentor and visionary whose great intellect and generosity of spirit continues to inspire.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dickey, M.D. The pragmatics of virtual worlds for K-12 educators: investigating the affordances and constraints of Active Worlds and Second Life with K-12 in-service teachers. Education Tech Research Dev 59, 1–20 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9163-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9163-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation