Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Floral Traits and Plant Adaptation to Insect Pollinators: A Devil’s Advocate Approach

  • Chapter
Floral Biology

Abstract

Certain natural history phenomena may provide a vivid illustration of selection in action and its adaptive products, and nearly every evolutionary biologist would agree that the pollination of flowers by animals provides a most illustrative example. It was surely not by chance that the first of Darwin’s books to be published after The Origin of Species was precisely his treatise on the “contrivances by which orchids are fertilised by insects” (Darwin, 1862), the first in a series of monographs aimed at providing detailed supporting evidence for the theory of natural selection. Darwin’s book on orchids evoked a major revolution in botany and gave rise to an enormous literature on pollination ecology (Ghiselin, 1984). It also marked the starting point for a tradition in the practice of pollination biology.

When one considers that populations are so rich in genetic variation and that responses to artificial selection almost invariably occur, the remarkable fact is not that some populations rapidly adapt to changed conditions, but that so few do.

—D.J. Futuyma (1979)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andersson, S. and B. Widén. 1993. Pollinator-mediated selection on floral traits in a synthetic population of Senecio integrifolius (Asteraceae). Oikos, 66: 72–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S.J. and M.J. Wade. 1984. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: Theory. Evolution, 38: 709–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H.G. 1961. The adaptation of flowering plants to nocturnal and crepuscular pollinators. Quart. Rev. Biol., 36: 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H.G. 1963. Evolutionary mechanisms in pollination biology. Science, 139: 877–883.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H.G. 1983. An outline of the history of anthecology, or pollination biology. In Pollination biology (L.A. Real ed.), Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H.G. and P.D. Hurd. 1968. Intrafloral ecology. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 13: 385–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, A. 1974. Floral evolution in Viola. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard., 61: 781–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertin, R.I. and M.F. Willson. 1980. Effectiveness of diurnal and nocturnal pollination of two milkweeds. Can. J. Bot., 58: 1744–1746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, J. 1986. Insectos florĭcolas y polinización en un matorral de romero. Unpubl. thesis, Univ. Barcelona, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, J. 1992. Floral biology and pollinators of three co-occurring Cistus species (Cistaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 109: 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broyles, S.B. and R. Wyatt. 1990. Paternity analysis in a natural population of Asclepias exaltata: Multiple paternity, functional gender, and the “pollen-donation hypothesis.” Evolution, 44: 1454–1468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.R. 1989. Measurements of selection in a hermaphroditic plant: Variation in male and female pollination success. Evolution, 43: 318–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1862. On the Various Contrivances by Which British and Foreign Orchids Are Fertilised by Insects. Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1877. The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species. Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M.A. 1987. The role of flower visitors in the explosive pollination of Thalia geniculata (Marantaceae), a Costa Rican marsh plant. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 114: 134–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin B. and N.C. Ellstrand. 1990. Male and female fertility variation in wild radish, a hermaphrodite. Am. Nat., 136: 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudash, M.R. 1991. Plant size effects on female and male function in hermaphroditic Sabatia angularis (Gentianaceae). Ecology, 72: 1004–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhart, V.M. 1991. The effects of floral display on pollinator visitation vary among populations of Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Evol. Ecol., 5: 370–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhart V.M. 1992. Spatio-temporal variation in abundance and variation in foraging behavior of the pollinators of gynodioecious Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Oikos, 64: 573–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A. 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faegri, K. and L. van der Pijl. 1966. The Principles of Pollination Ecology. Pergamon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat., 125: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenster, C.B. 1991. Selection on floral morphology by hummingbirds. Biotropica, 23: 98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D.J. 1979. Evolutionary Biology. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen, C. 1989. Measuring pollinator-mediated selection on morphometric traits: Bumble bees and the alpine sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution, 43: 882–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galen, C. and M.E.A. Newport. 1988. Pollination quality, seed set, and flower traits in Polemonium viscosum: Complementary effects of variation in flower scent and size. Am. J. Bot., 75: 900–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganders, F.R. 1979. The biology of heterostyly. N. Zeal. J. Bot., 17: 607–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M.T. 1984. Foreword to The Various Contrivances by Which Orchids Are Fertilised by Insects, 2nd ed., by C. Darwin. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, IL (reprint ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittleman, J.L. and H.K. Luh. 1992. On comparing comparative methods. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 23: 383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould S.J. and E.S. Vrba. 1982. Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8: 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guitián, P., J. Guitián, and L. Navarro. 1993. Pollen transfer and diurnal versus nocturnal pollination in Lonicera etrusca. Acta Oecol., 14: 219–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder, L.D. and S.C.H. Barrett. 1993. Pollen removal from tristylous Pontederia cordata: Effects of anther position and pollinator specialization. Ecology, 74: 1059–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P.H. and M.D. Pagel. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, C.M. 1986. Vertebrate-dispersed plants: Why they don’t behave the way they should. In Frugivores and Seed Dispersal (A. Estrada and T.H. Fleming, eds.), Junk, Dordrecht, pp. 5–18.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, C.M. 1987a. Components of pollinator “quality”: Comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. Oikos, 50: 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, C.M. 1988. Variation in mutualisms: The spatio-temporal mosaic of a pollinator assemblage. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 35: 95–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, C.M. 1992. Historical effects and sorting processes as explanations for contemporary ecological patterns: Character syndromes in Mediterranean woody plants. Am. Nat., 140: 421–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, C.M. 1993. Selection on floral morphology and environmental determinants of fecundity in a hawk moth-pollinated violet. Ecol. Monogr., 63: 251–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, J. 1985. Biología reproductiva del matorral de Doñana. Unpubl. thesis, Univ. Sevilla, Sevilla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, J. 1988. Pollination relationships in southern Spanish Mediterranean shrublands. J. Ecol., 76: 274–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz, C.C. and D.W. Schemske. 1990. Spatiotemporal variation in insect mutualists of a neotropical herb. Ecology, 71: 1085–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, H.F. 1984. Constraints on the evolution of mutualisms. Am. Nat., 123: 764–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inouye, D.W. 1979. Patterns of corolla tube length of bumble bee flowers from two continents. Maryland Agric. Exp. Sta. Spec. Misc. Publ., 1: 461–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inouye, D.W. and G.H. Pyke. 1988. Pollination biology in the Snowy Mountains of Australia: Comparisons with montane Colorado, USA. Aust. J. Ecol., 13: 191–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennersten, O. and D.H. Morse. 1991. The quality of pollination by diurnal and nocturnal insects visiting common milkweed, Asclepias syriaca. Am. Midl. Nat., 125: 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordano, P. 1990. Biología de la reproducción de tres especies del género Lonicera (Caprifoliaceae) en la Sierra de Cazorla. Anal. Jard. Bot. Madrid, 48: 31–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalin Arroyo, M.T., R. Primack, and J. Armesto. 1982. Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of central Chile. I. Pollination mechanisms and altitudinal variation. Am. J. Bot., 69: 82–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochmer, J.P. and S.N. Handel. 1986. Constraints and competition in the evolution of flowering phenology. Ecol. Monogr., 56: 303–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, J.R. and S.C.H. Barrett. 1992. Experimental studies on the functional significance of heterostyly. Evolution, 46: 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. and S.J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution, 37: 1210–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessios, H.A. 1990. Adaptation and phylogeny as determinants of egg size in echinoderms from the two sides of the Isthmus of Panama. Am. Nat., 135: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macior, L.W. 1971. Co-evolution of plants and animals—systematic insights from plant-insect interactions. Taxon, 20: 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, C and R.B. Primack. 1992. Influence of flower characteristics, weather, time of day, and season on insect visitation rates in three plant communities. Am. J. Bot., 79: 434–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton, S.J. and E.J. Moll. 1982. Phenology of Australian acacias in the S.W. Cape, South Africa, and its implications for management. Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 84: 295–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A.P. and T.R. Birkhead. 1992. A pairwise comparative method as illustrated by copulation frequency in birds. Am. Nat., 139: 644–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo, A.M. and J.D. Ackerman. 1986. Relative pollinator effectiveness and evolution of floral traits in Spathiphyllum friedrichsthalii (Araceae). Am. J. Bot., 73: 1665–1676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motten, A.F., D.R. Campbell, D.E. Alexander, and L.H. Miller. 1981. Pollination effectiveness of specialist and generalist visitors to a North Carolina population of Claytonia virginica. Ecology, 62: 1278–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, L.A. 1988. The evolution of flowers with deep corolla tubes. Nature, 334: 147–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, L.A., L. Jonsson, L. Rason and E. Randrianjohany. 1985. Monophily and pollination mechanisms in Angraecum arachnites Schltr. (Orchidaceae) in a guild of long-tongued hawk-moths (Sphingidae) in Madagascar. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 26: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, L.A., L. Jonsson, L. Ralison, and E. Randrianjohany. 1987. Angraecoid orchids and hawkmoths in central Madagascar: Specialized pollination systems and generalist foragers. Biotropica, 19: 310–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, J.M. 1985. The Macaronesian bird-flower element and its relation to bird and bee opportunists. Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 91: 395–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, J.M. 1988. Floral biology of the Canarian Echium wildpretii: Bird-flower or a water resource to desert bees? Acta Bot. Neerl., 37: 509–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percival, M. 1965. Floral Biology. Pergamon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percival, M. 1974. Floral ecology of coastal scrub in southeast Jamaica. Biotropica, 6: 104–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, M.W. 1991. Pollination by a guild of fluctuating moth populations: Option for unspecialization in Silene vulgaris. J. Ecol., 79: 591–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podoler, H., I. Galon, and S. Gazit. 1984. The role of nitidulid beetles in natural pollination of annona in Israel. Acta Oecol., Oecol. Appl., 5: 369–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, M.V. and N.M. Waser. 1979. Pollen dispersal and optimal outcrossing in Delphinium nelsonii. Nature, 277: 294–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primack, R.B. 1983. Insect pollination in the New Zealand mountain flora. N. Zeal. J. Bot., 21: 317–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack, R.B. and H. Kang. 1989. Measuring fitness and natural selection in wild plant populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 20: 367–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, M. and P. Yeo. 1973. The Pollination of Flowers. Collins, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, M.W. 1988. Differences in pollinator effectiveness of birds and insects visiting Banksia menziesii (Proteaceae). Oecologia (Berl.), 76: 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, H.K. and P.W. Sherman. 1993. Adaptation and the goals of evolutionary research. Quart. Rev. Biol., 68: 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rick, C.M. 1950. Pollination relations of Lycopersicon esculentum in native and foreign regions. Evolution, 4: 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J.L. and R. Wyatt. 1990. Evidence for pollination ecotypes in the yellow-fringed orchid, Platanthera ciliar is. Evolution, 44: 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schemske, D.W. 1983. Limits to specialization and coevolution in plant-animal mutualisms. In Coevolution (M.H. Nitecki, ed.), Chicago Univ. Press, Chicago, IL. pp. 67–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske, D.W. and C.C. Horvitz. 1984. Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: A precondition for mutualism specialization. Science, 225: 519–521.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schemske, D.W. and C.C. Horvitz. 1988. Plant-animal interactions and fruit production in a neotropical herb: A path analysis. Ecology, 69: 1128–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schemske, D.W. and C.C. Horvitz. 1989. Temporal variation in selection on a floral character. Evolution, 43: 461–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schluter, D. 1988. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution, 42: 849–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.M.B. 1988. Prunus (Amygdalaceae) in New South Wales. Telopea, 3: 145–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, A.A. and D.W. Roubik. 1987. Pollen deposition and removal by bees visiting two tree species in Panama. Biotropica, 19: 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R. and C.A. Braumann. 1980. Significance tests for coefficients of variation and variability profiles. Syst. Zool., 29: 50–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G.L. 1970. Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms. I. Pollination mechanisms. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1: 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, E.A. 1986. Anthecology and pollinator efficacy of Styrax officinale subsp. redivivum (Styracaceae). Am. J. Bot., 73: 919–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel S., C. Westerkamp, B. Thiel, and K. Gessner. 1984. Ornithophilie auf den Canarischen Inseln. Plant Syst. Evol., 146: 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser, N.M. 1983a. The adaptive nature of floral traits: Ideas and evidence. In Pollination Biology (L.A. Real, ed.), Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 241–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, N.M. 1983b. Competition for pollination and floral character differences among sympatric plant species: A review of evidence. In Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology (C.E. Jones and R.J. Little, eds.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 277–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, N.M. and M.V. Price. 1990. Pollination efficiency and effectiveness of bumble bees and hummingbirds visiting Delphinium nelsonii. Collect. Bot. (Barcelona), 19: 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, M. 1972. The Analysis of Biological Populations. Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. and J.D. Thomson. 1991. Heterogeneity among floral visitors leads to discordance between removal and deposition of pollen. Ecology, 72: 1503–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolda, H. 1983. “Long-term” stability of tropical insect populations. Res. Pop. Ecol., Suppl. 3: 112–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, L.M. and S.C.H. Barrett. 1989. Patterns of pollen removal and deposition in tristylous Pontederia cordata L. (Pontederiaceae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 36: 317–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J.K., D.W. Roubik, and J.D. Ackerman. 1989. Asynchronous phenologies of a neotropical orchid and its euglossine bee pollinator. Ecology, 70: 1192–1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Estación Biológica de Doñana, CSIC, Apartado 1056, E-41080, Sevilla, Spain

    Carlos M. Herrera

Authors
  1. Carlos M. Herrera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant & Microbial Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 1, New Zealand

    David G. Lloyd

  2. Department of Botany, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3B2, Canada

    Spencer C. H. Barrett

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Chapman & Hall

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herrera, C.M. (1996). Floral Traits and Plant Adaptation to Insect Pollinators: A Devil’s Advocate Approach. In: Lloyd, D.G., Barrett, S.C.H. (eds) Floral Biology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1165-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1165-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8494-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1165-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation