Skip to main content

Utility Theories in Cooperative Games

  • Chapter
Handbook of Utility Theory

Abstract

Cooperative game theory begins with descriptions of coalitional behavior. For every permissible coalition, a subset of the players of the game, there is a given set of feasible outcomes for its members. Each outcome is presupposed to arise from cooperative behavior by the members of the coalition; specific individual actions are secondary.1 Cooperative games take several forms—games with side payments, games without side payments, partition function form games, and others, including, for example, bargaining games. In this paper we focus on games with and without side payments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aumann, R. J. (1959). Acceptable Points in General Cooperative N-Person Games. In Tucker, A. W. and Luce, R. D., editors, Contributions to the Theory of Games, vol. 4, Annals of Math. Studies 40, pages 287–324. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. J. (1960). Linearity of Unrestricted Transferable Utilities. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 7:281–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. J. (1961). The Core of a Cooperative Game Without Side Payments. Transactions AMS, 9(8):539–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. J. (1981). Survey of Repeated Games. In Essays in Game Theory and Mathematical Economics in Honor of Oskar Morgenstern, pages 11-42. Bibliographishes Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. J. (1985a). An Axiomatization of the Non-Transferable Utility value. Econometrica, 53:599–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. J. (1985b). On the Non-Transferable Utility Value: A Comment on the Roth-Shafer Examples. Econometrica, 53:667–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. J. (1986). Rejoinder. Econometrica, 54:985–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. J. (1987). Value, Symmetry, and Equal Treatment: A Comment on Scafuri and Yannelis. Econometrica, 55:1461–1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. J. and Maschler, M. (1964). The Bargaining Set for Cooperative Games. In Dresher, M., Shapley, L. S., and Tucker, A. W., editors, Advances in Game Theory, pages 443–476. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. Maschler, M. (1965). The Kernel of a Cooperative Game. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 12:223–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of Value. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P. J. (1998). Objectively Expected Utility. In BarberĂ , S., Hammond, P. J., and Seidl, C., editors, Handbook of Utility Theory, volume 1, pages 143–211. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herstein, I. N. and Milnor, J. (1953). An Axiomatic Approach to Measurable Utility. Econometrica, 21:291–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. (1956). A Revision of Demand Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko, M. (1975). Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for the Nonemptiness of the Core of a Voting Game. International Journal of Game Theory, 4:215–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko, M. (1976). On Transferable Utility. International Journal of Game Theory, 5:183–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko, M. (1983). Housing Markets with Indivisibilities. Journal of Urban Economics, 13:22–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, H. (1988). Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, K. (1975). The Core of a Simple Game Without Ordinal Preferences. International Journal of Game Theory, 4:95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negishi, T. (1960). Welfare Economics and Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy. Metroeconomica, 12:92–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1970). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. E. (1980). Values for Games Without Sidepayments; Some Difficulties With Current Concepts. Econometrica, 48:457–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. E. (1986). On the Non-Transferable Utility Value: A Reply to Aumann. Econometrica, 54:981–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scafuri, A. J. and Yannelis, N. (1984). Non-Symmetric Cardinal Value Allocations. Econometrica, 52:1365–1368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarf, H. E. (1967). The Core of an N-Person Game. Econometrica, 35:50–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarf, H. E. (1971). On the Existence of a Cooperative Solution for a General Class of N-Person Games. Journal of Economic Theory, 3:169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D. (1969). The Nucleolus of a Characteristic Function Game. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 17:1163–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. S. (1953). A Value for N-Person Games. In Kuhn, H. and Tucker, A. W., editors, Contributions to the Theory of Games, vol. 1, Annals of Mathematical Studies No. 24, pages 307–317. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. S. (1969). Utility Comparisons and the Theory of Games. In La Decision: Agregation et Dynamique des Ordres de Preference, pages 251–261, Paris. Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. S. and Shubik, M. (1966). On Market Games. Journal of Economic Theory, 1:9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. S. and Shubik, M. (1971). The Assignment Game I: The Core. International Journal of Game Theory, 1:11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, M. (1984). Game Theory in the Social Sciences. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzawa, H. (1958). The Kuhn-Tucker Theorem in Concave Programming. In Arrow, K. J., Hurwicz, L., and Uzawa, H., editors, Studies in Linear and Nonlinear Programming, pages 32–37. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaneko, M., Wooders, M.H. (2004). Utility Theories in Cooperative Games. In: BarberĂ , S., Hammond, P.J., Seidl, C. (eds) Handbook of Utility Theory. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-7964-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-7964-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5417-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-7964-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics