Abstract
The paper explores the mapping between the syntax and semantics of copular sentences in Russian in comparison to English. It argues for a single underlying semantics of the copula in predicational, equative and specificational sentences in both languages. The paper derives the invariant semantics for the three types of copular sentence and explores how this invariant semantics is mapped to the syntactic structure in the two languages. Predicational sentences are assumed to be the basic type of copular sentence. The difference in interpretation between predicational, equative and specificational copular sentences is explained with the help of the ident type-shift, which enters the semantic composition of equative and specificational sentences at different places.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adger, D. & Ramchand, G. (2001). Predication and equation. In N. Zhang (Ed.), Syntax of Predication. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 26 (pp. 1–22). Berlin: ZAS.
Bierwisch, M. (1989). Event nominalizations. In: W. Motsch (Ed.), Wortstruktur und Satzstruktur (pp. 1–73). Berlin: Akatemie-Verlag.
Bierwisch, M. (1990). Verb cluster formation as a morphological process. In. G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology (pp. 173–190). Dordrecht: Foris.
Błaszczak, J & Geist, L. (2000a). Kopulasätze mit den pronominalen Elementen to/\dot{e}to im Polnischen und Russischen. In E. Lang (Ed.), Copular and AUX – Constructions. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 16 (pp. 115–139). Berlin: ZAS.
Błaszczak, J. & Geist, L. (2000b). Zur Rolle des Pronomens to/\dot{e}to in spezifizierenden Kopulakonstruktionen im Polnischen und Russischen. In G. Zybatow et al. (Eds.), Current Issues in Formal Slavic Linguistics. Linguistik International, 5 (pp. 247–257). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
Chierchia, G. (1984). Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Mass/Amherst.
Declerck, R. (1983). ‘It is Mr. Y’ or ‘He is Mr. Y’ ? Lingua, 59, 209–246.
Di Sciullo, A.-M. & Williams, E. (1987). On the Definition of Word. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Dowty, D. (1988). Type raising, functional composition, and non- constituent conjunction. In: R. Oehrle, E. Bach & D. Wheeler (Eds.), Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures (pp. 153–197). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Geist, L. (1999). Kopula byt’ (sein) eine funktionale und/oder eine lexikalische Kategorie ? In E. Lang & L. Geist (Eds.), Kopula-Prädikativ-Konstruktionen als Syntax/Semantik-Schnittstelle. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 14 (pp. 1–39). Berlin: ZAS.
Geist, L. (2006). Die Kopula und ihre Komplemente. Zur Kompositionalität in Kopulasätzen ( =Linguistische Arbeiten 502). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Heggie, L.A. (1988). The Syntax of Copular Structures. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.
Heycock, C. & Kroch, A. (1998). Inversion and equation in copular sentences. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 10, 71– 87.
Heycock, C. & Kroch, A. (1999). Pseudoclefts connectedness: implications for the LF interface level. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(3), 365–397.
Heycock, C. & Kroch, A. (2002). Topic, focus, and syntactic representations. In L. Mikkelsen & C. Potts (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st WCCFL (pp. 141–165). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Higgins, R. (1973). The Pseudo-Cleft Construction in English, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Mass/Amherst.
Jacobson, P. (1990). Raising as function composition. Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, 423–475.
Junghanns, U. (1997). On the so-called ?to-cleft construction. In M. Lindseth & S. Franks (Eds.), Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. The Indiana Meeting (pp. 166–190). Ann Arbor, Michigan: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Langobardi, G. (1994). Reference and proper names: a theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry, 25(4), 609–665.
Matushansky, O. (2000). The instrument of inversion. Instrumental case and verb raising in the Russian copula. In R. Billerey & L. Brook (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th WCCFL (pp. 101–115). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Mikkelsen, L. (2002a). Specification is not inverted predication. In M. Hirotani (Ed.), Proceedings of NELS 32 (pp. 403– 422). University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA.
Mikkelsen, L. (2002b): Two types of definite description subjects. In Proceedings from the Student Session at ESSLLI 14. Trento. ESSLI 14.
Mikkelsen, L. (2003). Specifying Who: On the Structure, Meaning, and Use of Specificational Copular Clauses. Ph.D. University of California Santa Cruz. [SLUG Pubs].
Molnár, V. (1991). Das TOPIK im Deutschen und Ungarischen. Lunder germanistische Forschungen 58. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
Molnár, V. (1993). Zur Pragmatik und Grammatik des Topik- Begriffs. In Marga R. (Ed.), Wortstellung und Informationsstruktur (pp. 155–202). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Moro, A. (1997). The Raising of Predicates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nichols, J. (1981). Predicate Nominals. A Partial Surface Syntax of Russian. (Linguistics 97). Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Padučeva, E.V. (1985). Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost’ s dejstvitel’nost’ju. Moskow: Nauka.
Padučeva, E.V. (1992). Značenie i sintaksičeskie funkcii slova ėto. In Poblemy strukturnoj lingvistiki 1980 (pp. 78–9). Moscow: Nauka.
Padučeva, E.V. & Uspenskij, V.A. (1997). Binominativnoe predloženie: problema soglasovanija svjazki. In L.P. Krysin (Ed.), Oblik slova. Sbornik statej pamjati D.I. Šmeleva (pp. 170–82). Moscow: Nauka.
Partee, B. (1986). Ambiguous pseudoclefts with unambiguous Be}. In S. Berman, J.-W. Choe & J. McDonough (Eds.), Proceedingsof NELS 16 (pp. 354–366). Amherst, Mass.: University of Mass.
Partee, B. (1987). Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In J. Groenendijk et al (Eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers (pp. 115–143). Dordrecht: Foris.
Partee, B. (1998). Copula inversion puzzles in English and Russian. In K. Dziwirek et al. (Eds.), Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Seattle Meeting (pp. 361–395). Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Pereltsvaig, A. (2001). On the Nature of the Intra-Clausal Relations: A study of Copular Sentences in Russian and Italian. Dissertation, McGill University Montréal.
Reinhart, T. (1982). Pragmatics and Linguistics: An analysis of Sentence Topics. Bloomington. Reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistic Club.
Rothstein, S. (2001). Predicates and Their Subjects. (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 74). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer.
Russell, B. (1919). Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. London: Allen & Unwin.
Schlenker, P. (1998). Pseudocleft Connectivity and the Structure of NP. Ms, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Schlenker, P (2001). Clausal equations (a note on the connectivity problem). NLLT, 21(1), 157–214.
Sharvit, Y. (1999). Connectivity in specificational sentences. NLS, 7, 299–339.
Steedman, M.J. (1985): Dependency and coordination in the grammar of Dutch and English. Language, 61(3), 523–568.
Steube, A. & Späth, A. (1998). DP-Semantik und Informationsstrukturierung im Russischen (auf der Basis eines Vergleichs mit dem Deutschen). Sprache & Pragmatik, 46, 1–70.
Strawson, P.F. (1964). Identifying reference and truth values. Theria 30. Reprinted in D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovits (Eds.) (1971), Semantics. London: Cambridge: University Press.
Wierzbicka, A. (1980). The Case for Surface Case. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Karoma.
Williams, E. (1983). Semantic vs. syntactic categories. Linguistics and Philosophy, 6, 423–446.
Zamparelli, R. (2000): Layers in the Determiner Phrase. New York: Garland.
Zlatic, L. (1997). The Structure of the Serbian Noun Phrase. Ph.D. Universtity of Texas Austin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Geist, L. (2008). Predication and Equation in Copular Sentences: Russian vs. English. In: Comorovski, I., von Heusinger, K. (eds) Existence: Semantics and Syntax. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 84. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6197-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6197-4_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6198-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6197-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)