Skip to main content
Log in

Semantic vs. syntactic categories

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  • Bresnan, J.: 1972,The Theory of Complementation in English Syntax, MIT dissertation.

  • Chomsky, N.: 1957,Syntactic Structures, Mouton.

  • Chomsky, N.: 1965,Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press.

  • Chomsky, N.: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris.

  • Cooper, R.: 1975,Montague's Semantic Theory and Transformational Syntax, Univ. of Mass. dissertation.

  • Dowty, D., R. Wall, and S. Peters: 1981,Introduction to Montague Semantics, Reidel, Dordrecht-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P.: 1962,Reference and Generality, Cornell University Press.

  • Higgins, R.: 1972,The Pseudocleft Construction in English.

  • Jackendoff, R.: 1972,Semantics in Generative Grammar, MIT Press.

  • Montague, R.: 1970, ‘Universal Grammar’, in Montague (1974).

  • Montague, R.: 1973, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in Montague (1974).

  • Montague, R.: 1974,Formal Philosophy, R. Thomason (ed.), Yale University Press.

  • Sag, I.: 1980, ‘A Semantic Theory of “NP movement” Dependencies’, in I. Sag (ed.),Standford Working Papers I.

  • Williams, E.: 1980, ‘Predication’,Linguistic Inquiry 11, No. 1.

  • Williams, E.: 1981, ‘Argument Structure and Morphology’,Linguistic Review 1, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.: 1982, ‘The NP Cycle’, inLinguistic Inquiry 13, No. 2.

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Semantic vs. syntactic categories. Linguist Philos 6, 423–446 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627484

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627484

Keywords

Navigation