Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter deals with the general approaches to policy and governance as presented in the literature and as applied to the field of higher education (HE). We examine issues related to both politics and polity. By ‘politics’ we mean the focus on the resolution of conflict and development of consent, resulting in decision-making processes (the procedural dimension). By ‘polity’ we mean the focus on state organization and the management of the system to obtain political order and stability, through laws, regulations and institutions in different types of politically organized communities (March and Olsen, 1984; North, 1990).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amaral, A., Jones, G. A. and B. Karseth (2002) Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance (Dordrecht: Kluwer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I. and M. Flinders (2004) Multi-level Governance (Oxford: Oxford University).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T. and M. Kogan (1992) Process and Structure in Higher Education (Milton Keynes: Open University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, R. (1990) ‘Academic freedom, autonomy and accountability in British universities’, Studies in Higher Education, 15(2), 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I. and M. Kogan (2007) ‘Organization and governance of universities’, Higher Education Policy, 20, 477–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. and T. Risse (2010) ‘Governance without a state: can it work?’ Regulation and Governance, 4, 113–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. and F. X. Merrien (1999) Towards a Model of Governance for Universities. A Comparative View (London: Jessica Kingsley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusson, N. and K. Sahlin-Andersson (2000) ‘Constructing organizations: the example of public sector reform’, Organization Studies, 21, 721–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capano, G. (2011) ‘Government continues to do its job: a comparative study on governance shift in the higher education sector’, Public Administration, 89(4), 1622–1642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (ed) (1983) Perspectives on Higher Education: Eight Disciplinary and Comparative Views (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D., March, G. J. and P. J. Olsen (1972) ‘A garbage can model of organizational choice’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, H., Enders, J. and L. Leisyte (2007) ‘Public sector reform in Dutch higher education: the organizational transformation of the university’, Public Administration, 85(1), 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diefenbach, T. and J. A. A. Sillince (2011) ‘Formal and informal hierarchy in different types of organizations’, Organization Studies, 32(11), 1515–1537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. (1997) ‘Higher education markets and public policy’, Higher Education Policy, 10(3–4), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M. L. and K. Sahlin-Andersson (2006) Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dooris, M. J., Kelley, J. M. and J. M. Trainer (2004) ‘Strategic planning in higher education’, New Directions for Institutional Research, 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Musselin, C. and L. Andresani (2008) ‘The “Steering” of higher education systems: a public management perspective’, Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gläser, J. (2010) ‘From governance to authority relations’, in R. Whitley, J. Gläser and L. Engwall (eds) Reconfiguring Knowledge Production (pp. 357–369) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, A. and P. Maassen (2000) ‘Hybrid steering approaches with respect to European higher education’, Higher Education Policy, 13(3), 267–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, A., Kogan M. and A. Amaral (2005) Reform and Change in Higher Education (Dordrecht: Springer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., James, O., Peters, B. G. and C. Scott (eds) (2004) Controlling Modern Government: Variety, Commonality and Change (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. and G. Marks (2001) Multi-level Governance and European Integration (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefiel).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J. (2009) ‘Coming to terms with governance in higher education’, in J. Huisman (ed) International Perspectives on the Governance of Higher education. Alternative Frameworks for Coordination (pp. 1–9) (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H. (2005) ‘Networks and interorganizational coordination’, in E. Ferlie, L. Lynn and C. Pollit (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (Oxford: Oxford University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, M. and S. Hanney (2000) Reforming Higher Education (Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (2003) Governing as Governance (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. and P. E. Murphy (1981) ‘Strategic planning for higher education’, Journal of Education, 52(5), 470–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krucken, G. and F. Meier (2006) ‘Turning the university into an organizational actor’, in G. Drori, J. Meyer and H. Hwang (eds) Globalization and Organization (pp. 241–257) (Oxford: Oxford University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maassen, P. and F. A. van Vught (1992) ‘Strategic planning’, in B. R. Clark and G. Neave (eds) The Encyclopedia of Higher Education, Volume 2 (pp. 1483–1494) (Oxford:Pergamon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Magalhães, A. and A. Amaral (2009) ‘Mapping out discourses on higher education governance’, in J. Huisman (ed) International Perspectives on the Governance of Higher Education: Alternative Frameworks for Coordination (pp. 182–198) (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, G. J. and P. J. Olsen (1984) ‘The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life’, American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (1997) Markets in Education (New South Wales: Allen and Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (1998) New Challenges to Governance Theory, Jean Monet Chair Papers, No. 50, European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (2003) ‘From government to governance: political steering in modern societies’, Summer Academy on IPP, Wuerzburg, September 7–11, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musselin, C. (2014) ‘Research issues and institutional prospects for higher education studies’, Studies in Higher Education, 39(8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Musselin, C. (2007) ‘Are universities specific organizations?’ in G. Krucken, A. Kosmutzky and M. Torka (eds) Towards a Multiversity? Universities between Global Trends and National Traditions (pp. 63–84) (Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Musselin, C. (2004) The Long March of French Universities (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1998) ‘The evaluative state revisited. 20th Anniversary Issue of Review of Trends in Higher Education’, European Journal of Education, 33(3), 265–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. and F. A. van Vught (1991) Prometheus Bound: The Changing Relationship between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe (Oxford: Pergamon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. (2001) Modernizing Governance (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P. (2006) ‘The new public governance’, Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, V. and E. Ostrom (1971) ‘Public choice: a different approach to the study of public administration’, Public Administration Review, 31(2), 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Goestellac, G. and I. Bleiklie (2009a) ‘University steering: between stories and history’, in C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie and E. Ferlie (eds) University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives (pp. 227–246) (Dordrecht: Springer).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I. and E. Ferlie (2009b) ‘A comparative approach to higher education reforms in Western European countries’, in C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie and E. Ferlie (eds) University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives (pp. 197–225) (Dordrecht: Springer).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (2012) ‘Governance as political theory’, in D. Levy-Faur (ed) Oxford Handbook on Governance (pp. 19–32) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (2003) ‘Changing nature of public administration: from easy answers to hard questions’, Viesoji Politika Ir Administravimas, 5, 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (2002) ‘Governance: a garbage can perspective’, Political Science Series, 84, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. and J. Pierre (2001) ‘Developments in intergovernmental relations: towards multi-level governance’, Policy and Politics, 29(2), 131–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. and J. Pierre (1998) ‘Governance without government? rethinking public administration’, Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory, 8, 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. (2000) Debating Governance (Oxford: Oxford University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckeart (2004) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reale, E. and M. Seeber (2013) ‘Instruments as empirical evidence for the analysis of higher education policies’, Higher Education, 65, 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability (London: Open University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. and E. O. Czempiel (1992) Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M. (2000) ‘The new governance and the tools of public action: an introduction’, in L. M. Salamon (ed) The Tools of Government: A Guide to New Governance (pp. 1–47) (New York: Oxford University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1997) Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research (Boulder: Westview).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2008) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests, 3rd edn (Los Angeles: Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (ed) (2014) International Trends in University Governance. Autonomy, Self-government and the Distribution of Authority (pp. 34–48) (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (2000) ‘Bounded rationality in social science: today and tomorrow’, Mind & Society, 1, 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sporn, B. (1999) Adaptive University Structures: An Analysis of Adaptation to Socioeconomic Environments of US and European Universities (London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. and P. C. Schmitter (1985) Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Texeira, P., Jongbloed, B., Dill, D. and A. Amaral (2004) Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or Reality? (Dordrecht: Kluwer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G., Frances, J., Levacic, R. and J. Mitchell (1991) Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: The Coordination of Social Life (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Heffen, O., Kickert, W. J. M., and J. Thomassen (2001) ‘Governance in modern society: effects, change and formation of government institutions’, Library of Public Policy and Public Administration, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vught, F. A. (2008) ‘Mission diversity and reputation in higher education’, Higher Education Policy, 21, 151–174. doi:10.1057/hep.2008.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Vught, F. A. (1995) ‘Policy models and policy instruments in higher education: the effects of governmental policy-making on the innovative behaviour of higher education institutions’, Institute for Higher Studies, Series No. 26, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. F. (1976) ‘Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (2007) ‘Introduction’, in R. Whitley and J. Gläser (eds) The Changing Governance of the Sciences (pp. 3–30) (Dordrecht: Springer).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (2012) ‘Transforming universities: national conditions of their varied organisational actorhood’, Minerva, 50(4), 493–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Emanuela Reale and Emilia Primeri

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reale, E., Primeri, E. (2015). Approaches to Policy and Governance in Higher Education. In: Huisman, J., de Boer, H., Dill, D.D., Souto-Otero, M. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Higher Education Policy and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-45617-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics