Abstract
In this chapter, fractional calculus has been used to account for long-range interactions between material particles. Cohesive forces have been assumed decaying with inverse power law of the absolute distance that yields, as limiting case, an ordinary, fractional differential equation. It is shown that the proposed mathematical formulation is related to a discrete, point-spring model that includes non-local interactions by non-adjacent particles with linear springs with distance-decaying stiffness. Boundary conditions associated to the model coalesce with the well-known kinematic and static constraints and they do not run into divergent behavior. Dynamic analysis has been conducted and both model shapes and natural frequency of the non-local systems are then studied.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aifantis EC (1994) Gradient effects at macro micro and nano–scales. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials 5:355–375
Aifantis EC (2003) Update on a class of gradient theories. Mechanics of Materials 35:259–280
Atanackovic TM (2002) A model for the uniaxial isothermal deformation of viscoelastic body. Acta Mechanica 159:77-86
Bažant ZP, Belytschko TB (1984) Continuum theory for strain–softening. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 110:1666–1692
Bažant ZP, Jirásek M (2002) Non–local integral formulations of plasticity and damage. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 128:1129–1239
Benvenuti E, Borino G, Tralli A (2002) A thermodynamically consistent non–local formulation of damaging materials. European Journal of Mechanics /A Solids 21:535–553
Borino G, Failla B, Parrinello F (2003) A Symmetric non–local damage theory. International Journal of Solids and Structures 40:3621–3645
Carpinteri A, Chiaia B, Cornetti P (2001) Static–kinematic duality and the principle of virtual work in the mechanics of fractal media. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 191:3–19
Carpinteri A, Chiaia B, Cornetti P (2004) A mesoscopic theory of damage and fracture in heterogeneous materials. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 41:43–50
Carpinteri A, Chiaia B, Cornetti P (2003) On the mechanics of quasi–brittle materials with a fractal microstructure. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 70:2321–2349
Chechkin A, Gonchar V, Klafter J, Metzler R, Tanatarov L (2002) Stationary states of non–linear oscillators driven by Lévy noise. Chemical Physics 284:233–251
Cottone G, Di Paola M (2007) On the use of fractional calculus for the probabilistic characterization of random variables. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics (Submitted)
Cottone G, Di Paola M, Pirrotta A (2008) Path integral solution handled by fractional calculus. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 96: 012007. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/96/1/012007
Di Paola M, Zingales M (2008) Long–range cohesive interactions of non–local continuum faced by fractional calculus. International Journal of Solids and Structures (to appear)
Eringen AC, Edelen DGB (1972) On non–local elasticity. International Journal of Engineering Science 10:233–248
Fuschi P, Pisano AA (2003) Closed form solution for a non–local elastic bar in tension. International Journal of Solids and Structures 40:13–23
Ganghoffer JF, de Borst R (2000) A new framework in non–local mechanics. International Journal of Engineering Science 38:453–486
Gonchar V, Tanatarov L, Chechkin A (2002), Stationary solutions of the fractional kinetic equation with a symmetric power–law potential. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 131(1):582–594
Hilfer R (ed) (2000) Applications of fractional calculus in physics. World Scientific Publishing Co
Kilbas AA, Srivastava HM, Trujillo JJ (2006) Theory and applications of fractional differential equations. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Kroner E (1967) Elasticity theory of materials with long–range cohesive forces. International Journal of Solids and Structures 3:731–742
Krumhanls JA (1967) Some considerations of the relations between solid state physics and generalized continuum mechanics. In: Kroner (ed) Mechanics of Generalized Continua. Proc. IUTAM symposium. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Lazopoulos KA (2006) Non–local continuum mechanics and fractional calculus. Mechanics Research Communication 33:751–757
Metzler R, Klafter J (2000) The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach. Physics Reports 339:1–77
Metzler R, Klafter J (2004) The restaurant at the end of the random walk: recent developments in the description of anomalous transport by fractional dynamics. Journal of Physics A 37:R161–R208
Miller KS, Ross B (1993) An introduction to the fractional calculus and fractional differential equations. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Mindlin RD, Eshel NN (1968) On first strain–gradient theories in linear elasticity. International Journal of Solids and Structures 4:109–124
Narahari ABN, Hanneken JW, Clarke T (2004) Damping characteristic of a fractional oscillator. Physica A 339:311–319
Oldham KB, Spanier J (1974) The fractional calculus. Academic Press, New York
Pijaudier–Cabot G, Bažant ZP (1987) Non–local damage theory. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 113:1512–1533
Podlubny I (1999) Fractional differential equations. Academic Press, New York
Polizzotto C, Borino G (1998) A thermodynamics–based formulation of gradient–dependent plasticity. European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids 17:741–761
Polizzotto C (2001) Non–local elasticity and related variational principles. International Journal of Solids and Structures 38:7359–7380
Polizzotto C (2003) Gradient elasticity and non standard boundary conditions. International Journal of Solids and Structures 40:7399–7423
Samko GS, Kilbas AA, Marichev OI (1993) Fractional integrals and derivatives, Theory and Applications. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers
Shkanukov MK (1996) On the convergence of difference schemes for differential equations with a fractional derivative (in Russian). Dokl. Akad. Nauk. 348:746–748
West BJ, Bologna M, Grigolini P (2003) Physics of fractal operators. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Properties of fractional operators
Appendix: Properties of fractional operators
Fractional calculus might involve very cumbersome calculations that can hardly be tackled by hand. In some cases, the composition properties and the Leibniz rule may be helpful and are reported in the following.
1.1 A.1 Leibniz rule
In this section, we present the extension of the classical Leibniz rule
to fractional derivatives. It is an important rule because it consents to transform fractional derivatives of many functions in series forms, without performing any burdensome integration. Indeed, given two functions f and g analytic in the interval \(\left[ {a,b} \right]\), ([35], p. 280), the generalized Leibniz rule is expressed in the form
where \(\left( {\begin{array}{c} \gamma \\ j\end{array}} \right)\) are the binomial coefficients and \(g^{\left( j \right)}\) is the derivative of integer order j. One must note that the presence of the integer derivative of the function \(g\left( x \right)\) can be fruitful from the computational perspective. Indeed, the knowledge of the jth classical derivative of \(g\left( x \right)\), combined with the fractional derivative of a constant, for example, \(f\left( x \right) = 1\), gives quite easily a series representation of the fractional derivative of \(g\left( x \right)\) in the form
with the particular choice \(a = 0\). The last expression suggests that any fractional derivative, if it exists, has a series representation.
1.2 A.2 Compositions rules
Some useful properties dealing with fractional operators will be indicated; for readability’s sake, we will report only some simple composition rules referring to [26, 35] for further relations and rigorous proofs. Let us suppose the existences of the integrals and derivatives involved in the following relations, indicated with \(\gamma _1 > 0\) and \(\gamma _2 > 0\), then, the properties
on the composition of different order integrals are valid. On the contrary, commutation between fractional integration and differentiation is not straightforward and needs some introductory remarks. In ordinary calculus it is well known that performing first the integral of a function and then a derivative, \(\frac{d}{{dx}}\int_a^x {f\left( x \right)dx = f\left( x \right)} ,\) the original function is obtained.
But, if one changes the operations order, i.e, \(\int_a^x {\frac{d}{{dx}}f\left( x \right)dx \ne f\left( x \right)}\) the result is different because of the presence of a constant. For higher order derivatives and integrals, in the same way \(\frac{{d^n }}{{dx^n }}I_{a + }^n f = f\) holds, but \(I_{a + }^n \frac{{d^n }}{{dx^n }}f\) differs from the function by a polynomial of order \(n - 1\). This simple argument is valid also in the case of fractional operators. Then, the equality
is always valid and, conversely,
has been shown [35, p. 43–45] to be true only for those functions having
Also the simultaneous application of integration and differentiation can be simplified in the following way with \(f\left( x \right) \in Leb_1 \left( {\left[ {a,b} \right]} \right){\rm{:}}\)
On the contrary, if \(f\left( x \right)\) does not satisfy Eq. (A8), the relation
holds.
In particular, the composition rules involving classical derivatives read
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cottone, G., Paola, M.D., Zingales, M. (2009). Fractional mechanical model for the dynamics of non-local continuum. In: Mastorakis, N., Sakellaris, J. (eds) Advances in Numerical Methods. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 11. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76483-2_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76483-2_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-76482-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-76483-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)