Skip to main content

Berth Allocation Planning Optimization in Container Terminals

  • Chapter
Supply Chain Analysis

Part of the book series: International Series In Operations Research & Mana ((ISOR,volume 119))

We study the problem of allocating berth space for vessels in container terminals, which is referred to as the berth allocation planning problem. We solve the static berth allocation planning problem as a rectangle packing problem with release time constraints, using a local search algorithm that employs the concept of sequence pair to define the neighborhood structure. We embed this approach in a real time scheduling system to address the berth allocation planning problem in a dynamic environment. We address the issues of vessel allocation to the terminal (thus affecting the overall berth utilization), choice of planning time window (how long to plan ahead in the dynamic environment), and the choice of objective used in the berthing algorithm (e.g., should we focus on minimizing vessels’ waiting time or maximizing berth utilization?). In a moderate load setting, extensive simulation results show that the proposed berthing system is able to allocate space to most of the calling vessels upon arrival, with the majority of them allocated the preferred berthing location. In a heavy load setting, we need to balance the concerns of throughput with acceptable waiting time experienced by vessels. We show that, surprisingly, these can be handled by deliberately delaying berthing of vessels in order to achieve higher throughput in the berthing system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R.K. Ahuja, T.L. Magnanti, and J.B. Orlin (1993). Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Barahona and R. Anbil (2000). The volume algorithm: producing primal solutions using a subgradient method, Mathematical Programming, 87, 385-399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G.G. Brown, S. Lawphongpanich, and K.P. Thurman (1994). Optimizing ship berthing, Naval Research Logistics, 41, 1-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.Y. Chen and T.W. Hsieh (1999). A time-space network model for the berth allocation problem, Presented at the 19th IFIP TC7 Conference on System Modelling and Optimization.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.W. Chen (1998). Optimisation problem in a container port, M.Sc. Research Report, SoC, NUS.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.T. Chia, H.C. Lau, and A. Lim (1999). Ant colony optimization for the ship berthing problem, in P.S. Thiagarajan, R. Yap (Eds.): ASIAN’99, LNCS 1742, pp. 359-370.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.G. Dai and W. Lin (2005). Maximum pressure policies in stochastic processing networks, Operations Research, 53, 197-218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.V. Fishkin, K. Jansen and L. Porkolab (2001). On minimizing average weighted completion time: A PTAS for scheduling general multiprocessor tasks, in Proceedings 13th International Symposium on Fundamentals of Computation Theory (FCT’01), Rusins Freivalds (Ed.), Riga, LNCS 2138, Springer Verlag, pp. 495-507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y.P. Guan and R.K. Cheung (2004). The berth allocation problem: models and solution methods, OR Spectrum, 26, 75-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Y.P. Guan, W.Q. Xiao, R.K. Cheung, and C.-L. Li (2002). A multiprocessor task scheduling model for berth allocation: heuristic and worst case analysis, Operations Research Letters, 30, 343-350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Imahori, M. Yagiura, and T. Ibaraki (2003). Local search algorithms for the rectangle packing problem with general spatial costs, Mathematical Programming Series B, 97, 543-569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Imai, E. Nishimura, and S. Papadimitriou (2001). The dynamic berth allocation problem for a container port, Transportation Research Part B, 35, 401-417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Imai, E. Nishimura, and S. Papadimitriou (2003). Berth allocation with service priority, Transportation Research Part B, 37, 437-457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.H. Kim and K.C. Moon (2003). Berth scheduling by simulated annealing, Transportation Research Part B, 37, 541-560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.L. Li, X. Cai, and C.Y. Lee (1998). Scheduling with multiple-job-on-one-processor pattern, IIE Transactions, 30, 433-446.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Lim (1998). On the ship berthing problem, Operations Research Letters, 22(2-3), 105-110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.N. Loh (1996), The Quadratic Assignment Problem and its Generalization to the Berth Allocation Problem, Honours Years Project Report, DISCS, NUS.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.C. Moon (2000). A Mathematical Model and a Heuristic Algorithm for Berth Planning, Unpublished Thesis. Pusan National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Murata, K. Fujiyoshi, S. Nakatake, and Y. Kajitani (1996). VLSI module placement based on rectangle packing by the sequence pair, IEEE Transactions on Computer Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 15-12, 1518-1524.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Murata, K. Fujiyoshi, and M. Kaneko (1998). VLSI/PCB placement with obstacles based on sequence pair, IEEE Transactions on Computer Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 17, 60-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Y.M. Park and K.H. Kim (2003). A scheduling method for Berth and Quay cranes, OR Spectrum, 25, 1-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Steenken, S. Voss, and R. Stahlbock (2004). Container terminal operation and operations research a classification and literature review, OR Spectrum, 26, 3-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • X. Tang, R. Tian, and D.F. Wong (2000). Fast evaluation of sequence pair in block placement by longest common subsequence computation, in Proceedings of the Conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe, pp. 106-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.J. Tong, H.C. Lau, A. Lim (1999). Ant Colony Optimization for the ship Berthing problem, Asian Computing Science Conference (ASIAN), pp. 359-370.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dai, J., Lin, W., Moorthy, R., Teo, CP. (2008). Berth Allocation Planning Optimization in Container Terminals. In: Tang, C.S., Teo, CP., Wei, KK. (eds) Supply Chain Analysis. International Series In Operations Research & Mana, vol 119. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75240-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics