Abstract
Supervisors often exhibit paradoxical leadership behaviors in certain Confucian organizations that may seem contradictory but are interconnected, and employees demonstrate paradoxical innovation behaviors that encompass both proactive and reactive elements. By employing self-determination theory, the present study constructs a comprehensive model to investigate the impact of paradoxical leadership on employee paradoxical innovation behavior from both differentiation and integration perspectives. We conducted a three-wave survey among Chinese employees, collecting 371 valid questionnaires and analyzing the data using multiple regression analysis. The results show that: (i) Paradoxical leadership is positively related to employee proactive innovation behavior and autonomous work motivation plays a mediating role; (ii) Paradoxical leadership is also positively related to employee-reactive innovation behavior, and controlled work motivation plays a mediating role; and (iii) Paradoxical leadership facilitates employees in balancing the relationship between autonomous and controlled motivation, thereby exhibiting paradoxical innovation behaviors that are both proactive and reactive.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
References
Al-Omoush, K. S., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Lassala, C., & Skare, M. (2022). Networking and knowledge creation: Social capital and collaborative innovation in responding to the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(2), 100181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100181
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995
Backhaus, L., Reuber, A., Vogel, D., & Vogel, R. (2022). Giving sense about paradoxes: Paradoxical leadership in the public sector. Public Management Review, 24(9), 1478–1498. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1906935
Batool, U., Raziq, M. M., Sarwar, N., Saleem, S., & Obaid, A. (2023). Paradoxical leader behavior and leader effectiveness: Moderating role of structural and job-related uncertainty. European Business Review, 35(2), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-08-2022-0163
Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. (2016). A Critical Review and best-practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 229–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12103
Chen, Y. T., Wei, J. R., Zhang, J., & Li, X. (2021). Effect Mechanism of Error Management Climate on Innovation Behavior: An Investigation from Chinese Entrepreneurs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 733741. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733741
Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology-Psychologie Canadienne, 49(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14
Devi, N. C. (2023). Paradoxical leadership and employee creativity: Knowledge sharing and hiding as mediators. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-10-2022-0779
Fan, C. H., Tang, S. J., Chen, L., & Sun, T. T. (2022). Perceived organizational support and proactive innovation behavior: The mediating role of basic psychological needs. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 804363. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.804363
Franken, E., Plimmer, G., & Malinen, S. (2020). Paradoxical leadership in public sector organizations: Its role in fostering employee resilience. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12396
Furstenberg, N., Alfes, K., & Kearney, E. (2021). How and when paradoxical leadership benefits work engagement: The role of goal clarity and work autonomy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(3), 672–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12344
Gagne, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M. H., Aube, C., Morin, E., & Malorni, A. (2010). The motivation at work scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 628–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355698
Geng, Z. Z., Wang, Y. F., Fan, Y. Q., & Shan, C. X. (2023). Motivation and hindrance: The mixed blessing of paradoxical leader behavior for workplace creativity in China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 29(1), 206–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2022.2134965
Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 890–898. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.890
Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago Press.
He, P. X., Sun, R., Zhao, H. D., Zheng, L. L., & Shen, C. G. (2022). Linking work-related and non-work-related supervisor-subordinate relationships to knowledge hiding: A psychological safety lens. Asian Business & Management, 21(4), 525–546. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-020-00137-9
He, S. C., & Yun, X. Y. (2022). Research on the influencing mechanism of paradoxical leadership on unethical pro-supervisor behavior. Behavioral Sciences, 12(7), 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12070231
Hober, B., Schaarschmidt, M., & von Korflesch, H. (2021). Internal idea contests: Work environment perceptions and the moderating role of power distance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.11.003
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling-a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Huertas-Valdivia, I., Gallego-Burin, A. R., & Llorens-Montes, F. J. (2019). Effects of different leadership styles on hospitality workers. Tourism Management, 71, 402–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.027
Hwang, T. J., & Choi, J. N. (2020). Different moods lead to different creativity: Mediating roles of ambiguity tolerance and team identification. Creativity Research Journal, 32(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1751542
Jada, U. R., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Titiyal, R. (2019). Empowering leadership and innovative work behavior: A moderated mediation examination. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(5), 915–930. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-08-2018-0533
Jia, J. F., Liu, Z., & Zheng, Y. Y. (2021). How does paradoxical leadership promote bootlegging: A TPB-based multiple mediation model. Chinese Management Studies, 15(4), 919–939. https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-09-2020-0418
Jia, J. F., Yan, J. Q., Cai, Y. H., & Liu, Y. P. (2018). Paradoxical leadership incongruence and Chinese individuals’ followership behaviors: Moderation effects of hierarchical culture and perceived strength of human resource management system. Asian Business & Management, 17(5), 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-018-0043-9
Jiang, F. F., Wang, D. H., & Wei, Z. L. (2022). How Yin-Yang cognition affects organizational ambidexterity: The mediating role of strategic flexibility. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39(4), 1187–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09759-9
Kaabomeir, N., Mazhari, K., Arshadi, N., & Karami, M. (2022). How supervisors can support employees’ needs and motivation? An experimental study based on SDT. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02922-5
Kanat-Maymon, Y., Elimelech, M., & Roth, G. (2020). Work motivations as antecedents and outcomes of leadership: Integrating self-determination theory and the full range leadership theory. European Management Journal, 38(4), 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.01.003
Kauppila, O. P., & Tempelaar, M. P. (2016). The Social-cognitive underpinnings of employees’ ambidextrous behaviour and the supportive role of group managers’ leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 53(6), 1019–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12192
Kundi, Y. M., Aboramadan, M., & Abualigah, A. (2023). Linking paradoxical leadership and individual in-role and extra-role performance: A multilevel examination. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-10-2022-1353
Li, C. L., Jiang, X. Q., He, H., & Zhang, X. Y. (2022). The influence of performance-contingent rewards on proactive and responsive creativity: Dual-path mediating effects of work motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 812298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812298
Lin, X. S., Wu, C. H., Dong, Y. T., Chen, G. Z. X., Wei, W., & Duan, J. Y. (2022). Psychological contract breach and destructive voice: The mediating effect of relative deprivation and the moderating effect of leader emotional support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 135, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103720
Liu, T., & Pak, J. (2022). Does paradoxical leadership better predict employee outcomes than servant leadership? The differential effects on subordinate creativity and psychological need satisfaction. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03965-4
Liu, Y. J., Xu, S. Y., & Zhang, B. N. (2020a). Thriving at work: How a paradox mindset influences innovative work behavior. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(3), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886319888267
Liu, Y. P., Lee, J. M., & Lee, C. (2020b). The challenges and opportunities of a global health crisis: The management and business implications of COVID-19 from an Asian perspective. Asian Business & Management, 19(3), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-020-00119-x
Lopes, S., & Chambel, M. J. (2017). Temporary agency workers’ motivations and well-being at work: A two-wave study. International Journal of Stress Management, 24(4), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000041
Lu, Y., Mei, Q., & Gao, P. (2021). Decision-making analysis of new generation employees’ active-passive innovation behavior guided by innovative performance. Forecasting, 40(2), 90–96. (in Chinese).
Luscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.31767217
Moran, C. M., Diefendorff, J. M., Kim, T. Y., & Liu, Z. Q. (2012). A profile approach to self-determination theory motivations at work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(3), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.09.002
Nguyen, T. M., Nham, T. P., Froese, F. J., & Malik, A. (2019). Motivation and knowledge sharing: A meta-analysis of main and moderating effects. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(5), 998–1016. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-01-2019-0029
Ning, B. Y., Omar, R., Ye, Y., Ting, H., & Ning, M. (2021). The role of Zhong-Yong thinking in business and management research: A review and future research agenda. Asia Pacific Business Review, 27(2), 150–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2021.1857956
Oh, S. H., Dong, L. Z., Nahm, A. Y., & Yu, G. C. (2021). Fostering innovation and involvement among Korean workers in problem-solving through trust and psychological safety: The role of paradoxical leader behaviors. Asia Pacific Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2021.1941529
Oluwafemi, T. B., Mitchelmore, S., & Nikolopoulos, K. (2020). Leading innovation: Empirical evidence for ambidextrous leadership from UK high-tech SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 119, 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.035
Pan, Z. L. (2021). Paradoxical leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: The serial mediating effect of a paradoxical mindset and personal service orientation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(6), 869–881. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-08-2020-0351
Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310363732
Pearce, C. L., Wassenaar, C. L., Berson, Y., & Tuval-Mashiach, R. (2019). Toward a theory of meta-paradoxical leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.03.003
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Rahim, M. A. (1989). Relationships of leader power to compliance and satisfaction with supervision: Evidence from a national sample of managers. Journal of Management, 15(4), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500404
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2020). Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(12), 1617–1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Vansteenkiste, M., & Soenens, B. (2021). Building a science of motivated persons: Self-determination theory’s empirical approach to human experience and the regulation of behavior. Motivation Science, 7(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000194
Sandrin, E., Gillet, N., Fernet, C., Leloup, M., & Depin-Rouault, C. (2019). Effects of motivation and workload on firefighters’ perceived health, stress, and performance. Stress and Health, 35(4), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2873
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.5465/256701
Shao, Y., Nijstad, B. A., & Tauber, S. (2019). Creativity under workload pressure and integrative complexity: The double-edged sword of paradoxical leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155, 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.01.008
She, Z. L., Li, Q., Yang, B. Y., & Yang, B. (2020). Paradoxical leadership and hospitality employees’ service performance: The role of leader identification and need for cognitive closure. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 89, 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102524
Shehata, A. E., Khan, M. A., Khalid, R., Raza, M., & Selem, K. M. (2023). Consequences of paradoxical leadership in the hotel setting: Moderating role of work environment. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 32(5), 670–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2023.2190318
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.59330958
Sulphey, M. M., & Jasim, K. M. (2022). Paradoxical leadership as a moderating factor in the relationship between organizational silence and employee voice: An examination using SEM. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(3), 457–481. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-02-2021-0075
Sun, Y., Garrett, T. C., & Kim, K. H. (2016). Do Confucian principles enhance sustainable marketing and customer equity? Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3772–3779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.069
Sung, S. Y., Antefelt, A., & Choi, J. N. (2017). Dual effects of job complexity on proactive and responsive creativity: Moderating role of employee ambiguity tolerance. Group & Organization Management, 42(3), 388–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115619081
Tian, H. R., Zhang, J., & Li, J. J. (2020). The relationship between pro-environmental attitude and employee green behavior: The role of motivational states and green work climate perceptions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(7), 7341–7352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07393-z
Unsworth, K. (2001). Unpacking creativity. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/259123
Veenstra, G. L., Dabekaussen, K., Molleman, E., Heineman, E., & Welker, G. A. (2022). Health care professionals’ motivation, their behaviors, and the quality of hospital care: A mixed-methods systematic review. Health Care Management Review, 47(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0000000000000284
Wei, W., Zhou, Y., & Wang, D. N. (2023). Learning to integrate conflicts: Paradoxical leadership fosters team innovation. Journal of Business Research, 165, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114076
Xing, Y. J., Liu, Y. P., Froese, F. J., & Huang, M. L. (2023). Advancing Chinese leadership research: Review and future directions. Asian Business & Management, 22(2), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-023-00224-7
Yang, Y., Fan, Y. Q., & Jia, J. F. (2022). The Eastern construction of paradoxical cognitive framework and its antecedents: A Yin-Yang balancing perspective. Chinese Management Studies, 16(5), 1081–1107. https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-12-2020-0577
Yi, L., Mao, H. Y., & Wang, Z. J. (2019). How paradoxical leadership affects ambidextrous innovation: The role of knowledge sharing. Social Behavior and Personality, 47(4), e7636. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7636
Yin, J. (2022). Living with tensions in the workplace: A grounded theory of paradoxical leadership in cultivating subordinates’ paradox mindset. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(6), 862–873. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-04-2021-0151
Yip, L., Thomas, E. F., Amiot, C., Louis, W. R., & McGarty, C. (2023). Autonomous motives foster sustained commitment to action: Integrating self-determination theory and the social identity approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221148396
Zhang, M. J., Zhang, Y., & Law, K. S. (2022a). Paradoxical leadership and innovation in work teams: The multilevel mediating role of ambidexterity and leader vision as a boundary condition. Academy of Management Journal, 65(5), 1652–1679. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1265
Zhang, Y., & Liu, S. M. (2022). Balancing employees’ extrinsic requirements and intrinsic motivation: A paradoxical leader behavior perspective. European Management Journal, 40(1), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.11.008
Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y. L., & Li, X. B. (2015). Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538–566. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0995
Zhang, Y., Xi, W., & Xu, F. Z. (2022b). Determinants of employee innovation: An open innovation perspective. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 31(1), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2021.1934933
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Law, K. S., & Zhou, J. (2022c). Paradoxical leadership, subjective ambivalence, and employee creativity: Effects of employee holistic thinking. Journal of Management Studies, 59(3), 695–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12792
Zhao, B., Liu, K., Li, X., & Bi, X. (2015). The construct definition and scale development of employee reactive innovation behavior. Studies in Science of Science, 33(12), 1909–1919. (in Chinese).
Zhu, N. B., Yang, Z. L., Cai, S. H., & Sun, H. H. (2022). Understanding the differences between Chinese and Western business practices: Insights into Confucian philosophy. European Journal of International Management, 17(2–3), 180–197. https://doi.org/10.1504/ejim.2022.120701
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the innovation program of Shandong University of Science and Technology (No. YC20211497).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, G., Zhu, G. & Guo, Y. Effect of paradoxical leadership on employee innovation behavior in a Confucian context. Asian Bus Manage 22, 2249–2279 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-023-00249-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-023-00249-y