Abstract
Plan evaluations about park accessibility are rare at the neighbourhood scale. Moreover, urban plans traditionally identify park accessibility with predetermined measurements that may ignore limited walking conditions of children, the elderly, women with children, and low-income groups. Alternatively, this paper considers equitable (rather than equal) park accessibility as an important goal concerning environmental justice. To guide a path to achieving this goal, it investigates how to assess and revise urban plans with parks within walking distance to social groups in the case of a plan (1/1000 scale) in Izmir (Türkiye). Deployment of the location-allocation analysis (a multi-criteria assessment methodology in Geographic Information Systems, GIS) allows this research to consider physical/geographical barriers to walkability in actual neighbourhood settings and reconfigure such barriers as contextual variables, including limited walking distances of disadvantaged groups. Ultimately, this study also contributes to how to handle spatial and demographic data deficiencies in Türkiye when measuring equitable accessibility of public facilities by walking. Results identify an uneven distribution of park accessibility even within the neighbourhood on the plan and the potential for improving park accessibility by designing some non-park public lands with park features.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This study is part of a research project (no.215K239) supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TUBITAK) and another one by the Izmir Metropolitan Municipality.
References
Arefi, M., and N. Nasser. 2021. Urban design, safety, livability, & accessibility. Urban Design International 26 (1): 1–2.
Beler, E.F. 1997. The distribution of urban public services: The case of parks and recreational services in Ankara. Cities 14 (6): 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(97)00026-7.
Boone, C.G., G.L. Buckley, J.M. Grove, and C. Sister. 2009. Parks and people: An environmental justice inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 99 (4): 767–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600903102949.
Boulton, C., A. Dedekorkut-Howes, and J. Byrne. 2018. Factors shaping urban greenspace provision: A systematic review of the literature. Landscape and Urban Planning 178: 82–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.029.
Byrne, J., and J. Wolch. 2009. Nature, race, and parks: Past research and future directions for geographic research. Progress in Human Geography 33 (6): 743–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509103156.
Cetin, M. 2015. Using GIS analysis to assess urban green space in terms of accessibility: Case study in Kutahya. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 22 (5): 420–424.
Day, R. 2008. Local environments and older people’s health: Dimensions from a comparative qualitative study in Scotland. Health and Place 14 (2): 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.07.001.
EarthExplorer. 2020. https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/
Ekkel, E.D., and S. de Vries. 2017. Nearby green space and human health: Evaluating accessibility metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning 157: 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.008.
Fan, P., L. Xu, W. Yue, and J. Chen. 2017. Accessibility of public urban green space in an urban periphery: The case of Shanghai. Landscape and Urban Planning. 165: 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.11.007.
Forsyth, A., J. Molinsky, and H.Y. Kan. 2019. Improving housing and neighborhoods for the vulnerable: Older people, small households, urban design, and planning. Urban Design International 24 (3): 171–186.
Garcia-Garcia, M.J., L. Christien, E. García-Escalona, and C. González-García. 2020. Sensitivity of green spaces to the process of urban planning: Three case studies of Madrid (Spain). Cities 100: 102655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102655.
Gebhardt, A., and P.F.J. Eagles. 2014. Factors leading to the implementation of strategic plans for parks and recreation. Managing Leisure 19 (5): 321–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13606719.2014.895127.
Goličnik, B., and C.W. Thompson. 2010. Emerging relationships between design and use of urban park spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning 94 (1): 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.016.
Gradinaru, S.R., D.A. Onose, E. Oliveira, A.R. Slave, A.M. Popa, and A.A. Gravrilidis. 2023. Equity in urban greening: Evidence from strategic planning in Romania. Landscape and Urban Planning 230: 104614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104614.
Guzman, L.A., D. Oviedo, and C. Rivera. 2017. Assessing equity in transport accessibility to work and study: The Bogotá region. Journal of Transport Geography 58: 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.12.016.
Haaland, C., and C.K. van Den Bosch. 2015. Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: A review. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 14: 760–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.009.
Heckert, M. 2013. Access and equity in greenspace provision: A comparison of methods to assess the impacts of greening vacant land. Transactions in GIS 17 (6): 808–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12000.
Heynen, N., H.A. Perkins, and P. Roy. 2006. The political ecology of uneven urban green space the impact of political economy on race and ethnicity in producing environmental inequality in Milwaukee. Urban Affairs Review 42 (1): 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087406290729.
Ho, C., V. Sasidharan, W. Elmendorf, F.K. Willits, A. Graefe, and G. Godbey. 2005. Gender and ethnic variations in urban park preferences, visitation and perceived benefits. Journal of Leisure Research 37: 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2005.11950054.
Ignaccolo, M., G. Inturri, N. Giuffrida, M.L. Pira, V. Torrisi, and G. Calabrò. 2020. A step towards walkable environments: Spatial analysis of pedestrian compatibility in an urban context. European Transport 76 (6): 1–12.
Karuppannan, S., and A. Sivam. 2013. Comparative analysis of utilisation of open space at neighbourhood level in three Asian cities: Singapore, Delhi and Kuala Lumpur. Urban Design International 18 (2): 145–164.
Kaza, N. 2019. Vain foresight: Against the idea of implementation in planning. Planning Theory 18 (4): 410–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095218815201.
Kronenberg, J., A. Haase, E. Łaszkiewicz, A. Antal, A. Baravikova, M. Biernacka, and D.A. Onose. 2020. Environmental justice in the context of urban green space availability, accessibility, and attractiveness in postsocialist cities. Cities 106: 102862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102862.
Kwan, M.P. 2010. Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: A Comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis 30 (3): 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1998.tb00396.x.
Laurian, L., J. Crawford, M. Day, P. Kouwenhoven, G. Mason, N. Ericksen, and L. Beattie. 2010. Evaluating the outcomes of plans: Theory, practice, and methodology. Environment and Planning b: Planning and Design 37 (4): 740–757. https://doi.org/10.1068/b35051.
Lee, J., and S. Park. 2018. Exploring neighborhood unit’s planning elements and configuration methods in Seoul and Singapore from a walkability perspective. Sustainability 10 (4): 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040988.
Li, C., G. Chi, and R. Jackson. 2015. Perceptions and barriers to walking in the rural south of the United States: The influence of neighborhood built environment on pedestrian behaviors. Urban Design International 20 (4): 255–273.
Loukaitou-Sideris, A., and A. Sideris. 2009. What brings children to the park? Analysis and measurement of the variables affecting children’s use of parks. Journal of the American Planning Association 76 (1): 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360903418338.
Lucy, W. 1981. Equity and planning for local services. Journal of the American Planning Association 37 (6): 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368108976526.
Lyles, W., P. Berke, and G. Smith. 2016. Local plan implementation: Assessing conformance and influence of local plans in the United States. Environment and Planning b: Planning and Design 43 (2): 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515604071.
Malczewski, J. 2006. GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20 (7): 703–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810600661508.
Maliene, V., V. Grigonis, V. Palevičius, and S. Griffiths. 2011. Geographic information system: Old principles with new capabilities. Urban Design International 16 (1): 1–6.
Moser, G., E. Ratiu, and G. Fleury-Bahi. 2002. Appropriation and interpersonal relationships: From dwelling to city through the neighborhood. Environment and Behavior 34 (1): 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034001009.
Neutens, T., T. Schwanen, F. Witlox, and P. De Maeyer. 2010. Equity of urban service delivery: A comparison of different accessibility measures. Environment and Planning a: Economy and Space 42 (7): 1613–1635. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4230.
Niță, M.R., A.M. Anghel, C. Bănescu, A.M. Munteanu, S.S. Pesamosca, M. Zețu, and A.M. Popa. 2018. Are Romanian urban strategies planning for green? European Planning Studies 26 (1): 158–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1382446.
Pereira, M.F., P. Santana, and D.S. Vale. 2021. The relationship between the population’s socio-economic status and walkability measures: The context of the Lisbon metropolitan area. Transport in Human Scale Cities, 27–39. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Rehling, J., C. Bunge, J. Waldhauer, and A. Conrad. 2021. Socioeconomic differences in walking time of children and adolescents to public green spaces in urban areas-results of the German Environmental Survey (2014–2017). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18: 2326. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052326.
Rigolon, A. 2016. A complex landscape of inequity in access to urban parks: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning 153: 160–169.
Rigolon, A., S.J. Keith, B. Harris, L.E. Mullenbach, L.R. Larson, and J. Rushing. 2019. More than “just green enough”: Helping park professionals achieve equitable greening and limit environmental gentrification. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 38 (3): 29–54. https://doi.org/10.18666/JPRA-2019-9654.
Rigolon, A., and J. Nemeth. 2020. Green gentrification or ‘just green enough’: Do park location, size and function affect whether a place gentrifies or not? Urban Studies 57 (2): 402–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019849380.
Şenol, F. 2019. Evaluation of Existing Neighborhood Parks based on the “Need-Based Equity”: Why and who do and do (can) not use neighborhood parks in Izmir? Unpublished TUBITAK Research Project, No: 215K239.
Şenol, F., and İ Atay Kaya. 2021. GIS-based mappings of park accessibility at multiple spatial scales: a research framework with the case of Izmir (Turkey). Local Environment 26 (11): 1379–1397. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2021.1983793.
Sharifi, F., I. Levin, W.M. Stone, and A. Nygaard. 2021. Green space and subjective well-being in the Just City: A scoping review. Environmental Science & Policy 120: 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.03.008.
Silva, C.S., I. Viegas, T. Panagopoulos, and S. Bell. 2018. Environmental justice in accessibility to green infrastructure in two European cities. Land 7: 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040134.
Spatial Planning Regulation. 2014. Mekansal Planlar Yapım Yönetmeliği, https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr
Stafford, L., and C. Baldwin. 2018. Planning walkable neighborhoods: Are we overlooking diversity in abilities and ages? Journal of Planning Literature 33 (1): 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412217704649.
Ståhle, A. 2010. More green space in a denser city: Critical relations between user experience and urban form. Urban Design International 15 (1): 47–67.
Talen, E. 1998. Visualizing fairness: Equity maps for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association 64 (1): 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369808975954.
Talen, E. 2010. The spatial logic of parks. Journal of Urban Design 15 (4): 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.502335.
Talen, E., and L. Anselin. 2021. City cents: Tracking the spatial imprint of urban public expenditures. Cities 108: 102962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102962.
Tan, P.Y., and R. Samsudin. 2017. Effects of spatial scale on assessment of spatial equity of urban park provision. Landscape and Urban Planning 158: 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.11.001.
Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT). 2019. Population statistics.
Unal, M., C. Uslu, and A. Cilek. 2016. GIS-based accessibility analysis for neighbourhood parks: The case of Cukurova District modelling accessibility to urban greenspaces. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture 1: 46–56. https://doi.org/10.14627/537612006.
Vaughan, K.B., A.T. Kaczynski, S.A. Wilhelm Stanis, et al. 2013. Exploring the distribution of park availability, features, and quality across Kansas City. Missouri by Income and Race/ethnicity, Annals of Behavioral Medicine 45: 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9425-y.
Wolch, J., J.P. Wilson, and J. Fehrenbach. 2005. Parks and park funding in Los Angeles: An equity-mapping analysis. Urban Geography 26 (1): 4–35. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.26.1.4.
Xie, K., H. Xu, and J. Wu. 2019. The accessibility of Nanjing urban park based on GIS. Open House International 44 (3): 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-03-2019-B0029.
Xing, L., Y. Liu, X. Liu, X. Wei, and Y. Mao. 2018. Spatio-temporal disparity between demand and supply of park green space service in urban area of Wuhan from 2000 to 2014. Habitat International 71: 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.11.002.
Yeh, A.G.-O., and M.H. Chow. 1996. An integrated GIS and location-allocation approach to public facilities planning: An example of open space planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 20 (4): 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(97)00010-0.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Şenol, F., Öztürk, S.P. & Atay Kaya, İ. An urban plan evaluation for park accessibility: a case in Izmir (Türkiye). Urban Des Int 28, 220–233 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-023-00221-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-023-00221-4