Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Human Breast Development

  • Published:
Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This review presents an atlas of the histology of the normal physiological states of the human breast including prenatal, prepubertal, and pubertal development, adult resting gland, pregnancy, lactation, and postinvolution. The aim is to produce a pictorial overview of the main stages in development and the common findings in the adult that are considered to be within the range of normality. Unlike inbred strains of animals, in humans it is clear that the chronology of ductal and lobular development is not predictable, either in the fetus, the infant, the peripubertal breast, or the adult. This is probably due to the individual variation in hormone levels both in utero and after birth. For many of the developmental time points there are very little data available. In this review we indicate the current state of knowledge of human breast development and some of the main similarities and differences with the rodent, the main animal model. The major phases of growth and development are described and accompanied by photographs that are representative of each stage. Stress is placed on terminology as there is confusion in the literature. This article is written as an accessory to the companion review on breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCE

  1. T. Sakakura (1987). Mammary embryogenesis. In M. C. Neville and C. W. Daniel (eds.), The Mammary Gland: Development Regulation and Function, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. W. Robinson, A. B. Karpf, and K. Kratochwil (1999). Regulation of mammary gland development by tissue interaction. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 4:9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Chepko and G. H. Smith (1999). Mammary epithelial stem cells: Our current understanding. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 4:35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. Thesleff, A. Vaahtokari, and A. M. Partanen (1995). Regulation of organogenesis. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 39:35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Tickle (1995). Vertebrate limb development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5:478–484.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. L. Johnson and C. J. Tabin (1997). Molecular models for vertebrate limb development. Cell 90:979–990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. W. R. Schwabe, C. Rodriguez-Esteban, and J. C. I. Belmonte (1998). Limbs are moving: Where are they going? Trends Genet. 14:229–235.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Niswander (1997). Limb mutants: What can they tell us about normal limb development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7:530–536.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Peters and R. Balling (1999). Teeth. Where and how to make them. Trends Genet. 15:59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. Thesleff and P. Nieminen (1996). Tooth morphogenesis and cell differentiation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8:844–850.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. F. Wiesen, P. Young, Z. Werb, and G. R. Cunha (1999). Signaling through the stromal epidermal growth factor receptor is necessary for mammary ductal development. Development 126:335–344.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. E. Dunbar, P. Young, J. P. Zhang, J. McCaughern-Carucci, B. Lanske, J. J. Orloff, A. Karaplis, G. Cunha, and J. J. Wysolmerski (1998). Stromal cells are critical targets in the regulation of mammary ductal morphogenesis by parathyroid hormone-related protein. Dev. Biol. 203:75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Sebastian, R. G. Richards, M. P. Walker, J. F. Wiesen, Z. Werb, R. Derynck, Y. K. Hom, G. R. Cunha, and R. P. DiAugustine (1998). Activation and function of the epidermal growth factor receptor and erbB-2 during mammary gland morphogenesis. Cell Growth Differ. 9:777–785.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Hennighausen and G. W. Robinson (1998). Think globally, act locally: The making of a mouse mammary gland. Genes Dev. 12:449–455.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. D. Cardiff and S. R. Wellings (1999). The comparative pathology of human and mouse mammary glands. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 4:105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Vorherr (1974). The Breast: Morphology, Physiology, and Lactation. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. S. R. Hughes (1949). The development of the mammary gland. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 6:99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. K. Dawson (1934). A histological study of the normal mamma in relation to tumour growth. 1—Early development to maturity. Edinburgh Med. J. 41:653–682.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. J. Laurence, P. Monaghan, and B. A. Gusterson (1991). The development of the normal human breast. Oxf. Rev. Reprod. Biol. 13:149–174.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Russo and I. H. Russo (1987). Development of the human mammary gland. In M. C. Neville and C. W. Daniel (eds.), The Mammary Gland: Development Regulation and Function, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 67–93.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. R. Gates (1946). Inheritance of various sexual and intersexual conditions, Human Genetics, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Dixon (1995). ABC of Breast Diseases, BMJ, London.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. E. Hughes, R. E. Mansel, and D. J. T. Webster (1989). Benign Disorders and Diseases of the Breast: Concepts and Clinical Management, Baillière Tindall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. C. Fraser (1956). Dominant Inheritance of Absent Nipples and Breasts, Instituto Gregorio Mendel, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Goldenring and E. S. Crelin (1961). Mother and daughter with bilateral congenital amastia. Yale J. Biol. Med. 33:466–467.

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. H. Klinkerfuss (1924). Four generations of polymastia. JAMA 82:1247–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Bamshad, R. C. Lin, D. J. Jaw, W. S. Watkins, P. A. Krakowiak, M. E. Moore, P. Franceschini, R. Lala, L. B. Holmes, T. C. Gebuhr, B. G. Bruneau, A. Schinzel, C. E. Seidman, and L. B. Jorde (1997). Mutations in human TBX3 alter limb, apocrine and genital development in ulnar-mammary syndrome. Nat. Genet. 16:311–315.

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. van Bokhoven, M. Jung, A. P. Smits, S. van Beersum, R. S. F. M. van Steensel, M. Veenstra, J. H. Tuerlings, E. C. Mariman, H. G. Brunner, T. F. Wienker, A. Reis, H. H. Ropers, and B. C. Hamel (1999). Limb mammary syndrome: A new genetic disorder with mammary hypoplasia, ectrodactyly, and other hand/foot anomalies maps to human chromosome 3q27. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 64:538–546.

    Google Scholar 

  29. E. F. Scanlon (1986). Benign diseases of the breast. In R. J. McKenna and G. P. Murphy (eds.), Fundamentals of Surgical Oncology, Macmillan, New York, pp. 548–556.

    Google Scholar 

  30. B. Staats, U. Bonk, S. Wanschura, P. Hanisch, E. F. Schoenmakers, W. J. Van de Ven, S. Bartnitzke, and J. Bullerdiek (1996). A fibroadenoma with a t(4;12) (q27;q15) affecting the HMGI-C gene, a member of the high mobility group protein gene family. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 38:299–303.

    Google Scholar 

  31. P. P. Osin, R. Anbazhagan, J. Bartkova, B. Nathan, and B. A. Gusterson (1998). Breast development gives insights into breast disease. Histopathology 33:275–283.

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. Anbazhagan (1993). Foetal and infant breast development. In Pathology, University of London, London, p. 292.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R. Anbazhagan, P. P. Osin, J. Bartkova, B. Nathan, E. B. Lane, and B. A. Gusterson (1998). The development of epithelial phenotypes in the human fetal and infant breast. J. Pathol. 184:197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  34. P. Monaghan, N. P. Perusinghe, P. Cowen, and B. A. Gusterson (1990). Peripubertal human breast development. Anat. Rec. 226:501–508.

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. Anbazhagan, B. Nathan, and B. A. Gusterson (1992). Prenatal influences and breast cancer [letter; comment]. Lancet 340:1477–1478.

    Google Scholar 

  36. R. Anbazhagan and B. A. Gusterson (1992). Reversed cerebral asymmetry and breast cancer [letter; comment]. Lancet 339:1056.

    Google Scholar 

  37. R. Anbazhagan and B. A. Gusterson (1994). Prenatal factors may influence predisposition to breast cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 1:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. F. Meckel (1820). Handbuch der menschlichen Anatomie, Halle, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  39. C. Langer (1850). Milchdruse. Idenkschr. Akad. Wiss. Wien.

  40. M. Huss (1873). Entwicklungsgeschichte der Milchdrusen. Jena Z. Naturw. 7:176.

  41. A. Kolliker (1879). Brustdruse. Verh. Med.-Physik. Ges. Wurzb. 14:198–202.

    Google Scholar 

  42. G. Rein (1896). Hyperthelie menschlichen Embryonen. Anat. Anz. 11:702.

    Google Scholar 

  43. M. C. Alvarez Sanz, J. M. Liu, H. H. Huang, and E. J. Hawrylewicz (1986). Effect of dietary protein on morphologic development of rat mammary gland. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 77:477–487.

    Google Scholar 

  44. H. Salazar, H. Tobon, and J. B. Josimovich (1975). Developmental, gestational and postgestational modifications of the human breast. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 18:113–137.

    Google Scholar 

  45. P. Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, R. M. Johansson, and L. J. Pelliniemi (1987). Ultrastructure of human fetal mammary gland. Anat. Rec. 218:66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  46. B. L. Hogan (1999). Morphogenesis. Cell 96:225–233.

    Google Scholar 

  47. K. Kratochwil (1971). In vitro analysis of the hormonal basis for sexual dimorphism in the embryonic development of the mouse mammary gland. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 25:141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  48. R. Anbazhagan, J. Bartek, P. Monaghan, and B. A. Gusterson (1991). Growth and development of the human infant breast. Am. J. Anat. 192:407–417.

    Google Scholar 

  49. K. Kratochwil and P. Schwartz (1976). Tissue interaction in androgen response of embryonic mammary rudiment of the mouse: Identification of target tissue for testosterone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73:4041–4044.

    Google Scholar 

  50. C. W. Turner (1931). The anatomy of the mammary gland in cattle. II. Fetal development. Missouri Agric. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 160:5–39.

    Google Scholar 

  51. C. W. Turner (1930). The anatomy of the mammary gland of cattle. I. Embryonic development. Missouri Agric. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 140:3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  52. B. Nathan, R. Anbazhagan, P. Clarkson, J. Bartkova, and B. Gusterson (1994). Expression of BCL-2 in the developing human fetal and infant breast. Histopathology 24:73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  53. J. Hiba, E. D. Pozo, A. Genazzani, E. Pusterla, I. Lancranjan, D. Sidiropoulos, and J. Gunti (1977). Hormonal mechanism of milk secretion in the newborn. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 44:973–976.

    Google Scholar 

  54. A. J. Atherton, M. J. Warburton, M. J. O'Hare, P. Monaghan, D. Schuppan, and B. A. Gusterson (1998). Differential expression of type IV collagen/undulin by human mammary gland intralobular and interlobular fibroblasts. Cell Tiss. Res. 291:507–511.

    Google Scholar 

  55. A. J. Atherton, P. Monaghan, M. J. Warburton, D. Robertson, A. J. Kenny, and B. A. Gusterson (1992). Dipeptidyl peptidase IV expression identifies a functional subpopulation of breast fibroblasts. Int. J. Cancer 50:15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  56. A. J. Atherton, P. Monaghan, M. J. Warburton, and B. A. Gusterson (1992). Immunocytochemical localization of the ectoenzyme aminopeptidase N in the human breast. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 40:705–710.

    Google Scholar 

  57. R. Anbazhagan, J. Bartkova, G. Stamp, M. Pignatelli, B. Gusterson, and J. Bartek (1995). Expression of integrin subunits in the human infant breast correlates with morphogenesis and differentiation. J. Pathol. 176:227–232; Erratum (1996), J. Pathol. 178(2):235.

    Google Scholar 

  58. J. W. Keeling, G. King, and F. Walker (1998). Oestrogen and progesterone receptors in fetal, infant and childhood mammary tissue. J. Pathol. 186:21A.

    Google Scholar 

  59. S. A. Bartow (1998). Use of the autopsy to study ontogeny and expression of the estrogen receptor gene in human breast. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 3:37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  60. A. Dabelow (1957). Die Milchdruse. In A. Benninghoff et al. (eds.), Handbuch der mikroskopischen Anatomie des Menschen, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 277–512.

    Google Scholar 

  61. K. C. Richardson. (1947). The structural features of the mammary tissues. Br. Med. Bull. 5:123–129.

    Google Scholar 

  62. J. O. Drife (1986). Breast development in puberty. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 464:58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  63. J. Fraser (1929). The breast in health and disease. Edinburgh Med. J. 36:217–241.

    Google Scholar 

  64. D. L. Page and T. J. Anderson (1987). Diagnostic Histopathology of the Breast, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  65. H. Hamperl (1970). The myothelia (myoepithelial cells). Normal state; regressive changes; hyperplasia; tumors. Curr. Top. Pathol. 53:161–220.

    Google Scholar 

  66. C. A. Smith, P. Monaghan, and A. M. Neville (1984). Basal clear cells of the normal human breast. Virchows Arch. A Pathol. Anat. Histopathol. 402:319–329.

    Google Scholar 

  67. T. Kamalati, B. Niranjan, A. Atherton, R. Anbazhaghan, and B. Gusterson (1996). Differentiation antigens in stromal and epithelial cells of the breast. Cancer Treat. Res. 83:227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  68. C. Pechoux, T. Gudjonsson, L. Ronnov-Jessen, M. J. Bissell, and O. W. Petersen (1999). Human mammary luminal epithelial cells contain progenitors to myoepithelial cells. Dev. Biol. 206:88–99.

    Google Scholar 

  69. B. P. Eyden, R. J. Watson, M. Harris, and A. Howell (1986). Intralobular stromal fibroblasts in the resting human mammary gland: Ultrastructural properties and intercellular relationships. J. Submicrosc. Cytol. 18:397–408.

    Google Scholar 

  70. A. J. Atherton, R. Anbazhagan, P. Monaghan, J. Bartek, and B. A. Gusterson (1994). Immunolocalisation of cell surface peptidases in the developing human breast. Differentiation 56:101–106.

    Google Scholar 

  71. J. R. Harris (1996). Diseases of the Breast. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  72. W. M. Kramer and B. F. Rush, Jr. (1973). Mammary duct proliferation in the elderly. A histopathologic study. Cancer 31:130–137.

    Google Scholar 

  73. E. Mallon, P. Osin, N. Nasiri, I. Blain, B. Howard, and B. Gusterson (2000). The basic pathology of human breast cancer. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia, this issue.

  74. W. Bateson (1894). Materials for the Study of Variation, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Breakthrough Toby Robins Breast Cancer Research Centre, Section of Cell Biology and Experimental Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JB, England

    Beatrice A. Howard

  2. The Breakthrough Toby Robins Breast Cancer Research Centre, Section of Cell Biology and Experimental Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JB, England

    Barry A. Gusterson

Authors
  1. Beatrice A. Howard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barry A. Gusterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howard, B.A., Gusterson, B.A. Human Breast Development. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 5, 119–137 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026487120779

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026487120779

Search

Navigation