Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysing land-cover changes in relation to environmental variables in Hesse, Germany

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land-use and land-cover changes affect ecological landscape functions and processes. Hence, landscape ecologists have a central interest in a comprehensive understanding of such changes. Our study focuses on the relationships between environmental conditions and agricultural land-cover changes. We present a method to (i) characterise the major spatial-temporal processes of land-cover changes, (ii) identify the correlations between environmental attributes and land-cover changes and (iii) derive potential environmental drivers of land-cover changes in a German marginal rural landscape. The method was applied to study land-cover dynamics from 1945 to 1998 in the districts of Erda, Steinbrücken and Eibelshausen, situated in the marginal rural landscape of the Lahn-Dill Highlands, Germany. We employed land-cover data gained by the interpretation of multi-temporal aerial photographs. Various environmental variables were introduced into the analyses. We identified physical landscape attributes (elevation, slope, aspect, available water capacity and soil texture) and structural landscape dimensions (patch size, patch shape and distance between patch and nearest settlement). With the aid of GIS, K-means partitioning and canonical correspondence analysis, we investigated land-cover trajectory types, land-cover transitions at individual time intervals and their relationships to these environmental variables. Our results show that, between 1945 and 1998, land-cover changes correlated with the physical attributes of the underlying landscape. On the other hand, the structural landscape dimensions correlated with land cover only in periods of minor land-cover changes (1972–98). Greater diversity of physical landscape attributes is correlated with greater land-cover dynamics. Besides the important influence of socio-economic factors, land-cover changes in the study areas took place within the relatively stable physical constraints of the underlying landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADV 2002. (http://www.atkis.de).

  • AG Boden 1982. Bodenkundliche Kartieranleitung, 3rd ed. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • del Barrio G., Alvera B., Puigdefabregas J. and Diez C. 1997. Response of high mountain landscape to topographic variables: Central Pyrenees. Landscape Ecology. 12: 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudry J. 1993. Landscape dynamics and farming systems: problems of relating patterns and predicting ecological changes. In: Bunce R.G.H., Ryszkowski L. and Paoletti M.G. (eds), Landscape Ecology and Agroecosystems, pp. 21–40. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. Bundesministerium für Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung und Landwirtschaft 2001. Agrarbericht der Bundesregierung 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burel F. and Baudry J. 1995. Species biodiversity in changing agricultural landscapes: A case study in the Pays d’Auge, France. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment. 55: 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain D.H., Riitters K. and Orvis K. 1997. A multi-scale analysis of landscape statistics. Landscape Ecology. 12: 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Biometry Wageningen 1998. Canoco for Windows 4.0. Wageningen, The Netherlands.

  • Chen L., Wang J., Bojie F. and Qiu Y. 2001. Land-use change in a small catchment of northern Loess Plateau, China. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment. 86: 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherrill A.J., McClean C., Watson P., Tucker K., Rushton S.P. and Sanderson R. 1995. Predicting the distributions of plant species at the regional scale: a hierarchical matrix model. Landscape Ecology. 10: 197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckart K. 1998. Agrargeographie Deutschlands: Agrarraum und Agrarwirtschaft Deutschlands im 20 Jahrhundert. Klett-Perthes, Gotha, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster D.R. 1992. Land-use history (1730-1990) and vegetation dynamics in central New England. USA. Journal of Ecology 80: 753–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frede H.-G. and Bach M. 1999. Perspectives for peripheral regions. Journal of Rural Engineering Development 40: 193–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller J.L., Foster D.R., McLachlan J.S. and Drake N. 1998. Impact of human acitivity on regional forest-composition and dynamics in central New England. Ecosystems 1: 76–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhr-Bossdorf K., Waldhardt R. and Otte A. 1999. Auswirkungen der Landnutzungsdynamik auf das Potential von Pflanzengemeinschaften und Pflanzenarten einer peripheren Kulturlandschaft. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft fü Ökologie. 29: 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel G. 1995. Der ländliche Raum, 2nd ed. Teubner, Stuttgart, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog F., Lausch A., Müller E., Thulke H.-H., Steinhardt U. and Lehmann S. 2001. Landscape metrics for assessment of landscape destruction and rehabilitation. Environmental Management. 27: 91–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HSL (Statistical Office of the State of Hesse) 1950-1998.Hessische Gemeindestatistik, Wiesbaden, Germany.

  • Irwin E.G. and Geoghegan J. 2001. Theory, data, methods: developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment. 85: 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson L.R. 1988. Land-use change in Illinois, USA: The influence of landscape attributes on current and historic land use. Landscape Ecology. 2: 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keunecke K. 1997. Die zukünftige Entwicklung der Landwirtschaft in ausgewählten hessischen Landkreisen. Dissertation Univ. Giessen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl M. 1978. Die Dynamik der Kulturlandschaft im oberen Lahn-Dillkreis. Wandlungen von Haubergswirtschaft und Ackerbau zu neuen Formen der Landnutzung in der modernen Regionalentwicklung. Giessener Geographische Schriften 45.

  • Lambin E.F. 1997. Modelling and monitoring land-cover change processes in tropical regions. Progress Physical Geography 21: 375–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P. and Legendre L. 1998. Numerical ecology, 2nd ed. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieb A. unpublished data. Nutzung der Bodenschätzung zur Ableitung bodenkundlicher Kennwerte am Beispiel der Gemarkung Steinbrücken (Rheinisches Schiefergebirge). Diplomarbeit (university thesis). Univ. Marburg, Germany.

  • López E., Bocco G., Mendoza M. and Duhau E. 2001. Predicting land-cover and land-use change in the urban fringe. A case in Morelia city, Mexico. Landscape and Urban Planing 55: 271–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K. and Marks B.J. 1994. Fragstats-spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Users manual, Version 2.0.

  • Merriam G. 1988. Landscape dynamics in farmland. TREE 3: 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens B. and Lambin E.F. 2000. Land-cover-change trajectories in southern Cameroon. Annals Associations American Geographers 90: 467–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mladenoff D.J., White M.A., Pastor J. and Crow T.R. 1993. Comparing spatial pattern in unaltered old-growth and disturbed forest landscapes. Ecological Applications 3: 294–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • OEkland R.H. 1990. Vegetation ecology: theory, methods and applications with reference to Fennoscandia. Sommerfeltia Supplement 1: 1–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson E.G.A., Austrheim G. and Grenne S.N. 2000. Landscape change patterns in mountains, land use and environmental diversity, Mid-Norway 1960-1993. Landscape Ecology 15: 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan D., Domon G., de Blois S. and Bouchard A. 1999. Temporal (1958-1993) and spatial patterns of land use changes in Haut-Saint-Laurent (Quebec, Canada) and their relation to landscape physical attributes. Landscape Ecology 14: 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poudevigne I., van Rooij S., Morin P. and Alard D. 1997. Dynamics of rural landscapes and their main driving factors: A case study in the Seine Valley, Normandy, France. Landscape Urban Planning 38: 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power J. and Cooper A. 1995. Vegetation and land use change in north-eastern Ireland. Landscape Urban Planning 31: 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rescia A.J., Schmitz M.F., Martín de Agar P., de Pablo C.L. and Pineda F.D. 1997. A fragmented landscape in northern Spain analyzed at different spatial scales: Implications for management. Vegetation Science 8: 343–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothkegel W. 1950. Geschichtliche Entwicklung der Bodenbonitierungen und Wesen und Bedeutung der deutschen Bodenschätzung. Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell E.J. 1988. Soil conditions and plant growth, 11th ed. Longman, Harlow, Essex, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer S. and Harrach T. 2000. Rooting and available water capacity of soils as regulators of ecological soil functions. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Bodenkundlichen Gesellschaft. 93: 200–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider L.C. and Pontius R.G. 2001. Modeling land-use change in the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 85: 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze von Hanxleden P. 1972. Extensivierungserscheinungen in der Agrarlandschaft des Dillgebietes. Marburger Geographische Schriften 54.

  • Seiffert P., Schwineköper K. and Konold W. 1994. Analyse und Bewertung von Kulturlandschaften: Das Beispiel Westallgäuer Hügelland. Ecomed, Landsberg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmering D., Waldhardt R. and Otte A. 2001. Syndynamik und Ökologie von Besenginsterbeständen des Lahn-Dill-Berglands unter Berücksichtigung ihrer Genese aus verschiedenen Rasengesellschaften. Tuexenia 21: 51–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson J.W., Boerner R.E.J., deMers M.N., Berns L.A., Artigas F.J. and Silva A. 1994. Forty-eight years of landscape change on two contiguous Ohio landscapes. Landscape Ecology. 9: 261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skånes H.M. and Bunce R.G.H. 1997. Directions of landscape change (1741-1993) in Virestad, Sweden-characterised by multivariate analysis. Landscape Urban Planning 38: 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft Inc. 2001. Statistica für Windows (Software-System für Datenanalyse) Version 6. (http://www.statsoft.com).

  • Szibalski M., Behrens T. and Felix-Henningsen P. 1999. Regionalisation of soil properties of peripheral regions by the example of the pH value. J. Rural Engineering Development 40: 228–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak C.J.F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167–1179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak C.J.F. and Šmilauer P. 1998. Canoco reference manual and user’s guide to Canoco for Windows-Software for canonical community ordination. Centre for Biometry, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Thünen J.H. 1826. Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie. Hamburg, Germany.

  • Turner II B.L., Meyer W.B. and Skole D.L. 1994. Global land use/land cover change: towards an integrated study. Ambio 23: 91–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M.G., Wear D.N. and Flamm R.O. 1996. Landscape ownership and land-cover change in the southern Appalachian highlands and the Olympic Peninsula. Ecological Applications 6: 1150–1172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veldkamp A. and Fresco L.O. 1997. Reconstructing land use drivers and their spatial scale dependence for Costa Rica (1973 and 1984). Agricultural Systems 55: 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos W., Stortelder A. and Zube E.H. 1993. Vanishing Tuscan landscapes-Landscape ecology of a submediterranean-montane area (Solano-basin, Tuscany, Italy). Landscape Urban Planning 27: 51–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek P.M., Mooney H.A., Lubchenco J. and Melillo J.M. 1997. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 277: 494–500.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waldhardt R., Fuhr-Bossdorf K., Otte A. and Simmering D. 2000. Floristisch-phytocoenotische Diversitäten einer peripheren Kulturlandschaft in Abhängigkeit von Landnutzung, Raum und Zeit. Agrarspectrum 31: 121–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldhardt R. and Otte A. 2003. Indicators of plant species and community diversity in grasslands. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 98: 339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber A., Fohrer N. and Möller D. 2001. Long-term land use changes in a mesoscale watershed due to socio-economic factors-effects on landscape structures and functions. Ecological Modelling 140: 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, IFZ, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26–32, D-35392, Giessen, Germany

    Elke Hietel, Rainer Waldhardt & Annette Otte

Authors
  1. Elke Hietel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rainer Waldhardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Annette Otte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hietel, E., Waldhardt, R. & Otte, A. Analysing land-cover changes in relation to environmental variables in Hesse, Germany. Landscape Ecol 19, 473–489 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000036138.82213.80

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000036138.82213.80

Search

Navigation