Skip to main content
Log in

Forty-eight years of landscape change on two contiguous Ohio landscapes

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study analyzes the current and historic structure of two contiguous, rural landscapes covering approximately 242 km2 in central Ohio, USA: a till plain landscape with relatively homogeneous topography and soils, and a moraine landscape with greater geomorphological diversity and heterogeneity. These landscapes were chosen because they were both heavily dominated by agriculture during 1900–1940 and were both initially surveyed by the metes-and-bounds system. They differed, however, in the temporal pattern of settlement and development and in the inherent agricultural capability of their soils. We combined analysis of aerial photographs from 1940, 1957, 1971, and 1988 with historical archives and other available mapped data in a GIS data base to facilitate analysis of both spatial and temporal patterns of change. On the moraine, the agricultural matrix decreased over time as forest, urban/suburban areas, and industry increased. In contrast, on the till plain agricultural landcover increased through 1988, with concommitant decreases in upland forest and oak savanna. The moraine landscape exhibited greater diversity and equitability than the till plain on each date. The till plain had its greatest diversity and equitability in 1940, whereas the moraine increased in diversity and equitability during each time period. The undulating topography of the moraine encouraged landcover dynamism rather than stability, whereas the more homogeneous till plain exhibited considerable inertia. Patch and matrix shape remained constant and predominantly angular over the 48 year study period. Differences in the physical environment, especially topography and soil capability, and the socioeconomic environment, especially agricultural policies and patterns of urbanization, resulted in these two contiguous landscapes having different trajectories of change. It is clear from this study that socioeconomic factors must be combined with the physical setting to fully understand patterns of change in human-dominated landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Artigas, F.J. and Boerner, R.E.J. 1993. Landscape structure in post-agricultural southcentral Ohio: forty-four years of change in the Hocking Hills. Landscape and Urban Planning: submitted.

  • Boerner, R.E.J. and Kooser, J.G. 1989. Leaf litter redistribution among forest patches within an Allegheny Plateau watershed. Landscape Ecol. 2: 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, R.A. 1937. Vegetation of the northern ‘Virginia Military Lands’ of Ohio. Ph.D. Thesis, Ohio State University,Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durant, P.A. 1983. The History of Union County, Ohio. W.H. Beers Publishers, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, D.R. 1992. Land-use and vegetation dynamics in central New England: an historical perspective. J. Ecol. 80: 753–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, D.R. 1993. Land-use history and forest transformations in Central New England. In Humans as Components of Ecosystems, pp. 91–110. Edited by McDonnell, M.J. and Pickett, S.T.A. Springer-Verlag, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, S.R. and Parker, A.J. 1991. Spatial components of biotic diversity in landscapes of Georgia, USA. Landscape Ecol. 5: 125–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, H. 1857. Historical Collections of Ohio. E. Morgan, Cincinnati, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, L.R. 1988. Land-use change in Illinois, USA: The influence of landscape attributes on current and historic land use, Landscape Ecol. 2: 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, C.C. 1981. Prairies of the Darby Plains of west-central Ohio. In The Prairie Peninsula - In the Shadow of Transeau. Proceedings of the Sixth North American Prairie Conference. pp. 108–127. Edited by Stuckey, R.L. and Reese, K.J. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, R.V., Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Rugihara, G., Jackson, B., DeAngelis, D.L., Milne, B.T., Turner, M.G., Zygmunt, B., Christensen, S.W., Dale, V.H. and Graham, R.I. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol. 1: 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS. 1985. Statistical Analysis System User's Guide: Statistics. 1985 Edition. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, P.B. 1925. The natural vegetation of Ohio. I. A map of the virgin forest. Ohio J. Sci. 25: 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrower, N.J. 1966. Original Survey and Land Subdivision. American Society of Geographers Monograph. Rand McNally, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. 1987. Spatial simulation of landscape changes in Georgia: A comparison of 3 transition models, Landscape Ecol. 1: 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. 1990. Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape patterns. Landscape Ecol. 4: 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. and Ruscher, C.L. 1988. Changes in landscape patterns in Georgia, USA. Landscape Ecol. 1: 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, D.D. and Matanzo, F. 1975. Soil Survey of Union County, Ohio. U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simpson, J.W., Boerner, R.E., DeMers, M.N. et al. Forty-eight years of landscape change on two contiguous Ohio landscapes. Landscape Ecol 9, 261–270 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129237

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129237

Keywords

Navigation