Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic divergence for cross prediction in potato

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To study the effectiveness of genetic divergence for cross prediction in potato, progeny means, heterosis and specific combining ability effects were correlated with parents’ genetic distances (D values) estimated under six in vitro and four in vivo conditions, for tuber yield in 72 crosses (18 × 4) of 22 parents under autumn crop conditions for three successive generations. Genetic distances under in vitro conditions had no relationship with the progeny means for tuber yield. Whereas, those under in vivo conditions in the autumn seasons were positively associated with the progeny means. Similarly, heterosis for tuber yield had a stronger relationship with genetic distances based on an in vivo crop than those based on an in vitro crop. All correlation coefficients between genetic distances and specific combining ability effects were non-significant. The magnitudes of the significant correlation coefficients showed that genetic divergence can be used as an indirect parameter of moderate effectiveness in selecting parents to produce heterotic high yielding progenies. Such cross predictions, however, would be effective only if parents are evaluated under the conditions similar to those under which crosses are likely to be evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amirouche, L., T. Stauchbury & S. Matthews, 1985. Comparisons of cultivars performance on different nutrient media in a routine method for potato micropropagation. Potato Res 28: 469–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, V., 1981. Genetic distance in plant breeding. Int J Genet Pl Breed 41: 226–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, V., A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Nigam & R.W. Gibbons, 1984. Heterosis in relation to genetic divergence and specific combining ability in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Euphytica 33: 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behl, R.K., V.P. Singh & R.S. Paroda, 1985. Genetic divergence in relation to heterosis and specific combining ability in triticale. Ind J Genet Pl Breed 45: 368–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boppenmaier, J., A.E. Melchinger, E. Brunklans-Jung, H.H. Geiger & R.G. Herrmann, 1992. Genetic diversity for RELPs in European maize inbreds: Relation to performance of Fint × Dent crosses of forage traits. Crop Sci 32: 895–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, S.J., 1980. Utilizing Solanum germplasm to increase yields of the potato. I. Population improvement. II. Reciprocal differences. III. Heterosis. Dissertation Abstracts Intern (B) 41: 1577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, R.E. & H.F. Robinson, 1952. Estimation of average dominance of genes. In: J.W. Gowen (Ed.), Heterosis, Iowa State University Press, Des Moines, Iowa. pp. 494–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubillos, A.G. & R.L. Plaisted, 1976. Heterosis for yhield in hybrids between S. tuberosum ssp. tuberosum and S. tuberosum ssp. andigena. Am Potato J 53: 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, H. & P.R. Rowe, 1971. Inbreeding in cultivated diploid potatoes. Potato Res 14: 74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, H. & G.C.A. Tai, 1977. Analysis of tetraploid-diploid hybrids in cultivated potatoes. Potato Res 20: 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, J.W., M.A. Maroof-Saghai & G.K. Rufener, 1991. Molecular markers and grouping of parents in maize breeding programs. Crop Sci 31: 718–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaderi, A., M.W. Adams & A.M. Nassib, 1984. Relationship between genetic distance and heterosis for yield and morphological traits in dry edible bean and Faba bean. Crop Sci 24: 37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glendinning, D.R., 1969. The performance of progenies obtained by crossing groups Andigena and Tuberosum of Solanum tuberosum. Eur Potato J 12: 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godshalk, E.B., M. Lee & K.R. Lamkey, 1990. Relationship of restriction fragment length polymorphism to single cross hybrid performance of maize. Theor Appl Genet 80: 273–280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, J., 1996. In vitro selection, genetic divergence and cross prediction in potato. PhD Thesis. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjinov, M.I., V.S. Sherbak, N.I. Benko, V.P. Gusev, T.B. Sukhorzheus-Kaya & L.P. Voronova, 1980. Interrelationships between isozymes diversity and combining ability in maize lines. Maydica 27: 135–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Y., P. Vain & J. De Buyser, 1994. Genetic analysis of in vitro plant tissue culture response and regeneration capacities. Euphytica 79: 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, H.W., 1963. Some potato breeding problems, pp. 5–21. Rep. Pl. Breed. Inst. 1961–62. Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isleib, T.G. & J.C. Wynne, 1983. Heterosis in test crosses of 27 exotic plant cultivars. Crop Sci 23: 832–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamkey, K.R., A.R. Hallauer & A.L. Kahler, 1987. Allelic differences at enzyme loci and hybrid performance in maize. J Hered 78: 231–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefort-Bunson, M., B. Guillot-Lemoine & Y. Dattee 1987. Heterosis and genetic distance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): Crosses between European and Asiatic selfed lines. Genome 29: 413–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loiselle, F., G.C.C. Tai & B.R. Christie, 1991. Pedigree, agronomic and molecular divergence of parents in relation to progeny performance in potato. Potato Res 34: 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahalanobis, P.C., 1936. On the generalized distance in statistics. Proc Natl Acad Sci India 2: 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maris, B., 1989. Analysis of an incomplete diallel cross among three ssp. tuberosum varieties and seven long day adapted ssp. andigena clones of the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Euphytica 41: 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroti, M., J. Rudolf & B.I. Pozsar, 1980. Experiments with the in vitro production of potato plants from meristamatic shoot tips. Botanikai-Kozlemenyek 67: 237–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendiburu, A.O., S.J. Peloquin & D.W.S. Mok, 1974. Potato breeding with haploids and 2n gametes. In: K. Kasha (Ed.), Haploids in Higher Plants, pp. 249–258. University of Guleph, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P.R., L. Amirouche, T. Stuchbury & S. Matthews, 1985. The use of plant growth regulators in micropropagation of slow growing potato cultivars. Potato Res 28: 479–486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D.F., 1976. Multivariate statistical methods., McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Ltd., Tokyo, London, New Delhi, Paris, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige, T. & F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paxman, G.J., 1966. Heterosis in Andigena hybrids. Rep John Innes Inst 1965, pp. 51–53.

  • Prasad, S.K. & T.P. Singh, 1986. Heterosis in relation to genetic divergence in maize (Zea mays L.). Euphytica 35: 919–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C.R., 1952. Advanced statistical methods in biometrical research. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 357–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, J.C. & R.E. Hanneman Jr., 1982. A possible heterotic threshold in the potato and its implications for breeding. Theor Appl Genet 61: 151–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamsuddin, A.K.M., 1985. Genetic diversity in relation to heterosis and combining ability in spring wheat. Theor Appl Genet 70: 306–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R.K. & B.D. Chaudhary, 1977. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalyani Pub., Ludhiana, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, O.S., J.S.C. Smith, S.L. Bowen, R.A. Tenborg & S.J. Wall, 1990. Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield heterosis and RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 80: 833–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarn, T.R. & G.C.C. Tai, 1977. Heterosis and variation of yield components in F1 hybrids between group Tuberosum and group Andigena potatoes. Crop Sci 17: 517–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gopal, J., Minocha, J. Genetic divergence for cross prediction in potato. Euphytica 97, 269–275 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003076207221

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003076207221

Navigation