Abstract
To study the effectiveness of genetic divergence for cross prediction in potato, progeny means, heterosis and specific combining ability effects were correlated with parents’ genetic distances (D values) estimated under six in vitro and four in vivo conditions, for tuber yield in 72 crosses (18 × 4) of 22 parents under autumn crop conditions for three successive generations. Genetic distances under in vitro conditions had no relationship with the progeny means for tuber yield. Whereas, those under in vivo conditions in the autumn seasons were positively associated with the progeny means. Similarly, heterosis for tuber yield had a stronger relationship with genetic distances based on an in vivo crop than those based on an in vitro crop. All correlation coefficients between genetic distances and specific combining ability effects were non-significant. The magnitudes of the significant correlation coefficients showed that genetic divergence can be used as an indirect parameter of moderate effectiveness in selecting parents to produce heterotic high yielding progenies. Such cross predictions, however, would be effective only if parents are evaluated under the conditions similar to those under which crosses are likely to be evaluated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amirouche, L., T. Stauchbury & S. Matthews, 1985. Comparisons of cultivars performance on different nutrient media in a routine method for potato micropropagation. Potato Res 28: 469–477.
Arunachalam, V., 1981. Genetic distance in plant breeding. Int J Genet Pl Breed 41: 226–236.
Arunachalam, V., A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Nigam & R.W. Gibbons, 1984. Heterosis in relation to genetic divergence and specific combining ability in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Euphytica 33: 33–39.
Behl, R.K., V.P. Singh & R.S. Paroda, 1985. Genetic divergence in relation to heterosis and specific combining ability in triticale. Ind J Genet Pl Breed 45: 368–375.
Boppenmaier, J., A.E. Melchinger, E. Brunklans-Jung, H.H. Geiger & R.G. Herrmann, 1992. Genetic diversity for RELPs in European maize inbreds: Relation to performance of Fint × Dent crosses of forage traits. Crop Sci 32: 895–902.
Christopher, S.J., 1980. Utilizing Solanum germplasm to increase yields of the potato. I. Population improvement. II. Reciprocal differences. III. Heterosis. Dissertation Abstracts Intern (B) 41: 1577.
Comstock, R.E. & H.F. Robinson, 1952. Estimation of average dominance of genes. In: J.W. Gowen (Ed.), Heterosis, Iowa State University Press, Des Moines, Iowa. pp. 494–516.
Cubillos, A.G. & R.L. Plaisted, 1976. Heterosis for yhield in hybrids between S. tuberosum ssp. tuberosum and S. tuberosum ssp. andigena. Am Potato J 53: 145–150.
De Jong, H. & P.R. Rowe, 1971. Inbreeding in cultivated diploid potatoes. Potato Res 14: 74–83.
De Jong, H. & G.C.A. Tai, 1977. Analysis of tetraploid-diploid hybrids in cultivated potatoes. Potato Res 20: 111–121.
Dudley, J.W., M.A. Maroof-Saghai & G.K. Rufener, 1991. Molecular markers and grouping of parents in maize breeding programs. Crop Sci 31: 718–723.
Ghaderi, A., M.W. Adams & A.M. Nassib, 1984. Relationship between genetic distance and heterosis for yield and morphological traits in dry edible bean and Faba bean. Crop Sci 24: 37–42.
Glendinning, D.R., 1969. The performance of progenies obtained by crossing groups Andigena and Tuberosum of Solanum tuberosum. Eur Potato J 12: 13–19.
Godshalk, E.B., M. Lee & K.R. Lamkey, 1990. Relationship of restriction fragment length polymorphism to single cross hybrid performance of maize. Theor Appl Genet 80: 273–280.
Gopal, J., 1996. In vitro selection, genetic divergence and cross prediction in potato. PhD Thesis. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.
Hadjinov, M.I., V.S. Sherbak, N.I. Benko, V.P. Gusev, T.B. Sukhorzheus-Kaya & L.P. Voronova, 1980. Interrelationships between isozymes diversity and combining ability in maize lines. Maydica 27: 135–149.
Henry, Y., P. Vain & J. De Buyser, 1994. Genetic analysis of in vitro plant tissue culture response and regeneration capacities. Euphytica 79: 45–58.
Howard, H.W., 1963. Some potato breeding problems, pp. 5–21. Rep. Pl. Breed. Inst. 1961–62. Cambridge, England.
Isleib, T.G. & J.C. Wynne, 1983. Heterosis in test crosses of 27 exotic plant cultivars. Crop Sci 23: 832–841.
Lamkey, K.R., A.R. Hallauer & A.L. Kahler, 1987. Allelic differences at enzyme loci and hybrid performance in maize. J Hered 78: 231–234.
Lefort-Bunson, M., B. Guillot-Lemoine & Y. Dattee 1987. Heterosis and genetic distance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): Crosses between European and Asiatic selfed lines. Genome 29: 413–418.
Loiselle, F., G.C.C. Tai & B.R. Christie, 1991. Pedigree, agronomic and molecular divergence of parents in relation to progeny performance in potato. Potato Res 34: 305–316.
Mahalanobis, P.C., 1936. On the generalized distance in statistics. Proc Natl Acad Sci India 2: 49–55.
Maris, B., 1989. Analysis of an incomplete diallel cross among three ssp. tuberosum varieties and seven long day adapted ssp. andigena clones of the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Euphytica 41: 163–182.
Maroti, M., J. Rudolf & B.I. Pozsar, 1980. Experiments with the in vitro production of potato plants from meristamatic shoot tips. Botanikai-Kozlemenyek 67: 237–243.
Mendiburu, A.O., S.J. Peloquin & D.W.S. Mok, 1974. Potato breeding with haploids and 2n gametes. In: K. Kasha (Ed.), Haploids in Higher Plants, pp. 249–258. University of Guleph, Ontario, Canada.
Miller, P.R., L. Amirouche, T. Stuchbury & S. Matthews, 1985. The use of plant growth regulators in micropropagation of slow growing potato cultivars. Potato Res 28: 479–486.
Morrison, D.F., 1976. Multivariate statistical methods., McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Ltd., Tokyo, London, New Delhi, Paris, Sydney.
Murashige, T. & F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497.
Paxman, G.J., 1966. Heterosis in Andigena hybrids. Rep John Innes Inst 1965, pp. 51–53.
Prasad, S.K. & T.P. Singh, 1986. Heterosis in relation to genetic divergence in maize (Zea mays L.). Euphytica 35: 919–924.
Rao, C.R., 1952. Advanced statistical methods in biometrical research. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 357–364.
Sanford, J.C. & R.E. Hanneman Jr., 1982. A possible heterotic threshold in the potato and its implications for breeding. Theor Appl Genet 61: 151–159.
Shamsuddin, A.K.M., 1985. Genetic diversity in relation to heterosis and combining ability in spring wheat. Theor Appl Genet 70: 306–308.
Singh, R.K. & B.D. Chaudhary, 1977. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalyani Pub., Ludhiana, New Delhi.
Smith, O.S., J.S.C. Smith, S.L. Bowen, R.A. Tenborg & S.J. Wall, 1990. Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield heterosis and RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 80: 833–840.
Tarn, T.R. & G.C.C. Tai, 1977. Heterosis and variation of yield components in F1 hybrids between group Tuberosum and group Andigena potatoes. Crop Sci 17: 517–521.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gopal, J., Minocha, J. Genetic divergence for cross prediction in potato. Euphytica 97, 269–275 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003076207221
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003076207221