Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Genetic analysis of in vitro plant tissue culture responses and regeneration capacities

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The in vitro development of a whole plant from a single cell (eg microspore or somatic cells) is a characteristic feature of plants. The amenability of a plant to in vitro culture is influenced by the genotype, which is thus of major importance in the plant tissue culture response. The differences observed between different cultivars during in vitro tissue culture with respect to embryogenesis and regeneration result from quantitative or qualitative genetic differences. We describe results obtained from quantitative genetic studies, from Mendelian genetic analysis and from gene mapping. It is less easy to study the influence of cytoplasmic genomes. Moreover, it is necessary to discriminate between maternal effects and cytoplasmic inheritance. A conclusion from this review is that the choice of parental strains for a breeding program should be realized on agronomic criteria rather than on compatibility with the tissue culture technique used. Fortunately, it is relatively easy to incorporate short-term tissue culture capacity into agronomically valuable genotypes. This is of major interest since tissue culture remains necessary for most aspects of crop plants biotechnology. Very little is known about the molecular events that trigger in vitro embryogenesis and regeneration. It is clear that genes involved in the tissue culture response are not specialised ‘tissue culture genes’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Afele J.C. & L.W.Kannenberg, 1990. Genetic studies of corn (Zea mays L.) anther culture response. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 459–464.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agache S., J.DeBuyser, Y.Henry & J.W.Snape, 1988. Studies on the genetic relationship between anther culture and somatic tissue culture abilities in wheat. Plant Breeding 100: 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agache S., B.Bachelier, J.DeBuyser, Y.Henry & J.W.Snape, 1989. Genetic analysis of anther culture response in wheat using aneuploid, chromosome substitution and translocations lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 77: 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Armstrong C.L., J.Romero-Severson & T.K.Hodges, 1992. Improved tissue culture response of an elite maize inbred through backcross breeding, and identification of chromosomal regions important for regeneration by RFLP analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 755–762.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arnison P.G., P.Donaldson, A.Jackson, C.Semple & W.Keller, 1990. Genotype-specific response of cultured broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) anthers to cytokinins. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 20: 217–222.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aslam F.N., M.V.MacDonald, P.Loudon & D.S.Ingram, 1990. Rapid-cycling Brassica species: inbreeding and selection of B. campestris for anther culture ability. Annals of Botany 65: 557–566.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barloy D., L.Denis & M.Beckert, 1989. Comparison of the aptitude for anther culture in some androgenetic doubled haploid maize lines. Maydica 34: 303–308.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baroncelli S., M.Buiatti, A.Bennici, B.Foroughi-Wehr, B.Mix, H.Gaul, A.M.Tagliasacchia, M.Loiero & B.Biorgi, 1978. Genetic control of in vitro and in vivo growth in hexaploid wheat. I. Behaviour of ditelocentric lines. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg. 80: 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Beckert M. & C.M.Qing, 1984. Results of a diallel trial and a breeding experiment for in vitro aptitude in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 68: 247–251.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Becraft P.W. & G.A.Taylor, 1989. Effects of nucleus, cytoplasm and male sterile nucleus-cytoplasm combinations on callus initiation in anther culture of wheat. Euphytica 44: 235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Becraft P.W. & G.A.Taylor, 1992. Genetic variation for anther culture inducibility in crosses of highly culturable winter wheats. Plant Breeding 108: 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ben Amer I.M., A.Boerner & R.Schlegel, 1992a. The effect of the hybrid dwarfism gene D2 on tissue culture response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Cereal Research Communication 20, 1/2: 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ben Amer I.M., A.J.Worland & R.Schlegel, 1992b. In vitro culture variation of wheat and rye caused by genes affecting plant growth habit in vivo. Euphytica 61: 233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bentolila S., T.Hardy, C.Guitton & G.Freyssinet, 1992. Comparative analyses of F2 plants and anther culture derived plants of maize. Genome 35: 575–582.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bingham E.T., R.V.Hurley, D.M.Kaatz & J.W.Saunders, 1975. Breeding alfalfa which regenerates from callus tissue in culture. Crop Science 15: 719–721.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bregitzer P., 1992. Plant regeneration and callus type in barley: Effects of genotype and culture medium. Crop Science 32: 1108–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bruneau R., 1985. Régénération in vitro à partir de cals d'embryons immatures de maïs. Aspects quantitatifs et transmission héréditaire. Agronomie 5: 591–597.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Buiatti M., S.Baroncelli, A.Bennici, M.Pagliai & R.Tesi, 1974. Genetics of growth and differentiation in vitro of Brassica oleracea var. botrytis. II. An in vitro and vi vivo analysis of a diallel cross. Z. Pflanzenüchtg. 72: 269–274.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bullock W.P., P.S.Baenziger, G.W.Schaeffer & P.J.Botino, 1982. Anther culture of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) F1 's and their reciprocal crosses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 62: 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cattaneo M., Y.M.Qiao & N.E.Pogna, 1991. Embryoid induction and green plant regeneration from cultured anthers in a durum wheat line homozygous for the IBL/IRS translocation. J. Genet. & Breed. 45: 369–372.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Charmet G. & S.Bernard, 1984. Diallel analysis of androgenetic plant production in hexaploid triticale (x triticosecale, Wittmack). Theor. Appl. Genet. 69: 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cheliak W.M. & K.Klimaszewska, 1991. Genetic variation in somatic embryogenic response in open-pollinated families of black spruce. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82: 185–190.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cheng J. & R.E.Veilleux, 1991. Genetic analysis of protoplast culturability in Solanum phureja. Plant Science 75: 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chevrier N., J.A.Qureshi, P.Hucl & K.K.Kartha, 1990. Heritability of in vitro regeneration in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Can. J. Plant Science 70: 547–550.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chowdhury H., K.Kato, Y.Yamamoto & K.Hayashi, 1991. Varietal variation in plant regeneration capacity from immature embryo among common wheat cultivars. Japan. J. Breed. 41: 443–450.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chu Q.R. & T.P.Croughan, 1990. Genetics of plant regeneration in immature panicle culture of rice. Crop Science 30: 1194–1197.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Close K.R. & L.A.Gallagher-Ludeman, 1989. Structure-activity relationships of auxin-like plant growth regulators and genetic influences on the culture induction response in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Science 61: 245–252.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Coleman M., R.Waugh & W.Powell, 1990. Genetical analysis of in vitro cell and tissue culture response in potato. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 23: 181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cowen N.M., C.D.Johnson, K.Armstrong, M.Miller, A.Woosley, S.Pescitelli, M.Skokut, S.Belmar & J.F.Petolino, 1992. Mapping genes conditioning in vitro androgenesis in maize using RFLP analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 720–724.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Deaton W.R., S.G.Metz, T.A.Armstrong & P.N.Mascia, 1987. Genetic analysis of the anther-culture response of three spring wheat crosses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 334–338.

    Google Scholar 

  31. DeBuyser J. & Y.Henry, 1979. Androgenèse sur des blés tendres en cours de sélection. I. L'obtention des plantes in vitro. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg. 83: 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  32. DeBuyser J. J.-L.Marcotte & Y.Henry, 1992a. Genetic analysis of in vitro wheat somatic embryogenesis. Euphytica 63: 265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  33. DeBuyser J., S.Hachemi-Rachedi, M.-L.Lemee, S.Sejourne, J.-L.Marcotte & Y.Henry, 1992b. Aneuploid analysis of anther culture response in wheat. Plant Breeding 109: 339–342.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Delbreil, B. & M. Julien, 1992. In vitro isolation and characterization of an Asparagus somatic embryogenic line and sexual transmission of the high domatic embryogenic ability character. In: XIIIùme Eucarpia Congress on Reproductive Biology and Plant Breeding, July 6–11th 1992, Angers (France), p. 349.

  35. Devaux, P., P. Lonnet & R. Jean, 1990. Significant higher proportions of 1BL-1RS wheat-rye translocation lines among doubled haploid progenies derived from F1 hybrids between translocated and non-translocated wheat cultivars. In: H.J.J. Nijkamp, L.H.W. Van Der Plas & J. Van Aartrijk (Eds), Progress in plant cellular and molecular biology, Proc. 7th Intl. Congress on Plant Tissue and Cell Culture, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24–29 June 1990, pp. 422–426.

  36. Devaux, P., 1992. Haploidy in barley and wheat improvement. In: Reproductive biology and plant breeding, XIIIùme Congrès Eucarpia, 6–11 Juillet 1992, Angers (France), pp. 139–151.

  37. Dieu P. & M.Beckert, 1986. Further studies of androgenetic embryo production and plant regeneration from in vitro cultured anthers in maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica XXXI: 245–259.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dulieu H., 1991. Inheritance of the regeneration capacity in the genus Petunia. Euphytica 53: 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dunwell J.M., R.J.Francis & W.Powell, 1987. Anther culture of Hordeum vulgare L.: a genetic study of microspore callus production and differentiation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 60–64.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ekiz A. & C.F.Konzak, 1991a. Nuclear and cytoplasmic control of anther culture response in wheat: I. Analysis of alloplasmic lines. Crop Science 31: 1421–1427.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ekiz A. & C.F.Konzak, 1991b. Nuclear and cytoplasmic control of anther culture response in wheat: II. Common wheat x alloplasmic lines. Crop Science 31: 1427–1431.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ekiz A. & C.F.Konzak, 1991c. Nuclear and cytoplasmic control of anther culture response in wheat: III. Common wheat crosses. Crop Science 31: 1432–1436.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Felsenburg T., M.Feldman & E.Galun, 1987. Aneuploid and alloplasmic lines as tools for the study of nuclear and cytoplasmic control of culture ability and regeneration of scutellar calli from common wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 802–810.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Foroughi-Wehr B., W.Friedt & G.Wenzel, 1982. On the genetic improvement of androgenetic haploid formation in Hordeum vulgare L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 62: 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Frankenberger E.A., P.M.Hasegawa & E.C.Tighelaar, 1981. Diallel analysis of shoot-forming capacity among selected tomato genotypes. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 102: 233–242.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Galiba G., G.Lovacs & J.Sutka, 1986. Substitution analysis of plant regeneration from callus culture in wheat. Plant Breeding 97: 261–263.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gavin A.L., B.V.Conger & R.N.Trigano, 1989. Sexual transmission of somatic embryogenesis in Dactylis glomerata. Plant Breeding 103: 251–254.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gawell N.J. & C.D.Robacker, 1990. Genetic control of somatic embryogenesis in cotton petiole callus culture. Euphytica 49: 249–253.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ghaemi M., A.Sarrafi & G.Alibert, 1993. Influence of geno-type and culture conditions on the production of embryos from anthers of tetraploid wheat (Triticum turgidum). Euphytica 65: 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ghaemi M. & A.Sarrafi, 1994. The effect of the ‘D’ genome from synthetic wheat lines in anther culture response. Plant Breeding 112: 76–79.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gordey I.A. & A.P.Sorokin, 1991. Alloplasmic effect in anthers culture of winter hexaploid Triticale. Genetika 27: 565–567.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Green C.E. & C.A.Rhodes, 1982. Plant regeneration in tissue cultures of maize. In: W.F.Sheridan (Ed.), Maize for biological research, pp. 367–372. Univ. Press, Univ. Dakota, Grand Forks, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Guha S. & S.C.Maheshwari, 1964. In vitro production of embryos from anthers of Datura. Nature 204: 497–499.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Halberg N., A.Olesen, I.K.D.Tuvesson & S.B.Andersen, 1990. Genotypes of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) with anther-culture response through hybridization. Plant Breeding 105: 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Henry Y., J.DeBuyser, T.Guenegou & C.Ory, 1984. Wheat microspore embryogenesis during in vitro anther culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 67: 439–442.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Henry Y. & J.DeBuyser, 1985. Effect of the 1B/1R translocation on anther culture ability in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Cell Reports 4: 307–310.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Henry Y. & J.DeBuyser, 1990. Wheat anther culture: Agronomic performance of doubled haploid lines and the release of a new variety ‘Florin’. In: Y.P.S.Bajaj (Ed) Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 13: Wheat, pp. 285–352. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Henry Y., S.Bernard, M.Bernard, G.Gay, J.-L.Marcotte & J.DeBuyser, 1993. Nuclear gametophytic genes from chromosome arm 1RS improve regeneration from wheat microspore embryos. Genome 36: 808–814.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Henry, Y, J.-L. Marcotte & J. De Buyser. Chromosomal location of genes controlling short-term and long-term somatic embryogenesis in wheat revealed by immature embryo culture of aneuploid lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. (in press).

  60. Hernandez-Fernandez M.M. & B.R.Christie, 1989. Inheritance of somatic embryogenesis in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Genome 32: 318–321.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Higgins P. & R.J.Mathias, 1987. The effect of the 4B chromosomes of hexaploid wheat on the growth and regeneration of callus cultures. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 439–444.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hodges T.K., K.K.Kamo, C.W.Imbrie & M.R.Becvar, 1986. Genotype specificity of somatic embryogenesis and regeneration in maize. Biotechnology 4: 219–223.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Izhar S. & J.B.Power, 1977. Genetical studies with Petunia leaf protoplasts. I. Genetic variation to specific growth hormones and possible genetic control on stages of protoplasts development in culture. Plant Science Letters 8: 375–383.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Jurgens G., U.Mayer, R.A.Torres Ruiz, T.Berleth & S.Misera, 1991. Genetic analysis of pattern formation in the Arabidopsis embryo. Development Supplement 1: 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kaleikau E.K., R.G.Sears & B.S.Gill, 1989a. Monosomic analysis of tissue culture response in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 78: 625–632.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Kaleikau E.K., R.G.Sears & B.S.Gill, 1989b. Control of tissue culture response in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 78: 783–787.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Keyes G.J., G.B.Collins & N.L.Taylor, 1980. Genetic variation in tissue cultures of red clover. Theor. Appl. Genet. 58: 265–271.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kielly G.A. & S.R.Bowley, 1992. Genetic control of somatic embryogenesis in alfalfa. Genome 35: 474–477.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kinoshita T. & T.Mikami, 1984. Alloplasmic effects on callus proliferation and streptomycin resistance in common wheat. Seiken Zihô 32: 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Knudsen S., I.K.Due & S.B.Andersen, 1989. Components of response in barley anther culture. Plant Breeding 103: 241–246.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Koba T., T.Shimada & M.Otani, 1993. Diallel analysis of the performances on pollen embryo formation and plant regeneration in anther culture of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Bull RIAR Ishikawa Agr. Coll. 3: 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Komamine A., R.Kawahara, M.Matsumoto, S.Sunabori, T.Toya, A.Fujiwara, M.Tsukuhara, J.Smith, M.Ito, H.Fukuda, K.Nomura & T.Fujimura, 1992. Mechanisms of somatic embryogenesis in cell cultures: physiology, biochemistry, and molecular biology. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 28P: 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Komatsuda T., S.Enomoto & K.Nakajima, 1989. Genetics of callus proliferation and shoot differentiation in barley. J. Heredity 80: 345–350.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Komatsuda T., S.Annaka & S.Oka, 1993. Genetic mapping of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) that enhances the shoot differentiation rate in Hordeum vulgare L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 713–720.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Koornneef M., C.J.Hanhart & L.Martinelli, 1987. A genetic analysis of cell culture traits in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 633–641.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Koornneef M., J.Bade, C.Hanhart, K.Horsman, J.Schel, W.Soppe, R.Verkerk & P.Zabel, 1993. Characterization and mapping on a gene controlling shoot regeneration in tomato. The Plant Journal 3: 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Langridge P., P.Lazzeri & H.Lörz, 1991. A segment of rye chromosome 1 enhances growth and embryogenesis of calli derived from immature embryos of wheat. Plant Cell Reports 10: 148–151.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Larsen E.T., I.K.D.Tuvesson & S.B.Andersen, 1991. Nuclear genes affecting percentage of green plants in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) anther culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82: 417–420.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Lazar M.D., G.W.Schaeffer & P.S.Baenziger, 1984a. Cultivar and cultivar x environment effects on the development of callus and polyhaploid plants from anther cultures of wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 67: 273–277.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Lazar M.D., P.S.Baenziger & G.W.Schaeffer, 1984b. Combining abilities and heritability of callus formation and plantlet regeneration in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) anther cultures. Theor. Appl. Genet. 68: 131–134.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Lazar M.D., T.H.H.Chen, G.J.Scoles & K.K.Kartha, 1987. Immature embryo and anther culture of chromosome addition lines of rye in Chinese Spring wheat. Plant Science 51: 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Linacero R. & A.M.Vazquez, 1992. Somatic embryogenesis in polyembryonic Secale cereale L. Plant Cell Reports 12: 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Lindsey K. & J.F.Topping, 1993. Embryogenesis: a question of pattern. J. Exp. Bot. 44: 359–374.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Lu C., I.K.Vasil & P.Ozias-Akins, 1982. Somatic embryogenesis in Zea mays L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 62: 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Luckett D.J., S.Venkatanagappa, N.L.Darvey & R.A.Smithard, 1991. Anther culture of Australian wheat germplasm using modified C17 medium and membrane rafts. Aust. J. Plant. Physiol. 18: 357–367.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Maan S.S. & T.R.Endo, 1991. Nucleocytoplasmic interactions stabilize ploidy level in wheat interspecific hybrids. Genome 34: 983–987.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Masson J. & J.P.Paskowski, 1992. The culture response of Arabidopsis thaliana protoplasts is determined by the growth conditions of donor plants. The Plant Journal 2: 829–833.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Mathias R.J. & K.Fukui, 1986a. The effect of specific chromosome and cytoplasm substitutions on the tissue culture response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) callus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71: 797–800.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Mathias R.J., K.Fukui & C.N.Law, 1986b. Cytoplasmic effects on the tissue culture response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) callus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 72: 70–75.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Mathias R.J. & E.S.Simpson, 1986c. The interaction of genotype and culture medium on the tissue culture responses of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell) callus. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 7: 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Mathias R.J. & E.Atkinson, 1988. In vitro expression of genes affecting whole plant phenotype-the effect of Rht/Gai alleles on the callus culture response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell). Theor. Appl. Genet. 75: 474–479.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Mathias, R.J., P. Higghins & E. Atkinson, 1988. Genetic control of wheat (Triticum aestivum) tissue culture response. In: T.E. Miller & R.M.D. Koebner (Eds) Proc. of the Seventh Intl. Wheat Genetics Symposium, Cambridge, England, 13–19 July 1988, pp. 763–768.

  93. Mayer U., R.A.Torres Ruiz, T.Berleth, S.Misera & G.Jurgens, 1991. Mutations affecting body organization in the Arabidopsis embryo. Nature 353: 402–407.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Meyer R., Salamini F. & H.Uhrig, 1993. Isolation and characterization of potato diploid clones generating a high frequency of monohaploid or homozygous diploid androgenetic plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85: 905–912.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Miah M.A.A., E.D.Earle & G.S.Kush, 1985. Inheritance of callus formation ability in anther cultures of rice, Oryza sativa L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 70: 113–116.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Müller G., H.Borschel, U.Vahl, A.Wiberg, H.Härtel & W.Dammisch, 1989. Die Nutzung der Antherenkulturmethode im Zuchtprozeßvon Winterweizen. I. Zur Androgenesefähigkeit von iB-1R-Weizen-Roggen-Translokationsfonnen. Plant Breeding 102: 196–207.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Müller G., T.Böhme, H.Borschel, U.Vahl & A.Wiberg, 1990. Die Nutzung der Antherenkulturmethode im Zuchtprozeßvon Winterweizen. III. Zur Antherenkultureignung von Winterweizen-F1-Populationen mit den beiden heterozygoten Chromosomenpaaren 1AL-1AS/1AL-1RS and 1BL-1BS/1BL-1RS. Plant Breeding 104: 272–280.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Nadolska-Orczyk A. & S.Malepszy, 1989. In vitro culture of Cucumis sativus L. 7. Genes controlling plant regeneration. Theor. Appl. Genet. 78: 836–840.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Narasimhulu S.B., V.L.Chopra & S.Prakash, 1989. The influence of cytoplasmic differences on shoot morphogenesis in Brassica carinata A. Br. Euphytica 40: 241–243.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Nesticky M., F.J.Novak, A.Piovarci & M.Dolezelova, 1983. Genetic analysis of callus growth of maize (Zea mays L.) in vitro. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg 91: 322–328.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Ockendron D.J. & R.A.Sutheriand, 1987. Genetic and nongenetic factors affecting anther culture of Brussel sprouts (Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera). Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 566–570.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Orlov P.A. & A.N.Palilova, 1989. Modifying influence of alien cytoplasms on callus induction and growth of alloplasmic wheat lines. Genetika 25: 2168–2175.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Ou G., W.C.Wang & H.T.Nguyen, 1989. Inheritance of somatic embryogenesis and organ regeneration from immature embryo cultures of winter wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 78: 137–142.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Ouyang J., S.M.Zhou & S.E.Jia, 1983. The response of anther culture to culture temperature in Triticum aestivum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 66: 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Ozias-Akins P. & I.K.Vasil, 1982. Plant regeneration from cultured immature embryos and inflorescences of Triticum aestivum L. (wheat): evidence of somatic embryogenesis. Protoplasma 110: 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Ozdemir E., M.N.Inagaki & M.T.Tahir, 1990. Effect of alien cytoplasms on wheat haploid production through crosses with Hordeum bulbosum. Cereal Research Communications 18: 195–189.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Park Y.S., S.E.Pond & J.M.Bonga, 1993. Initiation of somatic embryogenesis in white spruce (Picea glauca): genetic control, culture treatment effects, and implications for tree breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 427–436.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Pechan P.M., D.Bartels, D.C.W.Brown & J.Schell, 1991. Messenger-RNA and protein changes associated with induction of Brassica microspore embryogenesis. Planta 184: 161–165.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Peng J. & T.K.Hodges, 1989. Genetic analysis of plant regeneration in rice (Oryza sativa L.). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology 25: 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Petolino J.F. & S.A.Thompson, 1987. Genetic analysis of anther culture response in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 174: 284–286.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Petolino J.F., A.M.Jones & S.A.Thompson, 1988. Selection for increased anther culture response in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76: 157–159.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Picard E. & J.DeBuyser, 1973. Obtention de plantes haploïdes de Triticum aestivum L. à partir de culture d'anthères in vitro. C.R. Acad Sc. Paris 277: 1463–1466.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Picard E., J.DeBuyser & Y.Henry, 1977. Technique de production d'haploides de blé par culture d'anthères in vitro. Le Sélectionneur Français 26: 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Powell W., 1988. Diallel analysis of barley anther culture response. Genome 30: 152–157.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Quimio C.A. & F.J.Zapata, 1990. Diallel analysis of callus induction and green-plant regeneration in rice anther culture. Crop Science 30: 188–192.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Rakoczy-Trojanowska M. & S.Malepszy, 1993. Genetic factors influencing regeneration ability in rye (Secale cereale L.) immature inflorescences. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 406–410.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Raquin C., 1982. Genetic control of embryo production and embryo quality in anther culture of Petunia. Theor. Appl. Genet. 63: 151–154.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Ray I.M. & T.E.Bingham, 1989. Breeding diploid alfalfa for regeneration from tissue culture. Crop Science 29: 1545–1548.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Reddy V.D. & G.M.Reddy, 1993. Genetic basis of plant regeneration in hexaploid triticale. Euphytica 70: 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Reisch B. & E.T.Bingham, 1980. The genetic control of bud formation from callus cultures of diploid alfalfa. Plant Science Letters 20: 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Reinbothe C., A.Tewes, M.Luckner & S.Reinbothe, 1992. Differential gene expression during somatic embryogenesis in Digitalis lanata analyzed by in vivo and in vitro protein synthesis. The Plant Journal 2: 917–926.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Reynolds T.L. & S.L.Kitto, 1992. Identification of embryoid-abundant genes that are temporally expressed during pollen embryogenesis in wheat anther cultures. Plant Physiol. 100: 1744–1750.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Rhodes C.A., C.E.Green & R.L.Phillips, 1986. Factors affecting tissue culture initiation from maize tassels. Plant Science 46: 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Rode A., C.Hartmann, J.DeBuyser & Y.Henry, 1988. Evidence for a direct relationship between mitochondrial organization and regeneration ability in hexaploid wheat somatic tissue culture. Curr. Genet. 14: 387–394.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Sagi L. & B.Barnabas, 1989. Evidence for cytoplasmic control of in vitro microspore embryogenesis in the anther culture of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 78: 867–872.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Saint-Johnston D. & C.Nüsslein-Volhardt, 1992. The origin of pattern and polarity in the Drosophila embryo. Cell 68: 201–219.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Shimada T. & T.Makino, 1975. In vitro anther culture in wheat. III. Anther culture of the A genome aneuploids in common wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 46: 407–410.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Shimada T., M.Otani & H.Hatanaka, 1993. Genetic factors of the anther culture response in Japanese winter wheat cultivars. Bull. RIAR Ishikawa Agr. Coll. 3: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Singsit C. & R.E.Veilleux, 1989. Intra- and interspecific transmission of androgenetic competence in diploid potato species. Euphytica 43: 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Sonnino A., S.Tanaka, M.Iwanaga & L.Schilde-Rentschler, 1989. Genetic control of embryo formation in anther culture of diploid potatoes. Plant Cell Reports 8: 105–107.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Stewards F.C., M.O.Mapes & K.Mears, 1958. Growth and organized development of cultured cells. II. Organization in cultures grown from freely suspended cells. Amer. J. Bot. 45: 705–708.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Szakacs E., G.Kovacs, J.Pauk & B.Barnabas, 1988. Substitution analysis of callus induction and plant regeneration from anther culture in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Cell Reports 7: 127–129.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Taylor T.E. & R.E.Veilleux, 1992. Inheritance of competences for leaf disc regeneration, anther culture and protoplast culture in Solanum phureja and correlations among them. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 31: 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Tomes D.T., 1985. Cell culture, somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in maize, rice, sorghum and millets. In: S.W.J.Bright & M.G.K.Jones (Eds) Cereal tissue and cell culture, pp. 175–203 Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Tomes D.T. & O.S.Smith, 1985. The effect of parental genotype on initiation of embryogenic callus from elite maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 70: 505–509.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Tsay, H.S., L.J. Chen, T.H. Tseng & P.C. Lai, 1982. The culture of rice anthers of japonica x indica crosses. In: A. Fujiwara (Ed.) Plant Tissue Culture 1982, Proc. 5th Intl. Congr. Plant Tissue and Cell Culture, Tokyo, July 11–16, pp. 561–562.

  137. Tuvesson I.K.D., S.Pedersen & S.B.Aandersen, 1989. Nuclear genes affecting albinism in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) anther culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 78: 879–883.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Vasil I.K., 1987. Developing cell and tissue culture systems for the improvement of cereal and grass crops. J. Plant Physiol. 128: 193–218.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Vergne P., F.Riccardi, M.Beckert & C.Dumas, 1993. Identification of a 32-kDa anther marker protein for andrognic response in maize, Zea mays L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 843–850.

    Google Scholar 

  140. Veronneau H., G.Lavoie & M.Cappadoccia, 1992. Genetic analysis of anther and leaf disc culture in two clones of Solanum chacoense Bitt. and their reciprocal hybrids. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 30: 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Walton P.D. & D.C.Brown, 1988. Screening Medicago wild species for callus formation and the genetic of somatic embryogenesis. J. Genet. 67: 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  142. Wan Y., Y.Sorrensen & G.H.Liang, 1988. Genetic control of in vitro regeneration in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Euphytica 39: 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  143. Wan Y., T.R.Rocheford & J.M.Widholm, 1992. RFLP analysis to identify putative chromosomal regions involved in the anther culture response and callus formation of maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85: 360–365.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Wenzel G. & H.Uhrig, 1981. Breeding for nematode and virus resistance in potato via anther culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 59: 333–340.

    Google Scholar 

  145. Willman M.R., S.M.Schroll & T.K.Hodges, 1989. Inheritance of somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration from primary (Type I) callus in maize. In Vitro Cellular & Develomental Biology 25: 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Worland A.J., M.D.Gale & C.N.Law, 1988. Wheat genetics. In: F.G.H.Lupton (Ed.) Wheat Breeding, pp. 129–171. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  147. Wu C. & Y.Chen, 1987. A study of the genotypical differences in anther culture of keng rice (Oryza sativa subsp. keng). Acta Genetica Sinica 11: 168–174.

    Google Scholar 

  148. Yu K. & K.P.Pauls, 1993. Identification of a RAPD marker associated with somatic embryogenesis in alfalfa. Plant Mol. Biol. 22: 269–277.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Zhang Y.L. & D.S.Li, 1984. Anther culture of monosomics in Triticum aestivum. Hereditas (Beijing) 6: 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  150. Zhou H. & C.F.Konzak, 1992. Genetic control of green plant regeneration from anther culture of wheat. Genome 35: 957–961.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire Végétale, URA CNRS 1128, Université Paris XI, bâtiment 630, 91405, Orsay, France

    Y. Henry & J. De Buyser

  2. Laboratoire de Physiologie Moléculaire Végétale, URA CNRS 1128, Université Paris XI, bâtiment 630, 91405, Orsay, France

    P. Vain

Authors
  1. Y. Henry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Vain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. De Buyser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henry, Y., Vain, P. & De Buyser, J. Genetic analysis of in vitro plant tissue culture responses and regeneration capacities. Euphytica 79, 45–58 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023575

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023575

Key words

Search

Navigation