Abstract
In site seismic characterization, peak ground acceleration (PGA) is an important parameter, along with response spectrum/time history, etc. Expanding strong motion network has been complemented by data sharing through satellite links. PGA is generally estimated using empirical expressions developed from this data (earthquake magnitude, distance from the site, etc.) and these have been updated periodically with fresh records. Certain studies added new factor/s specific to site, soil conditions, etc. for getting improved estimates of PGA. However, as estimation of PGA involves multiple uncertainties, the accuracy achieved by these equations leaves ample scope of improvement. In this article, development of data-driven model/s for estimation of PGA is presented using artificial neural network, using readily available recorded data from the literature. The best ANN models had a correlation between 0.86 and 0.89, mean absolute error between 18 and 25 gals, and root mean square error between 36 and 44 gals, indicating good performance. Out of 32 test data, only 2 (6%) of the estimates fell outside the one standard deviation limits on either side of the perfect fit for Set 1, one (3%) each in case of Set 2 and Set 3, and this can be considered to be a pretty good fit. The case study for Himalayan region in India would demonstrate comprehensive model evaluation followed by an intuitive ranking system to select the best model from a few candidate models.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data used in this study are available in the literature, and the listing may be shared on request.
References
Alavi AH, Gandomi AH (2011a) A robust data mining approach for formulation of geotechnical engineering systems. Eng Comput 28(3):242–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644401111118132
Alavi AH, Gandomi AH (2011b) Prediction of principal ground-motion parameters using a hybrid method coupling artificial neural networks and simulated annealing. Comput Struct 89:2176–2194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.08.019
Alves EI (2006) Earthquake forecasting using neural networks: results and future work. Nonlinear Dyn 44(1–4):341–349
Amiri GG, Bagheri A (2008) Application of wavelet multi resolution analysis and artificial intelligence for generation of artificial earthquake accelerograms. Struct Eng Mech 28(2):153–166
Anbazhagan P, Kumar A, Sitharam TG (2013) Ground motion prediction equation considering combined dataset of recorded and simulated ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 53:92–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.06.003
Arjun CR, Kumar A (2009) Artificial neural network-based estimation of peak ground acceleration. ISET J Earthq Technol 46(1):19–28
Arora MK, Sharma ML (1998) Seismic hazard analysis: an artificial neural network approach. Curr Sci 75(1):54–59
Bose NK, Liang P (1993) Neural networks fundamentals with graphs, algorithms, and applications. Tata-McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, India
Calabrese A, Lai CG (2013) Fragility functions of blockwork wharves using artificial neural networks. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 52:88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.05.002
Choobbasti A, Farrokhzad F, Mashaie R, Azar P (2015) Mapping of soil layers using artificial neural network (case study of Babol, northern Iran). J South African Instit Civil Eng 57(1):59–66
Dai H, Macbeth C (1995) Automatic picking of seismic arrivals in local earthquake data using an artificial neural network. Geophys J Int 120(3):758–774
Dauji S, Deo MC, Bhargava K (2014) Prediction of ocean currents with artificial neural networks. ISH J Hydraulic Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2014.938133
Dauji S, Deo MC, Bhargava K (2016a) Interpolation of gaps in current maps generated by high-frequency radar. Int J Remote Sens 37(21):5135–5154. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1230281
Dauji S, Deo MC, Joseph S, Bhargava K (2016b) A combined numerical and neural technique for short term prediction of ocean currents in the Indian Ocean. Environ Syst Res 5(4):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-016-0057-2
Dauji S (2018a) Neural prediction of concrete compressive strength. Int J Mater Struct Integ 12(1/2/3):17–35. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSI.2018.10014931
Dauji S (2018b) New approach for identification of suitable vibration attenuation relationship for underground blast. Eng J 22(4):147–159. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2018.22.4.147
Dauji S (2019) Estimation of corrosion current density from resistivity of concrete with neural network. INAE Lett 4:111–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41403-019-00071-z
Dauji S (2020a) Prediction of concrete spall damage under blast: neural approach with synthetic data. Comput Concrete 26(6):533–546
Dauji S (2020b) Prediction accuracy of underground blast variables: decision tree and artificial neural network. Int J Earthquake Impact Eng 3(1-2–3):40–59. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIE.2020.105382
Dauji S (2021a) Bond strength of corroded reinforcement in concrete: neural and tree based approaches. Structural Monitoring and Maintenance. (In press)
Dauji S (2021b) Re-look into modified scaled distance regression analysis approach for prediction of blast-induced ground vibration. Int J Geotech Earthquake Eng 12(1):22–39
Dauji S, Bhargava K (2018) Neural estimation of bond strength degradation in concrete affected by reinforcement corrosion. INAE Lett 3:203–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41403-018-0050-3
Dauji S, Rafi A (2021) Spatial interpolation of SPT with artificial neural networks. Eng J 25(2):109–120. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2021.25.2.109
Derras B, Bard P-Y, Cotton F, Bekkouche A (2012) Adapting the neural network approach to PGA prediction: an example based on the KiK-net data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102(4):1446–1461. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110088
Erzin Y (2007) Artificial neural networks approach for swell pressure versus soil suction behaviour. Can Geotech J 44(10):1215–1223. https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-0052
Gandomi M, Soltanpour M, Zolfaghari MR, Gandomi AH (2016) Prediction of peak ground acceleration of Iran’s tectonic regions using a hybrid soft computing technique. Geosci Front 7:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2014.10.004
Ghaboussi J, Lin CCJ (1998) New method of generating spectrum compatible accelerograms using neural networks. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 27(4):377–396
Ghorbani A, Hasanzadehshooiili H (2018) Prediction of UCS and CBR of microsilica-lime stabilized sulfate silty sand using ANN and EPR models: application to the deep soil mixing. Soils Found 58:34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2017.11.002
Giacinto G, Paolucci R, Roli F (1997) Application of neural networks and statistical pattern recognition algorithms to earthquake risk evaluation. Pattern Recogn Lett 18(11–13):1353–1362
Gullu H (2012) Prediction of peak ground acceleration by genetic expression programming and regression: a comparison using likelihood-based measure. Eng Geol 141–142:92–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.05.010
Gullu H, Ercelebi E (2007) A neural network approach for attenuation relationships: an application using strong ground motion data from Turkey. Eng Geol 93:65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.05.004
Gunaydin K, Gunaydin A (2008) Peak ground acceleration prediction by artificial neural networks for Northwestern Turkey. Math Probl Eng 919420:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/919420
Haykin SO (2008) Neural networks and machine learning. Pearson Education, New Delhi, India
Joshi A, Kumar A, Castanos H, Lomnitz C (2013) Seismic hazard of the Uttarakhand Himalaya, India, from deterministic modeling of possible rupture planes in the area. Geophys J Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/825276
Juang CH, Jiang T, Christopher RA (2001) Three-dimensional site characterisation: neural network approach. Geotechnique 51(9):799–809. https://doi.org/10.1680/goet.2001.51.9.799
Kerh T, Chu D (2002) Neural networks approach and microtremor measurements in estimating peak ground acceleration due to strong motion. Adv Eng Softw 33(11–12):733–742
Kerh T, Ting SB (2005) Neural network estimation of ground peak acceleration at stations along Taiwan high-speed rail system. Eng Appl Artif Intell 18(7):857–866
Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2006) Prediction of blast-induced ground vibrations and frequency in opencast mines: a neural network approach. J Sound Vib 289(4–5):711–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.02.044
Khosravikia F, Zeinali Y, Nagy Z, Clayton P, Rathje EM (2018) Neural Network-Based Equations for Predicting PGA and PGV in Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas. Paper presented at 5th Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics Conference, Austin, TX, USA, June 10–13 2018. Available from: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481462.052
Koelewijn AR, Maccabiani J (2006) Three examples of using artificial neural networks in geotechnical engineering. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Millpress Science Publishers/IOS Press; pp 1067–1070. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-656-9-1067
Kordnaeij A, Kalantary F, Kordtabar B, Mola-Abasi H (2015) Prediction of recompression index using GMDH-type neural network based on geotechnical soil properties. Soils Found 55(6):1335–1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.10.001
Lai J, Qiu J, Feng Z, Chen J, Fan H (2016) Prediction of soil deformation in tunnelling using artificial neural networks. Comput Intell Neurosci 6708183:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6708183
Latifi N, Rashid ASA, Siddiqua S, Majid MZA (2016) Strength measurement and textural characteristics of tropical residual soil stabilised with liquid polymer. Measurement 91:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.05.029
Latifi N, Vahedifard F, Ghazanfari E, Horpibulsuk S, Marto A, Williams J (2018) Sustainable improvement of clays using lowcarbon nontraditional additive. Int J Geomech 18(3):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001086
Liu BY, Ye LY, Xiao ML, Miao S (2006) Peak ground velocity evaluation by artificial neural network for west America region. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Neural Information Processing, Part II (ICONIP ’06). Lecture Notes in Computer Science: 4233. Hong Kong, pp 942–951
Mishra M, Barman SK, Maity D, Maity DK (2019) Performance studies of 10 metaheuristic techniques in determination of damages for large-scale spatial trusses from changes in vibration responses. ASCE J Comput Civil Eng 34(2):04019052
Mittal A, Kanungo DP, Sharma, S (2010) Prediction of Peak Ground Acceleration using Artificial Neural Network for Himalayan Region, India. In: Proceedings of 14th Symposium on Earthquake Engineering. IIT, Roorkee, India
Mittal A, Sharma S, Kanungo DP (2011) A Comparison of ANFIS and ANN for the Prediction of Peak Ground Acceleration in Indian Himalayan Region. In: K. Deep et al. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on SocProS, AISC 131, Springer, India, pp 485–495
Moayedi H, Hayati S (2018) Modelling and optimization of ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing near a slope by soft computing methods. Appl Soft Comput 66:208–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.02.027
Moayedi H, Rezaei A (2019) An artificial neural network approach for under reamed piles subjected to uplift forces in dry sand. Neural Comput Appl 31:327–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2990-z
Monjezi M, Ghafurikalajahi M, Bahrami A (2011) Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using artificial neural networks. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26:46–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2010.05.002
National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) (2010) Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of India – Final Report. NDMA, New Delhi, India
Pozos-Estrada A, Gómez R, Hong HP (2014) Use of Neural network to predict the peak ground accelerations and pseudo spectral accelerations for Mexican Inslab and Interplate Earthquakes. Geofis Int 53(1):39–57
Rafi A, Dauji S, Bhargava K (2020) Estimation of SPT from coarse grid data by spatial interpolation technique. In: Gali ML, Raghuveer Rao P (Eds.), Geotechnical characterization and modelling, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 85, Springer Nature, Singapore, pp 1079–1091. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6086-6_87
Ray S, Dauji S (2019) Ground vibration attenuation relationship for underground blast: a case study. J Instit Eng (india) Series A 100:763–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-019-00382-y
Saadat M, Khandelwal M, Monjezi M (2014) An ANN-based approach to predict blast-induced ground vibration of Gol-E-Gohar iron ore mine, Iran. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6:67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2013.11.001
Shahin MA, Jaksa MB, Maier HR (2002) Artificial neural network-based settlement prediction formula for shallow foundations on granular soils. Australian Geomechanics. September, pp 45–52
Shahri AA (2016) Assessment and prediction of liquefaction potential using different artificial neural network models: a case study. Geotech Geol Eng 34(3):807–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0004-z
Sharma ML (1998) Attenuation relationship for estimation of peak ground horizontal acceleration using data from strong-motion arrays in India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:1063–1069
Sharma ML (2005) A new empirical attenuation relationship for peak ground horizontal acceleration for Himalayan region using Indian and Worldwide data set. J Geophys Res 26:151–158
Sharma ML, Arora MK (2005) Prediction of seismicity cycles in the Himalayas using artificial neural network. Acta Geophysica Polonica 53(3):299–309
Shiuly A, Roy N, Sahu RB (2020) Prediction of peak ground acceleration for Himalayan region using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Arab J Geosci 13(215):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-5211-5
Shiuly A, Sahu RB, Mandal S (2017) Site specific seismic hazard analysis and determination of response spectra of Kolkata for maximum considered earthquake. J Geophys Eng 14:466–477. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2140/aa5d3b
Singh RP, Aman A, Prasad YJJ (1996) Attenuation relations for strong seismic ground motion in the Himalayan Region. PAGEOPH 147(1):161–180
Sivakumar B, Berndtsson R (2010) Advances in data-based approaches for hydrologic modeling and forecasting. World Scientific, Singapore
USGS (2021) Earthquake Hazards: Magnitude types. http://usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/science/magnitude-types?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects, Accessed 10 July 2021
Wasserman PD (1993) Advanced methods in neural computing. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, USA
Xie Y, Sichani ME, Padgett JE, DesRoches R (2020) The promise of implementing machine learning in earthquake engineering: A state-of-the-art review. Earthq Spectra. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020919419
Yin ZY, Jin YF, Liu ZQ (2020) Practice of artificial intelligence in geotechnical engineering. Appl Phys Eng 21(6):407–411. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A20AIGE1
Acknowledgements
The authors sincerely acknowledge the authors of articles/reports, from which data were used for this study. The authors would take this opportunity to express gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions for improving the manuscript.
Funding
This research did not receive any funding from any agency.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SD: conceptualization and methodology; all authors: literature review and data; SD: model development and analysis; authors: comparative analysis; SD and SK: writing. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript (original and revised).
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no known conflict of interest/competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dauji, S., Karmakar, S. & Singh, R. PGA Estimation for Indian Himalayan Region Using ANN: Ranking Approach for Selection of Best Model. Trans Indian Natl. Acad. Eng. 7, 243–258 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41403-021-00273-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41403-021-00273-4