Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On Stress–Strain Function of Geomaterials Subjected to Blast-Loads

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An appropriate stress–strain relationship of geomaterials subjected to blast loading is essential for the design of underground protective structures. Previous experimental and theoretical research efforts indicate that the constitutive behavior of geomaterials under blast loading depends upon strain rate, stress level, and interaction among the three phases (solid, liquid, and gases). In current state-of-the-art, various advanced constitutive models are available to model the stress–strain behavior of geomaterials under blast-loads. However, considering the cost of computation associated with such models, a functional form is discussed to model the loading and unloading branches of stress–strain curve of geomaterials subjected to blast load based on the three parameters: weight factor, initial modulus ratio, and strain recovery ratio. It is observed that the new functional form reasonably captures the mean trend of the experimentally obtained or simulated stress–strain data. This paper further investigates the applicability of this functional form and provides a catalog of the model parameters for direct use by practicing engineers. The dependence of function parameters on strain rate, lateral confinement, degree of saturation, initial compaction, and locking initiation stress is investigated, and some simple rules are proposed for reasonable estimation of the three parameters. The proposed functional form would be quite useful in practical design problems specially where cost of computation associated with advanced constitutive models is too high. In addition to this, the proposed simple parametrization of complex nonlinear stress–strain behavior also provides an opportunity to investigate the effect of uncertainties in soil parameters in a computationally efficient manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

adopted from Veyera [62]

Fig. 8

adopted from Jackson [73]

Fig. 9

adopted from Xia et al. [74]

Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

adopted from Higgins [67]

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Casagrande A, Shannon WL (1948) Strength of soils under dynamic loads. Proc Am Soc Civ Eng 74(4):591–608

    Google Scholar 

  2. Whitman RV (1970) The Response of Soils to Dynamic Loadings; Report 26, Final Report. AD708625, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg

  3. Jackson JG Jr, Ehrgott JQ, Rohani B (1980) Loading rate effects on the compressibility of sand. J. Geotech. Engrg. 108(8):829–852

    Google Scholar 

  4. Prapaharan S, Chameau JL, Holtz RD (1989) Effect of strain rate on undrained strength derived from pressuremeter tests. Geotech 39(4):615–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamamuro JA, Lade PV (1993) Effects of strain rate on instability of granular soils. Geotech Test J 16(3):304–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bolton JM, Durnford DS, Charlie WA (1994) One-dimensional shock and quasi-static liquefaction of silt and sand. J geotech eng 120(10):1874–1889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Semblat J, Luong MP, Gary G (1999) 3D-Hopkinson bar: new experiments for dynamic testing on soils. Soil Found 39(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Omidvar M, Iskander M, Bless S (2012) Stress-strain behavior of sand at high strain rates. Int J Impact Eng 49:192–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Z, Lu Y (2003) Numerical analysis on dynamic deformation mechanism of soils under blast loading. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 23(8):705–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Z, Hao H, Lu Y (2004) A three-phase soil model for simulating stress wave propagation due to blast loading. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 28(1):33–56

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. An J, Tuan CY, Cheeseman BA, Gazonas GA (2011) Simulation of soil behavior under blast loading. Int J Geomech 11(4):323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bleich HH, Weidlinger P (1963) Stresses waves in granular material. Weidlinger Associates, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Durbin WL (1964) Study of the Dynamic Stress-Strain and Wave-Propagation Characteristics of Soils; Report 2, Correlation of Stress-Strain and Wave-Propagation Parameters in Shock-Loading Dry Sands (No. 637-15). United Research Services Corp Burlingame CA

  14. Hampton D, Wetzel RA (1966) Stress wave propagation in confined soils. IIT Research Inst, Chicago IL

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schindler L (1968) Design and evaluation of a device for determining the one dimensional compression characteristics of soils subjected to impulse-type loads, PhD thesis, University of Illinois, in Urbana, Illinois

  16. Farr JV (1986) Loading rate effects on the one-dimensional compressibility of four partially saturated soils (No. WES/TR/SL-86–46. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Vicksburg MS Structures Lab

  17. Farr JV (1990) One-dimensional loading-rate effects. J Geotech Eng 116(1):119–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Henrych J (1979) The dynamics of explosion and its use. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Salvadori M, Skalak R and Weidlinger P (1960) Waves and Shocks in Locking and Dissipative Media, Proceedings ASCE, Vol. 86, No. EW2

  20. Rohani (1999) Theoretical Studies of Stress Wave Propagation in Laterally Confined Soils (No. WES/MP/SL-99–1). Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Vicksburg MS Structures Lab

  21. Pathak S and Ramana GV (2018) A Stress-Strain Model for Geomaterials Subjected to Air-Blast. In GeoShanghai International Conference (pp. 388–396). Springer, Singapore

  22. Smith RH and Newmark NM (1958) Numerical Integration for One-Dimensional Stress Waves, Civil Engineering Studies, Structural Research Series No. 162, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois

  23. Lu G, Fall M (2018) State-of-the-art modelling of soil behaviour under blast loading. Geotech Geol Eng 36(6):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang Z, Lu Y, Hao H (2004) Numerical investigation of effects of water saturation on blast wave propagation in soil mass. J Eng Mech ASCE 130(5):551–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang Z, Lu Y, Bai C (2008) Numerical analysis of blast-induced liquefaction of soil. Comput Geotech 5:196–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lewis BA (2004) Manual for LS–DYNA soil material model 147. Federal highway administration. Publication No. FHWA–HRT–095, McLean

  27. Grujicic M, Pandurangan B, Cheeseman BA (2006) The effect of degree of saturation of sand on detonation phenomena associated with shallow-buried and ground-laid mines. Shock Vib 13:41–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Grujicic M, Pandurangan B, Cheeseman BA, Roy WN, Skaggs RR, Gupta R (2008) Parameterization of the porous–material model for sand with various degrees of water saturation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28:20–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Grujicic M, Pandurangan B, Coutris N, Cheeseman BA, Roy WN, Skaggs RR (2008) Computer-simulations based development of a high strain–rate, large–deformation, high-pressure material model for STANAG 4569 sandy gravel. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28:1045–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tong X, Tuan CY (2007) Viscoplastic cap model for soils under high strain rate loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(2):206–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Feldgun VR, Karinski YS, Yankelevsky DZ (2011) Blast pressure distribution on a buried obstacle in a porous wet soil. Int J Prot Struct 2(1):45–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Feldgun VR, Karinski YS, Yankelevsky DZ (2013) A coupled approach to simulate the explosion response of a buried structure in a soil-rock layered medium. Int J Prot Struct 4(3):231–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Feldgun VR, Kochetkov AV, Karinski YS, Yankelevsky DZ (2008) Internal blast loading in a buried lined tunnel. Int J Impact Eng 35(3):172–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Feldgun VR, Kochetkov AV, Karinski YS, Yankelevsky DZ (2008) Blast response of a lined cavity in a porous saturated soil. Int J Impact Eng 35(9):953–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Karinski YS, Feldgun VR, Yankelevsky DZ (2009) Explosion induced dynamic soil–structure interaction analysis with the coupled Godunov-variational difference approach. Int J Numer Method Eng 77:824–851

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Karinski YS, Feldgun VR, Yankelevsky DZ (2009) Effect of soil locking on the cylindrical shock wave’s peak pressure attenuation. J Eng Mech ASCE 135(10):1166–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Higgins W, Chakraborty T, Basu D (2013) A high strain-rate constitutive model for sand and its application in finite-element analysis of tunnels subjected to blast. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 37(15):2590–2610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lyakhov GM (1974) Fundamentals of the dynamics of detonation waves in soils and rock. Nedra, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang Z, Lu Y, Bai C (2011) Numerical simulation of explosion induced soil liquefaction and its effect on surface structures. Finite Elem Anal Des 47(9):1079–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Simo JC, Kennedy JG, Govindjee S (1988) Non-smooth multisurface plasticity and viscoplasticity. loading/unloading conditions and numerical algorithms. Int J Numer Methods Eng 26:2161–2185

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Ghassemi A, Pak A, Shahir H (2010) Numerical study of the coupled hydro–mechanical effects in dynamic compaction of saturated granular soils. Comput Geotech 37:10–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Xu TH, Zhang LM (2015) Numerical implementation of a bounding surface plasticity model for sand under high strain-rate loadings in LS–DYNA. Comput Geotech 66:203–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lu G, Fall M (2017) Modelling blast wave propagation in a subsurface geotechnical structure made of an evolutive porous material. Mech Mater 108:21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lumb P (1974) Application of statistics in soil mechanics, “Soil Mechanics - new horizons.” Newness Butterworths, London, pp 44–111

    Google Scholar 

  45. Vanmarcke EH (1977) Probabilistic modeling of soil profiles. J Geotech Eng Division 103(GT11):1227–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Phoon KK, Kulhawy FH (1999) Characterization of geotechnical variability. Can Geotech J 36(4):612–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Phoon KK, Kulhawy FH (1999) Evaluation of geotechnical property variability. Can Geotech J 36:625–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Elkateb T, Chalaturnyk R, Robertson PK (2003) An overview of soil heterogeneity: quantification and implications on geotechnical field problems. Can Geotech J 40(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kondner RL (1963) Hyperbolic stress-strain response: cohesive soils. J Geotech Engrg Div 89(1):115–143

    Google Scholar 

  50. Duncan JM, Chang CY (1970) Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils. J Soil Mech Found Division 96(5):1629–1653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mellah R, Auvinet G, Masrouri F (2000) Stochastic finite element method applied to non-linear analysis of embankments. Probab Eng Mech 15(3):251–259

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Mei GX, Chen R, Liu J (2017) New insight into developing mathematical models for predicting deformation-dependent lateral earth pressure. Int J Geomech 17(8):06017003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Baek SH, Kim J, Lee SH, Chung CK (2017) Development of the cyclic py curve for a single pile in sandy soil. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 36(3):351–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Desai CS (1971) Nonlinear analyses using spline functions. J Soil Mech Found Division 97(10):1461–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Cheek Jr JB, Radhakrishnan N, and Tracy FT (1971) Application of Spline Interpolation Methods to Engineering Problems (No. WES-MP-8–71–2). Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Vicksburg Miss

  56. Puzrin AM, Burland JB (1996) A logarithmic stress-strain function for rocks and soils. Geotech 46(1):157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Nowatzki EA (1965) A non-linear analysis of the surface ground displacement due to a nuclear air burst. Master of Science Thesis. The University of Arizona, USA

  58. Ramberg W, Osgood WR (1943) Description of Stress-Strain Curves by Three Parameters. NACA TN902

  59. Weidlinger P and Matthews AT (1965) Shock and Reflection in a Nonlinear Medium, Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Paper No. 4375 (EM-3), 1.147

  60. Skalak R, Weidlinger P (1961) Attenuation of stress waves in bi-linear materials. J Eng Mech Div 87(3):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Hendron Jr AJ (1963) The Behavior of Sand in One-Dimensional Compression. Ph. D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana

  62. Veyera GE (1994) Uniaxial stress-strain behavior of unsaturated soils at high strain rates (No. WL-TR-93–3523). Wright Lab Tyndall AFB FL

  63. Wilson SD, Sibley EA (1962) Ground displacement from air-blast loading. J Soil Mech Found Division, ASCE 88(SM6):1–31

    Google Scholar 

  64. Frye J, Lipner N (1983) Determination of soil properties through ground motion analysis. Ballistic Missile Office, Norton AFB, CA

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice-hall civil engineering and engineering mechanics series, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  66. Goh SH, Lee FH, Tan TS (1998) Effects of lateral constraints and inertia on stress wave propagation in dry soil columns. Geotech 48(4):449–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Higgins IV, William T (2011) Development of a High Strain-Rate Constitutive Model for Sands and its Application in Finite Element Analysis of Tunnels Subjected to Blast. Master's Theses. University of Connecticut

  68. Akers SA (1986) Uniaxial strain response of Enewetak Beach sand. Technical Report SL-86–45. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station

  69. Song B, Chen W, Luk V (2009) Impact compressive response of dry sand. Mech Mater 41(6):777–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Martin BE, Chen W, Song B, Akers SA (2009) Moisture effects on the high strain-rate behavior of sand. Mech Mater 41(6):786–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Wang S, Shen L, Maggi F, El-Zein A, Nguyen GD (2017) Uniaxial compressive behavior of partially saturated granular media under high strain rates. Int J Impact Eng 102:156–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Pellegrino A, De Cola F, Dragnevski K, Petrinic N (2016) The dynamic response of etnean sand and the effect of its impingement on Ti-6Al-4 V Alloy. J dyn behav mater 2:438–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Jackson Jr JG (1968) Factors That Influence the Development of Soil Constitutive Relations (No. AEWES-MISC-PAPER-4–980). Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Vicksburg MS Structures Lab

  74. Xia K, Jafari M, Kanopoulos PP, and Wei Y (2015) Constitutive Modelling of Soils under High Strain Rates: theoretical, numerical, and experimental results. Contract Report DRDC-RDDC-2015-C071, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario

  75. Yamamuro JA, Bopp PA, Lade PV (1996) One-dimensional compression of sands at high pressures. J Geotech Engrg 122(2):147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Hendron AJ and Davisson MT (1964) Static and Dynamic Constrained Moduli of Frenchman Flat Soils, Proceedings of the Symposium on Soil Structure Interaction. Tucson: The University of Arizona

  77. Jackson JG Jr. and Windham JE (1968) Soil Property Investigation for HEST Test V. AEWES-TR-S-68–1. Vicksburg, MS: Army Eng. Waterways Exper. Station

  78. Hendron Jr AJ, Davisson MT, and Parola JF (1969) Effect of Degree of Saturation on Compressibility of Soils from the Defence Research Establishment, Suffield (No. AEWES-CR-S-69-3). Army engineer waterways experiment station, Vicksburg MS

  79. Isenberg J (1972) Nuclear Geoplosics-A Sourcebook of Underground Phenomena and Effects of Nuclear Explosions. Part 2. Mechanical Properties of Earth Materials (No. AA-R-7120-2000). Agbabian Associates El Segundo CA

  80. McCormick JM, Baron ML, and Nelson I (1968) Studies on the Distant Plain 1A Event, DASA 2213. New York: Paul Weidlinger Consulting Engineers, 7/68. (AD 849944L)

  81. Kabir ME, Song B, Martin BE, Chen W (2010) Compressive behavior of fine sand. Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  82. Felice CW, Gaffney S, Brown JA (1991) Extended split-hopkinson bar analysis for attenuating materials. J Eng Mech 117(5):1119–1135

    Google Scholar 

  83. Hadala PF (1973) Effect of Constitutive Properties of Earth Media on Outrunning Ground Shock from Large Explosions, Technical Report S-73–6 U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Precision Mechatronics Laboratory, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, 1050, Brussels, Belgium

    Shashank Pathak

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, 110016, India

    G. V. Ramana

Authors
  1. Shashank Pathak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. V. Ramana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shashank Pathak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pathak, S., Ramana, G.V. On Stress–Strain Function of Geomaterials Subjected to Blast-Loads. Indian Geotech J 51, 520–538 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-021-00527-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-021-00527-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation