Skip to main content
Log in

Soil Physical Indicators of a Sugarcane Field Subjected to Successive Mechanised Harvests

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tillage intensity and successive harvesting before sugarcane replanting are practices that may result in the formation of compacted layers. Compaction alters soil structure and influence soil water retention, soil aeration and soil strength. Thus, this study was designed to assess the soil physical indicators associated with water, air and soil strength functions of a sugarcane field subjected to six successive mechanised harvests. The experiment was performed in 2018 in sugarcane fields from the Carpina sugarcane experimental station, Pernambuco, Brazil. In situ penetrometer measurements were made, and soil cores were sampled at depths of 0–0.20, 0.20–0.40, 0.40–0.60, 0.60–0.80 and 0.80–1.00 m for determination of soil penetration resistance, field capacity and soil bulk density. We calculated the degree of compaction, water capacity and air capacity of cultivated soil and compared the results with indicators of a native forest soil adjacent to the experimental area. The results showed that successive sugarcane cultivation declined the soil physical quality for plant development. Measurements showed that the deterioration of soil physical quality occurs mainly up to 0.40 m depth, which is a layer that undergoes tillage intervention and is susceptible to the formation of plough pan below the tillage depth. An increase in soil compaction, strength and loss of aeration capacity were the main sources of the decline in the soil physical quality. These soil physical factors are known to cause severe restrictions to root development and plant performance. The alleviation of soil compaction with subsequent monitoring of the impact of field traffic (e.g. through machinery and soil conduction controls) could help prevent the decline of soil physical quality in sugarcane areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barbosa, L.C., P.S.G. Magalhães, R.O. Bordonal, M.R. Cherubin, G.A.F. Castioni, S. Tenelli, H.C.J. Franco, and J.L.N. Carvalho. 2019. Soil physical quality associated with tillage practices during sugarcane planting in south-central Brazil. Soil & Tillage Research 195: 104383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengough, A.G., B.M. McKenzie, P.D. Hallett, and T.A. Valentine. 2011. Root elongation, water stress and mechanical impedance: a review of limiting stresses and beneficial root tip traits. Journal of Experimental Botany 62: 59–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brus, D.J., and J.J. Van Den Akker. 2018. How serious a problem is subsoil compaction in the Netherlands? A survey based on probability sampling. Soil 4: 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcanti, R.Q., M.M. Rolim, R.P. de Lima, U.E. Tavares, E.M.R. Pedrosa, and M.R. Cherubin. 2020. Soil physical changes induced by sugarcane cultivation in the Atlantic Forest biome, northeastern Brazil. Geoderma 370: 114353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcanti, R.Q., M.M. Rolim, R.P. de Lima, U.E. Tavares, E.M.R. Pedrosa, and I.F. Gomes. 2019. Soil physical and mechanical attributes in response to successive harvests under sugarcane cultivation in Northeastern Brazil. Soil & Tillage Research 189: 140–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherubin, M.R., D.L. Karlen, A.L. Franco, C.A. Tormena, C.E. Cerri, C.A. Davies, and C.C. Cerri. 2016. Soil physical quality response to sugarcane expansion in Brazil. Geoderma 267: 156–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lima, R.P., A.P. da Silva, N.F.B. Giarola, A.R. da Silva, M.M. Rolim, and T. Keller. 2018. Impact of initial bulk density and matric suction on compressive properties of two oxisols under no-till. Soil & Tillage Research 175: 168–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lima, R.P., A.P. da Silva, N.F. Giarola, A.R. da Silva, and M.M. Rolim. 2017. Changes in soil compaction indicators in response to agricultural field traffic. Biosystems Engineering 162: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lima, R.P., M.M. Rolim, D.C. Dantas, A.R. da Silva, and E.A. Mendonça. 2020. Compressive properties and least limiting water range of plough layer and plough pan in sugarcane fields. Soil Use and Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lima, R.P., C.A. Tormena, G.C. Figueiredo, A.R. da Silva, and M.M. Rolim. 2020. Least limiting water and matric potential ranges of agricultural soils with calculated physical restriction thresholds. Agricultural Water Management 240: 106299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lima, R.P., A.R. da Silva, A.P. da Silva, T.P. Leão, and M.R. Mosaddeghi. 2016. soilphysics: An R package for calculating soil water availability to plants by different soil physical indices. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 120: 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa, A.C.M., C.V.V. Farhate, Z.M. de Souza, J.L.R. Torres, and R.B. da Silva. 2019. Soil load-bearing capacity and development of root system in area under sugarcane with traffic control in Brazil. Sugar Tech 21: 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prado do, E.A.F., A.C.T. Vitorino, R.A. Garcia, C.J. Silva da, and M. Mauad. 2019. Structural quality of an oxisol under conventional soil tillage and predecessor crops in sugarcane rotation. Sugar Tech 21: 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteban, D.A.A., Z.M. de Souza, C.A. Tormena, L.H. Lovera, E. de Souza Lima, I.N. de Oliveira, and N. de Paula Ribeiro. 2019. Soil compaction, root system and productivity of sugarcane under different row spacing and controlled traffic at harvest. Soil & Tillage Research 187: 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, G.W., and D. Or. 2002. Particle size analysis. In Methods of 598 soil analysis Physical method, ed. J.H. Dane and G.C. Topp, 255–293. Madison: Soil Science Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, R., D. Holthusen, J. Dörner, A. Mordhorst, and H. Fleige. 2019. Scale-dependent soil strengthening processes–what do we need to know and where to head for a sustainable environment? Soil & Tillage Research 195: 104388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letey, J. 1985. Relationship between soil physical properties and crop production. Advances in Soil Science 1: 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisboa, I.P., M.R. Cherubin, L.S. Satiro, M. Siqueira-Neto, R.P. de Lima, M.R. Gmach, and C.E. Cerri. 2019. Applying Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) on short-term sugarcane straw removal in Brazil. Industrial Crops and Products 129: 175–184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, N., M.M. Rolim, V.S. Oliveira, U.E. Tavares, and E.M.R. Pedrosa. 2013. Evaluation of soil compaction by modeling field vehicle traffic with SoilFlex during sugarcane harvest. Soil and Tillage Research 129: 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moraes, M.T., A.G. Bengough, H. Debiasi, J.C. Franchini, R. Levien, A. Schnepf, and D. Leitner. 2018. Mechanistic framework to link root growth models with weather and soil physical properties, including example applications to soybean growth in Brazil. Plant and Soil 428: 67–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for statistical computing. Available at: https://www.R-project.org. Accessed 13.07.20.

  • Reynolds, W.D., B.T. Bowman, C.F. Drury, C.S. Tan, and X. Lu. 2002. Indicators of good soil physical quality: Density and storage parameters. Geoderma 110: 131–146.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, A.P., B.D. Kay, and E. Perfect. 1994. Characterization of the least limiting water range of soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58: 1775–1781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, R.P., M.M. Rolim, I.F. Gomes, E.M. Pedrosa, U.E. Tavares, and A.N. Santos. 2018. Numerical modeling of soil compaction in a sugarcane crop using the finite element method. Soil & Tillage Research 181: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 12th ed. NRCS, Washington, DC.

  • Stettler, M., T. Keller, P. Weisskopf, M. Lamandé, P. Lassen, and P. Schjønning. 2014. Terranimo®—a web-based tool for evaluating soil compaction. Landtechnik 69: 132–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolf, R., D.K. Cassel, L.D. King, and K. Reichardt. 1998. Measuring mechanical impedance in clayey gravelly soils. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 22: 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, P.C., G.K. Donagemma, A. Fontana, and W.G. Teixeira. 2017. Manual de Métodos de Análise de Solo, 573p. Brasília: Embrapa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tormena, C.A., D.L. Karlen, S. Logsdon, and M.R. Cherubin. 2017. Corn stover harvest and tillage impacts on near-surface soil physical quality. Soil & Tillage Research 166: 122–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utomo, W.H., and A.R. Dexter. 1981. Age hardening of agricultural top soils. Journal of Soil Science 32: 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Brazil) and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brazil) for granting scholarships and financial support. Renato P. de Lima thanks to the CAPES-Brazil for granting scholarships (Process 88887.336805/2019-00).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renato P. de Lima.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jimenez, K.J., Rolim, M.M., de Lima, R.P. et al. Soil Physical Indicators of a Sugarcane Field Subjected to Successive Mechanised Harvests. Sugar Tech 23, 811–818 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-020-00916-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-020-00916-w

Keywords

Navigation