Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cardiac 123I-mIBG scintigraphy for prediction of catheter ablation outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Previous studies show inconsistent results on the role of innervation imaging (with 123I-mIBG) in predicting late atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation (CA). These studies included patients with paroxysmal AF and studied prognostic value of post-CA I-123-mIBG parameters. Current study investigated the ability of pre CA 123-I-mIBG imaging to predict late AF recurrence in patients with persistent AF.

Methods

123I-mIBG cardiac imaging was performed before CA in 82 patients with persistent AF. Patient was followed for 12 months.

Results

Multivariable analysis demonstrated that late heart-to-mediastinum ratio (H/Mlate) and washout rate (WR) were independent predictors of AF recurrence. ROC-curve analysis data showed that H/Mlate <1.6 (sensitivity 73.53%, specificity 81.3%, AUC 0.792, P < .001) and WR > 25.11 (sensitivity 70.6%, specificity 70.8.3%, AUC 0.712, P < .001) indicate high probability of AF relapses during 12 months after CA.

Conclusion

Pre-CA parameters of global cardiac sympathetic activity estimated by 123I-mIBG scintigraphy are associated with late AF relapses in persistent AF patients with normal LVEF and absence of significant CAD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

af:

Atrial fibrillation

CA:

Catheter ablation

123I-mIBG:

Iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine

HF:

Heart failure

PVI:

Pulmonary vein isolation

H/M:

Heart-to-mediastinum ratio

WR:

Washout rate

References

  1. Kirchhof P, Calkins H. Catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. European Heart Journal. 2017;38:20-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612

  3. Kornej J, Schumacher K, Dinov B, Kosich F, Sommer P, Arya A, et al. Prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):12686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fabritz L, Guasch E, Antoniades C, Bardinet I, Benninger G, Betts TR, et al. Expert consensus document: defining the major health modifiers causing atrial fibrillation: a roadmap to underpin personalized prevention and treatment. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13(4):230-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Deng H, Bai Y, Shantsila A, Fauchier L, Potpara TS, Lip GYH. Clinical scores for outcomes of rhythm control or arrhythmia progression in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Clin Res Cardiol. 2017;106(10):813-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Teresińska A. Iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine cardiac SPECT imaging in the qualification of heart failure patients for ICD implantation J Nucl Cardiol 2019;26:1182

  7. Zavadovsky KV, Mishkina AI, Lebedev DI, Gulya MO, Varlamova YuV, Lishmanov YuB, et al. 123I-MIBG scintigraphy in the assessment of heart failure prognosis and effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Kardiologiia. 2020;60(2):122-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bateman TM, Ananthasubramaniam K, Berman DS, Gerson M, Gropler R, Henzlova M, et al. Reliability of the 123 I-mIBG heart/mediastinum ratio: results of a multicenter test-retest reproducibility study. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019;26(5):1555-65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pontico M, Brunotti G, Conte M, Corica F, Cosma L, De Angelis C, et al. The prognostic value of 123 I-mIBG SPECT cardiac imaging in heart failure patients: a systematic review. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02501-w.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sazonova SI, Atabekov TA, Batalov RE, Mishkina AI, Varlamova JV, Zavadovsky KV, et al. Prediction of appropriate ICD therapy in patients with ischemic heart failure. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02321-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Teresińska A. I-123-MIBG cardiac innervation imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Nucl Cardiol 2020;27(6):1951-1954.

  12. Akutsu Y, Kaneko K, Kodama Y, Li HL, Suyama J, Shinozuka A, et al. Iodine-123 mIBG imaging for predicting the development of atrial fibrillation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(1):78-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Arimoto T, Tada H, Igarashi M, Sekiguchi Y, Sato A, Koyama T, et al. High washout rate of iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging predicts the outcome of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22(12):1297-304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawasaki M, Yamada T, Furukawa Y, Morita T, Tamaki S, Kida H, et al. Are cardiac sympathetic nerve activity and epicardial adipose tissue associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation in patients without heart failure? Int J Cardiol. 2020;303:41-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Europace. 2016;18(11):1609-78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Flotats A, Carrio I, Agostini D, Le Guludec D, Marcassa C, Schaffers M, et al. Proposal for standardization of 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) cardiac sympathetic imaging by the EANM Cardiovascular Committee and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1802-12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bax JJ, Kraft O, Buxton AE, Fjeld JG, Parízek P, Agostini D, et al. 123 I-mIBG scintigraphy to predict inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias on cardiac electrophysiology testing: a prospective multicenter pilot study [published correction appears in Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Mar;2(2):e14]. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1(2):131‐140.

  18. Verberne HJ, Acampa W, Anagnostopoulos C, Ballinger J, Bengel F, De Bondt P, et al. EANM procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT and SPECT/CT: 2015 revision. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(12):1929-40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A, Bugiardini R, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(38):2949-3003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, McMurray JJ. A population-based study of the long-term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew/Paisley study. Am J Med. 2002;113(5):359-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01236-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen J, Wasmund SL, Hamdan MH. Back to the future: the role of the autonomic nervous system in atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006;29(4):413-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00362.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wenning C, Lange PS, Schülke C, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is associated with regional cardiac sympathetic denervation. EJNMMI Res. 2013;3(1):81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jacobson AF, Senior R, Cerqueira MD, Wong ND, Thomas GS, Lopez VA, et al. Myocardial iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine imaging and cardiac events in heart failure results of the prospective ADMIRE-HF (AdreView Myocardial Imaging for Risk Evaluation in Heart Failure) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2212-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hashimoto H, Nakanishi R, Mizumura S, Hashimoto Y, Okamura Y, Yamanaka K, et al. Prognostic values of 123 I-mIBG myocardial scintigraphy and heart rate variability in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020;27(3):833-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Katoh S, Shishido T, Kutsuzawa D, Arimoto T, Netsu S, Funayama A, et al. Iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging can predict future cardiac events in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction. Ann Nucl Med. 2010;24(9):679-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Travin MI. Importance of individual patient characteristics when assessing the ability of cardiac adrenergic imaging to guide ICD use. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02387-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Berruezo A, Tamborero D, Mont L, Benito B, Tolosana JM, Sitges M, et al. Pre-procedural predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(7):836-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bisbal F, Alarco´n F, Ferrero-de-Loma-Osorio A, Gonza´lez-Ferrer J.J., Alonso C, Pacho´n M. et al. Left atrial geometry and outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation: results from the multicentre LAGO-AF study Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19(9):1002-1009.

  29. Wong CX, Sullivan T, Sun MT, Mahajan R, Pathak RK, Middeldorp M, et al. Obesity and the risk of incident, post-operative, and post-ablation atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of 626,603 individuals in 51 studies. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;1:139-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mahajan R, Wong CX. Obesity and metabolic syndrome in atrial fibrillation: cardiac and noncardiac adipose tissue in atrial fibrillation. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2021;13(1):77-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Talman AH, Psaltis PJ, Cameron JD, Meredith JT, Seneviratne SK, Wong DTL. Epicardial adipose tissue: Far more than a fat depot. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2014; 4(6):416-29.

  32. Zhu W, Zhang H, Guo L, Hong K. Relationship between epicardial adipose tissue volume and atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Herz. 2016;41:421-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Monti CB, Codari M, De Cecco CN, Secchi F, Sardanelli F, Stillman AE. Novel imaging biomarkers: epicardial adipose tissue evaluation. Br J Radiol 2020;93(1113):20190770.

  34. Romanov A, Minin S, Breault Ch, Pokushalov E. Visualization and ablation of the autonomic nervous system corresponding to ganglionated plexi guided by D-SPECT 123I-mIBG imaging in patient with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2017;106:76-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Haïssaguerre M, Shah DC, Jaïs P, et al. Electrophysiological breakthroughs from the left atrium to the pulmonary veins. Circulation. 2000;102:2463-5.

  36. Lin WS, Tai CT, Hsieh MH, et al. Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation initiated by non-pulmonary vein ectopy. Circulation. 2003;107:3176-83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Stavrakis S, Kulkarni K, Singh JP, Katritsis DG, Armoundas AA. Autonomic modulation of cardiac arrhythmias. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2020;6(5):467-8.

  38. Mujović N, Marinković M, Potpara TS, Geller L. Catheter ablation of lone atrial fibrillation. Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21:591-612.

  39. Mujović N, Marinković M, Lenarczyk R, Tilz R, Potpara TS. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: an overview for clinicians. Adv Ther. 2017;34:1897-917.

  40. Scherlag BJ, Yamanashi W, Patel U, Lazzara R, Jackman WM. Autonomically induced conversion of pulmonary vein focal firing into atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1878-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is partly supported by Russian Science Foundation, Grant No. 17-75-20118.

Disclosures

J.V. Varlamova declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author S.I. Sazonova declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author N.A. Nikitin declares that his work was supported by Russian Science Foundation, Grant No. 17-75-20118. Author S.M.Minin declares that that his work was supported by Russian Science Foundation, Grant No. 17-75-20118. Author I.V. Kisteneva declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author R.E. Batalov declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author A.I .Mishkina declares that she has no conflict of interest Author Y.N.Ilushenkova declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author K.V.Zavadovsky declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author S.V. Popov declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author A.B. Romanov declares that his work was supported by Russian Science Foundation, Grant No. 17-75-20118.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. I. Sazonova MD, PhD.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The authors of this article have provided a PowerPoint file, available for download at SpringerLink, which summarises the contents of the paper and is free for re-use at meetings and presentations. Search for the article DOI on SpringerLink.com.

The authors have also provided an audio summary of the article, which is available to download as ESM, or to listen to via the JNC/ASNC Podcast.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 1579 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MP3 6479 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sazonova, S.I., Varlamova, J.V., Nikitin, N.A. et al. Cardiac 123I-mIBG scintigraphy for prediction of catheter ablation outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 29, 2220–2231 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02658-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02658-y

Keywords

Navigation