Skip to main content
Log in

Differences and Similarities in Youth Social-emotional Competence Measurement Between North American and East Asian Countries: Exploratory Graph Analysis using the OECD Survey on Social and Emotional Skills Data

  • Published:
Child Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social-emotional competence (SEC) is a multidimensional construct involving diverse skills and mindsets contributing to intrapersonal and interpersonal well-being. Despite increasing efforts to promote youth SEC worldwide, the existing SEC measurements are largely based on frameworks and evidence originating from Western societies, questioning the applicability of prevalent SEC measurement models to non-Western contexts. This study aims to compare a measurement model of SEC between East Asian (EA) and North American (NA) countries. This study analyzed youth self-reports from the 2018 OECD Survey on Social and Emotional Skills (SSES; N = 25,454, age 10 and 15) from two countries in EA (China and South Korea) and two countries in NA (Canada and USA). Based on the Big Five personality model, the SSES was designed to measure five dimensions and 15 sub-constructs of SEC using 100 Likert-type items. Using a network psychometrics method called Exploratory Graph Analysis, we uncovered and compared the underlying structure of the multidimensional construct of youth SEC between EA and NA samples. The findings suggest that the SSES measurement model is largely comparable across two cultures, with some noteworthy differences. The commonly identified dimensions of SEC were: (1) Emotional Control, (2) Optimism, (3) Task Performance, (4) Open-mindedness, (5) Prosociality, and (6) Leadership. The differences observed in the structure of dimensions and sub-constructs are discussed. This study contributes to ongoing efforts to develop and enhance international SEC assessments that are cross-culturally applicable and comparable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akutsu, S., Yamaguchi, A., Kim, M. S., & Oshio, A. (2016). Self-construals, anger regulation, and life satisfaction in the United States and Japan. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ames, D. R., & Flynn, F. J. (2007). What breaks a leader: The curvilinear relation between assertiveness and leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, T., Jimerson, S., Haddock, A., Nolan, J., Jablonski, S., Czub, M., & Coelho, V. (2017). A review of the provision of social and emotional learning in Australia, the United States, Poland, and Portugal. Journal of Relationships Research, 8, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CASEL (2020). CASEL’s SEL Framework: What Are the Core Competence Areas and Where Are They Promoted? https://casel.org/casel-sel-framework-11-2020/?view=true.

  • Chang, E. C., Asakawa, K., & Sanna, L. J. (2001). Cultural variations in optimistic and pessimistic bias: Do easterners really expect the worst and Westerners really expect the best when predicting future life events? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 476–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S. N., & Duraiappah, A. K. (2020). Rethingking learning: A review of Social and Emotional Learning for Education Systems. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Education for Peace and Sustainable Development (UNESCO MGIEP).

  • Chen, X., Li, D., Li, Z., Li, B., & Liu, M. (2000). Sociable and prosocial dimensions of social competence in chinese children: Common and unique contributions to social, academic, and psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 36(3), 302–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A. P., & Golino, H. (2021). Estimating the stability of psychological dimensions via bootstrap exploratory graph analysis: A Monte Carlo simulation and tutorial. Psych, 3(3), 479–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A. P., Golino, H., & Silvia, P. J. (2020). A psychometric network perspective on the validity and validation of personality trait questionnaires. European Journal of Personality, 34(6), 1095–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vaus, J., Hornsey, M. J., Kuppens, P., & Bastian, B. (2018). Exploring the East-West divide in prevalence of affective disorder: A case for cultural differences in coping with negative emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(3), 285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domitrovich, C. E., Durlak, J. A., Staley, K. C., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Social-emotional competence: An essential factor for promoting positive adjustment and reducing risk in school children. Child Development, 88(2), 408–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, P. W., Howell, J. P., Hibino, S., Lee, J. K., Tate, U., & Bautista, A. (1997). Leadership in Western and asian countries: Commonalities and differences in effective leadership processes across cultures. The Leadership Quarterly, 8(3), 233–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J. A., Mahoney, J. L., & Boyle, A. E. (2022). What we know, and what we need to find out about universal, school-based social and emotional learning programs for children and adolescents: A review of meta-analyses and directions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 148(11–12), 765–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epskamp, S., Cramer, A. O., Waldorp, L. J., Schmittmann, V. D., & Borsboom, D. (2012). qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., & Fried, E. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 195–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feygina, I., & Henry, P. J. (2015). Culture and prosocial behavior. In D. A. Schroeder, & W. G. Graziano (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior (pp. 188–208). Oxford University Press.

  • Fortunato, S. (2010). Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports, 486(3–5), 75–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2008). Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics, 9(3), 432–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fruchterman, T. M., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience, 21(11), 1129–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye, K. E., Boss, D. L., Anthony, C. J., Du, H., & Xing, W. (2022). Content analysis of the CASEL framework using K–12 state SEL standards. School Psychology Review, 1–15.

  • Golino, H., & Epskamp, S. (2017). Exploratory graph analysis: A new approach for estimating the number of dimensions in psychological research. PloS One, 12(6), e0174035.

  • Golino, H., Christensen, A. P., & Moulder, R. (2020). EGAnet: Exploratory graph analysis: A framework for estimating the number of dimensions in multivariate data using network psychometrics. R Package Version 1.2.3.

  • Golino, H., Lillard, A. S., Becker, I., & Christensen, A. P. (2021). Investigating the structure of the children’s concentration and empathy scale using exploratory graph analysis. Psychological Test Adaptation and Development, 2(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1995). Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the West feel more vulnerable than the East? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 595–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2010). Long-versus short-term orientation: New perspectives. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(4), 493–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javidan, M., & Carl, D. E. (2004). East meets west: A cross-cultural comparison of charismatic leadership among canadian and iranian executives. Journal of Management Studies, 41(4), 665–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. M. (2004). Optimism and realism: A review of self-efficacy from a cross-cultural perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 39(3), 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. K., & Bong, M. (2017). Social and emotional learning as a solution for adolescent problems in Korea. In E. Frydenberg, A. Martin, & R. Collie (Eds.), Social and Emotional Learning in Australia and the Asia-Pacific: Perspectives, Programs and Approaches (pp. 233–251). Springer.

  • Lee, Y. T., & Seligman, M. E. (1997). Are Americans more optimistic than the Chinese? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(1), 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. B., Vazsonyi, T., A., & Dou, K. (2018). Is individualism-collectivism associated with self-control? Evidence from chinese and US samples. PloS One, 13(12), e0208541.

  • Liem, G. A. D., Chua, B. L., Seng, Y. B., Kamarolzaman, K., & Cai, E. Y. L. (2017). Social and emotional learning in Singapore’s schools: Framework, practice, research, and future directions. In E. Frydenberg, A. Martin, & R. Collie (Eds.). Social and Emotional Learning in Australia and the Asia-Pacific: Perspectives, Programs and Approaches (pp. 187–203). Springer.

  • Martinez-Yarza, N., Santibáñez, R., & Solabarrieta, J. (2023). A systematic review of instruments measuring social and emotional skills in school-aged children and adolescents. Child Indicators Research, 1–28.

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., & 78 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 547–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu, W. (2019). Eastern–western views of Creativity. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed., p. 448). Cambridge University Press.

  • OECD (2021a). Beyond academic learning: First results from the Survey of Social and emotional skills. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/92a11084-en.

  • OECD (2021b). OECD Survey on Social and Emotional Skills: Technical Report. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/social-emotional-skills-study/sses-technical-report.pdf.

  • Phuoc, C. T. N., Tran, T., Dau, M. L., & Nguyen, T. V. (2021). The Vietnamese version of the social and emotional competence questionnaire (SECQ): Psychometric properties among adolescents. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 28(2), 251–266.

  • Primi, R., Santos, D., John, O. P., & De Fruyt, F. (2016). Development of an inventory assessing social and emotional skills in brazilian youth. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 103–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Krasnor, L., & Denham, S. (2009). Social-emotional competence in early childhood. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. P. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, Relationships, and groups (pp. 162–179). Guilford Publications.

  • Rydell, A. M., Hagekull, B., & Bohlin, G. (1997). Measurement of two social competence aspects in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology, 33(5), 824–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, P. (2017). Advice on Exploratory Factor Analysis. Center for Academic Success, Birmingham City University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319165677_Advice_on_Exploratory_Factor_Analysis.

  • Shapiro, V. B., Duane, A. M., Lee, M. X., Jones, T. M., Metzger, A. N., Khan, S., Harvey, C. C., Hwang, S. H. J., Malicote, B., Nunez, A., Lee, J., McLaughlin, M., Caballero, J. A., Moore, J. E., Williams, C., Eva, A. L., Ferreira, C., McVeagh-Lally, P., & Kooler, J. M., & CalHOPE Research Committee. (in press). “We will build together”: Sowing the seeds of SEL statewide. Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy.

  • Shi, J., Cheung, A. C., Zhang, Q., & Tam, W. W. Y. (2022). Development and validation of a social emotional skills scale: Evidence of its reliability and validity in China. International Journal of Educational Research, 114, 102007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, T., & Klimecki, O. M. (2014). Empathy and compassion. Current Biology, 24(18), R875–R878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto, C. J., Napolitano, C. M., Sewell, M. N., Yoon, H. J., & Roberts, B. W. (2022). An integrative framework for conceptualizing and assessing social, emotional, and behavioral skills: The BESSI. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(1), 192–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vignoles, V. L., Owe, E., Becker, M., Smith, P. B., Easterbrook, M. J., Brown, R., González, R., Didier, N., Carrasco, D., Cadena, M. P., & Bond, M. H. (2016). Beyond the ‘east–west’dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(8), 966–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, K. E., Burrus, J., Murano, D., Anguiano-Carrasco, C., Way, J., & Roberts, R. D. (2022). A big five-based Multimethod Social and Emotional Skills Assessment: The Mosaic™ by ACT® Social Emotional Learning Assessment. Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, K. E., Murano, D., Burrus, J., & Casillas, A. (2023). Multimethod support for using the big five Framework to organize social and emotional skills. Assessment, 30(1), 144–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Dong, X., & Mao, Y. (2017). The impact of boarding on campus on the social-emotional competence of left-behind children in rural western China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 18, 413–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissberg, R. P., & Cascarino, J. (2013). Academic learning + social-emotional learning = national priority. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(2), 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, Y. (2023). Learn to become a unique interrelated person: An alternative of social-emotional learning drawing on confucianism and daoism. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(4), 519–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, W., & Mao, Y. (2023). The impact of social and emotional learning on students’ bullying behavior: Serial mediation of social and emotional competence and peer relationship. Psychology in the Schools. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, K., & Jiang, Z. (2017). Social and emotional learning in China: Theory, research, and practice. In E. Frydenberg, A. Martin, & R. Collie (Eds.), Social and Emotional Learning in Australia and the Asia-Pacific: Perspectives, programs and approaches (pp. 205–217). Springer.

  • Yuki, M., Maddux, W. W., Brewer, M. B., & Takemura, K. (2005). Cross-cultural differences in relationship-and group-based trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 48–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M., & Ee, J. (2012). Development and validation of the social emotional competence questionnaire (SECQ). The International Journal of Emotional Education, 4(2), 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Seed Fund for Basic Research from the University of Hong Kong. The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Changyong Choi, Yuwen Zeng, Jiaxin Wu, Anna Zhao, and Hui Emma Hu, who each provided valuable support in writing this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Lee contributed to the conception and design of the study. Junus contributed to data analysis. Lee contributed to drafting the Background and Discussion sections, while Junus contributed to drafting the Methods and Results sections. All authors contributed to editing and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juyeon Lee.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, J., Junus, A. Differences and Similarities in Youth Social-emotional Competence Measurement Between North American and East Asian Countries: Exploratory Graph Analysis using the OECD Survey on Social and Emotional Skills Data. Child Ind Res 17, 57–79 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-023-10074-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-023-10074-6

Keywords

Navigation