Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding how youth develop a purpose: A qualitative study among Chinese emerging adults

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding how youth develop a purpose in life could provide guidance for cultivating a positive purpose. This study explored this topic in a Chinese cultural context using in-depth interviews of 41 participants. Furthermore, we identified factors that are particularly important to a beyond-the-self purpose by comparing this with a self-oriented purpose. The findings revealed three pathways to purpose: proactive processes, involving active effort characterized by self-exploration and deepened self-knowledge; transformative processes, characterized by negative or positive major transformative life events; and reactive processes, involving the formation of purpose through external cultural and personal influences. Additionally, the findings indicate that compassion, gratitude, and family support are of particular importance for the development of a beyond-the-self purpose. These findings extend the existing theories and findings of purpose development; consequently, could help develop purpose-fostering interventions that aim to cultivate a positive purpose among youth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated for this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. As Burrow, Hill, Ratner and Sumner (2018) suggested, a clear scientific criterion for distinguishing “youth” is necessary, and “youth” now must focus on choices related to long-term commitments such as worldviews, career paths, and mate selection. This theme of commitment carries through to emerging adulthood, though in different forms. Therefore, emerging adults are included in this study.

  2. In the following interview, two participants who scored high in self-strengthening on the CLPO Questionnaire reported that their dominant purpose was family harmony, with self-strengthening being their second or fourth dominant purpose. The findings from the interview were included in the study since these offered a deeper understanding on the matter.

  3. As there were exceedingly few participants who had social dedication as the dominant purpose, we instead chose participants who had adopted it as their second or third most important purpose. In fact, in a previous study of ours with a larger sample (N = 1238), only 0.8% of participants had social dedication as their dominant purpose.

References

  • Andrews, M., Bundick, M., Jones, A., Bronk, K. C., Mariano, J. M., & Damon, W. (2006). Revised youth purpose interview. Unpublished instrument. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center on Adolescence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigler, M., Neimeyer, G. J., & Brown, E. (2001). The divided self revisited: Effects of self-concept clarity and self-concept differentiation on psychological adjustment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20, 396–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Błażek, M., & Besta, T. (2012). Self-concept clarity and religious orientations: Prediction of purpose in life and self-esteem. Journal of Religion and Health, 51(3), 947–960.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bronk, K. C. (2012). A grounded theory of the development of noble youth purpose. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27(1), 78–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronk, K. C. (2014). Purpose in life: A critical component of optimal youth development. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bronk, K. C., & Finch, W. H. (2010). Adolescent characteristics by type of long-term aim in life. Applied Developmental Science, 14(1), 35–44.

  • Bronk, K. C., Baumsteiger, R., Mangan, S., Riches, B., Dubon, V., Benavides, C., & Bono, G. (2019). Fostering purpose among young adults: Effective online interventions. Journal of Character Education, 15(2), 21–38.

  • Bronk, K. C., Mitchell, C., Hite, B., Mehoke, S., & Cheung, R. (2020). Purpose among youth from low-income backgrounds: A mixed methods investigation. Child Development, 91, e1231–e1248. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13434.

  • Bundick, M. J., & Tirri, K. (2014). Student perceptions of teacher support and competencies for fostering youth purpose and positive youth development: Perspectives from two countries. Applied Developmental Science, 18(3), 148–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrow, A. L., Hill, P. L., Ratner, K., & Sumner, R. (2018). A better tomorrow: Toward a stronger science of youth purpose. Research in Human Development, 15(2), 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L. (2017). The Core values of Chinese civilization. Singapore: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W. (2008). The path to purpose: How young people find their calling in life. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W., Menon, J., & Bronk, K. C. (2003). The development of purpose during adolescence. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faure, G. O., & Fang, T. (2008). Changing Chinese values: Keeping up with paradoxes. International Business Review, 17(2), 194–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, J. J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M. P., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and Health, 25(10), 1229–1245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. E. (1959). Man’s search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Y. L. (1948). A short history of Chinese philosophy. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanzer, P. L., Hill, J. P., & Robinson, J. A. (2015). Emerging adults’ conceptions of purpose and the good life: A classification and comparison. Youth and Society, 50(6), 715–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heng, M. A., & Pereira, A. (2020). Understanding adolescent purpose in the context of high-performance schooling in Singapore. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(5), 539–558.

  • Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S. A., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. L., Burrow, A. L., Brandenberger, J. W., Lapsley, D. K., & Quaranto, J. C. (2010). Collegiate purpose orientations and well-being in early and middle adulthood. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31(2), 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. L., Sumner, R., & Burrow, A. L. (2014). Understanding the pathways to purpose: Examining personality and well-being correlates across adulthood. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(3), 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, F., & Gao, D. (2018). Are Chinese student teachers’ life purposes associated with their perceptions of how much their university supports community service work? Journal of Moral Education, 47(2), 201–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, F., Lin, S., & Mariano, M. J. (2016). The influence of Chinese college teachers’ competence for purpose support on students’ purpose development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(5), 565–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. K., Terrell, J. M., Callina, K. S., & Weiner, M. B. (2018). Configurations of young people’s important life goals and their associations with thriving. Research on Human Development, 15(2), 139–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashdan, T. B., & Mcknight, P. E. (2009). Origins of purpose in life: Refining our understanding of a life well lived. Psychological Topics, 18(2), 303–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, N., & Hayward, R. D. (2014). Assessing stability and change in a second-order confirmatory factor model of meaning in life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 237–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, B., Lund, T., Mousseau, A., White, A. E., Spencer, R., & Walsh, J. (2018). Adolescent girls finding purpose: The role of parents and prosociality. Youth and Society, 50(6), 801–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, L. (2010). Chinese well-being. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (2nd ed., pp. 327–342). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malin, H., Reilly, T. S., Yeager, D., Moran, S., Andrews, M., Bundick, M., & Damon, W. (2008). Interview coding process for statuses of purpose determination. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center on Adolescence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malin, H., Reilly, T. S., Quinn, B., & Moran, S. (2013). Adolescent purpose development: Exploring empathy, discovering roles, shifting priorities, and creating pathways. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(1), 186–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malin, H., Liauw, I., & Damon, W. (2017). Purpose and character development in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(6), 1200–1215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, J., Eid, M., & Luhmann, M. (2019). Does growth require suffering? A systematic review and meta-analysis on genuine posttraumatic and postecstatic growth. Psychological Bulletin, 145(3), 302–338.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mariano, J. M. (2014). Introduction to special section: Understanding paths to youth purpose–why content and contexts matter. Applied Developmental Science, 18(3), 139–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariano, J. M., & Vaillant, G. E. (2012). Youth purpose among the ‘greatest generation’. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(4), 281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariano, J. M., Going, J., Schrock, K., & Sweeting, K. (2011). Youth purpose and the perception of social supports among African-American girls. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(8), 921–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Vol. 41). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, P. E., & Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Purpose in life as a system that creates and sustains health and well-being: An integrative, testable theory. Review of General Psychology, 13(3), 242–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2010). Does gratitude promote prosocial behavior? The moderating role of attachment security. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (1st ed., pp. 267–283). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2014). What “purpose” means to youth: Are there cultures of purpose? Applied Developmental Science, 18(3), 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2016). What do teachers think about youth purpose? Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(5), 582–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2019). Is personal life purpose replacing shared worldview as youths increasingly individuate? Implications for educators. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(5), 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S., Bundick, M. J., Malin, H., & Reilly, T. S. (2012). How supportive of their specific purposes do youth believe their family and friends are? Journal of Adolescent Research, 28(3), 348–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillemer, D. B. (2001). Momentous events and the life story. Review of General Psychology, 5, 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Råheim, M., Magnussen, L. H., Sekse, R. J. T., Lunde, Å., Jacobsen, T., & Blystad, A. (2016). Researcher–researched relationship in qualitative research: Shifts in positions and researcher vulnerability. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 11(1), 30996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(1), 1–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofaer, S. (1999). Qualitative methods: What are they and why use them? Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1101–1118.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavernier, R., & Willoughby, T. (2012). Adolescent turning points: The association between meaning-making and psychological well-being. Developmental Psychology, 48(4), 1058–1068.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tirri, K., Moran, S., & Mariano, J. M. (2016). Education for purposeful teaching around the world. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(5), 526–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lange, P. A., De Bruin, E., Otten, W., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of pro-social, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 733–746.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T., Jia, Y., You, X. Q., & Huang X. T. (2019). Exploring well-being among individuals with different life purposes in a Chinese context. The Journal of Positive Psychology. https://xs.scihub.ltd/https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2019.1663253.

  • Wang, T., You, X. Q., & Huang X. T. (2020). Chinese life purpose orientation questionnaire: Assessing purpose orientations among Chinese college students. Applied Developmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2020.1815535.

  • Yoo, H., Feng, X., & Day, R. D. (2013). Adolescents’ empathy and pro-social behavior in the family context: A longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(12), 1858–1872.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, H., Glanzer, P., & Johnson, B. (2016). Do the ends strengthen the means? An examination of the link between purpose in life and academic misconduct among college students. Journal of College and Character, 17(4), 255–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, N., Hawk, S. T., & Chang, L. (2019). Unpredictable and competitive cues affect pro-social behaviors and judgments. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to all fellows who assisted us to give out the online questionnaire and all respondents for their assistance. We also want to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (18ZDA333).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xi Ting Huang.

Ethics declarations

Statement of Ethics

The participants in this study have given their written informed consent. The study protocol has been approved by the research institute’s committee on human research.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, T., You, X.Q., Li, Y. et al. Understanding how youth develop a purpose: A qualitative study among Chinese emerging adults. Curr Psychol 41, 7824–7834 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01273-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01273-3

Keywords

Navigation