Abstract
Understanding how youth develop a purpose in life could provide guidance for cultivating a positive purpose. This study explored this topic in a Chinese cultural context using in-depth interviews of 41 participants. Furthermore, we identified factors that are particularly important to a beyond-the-self purpose by comparing this with a self-oriented purpose. The findings revealed three pathways to purpose: proactive processes, involving active effort characterized by self-exploration and deepened self-knowledge; transformative processes, characterized by negative or positive major transformative life events; and reactive processes, involving the formation of purpose through external cultural and personal influences. Additionally, the findings indicate that compassion, gratitude, and family support are of particular importance for the development of a beyond-the-self purpose. These findings extend the existing theories and findings of purpose development; consequently, could help develop purpose-fostering interventions that aim to cultivate a positive purpose among youth.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets generated for this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Notes
As Burrow, Hill, Ratner and Sumner (2018) suggested, a clear scientific criterion for distinguishing “youth” is necessary, and “youth” now must focus on choices related to long-term commitments such as worldviews, career paths, and mate selection. This theme of commitment carries through to emerging adulthood, though in different forms. Therefore, emerging adults are included in this study.
In the following interview, two participants who scored high in self-strengthening on the CLPO Questionnaire reported that their dominant purpose was family harmony, with self-strengthening being their second or fourth dominant purpose. The findings from the interview were included in the study since these offered a deeper understanding on the matter.
As there were exceedingly few participants who had social dedication as the dominant purpose, we instead chose participants who had adopted it as their second or third most important purpose. In fact, in a previous study of ours with a larger sample (N = 1238), only 0.8% of participants had social dedication as their dominant purpose.
References
Andrews, M., Bundick, M., Jones, A., Bronk, K. C., Mariano, J. M., & Damon, W. (2006). Revised youth purpose interview. Unpublished instrument. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center on Adolescence.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bigler, M., Neimeyer, G. J., & Brown, E. (2001). The divided self revisited: Effects of self-concept clarity and self-concept differentiation on psychological adjustment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20, 396–415.
Błażek, M., & Besta, T. (2012). Self-concept clarity and religious orientations: Prediction of purpose in life and self-esteem. Journal of Religion and Health, 51(3), 947–960.
Bronk, K. C. (2012). A grounded theory of the development of noble youth purpose. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27(1), 78–109.
Bronk, K. C. (2014). Purpose in life: A critical component of optimal youth development. New York: Springer.
Bronk, K. C., & Finch, W. H. (2010). Adolescent characteristics by type of long-term aim in life. Applied Developmental Science, 14(1), 35–44.
Bronk, K. C., Baumsteiger, R., Mangan, S., Riches, B., Dubon, V., Benavides, C., & Bono, G. (2019). Fostering purpose among young adults: Effective online interventions. Journal of Character Education, 15(2), 21–38.
Bronk, K. C., Mitchell, C., Hite, B., Mehoke, S., & Cheung, R. (2020). Purpose among youth from low-income backgrounds: A mixed methods investigation. Child Development, 91, e1231–e1248. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13434.
Bundick, M. J., & Tirri, K. (2014). Student perceptions of teacher support and competencies for fostering youth purpose and positive youth development: Perspectives from two countries. Applied Developmental Science, 18(3), 148–162.
Burrow, A. L., Hill, P. L., Ratner, K., & Sumner, R. (2018). A better tomorrow: Toward a stronger science of youth purpose. Research in Human Development, 15(2), 167–180.
Chen, L. (2017). The Core values of Chinese civilization. Singapore: Springer.
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.
Damon, W. (2008). The path to purpose: How young people find their calling in life. New York: The Free Press.
Damon, W., Menon, J., & Bronk, K. C. (2003). The development of purpose during adolescence. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 119–128.
Faure, G. O., & Fang, T. (2008). Changing Chinese values: Keeping up with paradoxes. International Business Review, 17(2), 194–207.
Francis, J. J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M. P., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and Health, 25(10), 1229–1245.
Frankl, V. E. (1959). Man’s search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy. Boston: Beacon.
Fung, Y. L. (1948). A short history of Chinese philosophy. New York: The Free Press.
Glanzer, P. L., Hill, J. P., & Robinson, J. A. (2015). Emerging adults’ conceptions of purpose and the good life: A classification and comparison. Youth and Society, 50(6), 715–733.
Heng, M. A., & Pereira, A. (2020). Understanding adolescent purpose in the context of high-performance schooling in Singapore. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(5), 539–558.
Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S. A., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196.
Hill, P. L., Burrow, A. L., Brandenberger, J. W., Lapsley, D. K., & Quaranto, J. C. (2010). Collegiate purpose orientations and well-being in early and middle adulthood. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31(2), 173–179.
Hill, P. L., Sumner, R., & Burrow, A. L. (2014). Understanding the pathways to purpose: Examining personality and well-being correlates across adulthood. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(3), 227–234.
Jiang, F., & Gao, D. (2018). Are Chinese student teachers’ life purposes associated with their perceptions of how much their university supports community service work? Journal of Moral Education, 47(2), 201–216.
Jiang, F., Lin, S., & Mariano, M. J. (2016). The influence of Chinese college teachers’ competence for purpose support on students’ purpose development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(5), 565–581.
Johnson, S. K., Terrell, J. M., Callina, K. S., & Weiner, M. B. (2018). Configurations of young people’s important life goals and their associations with thriving. Research on Human Development, 15(2), 139–166.
Kashdan, T. B., & Mcknight, P. E. (2009). Origins of purpose in life: Refining our understanding of a life well lived. Psychological Topics, 18(2), 303–313.
Krause, N., & Hayward, R. D. (2014). Assessing stability and change in a second-order confirmatory factor model of meaning in life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 237–253.
Liang, B., Lund, T., Mousseau, A., White, A. E., Spencer, R., & Walsh, J. (2018). Adolescent girls finding purpose: The role of parents and prosociality. Youth and Society, 50(6), 801–817.
Lu, L. (2010). Chinese well-being. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (2nd ed., pp. 327–342). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Malin, H., Reilly, T. S., Yeager, D., Moran, S., Andrews, M., Bundick, M., & Damon, W. (2008). Interview coding process for statuses of purpose determination. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center on Adolescence.
Malin, H., Reilly, T. S., Quinn, B., & Moran, S. (2013). Adolescent purpose development: Exploring empathy, discovering roles, shifting priorities, and creating pathways. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(1), 186–199.
Malin, H., Liauw, I., & Damon, W. (2017). Purpose and character development in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(6), 1200–1215.
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760.
Mangelsdorf, J., Eid, M., & Luhmann, M. (2019). Does growth require suffering? A systematic review and meta-analysis on genuine posttraumatic and postecstatic growth. Psychological Bulletin, 145(3), 302–338.
Mariano, J. M. (2014). Introduction to special section: Understanding paths to youth purpose–why content and contexts matter. Applied Developmental Science, 18(3), 139–147.
Mariano, J. M., & Vaillant, G. E. (2012). Youth purpose among the ‘greatest generation’. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(4), 281–293.
Mariano, J. M., Going, J., Schrock, K., & Sweeting, K. (2011). Youth purpose and the perception of social supports among African-American girls. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(8), 921–937.
Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Vol. 41). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage publications.
McKnight, P. E., & Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Purpose in life as a system that creates and sustains health and well-being: An integrative, testable theory. Review of General Psychology, 13(3), 242–251.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2010). Does gratitude promote prosocial behavior? The moderating role of attachment security. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (1st ed., pp. 267–283). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Moran, S. (2014). What “purpose” means to youth: Are there cultures of purpose? Applied Developmental Science, 18(3), 163–175.
Moran, S. (2016). What do teachers think about youth purpose? Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(5), 582–601.
Moran, S. (2019). Is personal life purpose replacing shared worldview as youths increasingly individuate? Implications for educators. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(5), 8–23.
Moran, S., Bundick, M. J., Malin, H., & Reilly, T. S. (2012). How supportive of their specific purposes do youth believe their family and friends are? Journal of Adolescent Research, 28(3), 348–377.
Pillemer, D. B. (2001). Momentous events and the life story. Review of General Psychology, 5, 123–134.
Råheim, M., Magnussen, L. H., Sekse, R. J. T., Lunde, Å., Jacobsen, T., & Blystad, A. (2016). Researcher–researched relationship in qualitative research: Shifts in positions and researcher vulnerability. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 11(1), 30996.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(1), 1–65.
Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Sofaer, S. (1999). Qualitative methods: What are they and why use them? Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1101–1118.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tavernier, R., & Willoughby, T. (2012). Adolescent turning points: The association between meaning-making and psychological well-being. Developmental Psychology, 48(4), 1058–1068.
Tirri, K., Moran, S., & Mariano, J. M. (2016). Education for purposeful teaching around the world. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(5), 526–531.
Van Lange, P. A., De Bruin, E., Otten, W., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of pro-social, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 733–746.
Wang, T., Jia, Y., You, X. Q., & Huang X. T. (2019). Exploring well-being among individuals with different life purposes in a Chinese context. The Journal of Positive Psychology. https://xs.scihub.ltd/https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2019.1663253.
Wang, T., You, X. Q., & Huang X. T. (2020). Chinese life purpose orientation questionnaire: Assessing purpose orientations among Chinese college students. Applied Developmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2020.1815535.
Yoo, H., Feng, X., & Day, R. D. (2013). Adolescents’ empathy and pro-social behavior in the family context: A longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(12), 1858–1872.
Yu, H., Glanzer, P., & Johnson, B. (2016). Do the ends strengthen the means? An examination of the link between purpose in life and academic misconduct among college students. Journal of College and Character, 17(4), 255–270.
Zhu, N., Hawk, S. T., & Chang, L. (2019). Unpredictable and competitive cues affect pro-social behaviors and judgments. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 203–211.
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our gratitude to all fellows who assisted us to give out the online questionnaire and all respondents for their assistance. We also want to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (18ZDA333).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Statement of Ethics
The participants in this study have given their written informed consent. The study protocol has been approved by the research institute’s committee on human research.
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, T., You, X.Q., Li, Y. et al. Understanding how youth develop a purpose: A qualitative study among Chinese emerging adults. Curr Psychol 41, 7824–7834 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01273-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01273-3