Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A three-gene signature and clinical outcome in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although the 5-year survival rates in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have improved over the last decades, there is a high relapse rate for Pediatric AML patients.

Methods

In the present study, we mainly combine PCA with the LASSO technique to identify prognostic markers for Pediatric AML patients coming from the NCI TARGET database.

Results

Three key genes (EEF1A1, RPLP2, RPL19) associated with poor prognosis of pediatric AML has been screened by both PCA and LASSO Cox regression analysis. Simultaneously, we developed a risk score model to predict the prognosis of pediatric AML, according to risk scores, the patients were divided into high‐ and low‐risk groups based on the median risk score. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis indicated that Pediatric AML patients with the high-risk group have a poorer survival rate than those with a low‐risk group (p < 0.000). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the risk model has a good performance (AUC:0.669). Moreover, the clinicopathologic correlation showed that the expression levels of three genes were related to the central nervous system (CNS) disease and chloroma. GSEA identified that those pathways including oxidative phosphorylation, apoptosis and TGFB signaling pathway were differentially enriched.

Conclusion

Taken together, those studies suggested that a gene panel that consists of three genes (EEF1A1, RPLP2, RPL19) may act as a potential prognostic marker.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data collections and processions were performed according to policies of TARGET project.

References

  1. Sexauer AN, Tasian SK. Targeting FLT3 Signaling in Childhood acute myeloid leukemia. Front Pediatr. 2017;5:248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rubnitz JE. Current management of childhood acute myeloid leukemia. Paediatr Drugs. 2017;19:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hunger SP, Mullighan CG. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1541–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rubnitz JE. How I treat pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2012;119:5980–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vardiman JW, et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009;114:937–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Meldrum C, Doyle MA, Tothill RW. Next-generation sequencing for cancer diagnostics: a practical perspective. Clin Biochem Rev. 2011;32:177.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zuo S, et al. A robust six-gene prognostic signature for prediction of both disease-free and overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer. J Transl Med. 2019;17:152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Adamson PC. Improving the outcome for children with cancer: development of targeted new agents. Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:212–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Downing JR, et al. The pediatric cancer genome project. Nat Genet. 2012;44:619.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carlson M. org.Hs.eg.db: Genome wide annotation for human. R package version 3.8.2. R Development Core Team: Vienna, Austria. 2019.

  11. Todorov H, Fournier D, Gerber S. Principal components analysis: theory and application to gene expression data analysis. Genom Comput Biol. 2018;4:e100041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wei T, et al. Package ‘corrplot’. Statistician. 2017;56:316–24.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Subramanian A, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005;102:15545–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu H, Zhang J. Decreased expression of TFAP2B in endometrial cancer predicts poor prognosis: a study based on TCGA data. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;149:592–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. de Rooij JDE, Zwaan CM, van den Heuvel-Eibrink M. Pediatric AML: from biology to clinical management. J Clin Med. 2015;4:127–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Perry H, et al. Care Groups II: a summary of the child survival outcomes achieved using volunteer community health workers in resource-constrained settings. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015;3:370–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jolliffe IT. Pincipal component analysis. J Mark Res. 2002;25:513.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Penzo M, Montanaro L, Treré D, Derenzini M. The ribosome biogenesis-cancer connection. Cells. 2019;8:55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc. 1972;34:187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Santosa F, Symes WW. Linear inversion of band-limited reflection seismograms. SIAM J Scie Stat Comput. 1986;7:1307–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bao Y, et al. High eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1 expression promotes proliferation and predicts poor prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Neoplasma. 2020;67:78–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Campos RK, et al. RPLP1 and RPLP2 are essential flavivirus host factors that promote early viral protein accumulation. J Virol. 2017;91:e01706–01716.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bee A, et al. Ribosomal protein l19 is a prognostic marker for human prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:2061–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hong M, Kim H, Kim I. Ribosomal protein L19 overexpression activates the unfolded protein response and sensitizes MCF7 breast cancer cells to endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced cell death. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;450:673–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank TARGET databases for providing high‐quality clinical data on Pediatric AML.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HW: designed this study. ZC and YW, FZ: wrote the manuscript and contributed to preparing and making figure and tables. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China (Hengyang, Hunan Province, China).

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, Z., Wu, Y., Zhang, F. et al. A three-gene signature and clinical outcome in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Transl Oncol 23, 866–873 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-020-02480-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-020-02480-x

Keywords

Navigation