Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterization of biopolymeric encapsulation system for improved survival of Lactobacillus brevis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 29 March 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Carrageenan can be used as an encapsulation material due to its gelling properties. Sodium alginate is traditionally used encapsulation material. However, different structural and viability issues were observed in different studies. The aim of this study was to improve the survival of L. brevis LBR1 using alginate-carrageenan beads through structural optimization. L. brevis LBR1 was microencapsulated by extrusion technique using varying concentration of carrageenan and alginate (To (0%: 0%) T1 (0.01%:1.5%), T2 (0.02%:1.5%), T3 (0.03%:1.5%), T4 (0.04%:1.5%), T5 (0.05%:1.5%). The beads were evaluated for release profile, storage stability and survival under simulated gastrointestinal conditions. All the treatments showed better encapsulation efficiency. The addition of carrageenan improved the structure of sodium alginate beads with better interlinkage. The free cells could not maintain their viability in GIT conditions as compare to encapsulated cells. The T5 comparatively showed better stability in simulated intestinal conditions. However, slow release was observed as compare to other formulations. Encapsulation significantly improved the probiotic viability using different combinations of carrageenan and alginate.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. S.B. Begum, R.R. Roobia, M. Karthikeyan, R.M. Murugappan, LWT 60, 743–750 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.10.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Abruzzo, B. Vitali, F. Lombardi, L. Guerrini, B. Cinque, C. Parolin, F. Bigucci, T. Cerchiara, C. Arbizzani, M.C. Gallucci, B. Luppi, Pharmaceutics 12, 241 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12030241

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Thangrongthong, N. Puttarat, B. Ladda, T. Itthisoponkul, W. Pinket, K. Kasemwong, M. Taweechotipatr, Food Sci. Biotechnol. 29(11), 1475–1482 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-020-00812-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Afzaal, F. Saeed, M. Saeed, M. Azam, S. Hussain, A.A. Mohamed, M.S. Alamri, F.M. Anjum, Int. J. Food Prop. 23, 1899–1912 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2020.1826513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Azam, M. Saeed, I. Yasmin, M. Afzaal, S. Ahmed, W.A. Khan, M.W. Iqbal, H.T. Hussain, M. Asif, J. Food Meas. Charact. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-00839-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Valero-Cases, M.J. Frutos, LWT 64, 824–828 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.06.049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A.T. Holkem, G.C. Raddatz, G.L. Nunes, A.J. Cichoski, E. Jacob-Lopes, C.R.F. Grosso, C.R. Menezes, LWT 71, 302–308 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.04.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. T. Riaz, M.W. Iqbal, M. Saeed, I. Yasmin, H.A.M. Hassanin, S. Mahmood, A. Rehman, J. Microencapsul. 36, 192–203 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/02652048.2019.1618403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. M.P. Silva, F.L. Tulini, M.M. Ribas, M. Penning, C.S. Fávaro-Trindade, D. Poncelet, Food Res. Int. 89, 582–590 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2016.09.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Ahmad, M. Cawood, Q. Iqbal, A. Arino, A. Batool, R.M.S. Tariq, M. Azam, S. Akhtar, Foods 8, 1–22 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/FOODS8090424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Afzaal, F. Saeed, M.U. Arshad, M.T. Nadeem, M. Saeed, T. Tufail, Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 11, 1348–1354 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-018-9485-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. I. Yasmin, M. Saeed, I. Pasha, M.A. Zia, Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-018-9407-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Azam, M. Saeed, I. Pasha, M. Shahid, Food Biosci. 37, 100679 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2020.100679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. W.A. Khan, M.S. Butt, I. Pasha, M. Saeed, I. Yasmin, M. Ali, M. Azam, M.S. Khan, J. Text. Stud. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D.C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments (Wiley, New York, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Atia, A. Gomaa, I. Fliss, E. Beyssac, G. Garrait, M. Subirade, J. Microencapsul. 33(1), 89–101 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3109/02652048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Wu, G. Zhang, LWT- Food Sci. Technol. 93, 135–141 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. L. Shi, Z. Li, Z. Zhang, T. Zhang, W. Yu, M. Zhou, Z.X. Tang, LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 54, 147–151 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the National Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad for providing technical support and laboratory facilities during research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Azam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Informed Consent For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 277 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azam, M., Saeed, M., Ahmad, T. et al. Characterization of biopolymeric encapsulation system for improved survival of Lactobacillus brevis. Food Measure 16, 2292–2299 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-022-01334-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-022-01334-0

Keywords

Navigation