Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental Investigation and Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of the Magnetite Concentrate Reduction Using Methane-Oxygen Flame in a Laboratory Flash Reactor

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experimental investigation of the reduction of magnetite concentrate particles was conducted in a laboratory-scale flash reactor representing a novel flash ironmaking process. In this reactor, methane was partially oxidized by oxygen to form a reducing H2 + CO gas mixtures. The test variables in this work included the particle residence time, the extent of excess reducing gases, particle feeding mode, and flame configuration. The experimental results obtained from this reactor proved that the concentrate particles can be reduced directly in a flash reactor utilizing natural gas. More than 80 pct reduction was achieved in this reactor despite its low operating temperature (1170 °C). In addition, a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model was developed to describe the reduction of concentrate particles in this reactor. The model was used to simulate the fluid flow, heat transfer, and chemical reactions involved. The gas phase was simulated in the Eulerian frame of reference, while the particles were tracked in the Lagrangian framework. The partial combustion of methane by oxygen was also simulated in this study. The temperature profile obtained from the simulations satisfactorily agreed with the experimental measurements, while the calculated reduction degrees consistently over predicted the experimental values. This was attributed to the soot formation as a consequence of methane cracking due to large metal surface of the reactor. The soot formation led to a high-water vapor generation in the partial combustion, which lowered the excess of hydrogen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Adapted from Ref. [30]

Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

d p :

Geometric mean diameter of the screened particle (m)

K j :

Equilibrium constant for the reduction of FeO by gas j

L :

Effective length where temperature remained within 1175 ± 25 K (m)

p :

Pressure (Pa)

u g :

Gas phase velocity (m s−1)

u t :

Terminal velocity of the particle (m s−1)

X :

Reduction degree

μ :

Gas phase viscosity (N m s−2)

ρ g :

Gas phase density (kg m−3)

ρ p :

Particle density (kg m−3)

τ :

Particle residence time (s)

References

  1. Steel’s Contribution to a Low Carbon Future and Climate Resilient Societies (2017). https://www.steel.org.au/resources/elibrary/resource-items/steel-s-contribution-to-a-low-carbon-future-and-cl. Accessed October 30, 2018.

  2. Themelis NJ, Zhao B (1995) In: Davies TW (ed) Flash Reaction Processes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 273-93

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson T, Davison J (1964) J Iron Steel Inst 202:406-19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Perez-Tello M, Sohn HY, St Marie K, Jokilaakso A (2001) Metall Mater Trans B 32B:847-68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Perez-Tello, H. Y. Sohn and P. J. Smith: Metall. Mater. Trans. B., 2001, vol. 32 (5), pp. 869-86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Jokiaakso, T. Ahokainen, O. Teppo, Y. Yang and K. Lilius: Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev., 1995, vol. 15 (1-4), pp. 217-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Y. Sohn: Steel Times Int., 2007, vol. 31, pp. 68-72.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Y. Sohn, M. E. Choi, Y. Zhang, and J. E. Ramos: AIST Trans., 2009, vol. 6 (8), pp. 158-65.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. E. Choi and H. Y. Sohn: Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2010, vol. 37 (2), pp. 81-88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. H. K. Pinegar, M. S. Moats, and H. Y. Sohn: Steel Res. Int., 2011, vol. 82 (8), pp. 951-63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. H. K. Pinegar, M. S. Moats, and H. Y. Sohn: Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2012, vol. 39 (6), pp. 398-408.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. H. K. Pinegar, M. S. Moats, and H. Y. Sohn: Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2013, vol. 40 (1), pp. 44-49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Y. Sohn and M. Olivas-Martinez: JOM, 2014, vol. 66 (9), pp. 1557-64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Y. Sohn and Y. Mohassab, J. Sust. Metall., 2(3), 216–227 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elzohiery M, Mohassab Y, Sohn HY (2017) Steel Res Int 88:1600133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Chen, Y. Mohassab, T Jiang and H. Y. Sohn: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2015, vol. 46 (3), pp. 1133-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Fan, Y. Mohassab, M. Elzohiery and H. Y. Sohn: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2016, vol. 47 (3), pp. 1669-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. F. Chen, Y. Mohassab, S. Zhang and H. Y. Sohn: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2015, vol. 46 (4), pp. 1716-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Fan, H. Y. Sohn, Y. Mohassab and M. Elzohiery: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2016, vol. 47 (6), pp 3489-500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Fan, H. Y. Sohn and M. Elzohiery: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2017, vol. 48 (5), pp. 2677-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Fan, M. Elzohiery, Y. Mohassab, and H.Y. Sohn: in 8th International Symposium on High-Temperature Metallurgical Processing, J.Y. Hwang, et al., eds., Springer, 2017, pp. 61–70.

  22. H.Y. Sohn, Y. Mohassab, M. Elzohiery, D. Fan, and A. Abdelghany: in Applications of Process Engineering Principles in Materials Processing, Energy and Environmental Technologies, S. Wang, et al., eds., Springer, 2017, pp. 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51091-0_2.

  23. D. Fan: PhD Dissertation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2019.

  24. HSC 5.11, Chemistry for Windows, Outokumpu Research, Oy, Pori, 2002.

  25. J. H. Ferziger and M. Peric, Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. W. P. Jones and R. P. Lindstedt, Combust. Flame, 1988, 73(3), pp.233-249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. I. R. Gran and B. F. Magnussen: Combust. Sci. Technol., 1996, vol. 119 (1-6), pp. 191-217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fluent Theory Guide, ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, USA.

  29. R.J. Kee, F.M. Rupley, C. Wang, and O. Adigun: CHEMKIN Collection, Release 3.6, Reaction Design, Inc., San Diego, CA, 2000.

  30. M. Elzohiery: PhD Dissertation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The technical support and resources provided by the Center for High Performance Computing at the University of Utah are gratefully acknowledged. The authors acknowledge the financial support from the U.S. Department of Energy under Award Number DE-EE0005751 with cost share by the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) and the University of Utah.

Disclaimer

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Y. Sohn.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Manuscript submitted October 27, 2019.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables AI and AII.

Table AI The Governing Equations for the Gas Phase
Table AII The Governing Equations for the Solid Phase

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elzohiery, M., Fan, D., Mohassab, Y. et al. Experimental Investigation and Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of the Magnetite Concentrate Reduction Using Methane-Oxygen Flame in a Laboratory Flash Reactor. Metall Mater Trans B 51, 1003–1015 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-020-01809-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-020-01809-9

Navigation