Skip to main content
Log in

Real-time prediction of walking state and percent of gait cycle for robotic prosthetic leg using artificial neural network

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Intelligent Service Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the walking motion prediction of a user and prediction-based joint trajectory generation of a robotic transfemoral prosthetic leg. To this end, two artificial neural networks are proposed to predict the user’s walking intention and percent of gait cycle (PGC) based on ground foot contact, kinematics, and electromyography (EMG) information. Through the sensor module designed for our study, EMG signals were measured at the tibialis anterior (TA) and gastrocnemius (GAS) of the sound leg, and inertial information was measured at the shin of the sound leg and the thigh of the affected leg. Notably, the time sequence feature data suggested based on the characteristics of the phase portrait of each joint motion showed better learning performance than when using the current time feature data. Walking and standing states were accurately predicted through an artificial neural network (ANN) for walking state classification, and the intention to start and stop walking could be predicted within approximately 83 ms. For generating gait motion of the robotic prosthetic leg, PGC while walking was also accurately predicted through an artificial neural network. Consequently, we developed an algorithm for the generation of gait motion using two artificial neural networks, and its performance was verified through dynamic simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R (2008) Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89(3):422–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lambrecht BG, Kazerooni H (2009) Design of a semi-active knee prosthesis. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 639–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005

  3. Berry D (2006) Microprocessor prosthetic knees. Phys Med Rehabilit Clin 17(1):91–113. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152828

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Elery T, Rezazadeh S, Nesler C, Gregg RD (2020) Design and validation of a powered knee–ankle prosthesis with high-torque, low-impedance actuators. IEEE Trans Rob 36(6):1649–1668. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2020.3005533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mendez J, Hood S, Gunnel A, Lenzi T (2020) Powered knee and ankle prosthesis with indirect volitional swing control enables level-ground walking and crossing over obstacles. Sci Robot. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aba6635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang UJ, Kim JY (2015) Mechanical design of powered prosthetic leg and walking pattern generation based on motion capture data. Adv Robot 29(16):1061–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2015.1026939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee SH, Kim JY (2017) Walking algorithm for a robotic transfemoral prosthesis capable of walking pattern recognition and posture stabilization. Adv Robot 31(18):965–989. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2017.1381645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Au SK, Herr H, Weber J, Martinez-Villalpando EC (2007) Powered ankle-foot prosthesis for the improvement of amputee ambulation. In: 2007 29th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. IEEE, pp 3020–3026. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352965

  9. Ledoux ED, Goldfarb M (2017) Control and evaluation of a powered transfemoral prosthesis for stair ascent. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 25(7):917–924. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2656467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pohjolainen T, Alaranta H, Kärkäinen M (1990) Prosthetic use and functional and social outcome following major lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 14(2):75–79. https://doi.org/10.3109/03093649009080326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lim H, Kim B, Park S (2020) Prediction of lower limb kinetics and kinematics during walking by a single IMU on the lower back using machine learning. Sensors 20(1):130. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Prado A, Cao X, Ding X, Agrawal SK (2020) Prediction of Gait cycle percentage using instrumented shoes with artificial neural networks. In: 2020 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp 2834–2840. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9196747

  13. Huang H, Zhang F, Hargrove LJ, Dou Z, Rogers DR, Englehart KB (2011) Continuous locomotion-mode identification for prosthetic legs based on neuromuscular–mechanical fusion. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58(10):2867–2875. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2011.2161671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nazmi N, Rahman MAA, Ariff MHM, Ahmad SA (2018) Generalization of ANN model in classifying stance and swing phases of gait using EMG signals. In: 2018 IEEE-EMBS conference on biomedical engineering and sciences (IECBES). IEEE, pp 461–466. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECBES.2018.8626626

  15. Huang Y, He Z, Liu Y, Yang R, Zhang X, Cheng G et al (2019) Real-time intended knee joint motion prediction by deep-recurrent neural networks. IEEE Sens J 19(23):11503–11509. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2019.2933603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chaparro-Rico BDM, Cafolla D (2020) Test-retest, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for spatiotemporal gait parameters using SANE (an eaSy gAit aNalysis systEm) as measuring instrument. Appl Sci 10(17):5781. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10175781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kharb A, Saini V, Jain YK, Dhiman S (2011) A review of gait cycle and its parameters. IJCEM Int J Comput Eng Manag 13:78–83

    Google Scholar 

  18. Phinyomark A, Khushaba RN, Scheme E (2018) Feature extraction and selection for myoelectric control based on wearable EMG sensors. Sensors 18(5):1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051615

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea grant (No. 2020R1F1A1055515). In addition, this work was also supported by Police-Lab 2.0 Program(www.kipot.or.kr) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT, Korea) & Korean National Police Agency (KNPA, Korea) [Project Name : Development and demonstration of unmanned patrol robot system for local police support / Project Number : 210121M05].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jung-Yup Kim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, TG., Kim, JY. Real-time prediction of walking state and percent of gait cycle for robotic prosthetic leg using artificial neural network. Intel Serv Robotics 15, 527–536 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-022-00434-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-022-00434-6

Keywords

Navigation