Abstract
To address climate change and promote green development, the Chinese government has implemented low-carbon city pilot policy since 2010, and continued to expand the scope of pilots. Accurately assessing the policy effects of pilot city construction is of great significance for the further promotion of low-carbon policy. Carbon emissions are included in the evaluation framework of China’s low-carbon city pilot policy, and used the panel data of 272 cities in 2000–2018 to evaluate the effectiveness of low-carbon city pilot policy based on the multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) model. Empirical findings that (1) low-carbon pilot policy could not only directly reduce carbon emissions, but also indirectly reduce carbon emissions through upgrading industrial structure and promoting technological innovation. (2) Given that there is remarkable gap in economic and social development across different regions, the policy effect is reexamined for nature resource and region location. The results indicate that carbon emissions reduction effect of low-carbon city pilot policy is more significant in resource-based cities and eastern cities. (3) Carbon emissions have significant spatial correlation, that is to say, low-carbon pilot policy has positive spillover effect on reducing carbon emissions in surrounding cities. The study provides empirical evidence for further expanding the scope of the pilot projects, as well as scientific basis for making environmental policies for carbon emissions reduction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L et al (2012) The environment and directed technical change. Am Econ Rev 102(1):131–166. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1668575
Ahmad M, Işık C, Jabeen G et al (2021) Heterogeneous links among urban concentration, non-renewable energy use intensity, economic development, and environmental emissions across regional development levels. Sci Total Environ 765:144527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144527
Anser MK, Usman M, Godil DI et al (2021) Correction to: does globalization affect the green economy and environment? The relationship between energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, and economic growth. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:51119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14243-4
Auffhammer M, Sun W, Wu J et al (2016) The decomposition and dynamics of industrial carbon dioxide emission for 287 Chinese cities in 1998-2009. J Econ Surv 30(3):460–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12158
Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Chapman Hall 51(6):1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bergek A, Berggren C (2014) The impact of environmental policy instruments on innovation: a review of energy and automotive industry studies. Ecol Econ 106:112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.016
Berrone P, Fosfuri A, Gelabert L et al (2013) Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strateg Manag J 34(8):891–909. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2041
Cairns RD (2014) The green paradox of the economics of exhaustible resources. Energy Policy 65(2):78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.047
Chagas ALS, Azzoni CR, Almeida AN (2016) A spatial difference-in-differences analysis of the impact of sugarcane production on respiratory diseases. Reg Sci Urban Econ 59:24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.04.002
Chen D, Chen S, Jin H (2018) Industrial agglomeration and CO2 emissions: evidence from 187 Chinese prefecture-level cities over 2005-2013. J Clean Prod 172:993–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.068
Cheng J, Yi J, Dai S, Xiong Y (2019) Can low-carbon city construction facilitate green growth? Evidence from China’s pilot low-carbon city initiative. J Clean Prod 231:1158–1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.327
Deng R, Chen M. (2022) The impact of low-carbon pilot policies on eco-efficiency and its spillover effects: an empirical analysis based on spatial dual difference. World of Res (01), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.13778/j.cnki.11-3705/C.2022.01.005.
Dogru T, Bulut U, Kocak E et al (2020) The nexus between tourism, economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions: contemporary evidence from OECD countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(32):40930–40948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10110-w
Dong ZQ, Wang H (2019) The “local neighbour” green technology progress effect of environmental regulation. China Ind Econ 01:100–118
Gehrsitz M (2017) The effect of low emission zones on air pollution and infant health. J Environ Econ Manag 83:121–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.02.003
Godil DI, Sharif A, Agha H et al (2020) The dynamic nonlinear influence of ICT, financial development, and institutional quality on CO2 emission in Pakistan: new insights from QARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:24190–24200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08619-1
Han H, Huang LX, Wang XB (2017) Has industrial policy promoted the upgrading of local industrial structure--Theoretical explanation and empirical test based on developmental local government. Econ Res 52(08):33–48
Işik C, Ahmad M, Ongan S et al (2021) Convergence analysis of the ecological footprint: theory and empirical evidence from the USMCA countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:32648–32659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12993-9
Işik C, Ongan S, Ozdemir D et al (2021) The increases and decreases of the environment Kuznets curve (EKC) for 8 OECD countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:28535–28543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12637-y
Işık C, Ongan S, Bulut U et al (2022) Reinvestigating the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis by a composite model constructed on the Armey curve hypothesis with government spending for the US States. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:16472–16483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16720-2
Kemp R, Pontoglio S (2011) The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments - A typical case of the blind men and the elephant? Ecol Econ 72:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.014
Khan SAR, Yu Z, Sharif A et al (2020) Determinants of economic growth and environmental sustainability in South Asian association for regional cooperation: evidence from panel ARDL. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:45675–45687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10410-1
Khanna N, Fridley D, Hong L (2014) China’s pilot low-carbon city initiative: a comparative assessment of national goals and local plans. Sustain Cities Soc 12:110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.03.005
Köne AÇ, Büke T (2019) Factor analysis of projected carbon dioxide emissions according to the IPCC based sustainable emission scenario in Turkey. Renew Energy 133:914–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.099
Li J, Li XP, Hao LF (2021) Effects of dual environmental regulation on carbon emission intensity under the constraint of technological innovation. China Popul Resources Environ 31(09):34–44
Liao H, Yang L, Dai S et al (2021) Outward FDI, industrial structure upgrading and domestic employment: empirical evidence from the Chinese economy and the belt and road initiative. J Asian Econ 74:101303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2021.101303
Liu FY, Liu CZ (2019) Regional disparity, spatial spillover effects of urbanisation and carbon emissions in China. J Clean Prod 241:118226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118226
Lu M, Feng H (2014) Agglomeration and emission reduction: empirical study on the impact of urban scale gap on industrial pollution intensity. World Econ 37(07):86–114
Ma Q, Murshed M, Khan Z (2021) The nexuses between energy investments, technological innovations, emission taxes, and carbon emissions in China. Energy Policy 155(30):112345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112345
Marbuah G, Amuakwa-Mensah F (2017) Spatial analysis of emissions in Sweden. Energy Econ 68:383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.10.003
Peng T, Deng H (2021) Research on the sustainable development process of low-carbon pilot cities: the case study of Guiyang, a low-carbon pilot city in south-west China. Environ Dev Sustain 23:2382–2403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00679-0
Pizer WA, Popp D (2008) Endogenizing technological change: matching empirical evidence to modeling needs. Energy Econ 30(6):2754–2770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.02.006
Ploeg F, Withagen C (2012) Is there really a green paradox? J Environ Econ Manag 64(3):342–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2012.08.002
Porter ME, Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Rassier DG, Earnhart D (2015) Effects of environmental regulation on actual and expected profitability. Ecol Econ 112:129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.011
Rehman A, Ma H, Ahmad M et al (2021) An asymmetrical analysis to explore the dynamic impacts of CO2 emission to renewable energy, expenditures, foreign direct investment, and trade in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(38):53520–53532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14537-7
Rehman A, Ulucak R, Murshed M et al (2021) Carbonization and atmospheric pollution in China: the asymmetric impacts of forests, livestock production, and economic progress on CO2 emissions. J Environ Manag 294:113059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113059
Ritter H, Schopf M (2014) Unilateral climate policy: harmful or even disastrous? Environ Resour Econ 58(1):155–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-013-9697-0
Roberts SH, Axon CJ, Goddard NH et al (2019) Modelling socio-economic and energy data to generate business-as-usual scenarios for carbon emissions. J Clean Prod 207:980–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.029
Sharif A, Afshan S, Qureshi MA (2019) Idolization and ramification between globalization and ecological footprints: evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:11191–11211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04351-7
Sharif A, Raza SA, Ozturk I et al (2019) The dynamic relationship of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption with carbon emission: a global study with the application of heterogeneous panel estimations. Renew Energy 133:685–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.052
Shen K, Jin G, Fang X (2017) Does environmental regulation cause pollution to be transferred nearby? Econ Res 52(05):44–59
Shi D Q, Ding H, Wei P, et al., 2018. Can smart city construction reduce environmental pollution. China Industrial Economy (06):117–135
Sinha A, Mishra S, Sharif A et al (2021) Does green financing help to improve the environmental & social responsibility? Designing SDG framework through advanced quantile modelling. J Environ Manag 292:112751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112751
Song QJ, Wang YF, Qi Y (2015) Carbon emission status of low carbon pilot cities in China. China Popul Resources Environ 25(01):78–82
Song H, Sun YJ, Chen DK (2019) Evaluation of government air pollution control effect—An empirical study from the construction of “low carbon city” in China. Manag World 35(06):95–108
Song M, Zhao X, Shang Y (2020) The impact of low-carbon city construction on ecological efficiency: empirical evidence from quasi-natural experiments. Resour Conserv Recycl 157:104777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104777
Su TY, Yu ZZ, Pan JX (2022) Carbon emission reduction effects of low-carbon and innovation-oriented cities: based on the collaborative perspective of green innovation and industrial upgrading. Sci Sci Manag Sci Technol 43(01):21–37
Tao F, Zhao JY, Zhou H (2021) Has environmental regulation achieved “incremental improvement” of green technology innovation—Evidence from environmental protection target responsibility system. China Ind Econ 02:136–154
Wang M (2018) Spatial effect of environmental regulation on carbon emissions. Ecol Econ 9(1):57–61
Wang Y, Li J (2019) Spatial spillover effect of non-fossil fuel power generation on carbon dioxide emissions across China’s provinces. Renew Energy 136(6):317–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.012
Wang YF, Tao WQ (2021) Impact and effect of low carbon city pilot on urban green total factor productivity growth. China Popul Resources Environ 31(06):78–89
Wang S, Shi C, Fang C et al (2019) Examining the spatial variations of determinants of energy-related CO2 emissions in China at the city level using geographically weighted regression model. Appl Energy 235:95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.083
Wei DM, Gu NH (2021) Urban low carbon governance and green economic growth-quasi natural experiment based on low carbon city pilot policy. Contemp Econ Sci 43(04):90–103
Wu L, Kaneko S, Matsuoka S (2005) Driving forces behind the stagnancy of China’s energy-related CO2 emissions from 1996 to 1999: the relative importance of structural change, intensity change and scale change. Energy Policy 33(3):319–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.08.003
Xie RH, Yuan YJ, Huang JJ (2017) Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on “green” productivity: evidence from China. Ecol Econ 132(2):104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.019
Xiong GQ, Shi DQ, Li MN (2020) The impact of low-carbon city pilot on enterprise green technology innovation. Sci Res Manag 41(12):93–102. https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2020.12.008
Xu J, Cui JB (2020) Green technology innovation in low carbon cities and enterprises. China Ind Econ 12:178–196
Yu Y, Zhang N (2021) Low-carbon city pilot and carbon emission efficiency: quasi-experimental evidence from China. Energy Econ 96(2):105125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105125
Yu YZ, Sun PB, Xuan Y (2020) Does the environmental objective constraints of local governments affect the industrial transformation and upgrading? Econ Res 55(08):57–72
Zhang H (2020) Can the pilot policy of low-carbon cities reduce carbon emissions—Evidence from quasi natural experiments. Econ Manag 42(06):25–41. https://doi.org/10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2020.06.002
Zhang XF, Fan DC (2021) The impact of carbon emission trading market on carbon emission reduction efficiency: an empirical analysis based on dual mediating effect. Sci Sci Manag Sci Technol 42(11):20–38
Zhang K, Zhang ZY, Liang QM (2017) An empirical analysis of the green paradox in China: from the perspective of fiscal decentralization. Energy Policy 103:203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.023
Zhang BB, Zhou JT, Yan ZJ. (2021) Pilot policies for low carbon cities and improvement of total factor energy efficiency—quasi-natural experiments from the implementation of three batches of pilot policies. Econ Rev (05): 32-49.
Zhao GM, Geng Y, Sun HP et al (2020) Study on the spatial effect and transmission mechanism of China’s inter provincial carbon emission intensity. China Popul Resources Environ 30(03):49–55
Funding
This research is funded by China Scholarship Council (CSC) during a visit of “Fang Liu” to Erasmus University (No. 202006680056) and Heilongjiang Natural Science Foundation Project “Research on the mechanism and path dynamic simulation of the digital transformation of the energy industry under the goal of “carbon neutrality” (LHG2021009)”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Fang Liu: Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
We declare that we have no human participants, human data, or human tissues.
Consent for publication
We do not have any individual person’s data in any form.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Arshian Sharif
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, F. The impact of China’s low-carbon city pilot policy on carbon emissions: based on the multi-period DID model. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 81745–81759 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20188-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20188-z