Abstract
The principle of complementarity in physics can be generalized and extended to information studies. It helps explain the dilemma faced by information studies today. The prevailing endeavor that going beyond the limitation of formal theories and to develop a unified theory of information falls in the dilemma which is structurally homologous to the dilemmas in quantum physics. The dilemma is caused by an epistemological paradox called assignment paradox. The paradox can be removed through generalized complementarity. It means that the concept of information embodying in different theoretical contexts are different phenomenon. They are complementary to each other. The analysis brings bad news to methodologically reductionism and fundamentalism but good news to transdisciplinary approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A systematic study on the generalization and application of Bohr’s Principle of Complementarity can see von Stillfried’s dissertation Theoretical and Emprical Exploration of “Generalized Quntum Theory” (2010).
Philosophers of language have made a distinction between reference and meaning since Frege (1892). However, I will ignore the distinction here because information is much more basic than language. Whether can we apply the analysis of language to information is still open.
When saying about academic usages of information, I do not hold the notion that there is an academic definition of information with which researchers from different disciplines all agree with. In fact, comes to mathematical theories of information, we can even say there are more divergences than consensus. More can see in Burgin (2010).
Some may argue that Shannon did not intend to develop a theory involving Ref and Nor as he said at the very beginning of his classic paper (1948), thus he did not intentionally assign Ref and Nor to information in his theory. The argument is fair. However, as Bar-Hillel has argued, many has ignored Shannon’s warning and equaled the information discussed in the theory to information in daily usage. The “people” in my claim refers to these.
References
Barbour, I. G. (1966). Issues in science and religion. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Bar-Hillel, Y. (1955). An examination of information theory. Philosophy of Science,22(2), 86–105.
Bar-Hillel, Y. & Carnap, R. (1953). An outline of a theory of semantic information. Reprinted in Bar-Hillel, Y. (1964). Language and information: Selected essays on their theory and application (pp. 221–274). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Barwise, J., & Perry, J. (1983). Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. Hampton: Hampton Press.
Bedau, H., & Oppenheim, P. (1961). Complementarity in quantum physics. Synthese,13(3), 201–232.
Bohr, N. (1937). Causality and complementarity. Philosophy of Science IV,3, 289–298.
Brier, S. (2008). Cybersemiotics: Why information is not enough. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press.
Brier, S. (2015). Finding an information concept suited for a universal theory of information? Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology,119(3), 622–633.
Brody, N., & Oppenheim, P. (1969). Applications of Bohr’s principle of complementarity to the mind–body problem. The Journal of Philosophy,66, 97–113.
Burgin, M. (2010). Theory of information: Fundamentality, diversity and unification. Singapore: World Scientific.
Carnap, R., & Bar-Hillel, Y. (1952). Semantic information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,4(14), 147–157.
Cashman, T. (2008). What connects the map to the territory. In M. Barbieri & J. Hoffmyer (Eds.), A legacy for living systems: Gregory Bateson as precursor to biosemiotics (pp. 45–58). New York: Springer.
Chaitin, G. J. (1987). Algorithmic information theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chalmers, D. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies,2(3), 200–219.
Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Collier, J. (1996). Information originates in symmetry breaking. Symmetry: Culture & Science,7, 247–256.
Collier, J. (2003). Hierarchical dynamical information system with a focus on biology. Entropy,5, 102.
Collier, J. (2015). What must the world be like to have information about it? In Proceedings of summit of international society for information science. Austria: Bertalanffy Center for System Science Studies, Technology University of Vienna.
Deacon, T. (2007). Shannon–Boltzmann–Darwin: Redefining information. Part 1. Cognitive Semiotics,1, 123–148.
Deacon, T. (2008). Shannon–Boltzmann–Darwin: Redefining information. Part 2. Cognitive Semiotics,2, 167–194.
Deacon, T. (2010). What is missing from information. In P. Davies & N. Gregersen (Eds.), Information and the nature of reality: From physics to metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deacon, T. (2012). Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter. New York: W. W. Nordon & Company.
Deacon, T. (2015). Steps to a theory of reference & significance in information. FIS discussion paper, September.
Dodig Crnkovic, G. (2011). Dynamics of information as natural computation. Information,2(3), 460–477.
Dretske, F. (1981). Knowledge and the flow of information. Oxford: Blackwell; reprinted, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1999.
Fisher, R. A. (1925). Theory of statistical estimation. Proceedings Cambridge Philosophical Society, 22(5), 700–725.
Floridi, L. (2004). Outline of a theory of strongly semantic information. Minds and Machines,14(2), 197–222.
Floridi, L. (2005/2015) Semantic conceptions of information. In E. N. Zalta (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2014 Edn). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/information-semantic/.
Floridi, L. (2010). Information: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L. (2011). The philosophy of information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frege, G. (1892/1993). On sense and reference. In P. Geach & M. Black (Eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 56–78). Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1960.
Gregersen, N. (2010). God, matter, and information: Towards a stoicizing logos christology. In P. Davies & N. Gregersen (Eds.), Information and the nature of reality: From physics to metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hofkirchner, W. (Ed.). (1999). The quest for a unified theory of information. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.
Hofkirchner, W. (2013). Emergent information: A unified information framework. Singapore: World Scientific.
Husserl, E. (1936). The crisis of European science and transcendental phenomenology (D. E. Carr, Trans and introduction). Evanston: Northwesterm University Press. (1970).
Kolmogorov, A. N. (1965). Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information. Problems of Information Transmission,1(1), 1–7.
Lindenberg, S., & Oppenheim, P. (1974). Generalization of complementarity. Synthese,28, 117–139.
Mackay, D. M. (1969). Information, mechanism and meaning. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Penrose, O. (1970). Foundations of statistical mechanics: A deductive treatment. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Schmidhuber, J. (1997). A computer scientist’s view of life, the universe, and everything. In C. Freksa (Ed.), Foundations of computer science: Potential-theory-cognition (pp. 201–208)., Lecture notes in computer science Berlin: Springer.
Shannon, C. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423.
Solomonoff, R. J. (1964a). A formal theory of inductive inference, part I. Information and Control,7(1), 1–22.
Solomonoff, R. J. (1964b). A formal theory of inductive inference, part II. Information and Control,7(2), 224–254.
Stonier, T. (1997). Information and meaning: An evolutionary perspective. New York: Springer.
von Neumann, J. (1955). Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Berlin: Springer.
von Stillfried, N. (2010). Theoretical and Empirical Explorations of “Generalized Quantum Theory”. Eingereicht an der Kulturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der, Europa-Universität Viadrina. Frankfurt an der Oder.
Weaver, W. (1949). Recent contributions to the mathematical theory of communication. In C. Shannon & W. Weaver (Eds.), The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: The University of Illinois Press.
Wheeler, J. A. (1989). Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. In W. Zurek (Ed.), Complexity, entropy, and the physics of information. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.
Wolframe, S. (2002). A new kind of science. Champaign: Wolframe Media, Inc.
Wu, K. (2005). Information philosophy: Theory, system and methods [信息哲学:理论、系统与方法]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Zhong, Y. X. (2017). the law of information conversion and intelligence creation. In M. Burgin & W. Hofkirchner (Eds.), Information studies and the quest for transdisciplinarity: Unity through diversity. Singapore: World Scientific.
Zhou, L. Q., & Brier, S. (2015). The metaphysics of Chinese information philosophy: A critical analysis of WuKun’s philosophy of information. Cybernetics & Human Knowing,22(1), 35–56.
Zuse, K. (1967). Rechnender Raum. Elektronische Datenverarbeitung,8, 336–344.
Acknowledgements
I thank anonymous referees for their insightful critiques and suggestions which improve the paper substantially. The paper is supported by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant 2017M611789.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, L. Complementarity in information studies. Synthese 197, 293–310 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1786-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1786-8