Skip to main content
Log in

A review of water quality models and monitoring methods for capabilities of pollutant source identification, classification, and transport simulation

  • Review paper
  • Published:
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water quality monitoring and modeling are vital in improving the aquatic ecosystem's health and surroundings. The advancements in computer science and its integration with mathematics have resulted in the development of divergent algorithms and models for evaluating/predicting water quality and simulating the fate/transport of environmental contaminants. In this paper, four widely used statistical methods/algorithms, viz. (1) topological method, (2) multivariate statistics, (3) geostatistics, and (4) information entropy method, have been discussed and assessed. The assessment is based on its application merits and de-merits in recent environmental/water resources projects to advocate its suitability and flexibility in water quality analysis. The assessment parameters of suitability taken into account are pollutant source identification and classification. The reviewed methods argue for river water quality improvement through restoration and pollution control plans, simultaneously trying to minimize the number of sampling locations. Further, the five most widely used WQ models, viz. MIKE, AQUATOX, SWAT, IBER, and TELEMAC have been compared based on their mode of access (paid/freely available), input data requirement, output, and applicability for specific scenarios (e.g., oil spillage, contaminant transport, etc.). This paper is the first of its kind that compares and reviews IBER software and other water quality modeling/analysis software. The review is constructed to guide the reader in selecting a particular method and software/model in various scenarios. The study of the water quality models will also help in selecting the most accurate model to uncover the distribution of biochemical contaminants in a water body and its prediction to generate risk maps.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ANN:

Artificial neural network

BLTM:

Branched Lagrangian transport model

BOD:

Biological oxygen demand

CAD:

Computer-aided design

DO:

Dissolved oxygen

GIS:

Geographical information system

N Fluxes:

Nitrogen fluxes

SPI:

Standard precipitation index

WASP:

Water quality analysis simulation program

WQ:

Water quality

References

  • Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2012) Water-quality indices. Elsevier

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-Elaty I et al (2019) Integrated modelling for groundwater contamination from polluted streams using new protection process techniques. Water 11(11):2321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andrea Lombardo AF, Pivato A, Barausse A (2014) Food web modeling of a river ecosystem for risk assessment of down-the-drain chemicals: a case study with AQUATOX. Sci Total Environ 508:214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area modeling and assessment part I-model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34:73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan O (2013) Spatially weighted principal component analysis (PCA) method for water quality analysis. Water Resour 40:315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asadi A, Moghaddam Nia A, Bakhtiari Enayat B, Alilou H, Ahmadisharaf E, Kimutai Kanda E, Chessum Kipkorir E (2021) An integrated approach for prioritization of river water quality sampling points using modified Sanders, analytic network process, and hydrodynamic modeling. Environ Monit Assess 193:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baozhu P et al (2016) A review of ecological restoration techniques in fluvial rivers. Int J Sed Res 31:110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basso M, Vieira DC, Ramos TB, Mateus M (2020) Assessing the adequacy of SWAT model to simulate postfire effects on the watershed hydrological regime and water quality. Land Degr Dev 31(5):619–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batur E, Maktav D (2019) Assessment of surface water quality by using satellite images fusion based on PCA method in the Lake Gala, Turkey. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 57:2938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedri Z, O’Sullivan JJ, Deering LA, Demeter K, Masterson B, Meijer WG, O’Hare G (2015) Assessing the water quality response to an alternative sewage disposal strategy at bathing sites on the east coast of Ireland. Marine Pollut Bullet 91(1):330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Behmel S, Damour M, Ludwig R, Rodriguez MJ (2016) Water quality monitoring strategies — a review and future perspectives. Sci Total Environ 571:1312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge D et al (2012) A geostatistical approach to optimize water quality monitoring networks in large lakes: application to Lake Winnipeg. J Great Lakes Res 38:174–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bin S et al (2018) Quantitative design of emergency monitoring network for river chemical spills based on discrete entropy theory. Water Res 134:140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bladé E et al (2014) Iber: herramienta de simulación numérica del flujo en ríos. Rev Int Métodos Numér Cálcx Diseño Ing. 30:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukavecka PA (2007) Effects of channel restoration on water velocity, transient storage, and nutrient uptake in a channelized stream. Environ Sci Technol 41:1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camargo JA, Alonso A, de la Puente M (2004) Multimetric assessment of nutrient enrichment in impounded rivers based on benthic macroinvertebrates. Environ Monit Assess 156:343

    Google Scholar 

  • Cea LB et al (2016) New simulation tool for 2D water quality modelling in rivers and shallow estuaries. J Hydroinf 18:816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang H, Carlson TN (2005) Water quality during winter storm events in Spring Creek, Pennsylvania USA. Hydrobiologia 544:321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chee K, Kyung R (2020) Prediction of dissolved oxygen and study of engineered nanoparticles to improve water quality. J Geogr Res 3:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen WB, Liu WC (2015) Water quality modeling in reservoirs using multivariate linear regression and two neural network models. Adv Artif Neural Syst 1:6

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen C-S et al (2016) Simulation of groundwater contaminant transport at a decommissioned landfill site—a case study, Tainan City. Taiwan Int J Environ Res Pub Health 13(5):467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C-F et al (2019) Changes in the total content and speciation patterns of metals in the dredged sediments after ocean dumping: Taiwan continental slope. Ocean Coast Manag 181:104893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinyama A, Ochieng GM, Nhapi I, Otieno FA (2014) A simple framework for selection of water quality models. Rev Environ Sci Bio/technol 13:109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough JS et al (2017) Establishing nearshore marine injuries for the deepwater horizon natural resource damage assessment using AQUATOX. Ecol Model 359:258–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costa C et al (2019) Applicability of water quality models around the world—a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26

  • da Silva MC, de Paula KE, Bendô AR, Marques WC, Vargas MM, Leite LR, Junior OO, Pertille J (2021) Dynamic modeling of effluent dispersion on Mangueira bay—Patos Lagoon (Brazil). Reg Stud Marine Sci 1(41):101544

    Google Scholar 

  • da Silva Burigato CM, Costa MLD, Almeida AK, Leite IR, de Almeida IK (2019) Applicability of water quality models around the world-a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(36):36141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dan Beveridge, A.S.-H., Taha B.M.J. Ouarda, Bahaa Khalil, F. Malcolm Conly, Leonard I. Wassenaar, Emily Ritson-Bennett, A geostatistical approach to optimize water quality monitoring networks in large lakes: Application to Lake Winnipeg. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 2012.

  • Das P, Kumar M (2020) Assessment of water quality using multivariate analysis—a case study on the Brahmaputra River, Assam, India, in emerging issues in the water environment during anthropocene. Springer Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • de Souza Teixeira A, Carneiro LA, da Silva Junior OP, de Carvalho SL, Américo-Pinheiro JH (2021) Assessment of water quality using principal component analysis: a case study of the Marrecas stream basin in Brazil. Environ Technol 42(27):4286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dębska K, Rutkowska B, Szulc W (2021) The influence of a dam reservoir on water quality in a small lowland river. Environ Monit Assess 193(3):123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deepshikha S, Kansal A (2013) Assessment of river quality models: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 12:285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delia KA et al (2021) Spatial analysis of a chesapeake bay sub-watershed: how land use and precipitation patterns impact water quality in the James River. Water 13(11):1592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deng C, Liu L, Li H, Peng D, Wu Y, Xia H, Zhang Z, Zhu Q (2021) A data-driven framework for spatiotemporal characteristics, complexity dynamics, and environmental risk evaluation of river water quality. Sci Total Environ 785:147134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dheeraj KD, Tripathi SK (2016) Assessment of surface water quality using hierarchical cluster analysis. Int J Environ 5:32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Do HT et al (2011) Optimal design of river nutrient monitoring points based on an export coefficient model. J Hydrol 406:129–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du Xiangjun FS et al (2017) Water quality assessment with hierarchical cluster analysis based on Mahalanobis distance. Environ Monit Assess 189:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Ejigu MT (2021) Overview of water quality modeling. Cogent Eng 8:189711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emad AMS, et al. (2012) Assessment of water quality of Euphrates River using cluster analysis. J Environ Prot

  • Environment CCCoMot (2006) Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection 1186 of Aquatic Life. 1186 of Aquatic Life

  • Epelde AM, Cerro I, Sánchez-Pérez JM, Sauvage S, Srinivasan R, Antigüedad I (2015) Application of the SWAT model to assess the impact of changes in agricultural management practices on water quality. Hydrol Sci J 60(5):825

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Esdras J, Zandagba B, Adandedji FM, Lokonon BE, Chabi A, Dan O, Mama D (2017) Application use of water quality index (WQI) and multivariate analysis for Nokoué Lake. Water Qual Assess 1:117

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans W, Kirkpatrick D, Townsend G (1999) Right-triangulated irregular networks. Algorithmica 30:264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatima SU et al (2022) Geospatial assessment of water quality using principal components analysis (PCA) and water quality index (WQI) in Basho Valley, Gilgit Baltistan (Northern Areas of Pakistan). Environ Monit Assess 194:151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y et al (2019) Improved entropy weighting model in water quality evaluation. Water Resour Manag 33:2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fereshteh K et al (2019) A modeling approach for calcium carbonate precipitation in a hypersaline environment: a case study from a shallow, alkaline lake. Ecol Compl 39:100774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrarin C et al (2021) Modelling the quality of bathing waters in the Adriatic Sea. Water 13(11):1525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisk T, Bilaletdin A, Kallio K, Saura M (1997) Modeling the effects of climatic change. Boreal Environ Res 2:53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Armisen T, Touron A, Petit F, Servais P (2005) Sources of faecal contamination in the Seine estuary (France). Estuaries 28:627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves AM, Alpuim T (2011) Water quality monitoring using cluster analysis and linear models. Environmetrics 22(8):933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grote M, Altenburger R, Brack W, Moschütz S, Mothes S, Michael C, Narten G-B, Paschke A, Schirmer K, Walter H, Wennrich R, Wenzel K-D, Schüürmann G (2005) Ecotoxicological profiling of transect river Elbe sediments. Acta Hydrochimica Et Hydrobiologia 33:555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gu Q et al (2014) Identification and assessment of potential water quality impact factors for drinking-water reservoirs. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11(6):6069–6084

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guven B, Karami F, Balci N (2019) A modeling approach for calcium carbonate precipitation in a hypersaline environment: a case study from a shallow, alkaline lake. Ecol Compl 39:00774

    Google Scholar 

  • Haiyan Y et al (2021) Modelling impacts of water diversion on water quality in an urban artificial lake. Environ Pollut 276:116694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haughey T (2010) The return on investment (ROI) of data modeling. CA, Erwin, pp 1–18

  • Holanda S et al (2011) Hydrodynamic modeling and morphological analysis of lake A´gua Preta: one of the water sources of BelemPA-Brazil. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 33:117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal MS, Hofstra N (2018) Modeling Escherichia coli fate and transport in the Kabul River Basin using SWAT. Human Ecol Risk Assess Int J 25(5):1279–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam MMM, Iqbal MS, Leemans R, Hofstra N (2018a) Modelling the impact of future socio-economic and climate change scenarios on river microbial water quality. Int J Hyg Environ Health 221(2):283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam MMM, Sokolova E, Hofstra N (2018b) Modelling of river faecal indicator bacteria dynamics as a basis for faecal contamination reduction. J Hydrol 563:1000–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel AO et al (2021) Impact of seasonal variation in climate on water quality of old woman creek watershed Ohio using SWAT. Climate 9:50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iturbide M et al (2020) An update of IPCC climate reference regions for subcontinental analysis of climate model data: definition and aggregated datasets. Earth Syst Sci Data 12:2959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji H, Peng D, Fan C, Zhao K, Gu Y, Liang Y (2022) Assessing effects of non-point source pollution emission control schemes on Beijing’s sub-center with a water environment model. Urban Clim 43:101148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia P, Wang Q, Lu X, Zhang B, Li C, Li S, Li S, Wang Y (2018) Simulation of the effect of an oil refining project on the water environment using the MIKE 21 model. Phys Chem Earth Parts a/b/c 103:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang J et al (2020) A comprehensive review on the design and optimization of surface water quality monitoring networks. Environ Model Softw 132:104792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiping J et al (2020) A comprehensive review on the design and optimization of surface water quality monitoring networks. Environ Model Softw 132:104792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen AM (2010) Monte Carlo methods. In: International Encyclopedia of education

  • Jonathan K, Ahmadian R, Falconer RA (2021) Hydro-epidemiological modelling of bacterial transport and decay in nearshore coastal waters. Water Res 196:117049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamble SR, Vijay R (2011) Assessment of water quality using cluster analysis in coastal region of Mumbai, India. Environ Monit Assess 178:321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiniry J, Williams J, Srinivasan R (2000) Soil and water assessment tool user's manual 202

  • Knuth DE (1968) The art of computer programming. Fundamental algorithms. Addison-Wesley, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Korstrom JS, Birtwell IK (2006) Effects of suspended sediment on the escape behavior and cover-seeking response of juvenile Chinook salmon in freshwater. Trans Am Fish Soc 135:1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni A et al (2020) Precipitation changes in India. In: Krishnan R et al (eds) Assessment of climate change over the Indian region: a report of the ministry of earth sciences (MoES), Government of India. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 47–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kumari M, Sarma K, Sharma R (2019) Using Moran’s I and GIS to study the spatial pattern of land surface temperature in relation to land use/cover around a thermal power plant in Singrauli district, Madhya Pradesh, India. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ 15:100239

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudon H, Westling O, Löfgren S, Bishop K (2004) Modeling preindustrial ANC and pH during the spring flood in northern Sweden. Biogeochemistry 54:171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavine W, Jamal MH, Abd Wahab AK, Kasiman EH (2020) Effect of sea level rise on oil spill model drift using TELEMAC-2D. J Water Clim Change 11(4):1021–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Zhang Q, Yao J, Werner AD, Li X (2014) Hydrodynamic and hydrological modeling of the Poyang Lake catchment system in China. J Hydrol Eng 19(3):607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang J et al (2015) MIKE 11 model-based wáter quality model as a tool for the evaluation of waer quality management plans. J Water Supp Res Technol AQUA 6:708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liuming H et al (2010) Effects on water quality following water transfer in Lake Taihu, China. Ecol Eng 36:471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lokhande S, Tare V (2021) Spatio-temporal trends in the flow and water quality: response of river Yamuna to urbanization. Environ Monit Assess 193:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo A et al (2014) Food web modeling of a river ecosystem for risk assessment of down-the-drain chemicals: a case study with AQUATOX. Sci Total Environ 508C:214–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Long Y et al (2016) Simulating the impacts of an upstream dam on pollutant transport: a case study on the Xiangjiang River, China. Water 8(11):516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke MM, Zammit B, Leyden E, Heneker TM, Hipsey MR, Skinner D, Aldridge K (2012) The impact of extreme low flows on the water quality of the Lower Murray River and Lakes (South Australia). Water Resour Manage 26:3923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunchakorn P et al (2008) The relationship of climatic and hydrological parameters to surface water quality in the lower Mekong River. Environ Int 34:860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maiolo M, Pantusa D (2021) Multivariate analysis of water quality data for drinking water supply systems. Water 13:1766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mancini JL (1978) Numerical estimates of coliform mortality rates under various conditions. J Water Pollut Control Feder 50(11):2477–2484

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron G (1963) Principles of geostatistics. Econ Geol 58:1246–1266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matta E, Selge F, Gunkel G, Rossiter K, Jourieh A, Hinkelmann R (2016) Simulations of nutrient emissions from a net cage aquaculture system in a Brazilian bay. Water Sci Technol 73:2430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mavukkandy MO, Karmakar S, Harikumar PS (2014) Assessment and rationalization of water quality monitoring network: a multivariate statistical approach to the Kabbini River (India). Environ Sci Pollut Control Ser 21:10045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mia B, Sokolova E, Nguyen A, Karlsson D, Karlsson A, Björklund K (2020) Hydrodynamic modelling of traffic-related microplastics discharged with stormwater into the Göta River in Sweden. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:24218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mimikou MA, Baltas E, Varanou E, Pantazis K (2000) Regional impacts of climate change on water resources quantity and quality indicators. J Hydrol 234:95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad RN, Pourshahabi S, Rezazadeh N, Ehsan Shafiee M (2017) Stakeholder engagement in multi-objective optimization of water quality monitoring network, case study: Karkheh Dam reservoir. Water Sci Technol Water Supp 17:966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MRC (2005) Over the hydrology of the Mekong Basin

  • Mrozińska N, Glińska-Lewczuk K, Burandt P, Kobus S, Gotkiewicz W, Szymańska M, Bąkowska M, Obolewski K (2018) Water quality as an indicator of stream restoration effects—a case study of the Kwacza River restoration project. Water 10:1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash MS, Heggem DT, Ebert D, Wade TG, Hall RK (2009) Multi-scale landscape factors influencing stream water quality in the state of Oregon. Environ Monit Assess 156:343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Navideh N, Kalin L, Isik S (2020) Water quality prediction using SWAT-ANN coupled approach. J Hydrol 590:125220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neitsch S, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR (2009) Soil & water assessment tool theoretical documentation version. Tech. rep., Texas Water Resources Institute Technical Report No. 406 Texas AM University System

  • Newcomer Johnson TA et al (2016) Nutrient retention in restored streams and rivers: a global review and synthesis. Water 8:116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngubane Z et al (2022) Water quality modelling and quantitative microbial risk assessment for uMsunduzi River in South Africa. J Water Health 20:641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu Z, Gou Q, Wang X, Zhang Y (2016) Simulation of a water ecosystem in a landscape lake in Tianjin with AQUATOX: sensitivity, calibration, validation and ecosystem prognosis. Ecol Model 335:54–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noori N, Kalin L, Isik S (2020) Water quality prediction using SWAT-ANN coupled approach. J Hydrol 590:125220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olaoye IA, Confesor RB, Ortiz JD (2021) Impact of seasonal variation in climate on water quality of old woman creek watershed Ohio Using SWAT. Climate 9(3):50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlando G-F et al (2020) A GPU accelerated tool for 2D water quality modeling in rivers and estuaries. Water 12:413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod SJ (2003) Restoration in applied ecology: editor’s introduction. J Appl Ecol 40:44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega DJ et al (2016) Development of index of resilience for surface water in watersheds. J Urban Environ Eng 10:72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ou C-PS-H et al (2012) Coupling geostatistical approaches with PCA and fuzzy optimal model (FOM) for the integrated assessment of sampling locations of water quality monitoring networks (WQMNs). J Environ Monit 14:3118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park R, Clough J (2004) AQUATOX (Release 2) modeling environmental fate and ecological effects in aquatic ecosystems. Tech Doc 213:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Park R et al (1988) Assessment of risks of toxic pollutants to aquatic organisms and ecosystems using a sequential modelling approach. In: Fate and effects of pollutants on aquatic organisms and ecosystems

  • Park RA et al (2008) AQUATOX: modeling environmental fate and ecological effects in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol Model 213:1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peavy HS, Rowe DR, Tchobanoglous G (1985) Environmental engineering. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps WSaE (1925) A study of the pollution and natural purification of the Ohio River, 111. In: Factors concerned in the phenomena of oxidation and reaeration. Public Health Bulletin No. 146, US Public Health Service, Government Printing Office, Washington

  • Pinay G, Gumiero B, Tabacchi E, Gimenez O, Tabacchi-Planty AM, Hefting MM, Burt TP, Black VA, Nilsson C, Iordache V, Bureau F, Vought L, Petts GE, Décamps H (2007) Patterns of denitrification rates in European alluvial soils under various hydrological regimes. Freshwater Biol 52:252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT (1986) Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulighe G et al (2021) Modeling climate change impacts on water balance of a mediterranean watershed Using SWAT+. Hydrology 8:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu Y et al (2022) Understanding the nonpoint source pollution loads’ spatiotemporal dynamic response to intensive land use in rural China. J Environ Manage 315:115066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajwa-Kuligiewicz A, Bialik R, Rowiński P (2015) Dissolved oxygen and water temperature dynamics in lowland rivers over various timescales. J Hydrol Hydromech 63:353–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasul MG et al (2017) Spatial and temporal variation of water quality in the bertam catchment, Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. Water Environ Res 89:2088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reitter C, Petzoldt H, Korth A, Schwab F, Stange C, Hambsch B, Tiehm A, Lagkouvardos I, Gescher J, Hügler M (2021) Seasonal dynamics in the number and composition of coliform bacteria in drinking water reservoirs. Sci Total Environ 15(787):147539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rimer AE, Nissen JA, Reynolds DE (1978) Characterization and impact of stormwater runoff from various land cover types. J Water Pollut Contr Feder 1:252

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabzipour B, Asghari O, Sarang A (2017) Evaluation and optimal redesigning of river water-quality monitoring networks (RWQMN) using geostatistics approach (case study: Karun, Iran). Sustain Water Resour Manag 5:439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadak D, Ayvaz MT, Elçi A (2020) Allocation of unequally-weighted wastewater discharge loads using a simulation-optimization approach. J Hydrol 589:125158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahaj S, Futaba K (2007) Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study of the Fuji River Basin, Japan. Environ Model Softw 22:464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo MM, Patra KC, Khatua KK (2015) Inference of water quality index using ANFIA and PCA. In: International conference on water resources, coastal and ocean engineering (ICWRCOE 2015) 4:1099

  • Salami ES, Ehteshami M (2015) Simulation, evaluation and prediction modeling of river water quality properties (case study: Ireland Rivers). Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:3235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Gómez A et al (2023) Streamflow components and climate change: lessons learnt and energy implications after hydrological modeling experiences in catchments with a Mediterranean climate. Energy Rep 9:277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders T et al (1983) Design of networks for monitoring water quality. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch

    Google Scholar 

  • Selméus L (2018) Dynamic modelling of bathing water quality with biodegradation of Escherichia coli in TELEMAC-3D. TVVR18/5001

  • Sharma D, Kansal A (2013) Assessment of river quality models: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 12:285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh VP (2013) Entropy theory and its application in environmental and water engineering. John Wiley & Sons

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singh K et al (2020) Development of irrigation water quality index incorporating information entropy. Environ Dev Sustain 22:3119 (in press)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh VP (2014) Entropy theory in hydraulic engineering: an introduction. Am Soc Civil Eng

  • Tom B, Baugh J (2015) Modelling the effects of water injection dredging on water quality. In: Book of abstracts (2015)

  • Uddin MG, Nash S, Olbert AI (2021) A review of water quality index models and their use for assessing surface water quality. Ecolog Ind 1(122):107218

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vliet MTH, Zwolsman JJG (2008) Impact of summer droughts on the water quality of the Meuse river. J Hydrol 353(1–2):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lan-Anh K-DN et al (2022) Development of a tool for modeling the fecal contamination in rivers with turbulent flows—application to the seine et Marne Rivers (Parisian Region, France). Water 14:1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varekar V et al (2015) Design of sampling locations for river water quality monitoring considering seasonal variation of point and diffuse pollution loads. Environ Monit Assess 187:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z et al (2021) An abnormal phenomenon in entropy weight method in the dynamic evaluation of water quality index. Ecol Ind 131:108137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward RC, Loftis JC, McBride GB (1986) The “data-rich but information-poor” syndrome in water quality monitoring. Environ Manag 10:291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerasinghe VPA, Handapangoda KH (2019) Surface water quality analysis of an urban lake; East Beira, Colombo, Sri Lanka. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag 12:100249

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenfeng W et al (2017) Microplastics pollution in inland freshwaters of China: a case study in urban surface waters of Wuhan, China. Sci Total Environ 575:1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenjie Y et al (2020) Using principal components analysis and IDW interpolation to determine spatial and temporal changes of surface water quality of Xin’anjiang River in Huangshan, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:2942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DG, Scott RL, Huxman TE, Goodrich DC, Lin G (2006) Sensitivity of riparian ecosystems in arid and semiarid environments to moisture pulses. Hydrolog Process 15:3191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollheim WM et al (2018) River network saturation concept: factors influencing the balance of biogeochemical supply and demand of river networks. Biogeochemistry 141:503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xin XK, Li KF, Finlayson B, Yin W (2015) Evaluation, prediction, and protection of water quality in Danjiangkou Reservoir, China. Water Sci Eng 8(1):30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong H et al (2021) Simulating the impact of piers on hydrodynamics and pollutant transport: a case study in the middle Yangtze River. PLoS ONE 16(12):e0260527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu F, Dong G, Wang Q, Liu L, Yu W, Men C, Liu R (2016) Impacts of DEM uncertainties on critical source areas identification for non-point source pollution control based on SWAT model. J Hydrol 540:355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Cui Y, Yang C, Wei S, Dong W, Huang L, Liu C, Ren Z, Wang W (2021) The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) and the principal component analysis (PCA) model simulation and its applications in water quality assessment of Nansi Lake Basin, China. Environ Eng Res 26:2

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan J, Jinxia L, You X, Shi X, Zhang L (2018) Simulating the gross primary production and ecosystem respiration of estuarine ecosystem in North China with AQUATOX. Ecol Model 373:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu C et al (2019) Managing nitrogen to restore water quality in China. Nature 567(7749):516–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang DC (2007) Fundamentals of environmental sampling and analysis. John Wiley & Sons

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Liu J, Li Y, Zhao Y (2013) Applying AQUATOX in determining the ecological risk assessment of polychlorinated biphenyl contamination in Baiyangdian Lake, North China. Ecol Model 265:239–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Qian H, Xu P, Hou K, Yang F (2021) Groundwater quality assessment using a new integrated-weight water quality index (IWQI) and driver analysis in the Jiaokou Irrigation District, China. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 212:111992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zou ZH, Sun JN, Ren GP (2005) Study and application on the entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. Acta Sci Circumst 18:1020

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PT: Conceived, designed the analysis and drafted the manuscript. BK: Supervised, reviewed and drafted the article. VVK: Supervised, reviewed and drafted the article and approved the version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vihangraj V. Kulkarni.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Talukdar, P., Kumar, B. & Kulkarni, V.V. A review of water quality models and monitoring methods for capabilities of pollutant source identification, classification, and transport simulation. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 22, 653–677 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-023-09658-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-023-09658-z

Keywords

Navigation