Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of different environmental regulations and their heterogeneity on air pollution control in China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study endeavors to explore the impact of different environmental regulations and their heterogeneity on air pollution control in China. By employing a slacks-based measure of directional distance function model, considering undesirable outputs, the efficiency of air pollution control of China’s 30 provinces during 2001–2014 is evaluated. The estimates indicate that the efficiency of air pollution control is fluctuating, and there is obvious regional differences. By using provincial-level panel data and panel threshold models, empirical results show that: (1) There is a nonlinear relationship between environmental regulation and air pollution control efficiency, and it can be positively correlated, but it is constrained by the stringency of regulation: there is a single threshold for formal (command-and-control (CAC) and market-based) regulation, while there is a double threshold for informal regulation. (2) Different environmental regulations have different governance effects. Compared with CAC regulation, market regulation can attract more attention of enterprises. (3) It may be ineffective to expect informal regulation to improve the air pollution control efficiency. Therefore, in order to achieve real sustainable development, the government should set up reasonable regulation stringency and optimize the combination of regulation tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arguedas, C., & Rousseau, S. (2015). Emission standards and monitoring strategies in a hierarchical setting. Environmental and Resource Economics, 60, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagayev, I., & Lochard, J. (2017). EU air pollution regulation: A breath of fresh air for Eastern European polluting industries? J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 83, 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basoglu, A., & Uzar, U. (2019). An empirical evaluation about the effects of environmental expenditures on environmental quality in coordinated market economies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26(37), 108–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R., & Henderson, V. (2000). Effects of air quality regulations on polluting industries. Journal of Political Economy, 108, 379–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, A. S. (2015). A game-theoretic approach to optimizing the scale of electricity storing systems in a regional electrical grid. Energy System, 6, 389–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benkovic, S. R., & Kruger, J. (2001). U.S. sulfur dioxide emissions trading program: Results and further applications. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 130, 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betsill, M. M., Corell, E., & Departure, P. (2001). NGO influence in international environmental negotiations: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 1, 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, A., & Kildegaard, A. (2010). Clean technological change in developing-country industrial clusters: Mexican leather tanning. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 12, 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T., & Buzogány, A. (2010). Environmental organisations and the Europeanisation of public policy in Central and Eastern Europe: The case of biodiversity governance. Environmental Politics, 19, 708–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostan, I., Onofrei, M., Dascalu, E. D., et al. (2016). Impact of sustainable environmental expenditures policy on air pollution reduction, during European integration framework. The Amfiteatru Economic Journal, 18(42), 286–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier, S. B., & Cohen, M. A. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 278–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. G., Fāure, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Productivity growth in APEC countries. Pacific Economic Review, 1, 181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. C., & Wang, N. (2010). Environmental regulations and emissions trading in China. Energy Policy, 38, 3356–3364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B., Dai, H., Wang, P., Xie, Y., Chen, L., Zhao, D., & Masui, T. (2016). Impacts of low-carbon power policy on carbon mitigation in Guangdong Province, China. Energy Policy, 88, 515–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. A., Elliott, R., & Shimamoto, K. (2005). Industrial characteristics, environmental regulations and air pollution: An analysis of the UK manufacturing sector. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50, 121–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S., Wheeler, D., Huq, M., & Zhang, C. (2001). Water pollution abatement by Chinese industry: Cost estimates and policy implications. Applied Economics, 33, 547–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, G., Ding, Y., & Ren, S. (2016). The study on the air pollutants embodied in goods for consumption and trade in China: Accounting and structural decomposition analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 332–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, H., Zheng, X., Huang, N., & Li, F. (2012). Strategic interaction in spending on environmental protection: Spatial evidence from Chinese cities. China World Economy, 20, 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economy, E. (2014). Environmental governance in China: State control to crisis management. Daedalus, 143, 184–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Pasurka, C. A. (2007). Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy, 32, 1055–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredriksson, P. G., & Millimet, D. L. (2002). Strategic interaction and the determination of environmental policy across U.S States. The Journal of Urban Economics, 51, 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, H., & Weber, W. L. (2009). A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 43, 274–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2010). What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. daily newspapers. Econometrica, 78, 35–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldar, B., & Banerjee, N. (2004). Impact of informal regulation of pollution on water quality in rivers in India. Journal of Environmental Management, 73, 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone, M. (2003). Estimating regulation-induced substitution: The effect of the clean air act on water and ground pollution. The American Economic Review, 93, 442–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, 3914, 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Economics, 93, 345–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B. E. (2011). Threshold autoregression in economics. Statistics and Its Interface, 4, 123–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hårsman, B., & Quigley, J. M. (2010). Political and public acceptability of congestion pricing: Ideology and self-interest. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29, 854–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C., & Meffe, G. (1996). Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology, 10, 328–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. T. (2018). Sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions and government spending on environmental protection in China-Evidence from spatial econometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 431–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanada, M., Fujita, T., Fujii, M., & Ohnishi, S. (2013). The long-term impacts of air pollution control policy: Historical links between municipal actions and industrial energy efficiency in Kawasaki City, Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 58, 92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kathuria, V. (2007). Informal regulation of pollution in a developing country: Evidence from India. Ecological Economics, 63, 403–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konisky, D. M. (2007). Regulatory competition and environmental enforcement: Is there a race to the bottom? American Journal of Political Science, 51, 853–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konisky, D. M., & Woods, N. D. (2012). Environmental free riding in state water pollution enforcement. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 12, 227–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanoie, P., Patry, M., & Lajeunesse, R. (2008). Environmental regulation and productivity: Testing the porter hypothesis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 30, 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, A. (1996). Environmental regulations and manufacturers’ location choices: Evidence from the Census of Manufactures. Journal of Public Economics, 62, 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, A. (2003). Environmental regulatory competition: A status report and some new evidence. National Tax Journal, 56, 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, A., & Taylor, M. S. (2008). Unmasking the pollution haven effect. International Economic Review (philadelphia), 49, 223–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., He, Q., Shao, S., & Cao, J. (2018). Environmental non-governmental organizations and urban environmental governance: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 206, 1296–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Zhou, L.-A. (2005). Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1743–1762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Wang, J., Chen, R., Xi, Y., Qiang, S., Wu, F., Masoud, M., & Wu, X. (2019). Innovation-driven industrial green development : The moderating role of regional factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 344–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindstad, H. E., & Eskeland, G. S. (2016). Environmental regulations in shipping: Policies leaning towards globalization of scrubbers deserve scrutiny. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 47, 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., Jiang, J., Bian, J., et al. (2021). Are environmental regulations holding back industrial growth? Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 306, 127007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Guo, W. (2013). Effects of energy conservation and emission reduction on energy efficiency retrofit for existing residence : A case from China. Energy Buildings, 61, 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Hao, Y., & Gao, Y. (2017). The environmental consequences of domestic and foreign investment: Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 108, 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y. R., Ji, Q., & Fan, Y. (2016). Spatial linkage analysis of the impact of regional economic activities on PM2.5 pollution in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1157–1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marco, A. Z., & Giménez, J. V. (2013). Environmental tax and productivity in a decentralized context: New findings on the Porter Hypothesis. European Journal of Law and Economics, 40, 313–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marconi, D. (2012). Environmental regulation and revealed comparative advantages in Europe: Is China a pollution haven? Review of International Economics, 20, 616–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meza, D. (1985). Effluent charges and environmental damage: A clarification. Oxford Economic Papers, 37, 700–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyborg, K., & Telle, K. (2006). Firms’ compliance to environmental eegulation : Is there really a paradox ? Environmental and Resource Economics, 35, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paras, S. (1997). Environmental taxation and industrial pollution prevention and control: Towards a holistic approach. European Environment, 7, 162–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pargal, S., & Wheeler, D. (1996). Informal regulation of industrial pollution in developing countries: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 1314–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. M. (1977). Estimating an effluent charge: The reserve mining case. Land Economics, 53, 328–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspective, 9, 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlottmannt, A. (1976). A regional analysis of air quality standaeds, coal conversion, and the steam-electric coal market. Journal of Regional Science, 16, 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S. (2013). China’s failure of policy innovation: The case of sulphur dioxide emission trading. Environmental Politics, 22, 918–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H. (2008). Public policies against global warming: A supply side. International Tax and Public Finance, 15, 360–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, E., Liu, F., Zhang, J., & Yu, J. (2014). A model to analyze the environmental policy of resource reallocation and pollution control based on fi rms’ heterogeneity. Resources Policy, 39, 88–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, Z., & Shen, R. (2014). Can China’s industrial SO2 emissions trading pilot scheme reduce pollution abatement costs? Sustainability, 6, 7621–7645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas-Vargas, M., Meseguer-Santamaría, M. L., Mondéjar-Jiménez, J., & Mondéjar-Jiménez, J. A. (2010). Environmental protection expenditure for companies: A Spanish regional analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research, 4, 373–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlachou, A. (2014). The European union’s emissions trading system. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38, 127–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Dwyer-Lindgren, L., Lofgren, K. T., Rajaratnam, J. K., Marcus, J. R., Levin-Rector, A., Levitz, C. E., Lopez, A. D., & Murray, C. J. L. (2012). Age-specific and sex-specific mortality in 187 countries, 1970–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, 380, 2071–2094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., & Wheeler, D. (2005). Financial incentives and endogenous enforcement in China’s pollution levy system. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 49, 174–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J.-H.Z., & Connell, J. (2016). Green Watershed in Yunnan: A multi-scalar analysis of environmental non-governmental organisation (eNGO) relationships in China. Australian Geographer, 47, 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Shen, N. (2016). Environmental regulation and environmental productivity : The case of China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 758–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Zhang, P., Yi, H., & Qin, Z. (2016). What causes haze pollution ? An empirical study of PM2.5 concentrations in Chinese cities. Sustainability, 8(132), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X., Gao, M., Guo, S., & Li, W. (2019a). Effects of environmental regulation on air pollution control in China: A spatial Durbin econometric analysis. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 55, 307–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X., Gao, M., Guo, S., & Maqbool, R. (2019b). Environmental and economic effects of sulfur dioxide emissions trading pilot scheme in China: A quasi-experiment. Energy & Environment, 30(7), 1255–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, R., Yuan, Y. J., & Huang, J. (2017). Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on “Green” productivity: Evidence from China. Ecological Economics, 132, 104–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, S., & Liang, H. (2017). Firm location, political geography and environmental information disclosure. Applied Economics, 49, 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, H., & Liu, Y. (2015). Green economy in China: Regional variations and policy drivers. Global Environmental Change, 31, 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 46, 351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, D. Z., & Zhao, L. (2009). Pollution havens and industrial agglomeration. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58, 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan, X., & Tang, S. (2013). Political opportunities, resource constraints and policy advocacy of environmental NGOs in China. Public Administration, 91, 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. J., & Wei, Y. M. (2010). An overview of current research on EU ETS: Evidence from its operating mechanism and economic effect. Applied Energy, 87, 1804–1814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, S., Wan, G., Sun, W., & Luo, D. (2013). Public appeal and urban environmental governance (in Chinese). Management World, 6, 72–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, S., Yi, H., & Li, H. (2015). The impacts of provincial energy and environmental policies on air pollution control in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49, 386–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Q., Zhang, X., Shao, Q., & Wang, X. (2019). The non-linear effect of environmental regulation on haze pollution : Empirical evidence for 277 Chinese cities during 2002–2010. Journal of Environmental Management, 248, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Q., Zhong, S., Shi, T., et al. (2021). Environmental regulation and haze pollution: Neighbor-companion or neighbor-beggar? Energy Policy, 151, 112183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, S., He, C., & Liu, Y. (2014). Going green or going away: Environmental regulation, economic geography and firms’ strategies in China’s pollution-intensive industries. Geoforum, 55, 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X., & Zhang, C. (2012). Reducing information asymmetry in the power industry: Mandatory and voluntary information disclosure regulations of sulfur dioxide emission. Energy Policy, 45, 704–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The funding was provided by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grand No. 18BGL176).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Trade, Fujian Jiangxia University, No. 2 Xiyuangong Road, Fuzhou, 350108, Fujian, China

    Xueping Wu

  2. School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, No. 2 Xueyuan Road, Fuzhou, 350116, Fujian, China

    Ming Gao

Authors
  1. Xueping Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ming Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Gao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, X., Gao, M. Effects of different environmental regulations and their heterogeneity on air pollution control in China. J Regul Econ 60, 140–166 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-021-09436-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-021-09436-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation