Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of environmental regulation on air pollution control in China: a spatial Durbin econometric analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on provincial panel date of China for the period 2001–2014, this study empirically adopts the slacks-based measure of directional distance function model and spatial Durbin model to explore the impacts of environmental regulation and its spatial spillover effect on air pollution control. The results show that the increase of environmental regulation stringency will help to improve air pollution control efficiency or reduce air pollutant emissions. In terms of spatial effect, evidence has been found to support environmental regulation has significantly spatial spillover effects. Specifically, the increase of environmental regulation in other provinces will decrease local air pollution control efficiency or increase local air pollutant emissions, which implies that there is strategic interaction of environmental regulation among local governments. Moreover, the results of the time interval test indicate that the effects of environmental regulation on air pollution control have improved in recent years, and with the increase of environmental regulation stringency, its spatial spillover effects have increased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models (Vol. 4(D), p. 3735). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., & Le Gallo, J. (2006). Interpolation of air quality measures in Hedonic House Price Models: Spatial aspects. Spatial Economic Analysis, 1(1), 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antweiler, W., Copeland, B., & Taylor, M. (2001). Is free trade good for the environment? The American Economic Review, 91(4), 877–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagayev, I., & Lochard, J. (2017). EU air pollution regulation: A breath of fresh air for Eastern European polluting industries? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 83, 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, A., & Kildegaard, A. (2010). Clean technological change in developing-country industrial clusters: Mexican leather tanning. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 12(3), 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldeira, E. (2012). Yardstick competition in a federation: Theory and evidence from China. China Economic Review, 23(4), 878–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, A. C., Rosen, H. S., & Hines, J. R. (1993). Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: Evidence from the states. Journal of Public Economics, 52(3), 285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. Y., Hu, F. Z. Y., Li, X., & Hua, J. (2017). Strategic interaction in municipal governments’ provision of public green spaces: A dynamic spatial panel data analysis in transitional China. Cities, 71, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirinko, R. S., & Wilson, D. J. (2017). Tax competition among U.S. states: Racing to the bottom or riding on a seesaw? Journal of Public Economics, 155(2015), 147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Y., Are, R. F., & Grosskopf, S. (1998). Emissions trading and profitability: The Swedish pulp and paper industry. Environmental and Resource Economics, 12, 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claude, D., Figuières, C., & Tidball, M. (2012). Regulation of investments in infrastructure: The interplay between strategic behaviors and initial endowments. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 14(1), 35–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. A., Elliott, R., & Shimamoto, K. (2005). Industrial characteristics, environmental regulations and air pollution: an analysis of the UK manufacturing sector. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50(1), 121–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2000). Data envelopment analysis. In W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, & J. Zhu (Eds.), Handbook on data envelopment analysis, 1st ed. (pp. 1–40).

  • Delmas, M., & Keller, A. (2005). Free riding in voluntary environmental programs: The case of the U.S. EPA WasteWise program. Policy Sciences, 38, 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, H., Zheng, X., Huang, N., & Li, F. (2012). Strategic interaction in spending on environmental protection: Spatial evidence from Chinese cities. China and World Economy, 20(5), 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Pasurka, C. A. (2007). Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy, 32(7), 1055–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, L., & Liao, W. (2016). Legislation, plans, and policies for prevention and control of air pollution in China: Achievements, challenges, and improvements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1549–1558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, L., Mears, L., Beaufort, C., & Schulte, J. (2016). Energy, economy, and environment analysis and optimization on manufacturing plant energy supply system. Energy Conversion and Management, 117, 454–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredriksson, P. G., & Millimet, D. L. (2002). Strategic interaction and the determination of environmental policy across U.S. states. Journal of Urban Economics, 51(1), 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, H., & Weber, W. L. (2009). A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 43(4), 274–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan, K., Sun, S., Wang, S., & Wei, Y. (2018). A secondary-decomposition-ensemble learning paradigm for forecasting PM2.5 concentration. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 9, 989–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National bureau of economic research working paper series, no. 3914 (pp. 1–57).

  • Hamamoto, M. (2006). Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries. Resource and Energy Economics, 28(4), 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 610–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. M., Zaman, K., Irfan, D., Awan, U., Ali, G., Kyophilavong, P., et al. (2016). Triangular relationship among energy consumption, air pollution and water resources in Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1375–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konisky, D. M., & Woods, N. D. (2012). Environmental free riding in state water pollution enforcement. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 12(3), 227–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurian, M., Ardakanian, R., Veiga, L. G., & Meyer, K. (2016). Political decentralization and public services. In M. Kurian, R. Ardakanian, L. G. Veiga, & K. Meyer (Eds.), Resources, services and risks (pp. 31–49). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lanoie, P., Laurent-lucchetti, J., Johnstone, N., & Ambec, S. (2011). Environmental policy, innovation and performance: New insights on the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 20(3), 203–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanoie, P., Patry, M., & Lajeunesse, R. (2008). Environmental regulation and productivity: Testing the porter hypothesis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 30, 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laplante, B., & Rilstone, P. (1996). Environmental inspections and emissions of the pulp and paper industry: The case of Quebec. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31(1), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage, J. P. (2008). An introduction to spatial econometrics. Revue d’économie industrielle, 123, 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesage, J., & Pace, R. (2010). Spatial econometric models. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, A. (2003). Environmental regulatory competition: A status report and some new evidence. National Tax Journal, 56(1), 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, A., & Taylor, M. S. (2008). Unmasking the pollution haven effect. International Economic Review, 49(1), 223–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, B., & Wu, S. (2017). Effects of local and civil environmental regulation on green total factor productivity in China: A spatial Durbin econometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 342–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Yang, Y., Xu, X., Xu, C., & Hong, J. (2016). Air pollution from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons generated by human activities and their health effects in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1360–1367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Zhou, L.-A. (2005). Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9), 1743–1762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L., & Sun, W. (2016). Location choice of FDI firms and environmental regulation reforms in China. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 50(2), 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindstad, H. E., & Eskeland, G. S. (2016). Environmental regulations in shipping: Policies leaning towards globalization of scrubbers deserve scrutiny. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 47(8), 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Hao, Y., & Gao, Y. (2017a). The environmental consequences of domestic and foreign investment: Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 108(February), 271–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Huang, L., Kaloudis, A., & Støre-Valen, M. (2017b). Does urbanization lead to less energy use on road transport? Evidence from municipalities in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 57, 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, J. (2006). Spatial interaction model of spillovers from locally provided public services. Regional Studies, 40(6), 631–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y. R., Ji, Q., & Fan, Y. (2016). Spatial linkage analysis of the impact of regional economic activities on PM2.5 pollution in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1157–1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marco, A. Z., & Giménez, J. V. (2013). Environmental tax and productivity in a decentralized context: New findings on the Porter Hypothesis. European Journal of Law and Economics, 40(2), 313–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasreen, S., Anwar, S., & Ozturk, I. (2017). Financial stability, energy consumption and environmental quality: Evidence from South Asian economies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, 1105–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nauleau, M. L. (2014). Free-riding on tax credits for home insulation in France: An econometric assessment using panel data. Energy Economics, 46, 78–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan, H. J. (2008). Reestimating the capital stock of China: 1952–2006 (in Chinese). The Journal of Quantitative and Technical Economics, 10, 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, G. M., Wang, J. N., Fu, F., & Xue, W. B. (2017). A study on transboundary air pollution based on a game theory model: Cases of SO2 emission reductions in the cities of Changsha, Zhuzhou and Xiangtan in China. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 8(2), 244–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, A. W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K. (2004). Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA: A slacks-based measure (SBM) approach. In GRIPS research report series, 2003 (pp. 44–45). Toronto: Presentation at NAPW III.

  • Vargas-Vargas, M., Meseguer-Santamaría, M. L., Mondéjar-Jiménez, J., & Mondéjar-Jiménez, J. A. (2010). Environmental protection expenditure for companies: A spanish regional analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research, 4(3), 373–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., & Song, L. (2000). Regional cooperation and the environment: Do dirty industries migrate. Weltwirtschafthches Archiv, 136(1), 137–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Zhou, M., & Li, H. (2016). ARDL-based research on the nexus among FDI, environmental regulation, and energy consumption in Shanghai (China). Natural Hazards, 84(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, O., Kara, B. Y., & Yetis, U. (2016). Hazardous waste management system design under population and environmental impact considerations. Journal of Environmental Management, 203, 720–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J., Zhou, L.-A., & Zhu, G. (2016). Strategic interaction in political competition: Evidence from spatial effects across Chinese cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 57(71171005), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, D. Z., & Zhao, L. (2009). Pollution havens and industrial agglomeration. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58(2), 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. J., Peng, Y. L., Ma, C. Q., & Shen, B. (2017). Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 100, 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., & Sun, B. (2016). The influence of Chinese environmental regulation on corporation innovation and competitiveness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1528–1536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, S., Kahn, M. E., Sun, W., & Luo, D. (2014). Incentives for China’s urban mayors to mitigate pollution externalities: The role of the central government and public environmentalism. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 47(1), 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, S., Yi, H., & Li, H. (2015). The impacts of provincial energy and environmental policies on air pollution control in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49, 386–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., Zhu, S., & He, C. (2017). How do environmental regulations affect industrial dynamics? Evidence from China’s pollution-intensive industries. Habitat International, 60, 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, S., He, C., & Liu, Y. (2014). Geoforum Going green or going away: Environmental regulation, economic geography and firms’ strategies in China’ s pollution-intensive industries. Geoforum, 55, 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge financial support from the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 18BGL176). The authors acknowledge the very helpful research assistance of the SSS (Economics) and the Economic growth Centre (EGC) in Nanyang Technological University. The authors are grateful for very helpful comments from anonymous reviewers. Chen Jianqing provides very competent research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, No. 2 Xueyuan Road, Fuzhou, 350116, Fujian, China

    Xueping Wu, Ming Gao & Wei Li

  2. School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 48 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639818, Singapore

    Xueping Wu & Wei Li

  3. School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Wu Shunde Building, Tsinghua Campus Haidian District, Beijing, 100084, China

    Shihong Guo

Authors
  1. Xueping Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ming Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shihong Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shihong Guo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, X., Gao, M., Guo, S. et al. Effects of environmental regulation on air pollution control in China: a spatial Durbin econometric analysis. J Regul Econ 55, 307–333 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-019-09384-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-019-09384-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation