Abstract
There is a long-standing argument about whether words or character morphemes are the functional units in reading Chinese. We propose a Character-Word Dual Function (CWDF) model of reading Chinese in which both characters and words are functional units that contribute differentially to orthographic and meaning processes in reading Chinese. Two masked constituent priming experiments examined one of the model’s predictions by testing orthographic and meaning priming effects in reading Chinese compounds. The meaning transparency of the prime (a constituent character) and the target (a compound word) was manipulated to distinguish meaning effects from orthographic effects. In transparent pairs, the prime and target were orthographically and semantically related (e.g., 家-家庭 [home-family]); in opaque pairs, the prime and target shared orthography only (e.g., 家-家伙 [home-guy]). Exposure durations of the prime were varied (50ms and 216ms) to allow orthographic and meaning priming, respectively. We manipulated word frequency to reflect the accessibility of word-level representations. The results are as follows: (1) Sharing character level orthography facilitated word reading for both high- and low-frequency words, supporting the assumption of an important role for the character level in orthographic processes. (2) The meaning priming effect was found with the longer exposure duration and only for low-frequency words. High-frequency words produced rapid access, which was not enhanced by the meaning priming of its constituent characters, suggesting that the word functions as the primary meaning provider in reading. These findings are congruent with the CWDF model, which posits that characters are the fundamental orthographic units of written Chinese and that words are primary meaning providers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JML.2007.12.005
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 1406.5823v1
Bowers, J. S. (2020). Reconsidering the evidence that systematic phonics is more effective than alternative methods of reading instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 32(3), 681–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10648-019-09515-Y
Brooks, T. L., & Cid de Garcia, D. (2015). Evidence for morphological composition in compound words using MEG. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00215
Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: a tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/JOC.10
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PloS one, 5(6), e10729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729
Cao, F., Lee, R., Shu, H., Yang, Y., Xu, G., Li, K., & Booth, J. R. (2010). Cultural constraints on brain development: evidence from a developmental study of visual word processing in mandarin Chinese. Cerebral Cortex, 20(5), 1223–1233. https://doi.org/10.1093/CERCOR/BHP186
Chen, H. C., & Shu, H. (2001). Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence against early phonological activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 511–518. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196186
Chen, L., Fang, X., & Perfetti, C. A. (2017). Word-to-text integration: ERP evidence for semantic and orthographic effects in Chinese. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 42, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNEUROLING.2016.11.010
Chen, L., Perfetti, C. A., Fang, X., Chang, L.-Y., & Fraundorf, S. (2019). Reading pinyin activates sublexcial character orthography for skilled Chinese readers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(6), 736–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1578891
Chen, L., Perfetti, C. A., & Leng, Y. (2019). Reading pinyin activates character orthography for highly experienced learners of Chinese. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891700058X
Chen, L., Perfetti, C., Leng, Y., & Li, Y. (2018). Word superiority effect for native Chinese readers and low-proficiency Chinese learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(6), 1097–1115. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000255
Chen, L., Zhong, L., Leng, Y., & Mo, L. (2014). The role of the character graphic information in different pinyin processing tasks. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(11), 1661–1670. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.01661
Chen, X., Hao, M., Geva, E., Zhu, J., & Shu, H. (2009). The role of compound awareness in Chinese children’s vocabulary acquisition and character reading. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9127-9
Chen, L., Perfetti, C. A., & Xu, Y. (Under review). Orthographic and meaning processes in reading Chinese compounds: Comparisons between L1 and L2 reading.
Chen, L., Xu, Y., & Perfetti, C. A. (Under review). Acquiring the structure of a writing system is important: A test of the character-word dual focus model in learning Chinese as a second language.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., del Prado, M., & Martín, F. (2009). Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(4), 684–691. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.684
Gu, J., & Li, X. (2015). The effects of character transposition within and across words in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 77(1), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0749-5
Hoosain, R. (1992). Psychological reality of the word in Chinese. In H.-C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 111–130). Elsevier.
Jarema, G., Busson, C., Nikolova, R., Tsapkini, K., & Libben, G. (1999). Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language, 68(1–2), 362–369. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2088
Juhasz, B. J., Lai, Y.-H., & Woodcock, M. L. (2014). A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1004–1019. https://doi.org/10.3758/S13428-014-0523-6
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
Li, H., Shu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Liu, H., & Peng, H. (2012). Chinese children’s character recognition: Visuo-orthographic, phonological processing and morphological skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(3), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-9817.2010.01460.X
Li, T. (2005). The three major arguments in teaching Chinese as a foreign language in the past ten years (In Chinese 近十年对外汉语词汇教学研究中的三大流派). Applied Linguistics (语言文字应用), S1, 9–11.
Li, X., Bicknell, K., Liu, P., Wei, W., & Rayner, K. (2014). Reading is fundamentally similar across disparate writing systems: A systematic characterization of how words and characters influence eye movements in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 895–913. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0033580
Li, X., Gu, J., Liu, P., & Rayner, K. (2013). The advantage of word-based processing in chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 39(3), 879–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030337
Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1139–1162. https://doi.org/10.1037/REV0000248
Li, X., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58(4), 525–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.003
Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (2003). Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language, 84(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00520-5
Liu, P., Li, W., Lin, N., & Li, X. (2013). Do Chinese readers follow the national standard rules for word segmentation during reading? PLoS ONE, 8(2), e55440. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0055440
Ma, G., & Li, X. (2015). How character complexity modulates eye movement control in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 28(6), 747–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11145-015-9548-1
McBride-Chang, C., & Ho, C. S. H. (2005). Predictors of beginning reading in Chinese and English: A 2-year longitudinal study of Chinese kindergartners. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0902_2
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Peng, D., Liu, Y., & Wang, C. (1999). How Is access representation organized? The relation of polymorphemic words and their morphemes in Chinese. In J. Wang, H.-C. Chen, R. Radach, & A. Inhoff (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 65–89). Psychology Press.
Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific studies of reading, 11(4), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–214). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.43
Perfetti, C. A., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
Perfetti, C. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Epilogue: Universals and particulars in learning to read across seventeen orthographies. In L. Verhoeven & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 455–480). Cambridge University Press.
Pine, N., Ping’an, H., & Ren Song, H. (2003). Decoding strategies used by Chinese primary school children. Journal of Literacy Research, 35(2), 777–812. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15548430JLR3502_5
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7–8), 942–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802069730
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4–5), 507–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119689
Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(2), 31–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.00004
Shen, D., & Forster, K. I. (1999). Masked phonological priming in reading Chinese words depends on the task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(5–6), 429–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386149
Shen, W., Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2018). The processing of Chinese compound words with ambiguous morphemes in sentence context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1270975
Taft, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E. M. H. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words (pp. 113–137). Boston, MA: Springer.
Taft, M., Liu, Y., & Zhu, X. (1999). Morphemic processing in reading Chinese. In J. Wang, H.-C. Chen, R. Radach, & A. Inhoff (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 103–126). Psychology Press.
Tan, L. H., Liu, H. L., Perfetti, C. A., Spinks, J. A., Fox, P. T., & Gao, J. H. (2001). The neural system underlying Chinese logograph reading. Neuroimage, 13(5), 836–846. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0749
Tan, L. H., & Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Phonological activation in visual identification of Chinese two-character words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(2), 382–393.
Tsai, J. L., & McConkie, G. W. (2003). Where do Chinese readers send their eyes? The Mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 159–176). Elsevier.
Tsang, Y. K., & Chen, H. C. (2013). Early morphological processing is sensitive to morphemic meanings: Evidence from processing ambiguous morphemes. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.003
Tsang, Y. K., Wong, A. W. K., Huang, J., & Chen, H. C. (2014). Morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic processing in word recognition and production: Evidence from ambiguous morphemes. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(5), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.790554
Tse, C.-S., & Yap, M. J. (2018). The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of two-character Chinese compound words: A megastudy analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(9), 2022–2038. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021817738965
Xu, Y., & Zhang, J. (2020). Chinese compound word inference through context and word-internal cues. Language Teaching Research, 26, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820905811
Yang, C. L., Perfetti, C. A., & Schmalhofer, F. (2007). Event-related potential indicators of text integration across sentence boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 33(1), 55–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.55
Yuan, C., & Huang, C. (1998). Chinese morpheme and word formation based on a Chinese morpheme corpus (基于语素数据库的汉语语素及构词研究). Chinese Teaching in the World (世界汉语教学), 2, 7–12.
Zhang, H. (2015). Morphological awareness in vocabulary acquisition among Chinese-Speaking children: Testing partial mediation via lexical inference ability. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.89
Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). Lexical representation of compound words: Cross-linguistic evidence. Psychologia, 43(1), 47–66.
Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H. (1999). Morphology, orthography, and phonology in reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(5–6), 525–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386185
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, L., Xu, Y. & Perfetti, C. A character-word dual function model of reading Chinese: evidence from reading Chinese compounds. Read Writ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10478-4
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10478-4