Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors associated gastrointestinal obstruction, perforation, and ulceration: an analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system database (FAERS)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background 

There have been cases reporting anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and associated serious gastrointestinal (GI) adverse drug reactions (gastrointestinal obstruction, perforation, and ulceration). These adverse drug reactions are not in the drug package inserts, and the drug relationships are not proven in the literature. 

Aim

We aimed to examine the potential association between GI obstruction, perforation, and ulceration, and ALK-TKIs by data mining of the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Method  

We conducted a disproportionality analysis of GI obstruction, perforation, and ulceration by estimating the reporting odds ratios (ROR) and the information component (IC) with 95% confidence intervals.

Results 

A total of 279 cases of ALK-TKI-associated GI obstruction, perforation, and ulceration from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020, were identified. GI obstruction, perforation, and ulceration cause 16% of cases of death. A significantly increased reporting rate for GI obstruction [ROR 1.77 (1.45–2.15); IC 0.82 (0.53–2.03)] and perforation [ROR 1.61 (1.28–2.02); IC 0.68 (0.35–1.92)] was observed for ALK-TKIs as a drug class. The signal of GI ulceration was detected only in crizotinib [ROR 1.23 (1.01–1.50); IC 0.29 (0.01–1.51)]. A statistically significant ROR and IC emerged for the site of the esophagus. 

Conclusion 

Overall, the pharmacovigilance study of the FAERS indicates slightly increased reporting of GI obstruction and perforation, which may cause severe or even fatal outcomes among ALK-TKIs users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barreca A, Lasorsa E, Riera L, et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase in human cancer. J Mol Endocrinol. 2011;47(1):R11–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaw AT, Engelman JA. ALK in lung cancer: past, present, and future. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(8):1105–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Soda M, Choi YL, Enomoto M, et al. Identification of the transforming EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer. Nature. 2007;448(7153):561–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan M, Lin J, Liao G, et al. ALK Inhibitors in the treatment of ALK positive NSCLC. Front Oncol. 2018;8:557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang L, Wang W. Safety and efficacy of anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Rep. 2021.

  6. Zhu Q, Hu H, Weng DS, et al. Pooled safety analyses of ALK-TKI inhibitor in ALK-positive NSCLC. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schaefer ES, Baik C. Proactive management strategies for potential gastrointestinal adverse reactions with ceritinib in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2016;8:33–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yanagisawa A, Hayama N, Amano H, et al. Crizotinib-induced rectal perforation with abscess. Internal Med. 2017;56(23):3211–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sussman TA, Khunger M, Velcheti V. A case of crizotinib-induced esophageal ulcers. Lung Cancer Manag. 2017;6(1):5–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jalil AA, Craig J, Bajaj R, et al. Severe ulcerative esophagitis induced by Crizotinib therapy. ACG Case Rep J. 2014;1(2):82–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Duan R, Zhang X, Du J, et al. Post-marketing drug safety evaluation using data mining based on FAERS. In: Data mining and big data: second international conference, DMBD 2017, Fukuoka, Japan, July 27–August 1, 2017 Proceedings DMBD (conference) (2nd : 2017: Fukuoka, Japan); 2017. pp. 379–89.

  12. Meng L, Huang J, Jia Y, et al. Assessing fluoroquinolone-associated aortic aneurysm and dissection: Data mining of the public version of the FDA adverse event reporting system. Int J Clin Pract. 2019;73(5):e13331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meng L, Yang B, Qiu F, et al. Lung Cancer adverse events reports for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: data mining of the FDA adverse event reporting system database. Front Med. 2021;8:594043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Böhm R, von Hehn L, Herdegen T, et al. OpenVigil FDA–inspection of US American adverse drug events pharmacovigilance data and novel clinical applications. PloS One. 2016;11(6).

  15. Böhm R, Höcker J, Cascorbi I, et al. OpenVigil—free eyeballs on AERS pharmacovigilance data. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(2):137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jaasu NM, Kamaraj R, Seetharaman R. MedDRA (Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities). Res J Pharm Technol. 2018;11(10):4751–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Meng L, Yang B, Qiu F, et al. Lung cancer adverse events reports for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: data mining of the FDA Adverse event reporting system database. Front Med. 2021;8(36).

  18. Bate A, Evans SJW. Quantitative signal detection using spontaneous ADR reporting. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010;18(6):427–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bate A, Pariente A, Hauben M, et al. Quantitative signal detection and analysis in pharmacovigilance. Mann’s Pharmacovigil. 2014;331–54.

  20. Harpaz R, DuMouchel W, LePendu P, et al. Performance of pharmacovigilance signal-detection algorithms for the FDA adverse event reporting system. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;93(6):539–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. van Puijenbroek EP, Bate A, Leufkens HG, et al. A comparison of measures of disproportionality for signal detection in spontaneous reporting systems for adverse drug reactions. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2002;11(1):3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bate A, Lindquist M, Edwards IR, et al. A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;54(4):315–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ehrenstein V, Huang K, Kahlert J, et al. Outcomes in patients with lung cancer treated with crizotinib and erlotinib in routine clinical practice: a post-authorization safety cohort study conducted in Europe and in the United States. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021;30(6):758–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ou SH, Ahn JS, De Petris L, et al. Alectinib in crizotinib-refractory ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II Global study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(7):661–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nielsen J, Meyer JM. Risk factors for ileus in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38(3):592–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Park J, Yoshida K, Kondo C, et al. Crizotinib-induced esophageal ulceration: a novel adverse event of crizotinib. Lung Cancer. 2013;81(3):495–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sawada T, Maeno K, Joh T. Esophageal ulcer in a lung cancer patient. Crizotinib-induced esophageal injury. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(2):e6-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmassmann A, Stettler C, Poulsom R, et al. Roles of hepatocyte growth factor and its receptor Met during gastric ulcer healing in rats. Gastroenterology. 1997;113(6):1858–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Baatar D, Jones MK, Pai R, et al. Selective cyclooxygenase-2 blocker delays healing of esophageal ulcers in rats and inhibits ulceration-triggered c-Met/hepatocyte growth factor receptor induction and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 activation. Am J Pathol. 2002;160(3):963–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Michel C, Scosyrev E, Petrin M, et al. Can disproportionality analysis of post-marketing case reports be used for comparison of drug safety profiles? Clin Drug Investig. 2017;37(5):415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Raschi E, Gatti M, Gelsomino F, et al. Lessons to be learnt from real-world studies on immune-related adverse events with checkpoint inhibitors: a clinical perspective from pharmacovigilance. Target Oncol. 2020;1–18.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This research was funded by Chongqing Health Commission (2020FYYX058).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Long Meng.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, J., Zhao, Y., Cao, Y. et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors associated gastrointestinal obstruction, perforation, and ulceration: an analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system database (FAERS). Int J Clin Pharm 44, 993–1003 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01425-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01425-4

Keywords

Navigation