A group of 20 healthy subjects (11 men and nine women) were studied performing an fMRI task involving selective auditory attention in a dichotic listening paradigm with different levels of perceptual load. Analysis of brain activation patterns measured using fMRI during selective listening to continuous speech with distractors of different strengths identified statistically significant sex-related differences in the topography of cortical activity. “Women > men” effects predominated in the left superior temporal gyrus and the left pre- and postcentral gyri, while the most marked “male > female” effects were found in the left insula, putamen, and frontal operculum. Statistically significant effects were also obtained by comparing activation patterns in terms of task difficulty: masking with the voice of a female speaker produced greater activation of additional areas associated with high-level information processing. These data indicate the presence of sexual dimorphism in the organization of the selective auditory attention system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, K., Alais, D., Shinn-Cunningham, B., and Carlile, S., “Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 130, No. 4, 2043–2053 (2011).
Beaman, C. P., “The irrelevant sound phenomenon revisited: What role for working memory capacity?” J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 30, No. 5, 1106–1118 (2004).
Berti, S. and Schröger, E., “Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: Evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 17, No. 5, 1119–1122 (2003).
Bosco, A., Longoni, A. M., and Vecchi, T., “Gender effects in spatial orientation: Cognitive profiles and mental strategies,” Appl. Cogn. Psychol., 18, No. 5, 519–532 (2004).
Bronkhorst, A. W., “The cocktail-party problem revisited: early processing and selection of multi-talker speech,” Atten., Percept. Psychophys., 77, No. 5, 1465–1487 (2015).
Brungart, D. S., Simpson, B. D., Ericson, M. A., and Scott, K. R., “Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 110, No. 5, Pt. 1, 2527–2538 (2001).
Cahill, L., “Fundamental sex difference in human brain architecture,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, No. 2, 577–578 (2014).
Cherry, E. C. and Taylor, W. K., “Some further experiments upon the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 26, No. 4, 554–559 (1954).
Cherry, E. C., “Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 25, No. 5, 975–979 (1953).
Chuprikov, A. P., “A sensitized handedness questionnaire for adolescents and adults,” in: Left-Handedness, Anthropoisometry, and Lateral Adaptation. Reference and Annotated Materials for the All-Union Interdisciplinary School-Seminar “Preservation of the Health of Left-Handed Children” (1985).
Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., and Bunting, M. F., “The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity,” Psychon. Bull. Rev., 8, No. 2, 331–335 (2001).
Corbetta, M. and Shulman, G. L., “Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 3, No. 3, 201–215 (2002).
Dalton, P., Santangelo, V., and Spence, C., “The role of working memory in auditory selective attention,” Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 62, No. 11, 2126–2132 (2009).
De Fockert, J. W., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., and Lavie, N., “The role of working memory in visual selective attention,” Science, 291, No. 5509, 1803–1806 (2001).
Evans, K. L. and Hampson, E., “Sex differences on prefrontally-dependent cognitive tasks,” Brain Cogn., 93, 42–53 (2015).
Falkenberg, L. E., Specht, K., and Westerhausen, R., “Attention and cognitive control networks assessed in a dichotic listening fMRI study,” Brain Cogn., 76, No. 2, 276–285 (2011).
Gur, R. C., Alsop, D., Glahn, D., et al., “An fMRI study of sex differences in regional activation to a verbal and a spatial task,” Brain Lang., 74, No. 2, 157–170 (2000).
Gur, R. C., Turetsky, B. I., Matsui, M., et al., “Sex differences in brain gray and white matter in healthy young adults: Correlations with cognitive performance,” J. Neurosci., 19, No. 10, 4065–4072 (1999).
Hansen, S., “Inhibitory control and empathy-related personality traits: Sexlinked associations,” Brain Cogn., 76, No. 3, 364–368 (2011).
Hyde, J. S., “Sex and cognition: Gender and cognitive functions,” Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 38, 53–56 (2016).
Ingalhalikar, M., Smith, A., Parker, D., et al., “Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, No. 2, 823–828 (2014).
Johnsrude, I. S., Mackey, A., Hakyemez, H., et al., “Swinging at a cocktail party: voice familiarity aids speech perception in the presence of a competing voice,” Psychol. Sci., 24, No. 10, 1995–2004 (2013).
Kaiser, A., Kuenzli, E., Zappatore, D., and Nitsch, C., “On females’ lateral and males’ bilateral activation during language production: a fMRI study,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 63, No. 2, 192–198 (2007).
Kansaku, K., Yamaura, A., and Kitazawa, S., “Sex differences in lateralization revealed in the posterior language areas,” Cereb. Cortex, 10, No. 9, 866–872 (2000).
Lavie, N. and De Fockert, J., “The role of working memory in attentional capture,” Psychon. Bull. Rev., 12, No. 4, 669–674 (2005).
Lavie, N., “Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load,” Trends Cogn. Sci., 9, No. 2, 75–82 (2005).
Liu, X., Li, J., Gao, J., et al., “Association of medial prefrontal cortex connectivity with consciousness level and its outcome in patients with acquired brain injury,” J. Clin. Neurosci., 42, 160–166 (2017).
Luria, A. R., Higher Cortical Functions and Their Impairment in Local Brain Lesions (1962).
Mikhailova, E. S., Mayorova, L. A., Gerasimenko, N. Yu., et al., “Sex differences in working memory for simple visual cues. Analysis of event-related potentials in sensor and dipole source space,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 72, No. 6, 836–850 (2022).
Muller-Gass, A. and Schröger, E., “Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction,” Brain Res., 1136, No. 1, 169–177 (2007).
Nakai, T., Kato, C., and Matsuo, K., “An fMRI study to investigate auditory attention: a model of the cocktail party phenomenon,” Magn. Reson. Med. Sci., 4, No. 2, 75–82 (2005).
Neuhaus, A. H., Opgen-Rhein, C., Urbanek, C., et al., “Spatiotemporal mapping of sex differences during attentional processing,” Hum. Brain Mapp., 30, No. 9, 2997–3008 (2009).
New, A. B., Robin, D. A., Parkinson, A. L., et al., “The intrinsic resting state voice network in Parkinson’s disease,” Hum. Brain Mapp., 36, No. 5, 1951–1962 (2015).
Newman, R. S. and Jusczyk, P. W., “The cocktail party effect in infants,” Percept. Psychophys., 58, No. 8, 1145–1156 (1996).
Olguin, A., Bekinschtein, T. A., and Bozic, M., “Neural encoding of attended continuous speech under different types of interference,” J. Cogn. Neurosci., 30, No. 11, 1606–1619 (2018).
Poeppel, D. and Hickok, G., “Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language,” Cognition, 92, No. 1–2, 1–12 (2004).
Puschmann, S., Steinkamp, S., Gillich, I., et al., “The right temporoparietal junction supports speech tracking during selective listening: Evidence from concurrent EEG-fMRI,” J. Neurosci., 37, No. 47, 11505–11516 (2017).
Ramos-Loyo, J., Angulo-Chavira, A., Llamas-Alonso, L. A., and González-Garrido, A. A., “Sex differences in emotional contexts modulation on response inhibition,” Neuropsychologia, 91, 290–298 (2016).
Rimskii, S. and Rimskaya, R., Almanac of Psychological Tests (1995).
Ruytjens, L., Georgiadis, J. R., Holstege, G., et al., “Functional sex differences in human primary auditory cortex,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging, 34, No. 12, 2073–2081 (2007).
Steffensen, S. C., Ohran, A. J., Shipp, D. N., et al., “Gender-selective effects of the P300 and N400 components of the visual evoked potential,” Vision Res., 48, No. 7, 917–925 (2008).
Thornton, D., Harkrider, A. W., Jenson, D. E., and Saltuklaroglu, T., “Sex differences in early sensorimotor processing for speech discrimination,” Sci. Rep., 9, No. 1 (2019).
Todd, J. J., Fougnie, D., and Marois, R., “Visual short-term memory load suppresses temporo-parietal junction activity and induces inattentional blindness,” Psychol. Sci., 16, No. 12, 965–972 (2005).
Voyer, D., “Sex differences in dichotic listening,” Brain Cogn., 76, No. 2, 245–255 (2011).
Voyer, D., Voyer, S. D., and Saint-Aubin, J., “Sex differences in visual-spatial working memory: A meta-analysis,” Psychon. Bull. Rev., 24, No. 2, 307–334 (2017).
Weiss, E. M., Kemmler, G., Deisenhammer, E. A., et al., “Sex differences in cognitive functions,” Pers.. Individ. Differ., 35, No. 4, 863–875 (2003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel’nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 73, No. 5, pp. 637–650, September–October, 2023.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mayorova, L.A., Kushnir, A.B. Sex-Related Differences in Selective Auditory Attention in Dichotic Listening with Different Levels of Difficulty: fMRI Data. Neurosci Behav Physi 54, 102–111 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-024-01572-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-024-01572-3