Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fetal head biometrics measurements using convolutional neural network and mid-point ellipse drawing algorithm

  • Published:
Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During pregnancy, it is considered to be necessary to monitor and measure fetal development. There are different fetal biometrics among which the fetal head biometrics are useful for finding out the fetus age, diagnosing malformations, and lowering the fetal mortality rate. Accurate measurement of fetal biometry is difficult because of a variety of factors such as the ultrasound image's low quality, inter-and intra-observer variability, and human error as a result of manual estimation. As a result of these issues, new-born babies are born with defects. To track and test fetal head biometrics, several automated and semi-automated methods have been proposed. However, most of the techniques are inaccurate, and the procedure is time-consuming. This work presents the creation of a new process for the segmentation of two-dimensional ultrasound images of fetal skulls based on convolution neural network combination U-Net architecture (UNet-C) and finding the circumference of the fetal head using the Midpoint ellipse drawing algorithm. A new strategy is developed based on U-Net for pre-processing, drop-out, evaluation of different activation layers, activation function, data augmentation, loss function and depth of the network. The computational results reveal the feasibility of the proposal in the correct segmentation of fetal skulls and head circumference measurements and achieved an accuracy of 98.55%. Validation loss and overall loss is calculated to be 0.287 and 0.0390. Validation accuracy and overall accuracy is calculated to be 0.9891 and 0.9840. The mean difference of the proposed method is between − 1.68 and 1.10 and the mean absolute difference is − 1.5 to 0.97. The proposed method is used to detect fetal head and measure circumference of head (HC), bi-parietal diameter (BPD) and occipito frontal diameter (OFD) of a fetus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Rustum, R. S., Daou, L., & Abu-Rustum, S. E. (2010). Role of first-trimester sonography in the diagnosis of aneuploidy and structural fetal anomalies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 29(10), 1445–1452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aji, C. P., Fatoni, M. H., Sardjono, T. A. (2019a). Automatic measurement of fetal head circumference from 2-dimensional ultrasound. In: 2019 International Conference on Computer Engineering, Network, and Intelligent Multimedia (CENIM), pp. 1–5.

  • Arduini, D., & Giacomello, F. (1996). Fetal biometry, estimation of gestational age, assessment of fetal growth. Academic Radiology, 3(3), 628–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. (2013). A short history of sonography in obstetrics and gynaecology. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn, 5(3), 213–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalana, V., Winter, T. C., Dale, R., Haynor, D. R., & Kim, Y. (1996). Automatic fetal head measurements from sonographic images. Academic Radiology, 3(8), 628–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-W., & Jain, L. C. (2019). Deep learning in healthcare, paradigms and applications. Intelligent systems reference library (pp. 53–93). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degani, S. (2001). Fetal biometry: Clinical, pathological, and technical considerations. Obstetrical and Gynaecological Survey, 56(3), 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinoza, J., Good, S., Russell, E., & Lee, W. (2013). Does the use of automated fetal biometry improve clinical work flow efficiency? Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 32(5), 847–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grande, M., Arigita, M., Borobio, V., Jimenez, J. M., Fernandez, S., & Borrell, A. (2012). First-trimester detection of structural abnormalities and the role of aneuploidy markers. Ultrasound Obstetrics Gynaecology, 39(2), 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. P., Lee, S. M., Kwon, J. Y., Park, Y., Kim, K. C., & Seo, J. K. (2019). Automatic evaluation of fetal head biometry from ultrasound images using machine learning. Physiological Measurement, 40(6), 065009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R. (2021). Impact of national health mission of India on infant and maternal mortality a logical framework analysis. Journal of Health Management, 23(1), 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, J., Lim, A., Wagner, M. W., Ertl-Wagner, B., & Sussman, D. (2022). Fetal organ anomaly classification network for identifying organ anomalies in fetal MRI. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, 832485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma'sum, M. A., Rahmah, N., Sanabila, H. R., Wisesa, H. A., Jatmiko, W. (2015). Automatic fetal head approximation using Particle Swarm Optimization based Gaussian Elliptical Path. In: 2015 International Symposium on Micro-Nano Mechatronics and Human Science (MHS), pp. 1–6.

  • Nadiyah, P., Rofiqah, N., Firdaus, Q. (2019). Automatic detection of fetal head using haar cascade and fit ellipse. In: 2019 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA), pp. 320–324.

  • Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T. (2015) U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), (pp. 234–241). Springer.

  • van den Heuvel, T. L. A., de Bruijn, D., de Korte, C. L., & van Ginneken, B. (2018). Automated measurement of fetal head circumference using 2D ultrasound images. PLoS ONE, 13(8), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijayalakshmi, S., Durgadevi, P., Gayathri, S. P., & Shariff, A. S. M. (2022). Automated fetal brain localization, segmentation, and abnormalities detection through random sample consensus. In S. Shukla, X. Z. Gao, J. V. Kureethara, & D. Mishra (Eds.), Data science and security. Lecture notes in networks and systems. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vishal, S., Pradeeba, S., & Jinman, K. (2021). Semantic segmentation of cerebellum in 2D fetal ultrasound brain images using convolutional neural networks. IEEE Access, 9, 85864–85873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaqub, M., Napolitano, R., Ioannou, C. (2012). Automatic detection of local fetal brain structures in ultrasound images. In: 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp.1555–1558.

  • Žaliūnas, B., Bartkevičienė, D., Drąsutienė, G., Utkus, A., & Vilnius, J. K. (2017). Fetal biometry: Relevance in obstetrical practice. Science Direct, 53(6), 357–364.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Author NPP participated in the design of algorithm, simulation analysis, and manuscript drafting and author AS participated in the integration of paper and simulation analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Nisha Priya.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nisha Priya, P., Anila, S. Fetal head biometrics measurements using convolutional neural network and mid-point ellipse drawing algorithm. Multidim Syst Sign Process 34, 749–766 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11045-023-00882-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11045-023-00882-y

Keywords

Navigation