Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Terminological (di) Similarities between Information Management and Knowledge Management: a Term Co-Occurrence Analysis

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The terminological composition of information management (IM) and knowledge management (KM) is described in order to evidence how much do these areas overlap within the library and information sciences (LIS) space. A term co-occurrence analysis is conducted as from documents extracted from Web of Science, covering the period 1980–2015. To examine the terminological (di) similarity two approaches are applied: ‘overlay visualizationʼ and ‘topic detectionʼ. The percentage of terminological similarity oscillates between 24% and 38% according to the ‘overlay visualizationʼ and ‘topic detectionʼ techniques. At the core of the terminological intersection between IM and KM lies the study around processes, technologies and information systems. However, they are semantically two separate areas that tend to address similar dimensions -such as the managerial, educational and medical, but emphasizing different approach. Moreover, IM refers to the library and information organizations, highlighting the focus on personal information management, human information behavior, health information management, and information resource management. Oppositely, KM highlights the business, management and accounting realms in which topics like knowledge sharing and social networks, knowledge management strategies, and knowledge management projects are prevailing. These results would help to (re) define curricular contents of LIS programs as well as research and practical activities conducted by academicians and managers. This is the most comprehensive quantitative study in examining the epistemic borders between IM and KM in the LIS research. The authors consider that the methodological procedures here employed might be suitable to understand the boundaries between similar fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schlögl, C. (2005). “Information and knowledge management: dimensions and approaches”, Information Research, Vol. 10 No. 4, paper 235, available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/10-4/paper235.html (Accessed 15 May 2018)

  2. Prabha Singh S (2007) What are we managing–knowledge or information? Vine 37(2):169–179

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kruger CN, Johnson RD (2010) Information management as an enabler of knowledge management maturity: a south African perspective. Int J Inf Manag 30(1):57–67

    Google Scholar 

  4. Amorim FB, Tomaél MI (2011) Gestão da informação e gestão do conhecimento na prática organizacional: análise de estudos de casos. RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação 8(2):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edelman F (1981) The management of information resources-A challenge for American business. MIS Q 5(1):17–27

    Google Scholar 

  6. Trauth EM (1989) The evolution of information resource management. Inf Manag 16(5):257–268

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vreeken A (2005) The history of information: lessons for information management, Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 5(2), available at: http://sprouts.aisnet.org/5-2 (Accessed 2 April 2018)

  8. Wright A (2007) Glut: mastering information through the ages. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wiig KM (2000) Knowledge management: an emerging discipline rooted in a long history. In: Despres C, Chauvel D (eds) Knowledge horizons: the present and the promise of knowledge management. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  10. Prusak L (2001) Where did knowledge management come from? IBM Syst J 40(4):1002–1007

    Google Scholar 

  11. McInerney CR, Day RE (2007) Rethinking knowledge management: from knowledge objects to knowledge processes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  12. Black A (1999) Information management in business, libraries and British military intelligence: towards a history of information management. J Doc 55(4):361–374

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wiig KM (1997) Knowledge management: where did it come from and where will it go? Expert Syst Appl 13(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davenport TH, Marchand D (1999) Is KM just good information management? The Financial Times Mastering Series: Mastering Information Management, pp. 2–3

  15. Day RE (2001) Totality and representation: a history of knowledge management through European documentation, critical modernity, and post-Fordism. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 52(9):725–735

    Google Scholar 

  16. Benedon W (2010) History of records and information management. In: Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, 3rd edn. Taylor and Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Horton FW, Marchand DA (1982) Information management in public administration. Information Resources Press

  18. Lambe P (2011) The unacknowledged parentage of knowledge management. J Knowl Manag 15(2):175–197

    Google Scholar 

  19. Davenport E, Cronin B (2000) Knowledge management: semantic drift or conceptual shift? J Educ Libr Inf Sci 41(4):294–306

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gold AH, Malhotra A, Segars AH (2001) Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective. J Manag Inf Syst 18(1):185–214

    Google Scholar 

  21. Blair DC (2002) Knowledge management: hype, hope, or help? J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 53(12):1019–1028

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fernández Marcial V (2006) Gestión del conocimiento versus gestión de la información. Investigación bibliotecológica 20(41):44–62

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barbosa RR (2008) Gestão da informação e do conhecimento: origens, polêmicas e perspectivas. Informação & Informação 13(1):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  24. Middleton M (1999) From information management to knowledge management: some perspectives on development. El Profesional de la Información 8(5):10–17

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chen XH, Snyman MMM, Sewdass N (2005) Interrelationship between document management, information management and knowledge management, South African Journal of Information Management, 7(3), available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10520/AJA1560683X_166 (Accessed 18 May 2018)

  26. Al-Hawamdeh S (2002) Knowledge management: re-thinking information management and facing the challenge of managing tacit knowledge. Info Res, 8(1), paper no. 143, available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/8-1/paper143.html (Accessed 15 May 2018)

  27. Giaglis G (2002) European research on knowledge and information management: current status and future prospects, In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Systems Thinking in Management, Salford, UK, pp. 3–5

  28. Miller F, Wallis J (2011) Social interaction and the role of empathy in information and knowledge management: a literature review. J Educ Libr Inf Sci 52(2):122–132

    Google Scholar 

  29. Świgoń M (2013) Personal knowledge and information management–conception and exemplification. J Inf Sci 39(6):832–845

    Google Scholar 

  30. de Souza ED, Dias EJW, Nassif ME (2011) A gestão da informação e do conhecimento na ciência da informação: perspectivas teóricas e práticas organizacionais. Informação & Sociedade: Estudos 21(1):55–70

    Google Scholar 

  31. Risso VG (2012) Aproximación teórica a la relación entre los términos gestión documental, gestión de información y gestión del conocimiento. Revista Española de Documentación Científica 35(4):531–554

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wilson TD (2002) The nonsense of 'knowledge management. Inf Res, 8(1), available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/8-1/paper144.html (Accessed 18 May 2018)

  33. Hjørland B (2012) Knowledge organization=information organization? Advances in Knowledge Organization 3:8–14

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bates MJ (2005) Information and knowledge: an evolutionary framework for information science. Info Res, 10(4), paper 239, available at http://InformationR.net/ir/10-4/paper239.html (Accessed 15 May 2018)

  35. Mortaza K, Gholamreza H, Shirazi SM (2015) Bibliographic comparison of information management and knowledge management fields through their scientific outputs with emphasis on the share of information science in each of these fields. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management 30(2):397–417

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bouthillier F, Shearer K (2002) Understanding knowledge management and information management: the need for an empirical perspective. Info Res, 8(1), paper no. 141, available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/8-1/paper141.html (Accessed 13 August 2018)

  37. Callon M, Courtial JP, Turner WA, Bauin S (1983) From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Soc Sci Inf 22(2):191–235

    Google Scholar 

  38. He Q (1999) Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Libr Trends 48(1):133–159

    Google Scholar 

  39. Braam RR, Moed HF, Van Raan AF (1991) Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis I. Structural aspects. J Am Soc Inf Sci 42(4):233–251

    Google Scholar 

  40. Law J, Bauin S, Courtial J, Whittaker J (1988) Policy and the mapping of scientific change: a co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification. Scientometrics 14(3–4):251–264

    Google Scholar 

  41. Whittaker J (1989) Creativity and conformity in science: titles, keywords and co-word analysis. Soc Stud Sci 19(3):473–496

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Noyons EC, van Raan AF (1998) Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective: self-organized structuring to map neural network research. J Am Soc Inf Sci 49(1):68–81

    Google Scholar 

  43. Noyons ECM (1999) Bibliometric mapping as a science policy and research management tool. In: Leiden University. DSWO Press, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  44. Leydesdorff L, Welbers K (2011) The semantic mapping of words and co-words in contexts. Journal of Informetrics 5(3):469–475

    Google Scholar 

  45. van Eck NJ, Waltman L, Noyons ECM, Buter RK (2010a) Automatic term identification for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 82(3):581–596

    Google Scholar 

  46. Nordstrom LO (1990) “Bradford’s law” and the relationship between ecology and biogeography. Scientometrics 18(3–4):193–203

    Google Scholar 

  47. Borgman CL, Rice RE (1992) The convergence of information science and communication: a bibliometric analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 43(6):397–411

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ellis D, Allen D, Wilson T (1999) Information science and information systems: conjunct subjects disjunct disciplines. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 50(12):1095–1107

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gu Y (2004) Information management or knowledge management? An informetric view of the dynamics of academia. Scientometrics 61(3):285–299

    Google Scholar 

  50. Jabr NH, Kallow SM (2010) Exploring integrity among information management and knowledge management within the multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and disciplinary environment. Information Studies 7:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ahmadi H, Kokabi M (2015) Co-word analysis: a study on the links and boundaries between information and knowledge management according to Iranian press authors. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management 30(3):647–676

    Google Scholar 

  52. Onyancha, O.B. (2011) How is “knowledge management” similar to or different from “information management”? An informetrics perspective, In E. Noyons; P. Ngulube and J. Leta (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Durban, South Africa (pp. 626–637)

  53. van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2011) Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ISSI Newsletter 7(3):50–54

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kay L, Newman N, Youtie J, Porter AL, Rafols I (2014) Patent overlay mapping: visualizing technological distance. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 65(12):2432–2443

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rotolo D, Rafols I, Hopkins MM, Leydesdorff L (2017) Strategic intelligence on emerging technologies: Scientometric overlay mapping. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 68(1):214–233

    Google Scholar 

  56. Leydesdorff L, Moya-Anegón F, Guerrero-Bote VP (2015) Journal maps, interactive overlays, and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of Scopus data (1996-2012). J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 66(5):1001–1016

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chen S, Arsenault C, Gingras Y, Larivière V (2015) Exploring the interdisciplinary evolution of a discipline: the case of biochemistry and molecular biology. Scientometrics 102(2):1307–1323

    Google Scholar 

  58. Yan E, Ding Y, Jacob EK (2012) Overlaying communities and topics: an analysis on publication networks. Scientometrics 90(2):499–513

    Google Scholar 

  59. van Eck NJ, Waltman L, Rommert Dekker R, den Berg JV (2010b) A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: multidimensional scaling and VOS. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 61(12):2405–2416

    Google Scholar 

  60. Haigh T (2011) The history of information technology. Annu Rev Inf Sci Technol 45(1):431–487

    Google Scholar 

  61. Bryant A, Black A, Land F, Porra J (2013) Information Systems history: what is history? What is IS history? What IS history? … and why even bother with history? J Inf Technol 28(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  62. Boaden R, Lockett G (1991) Information technology, information systems and information management: definition and development. Eur J Inf Syst 1(1):23–32

    Google Scholar 

  63. Alavi M, Leidner DE (2001) Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Q 25(1):107–136

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ackoff RL (1989) From data to wisdom. J Appl Syst Anal 16(1):3–9

    Google Scholar 

  65. Rowley J (2007) The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy. J Inf Sci 33(2):163–180

    Google Scholar 

  66. Zins C (2007) Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 58(4):479–493

    Google Scholar 

  67. Reardon DF (1998) Knowledge management: the discipline for information and library science professionals, paper presented at the 64th IFLA General Conference, 16–21 Aug., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, available at: http://archive.ifla.org/IV/ifla64/017-123e.htm (Accessed 10 Oct 2018)

  68. Martin B, Hazeri A, Sarrafzadeh M (2006) Knowledge management and the LIS professions: investigating the implications for practice and for educational provision. Aust Libr J 55(1):12–29

    Google Scholar 

  69. Roknuzzaman M, Umemoto K (2008) Knowledge management's relevance to library and information science: an interdisciplinary approach. J Inf Knowl Manag 7(04):279–290

    Google Scholar 

  70. Baskerville R, Dulipovici A (2015) The theoretical foundations of knowledge management. In: Edwards JS (ed) The essentials of knowledge management. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 47–91

    Google Scholar 

  71. Bath PA (2008) Health informatics: current issues and challenges. J Inf Sci 34(4):501–518

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sheffield J (2008) Inquiry in health knowledge management. J Knowl Manag 12(4):160–172

    Google Scholar 

  73. Schlögl C (2003) Wissenschaftslandkarte Informationsmanagement. Wirtschaftsinformatik 45(1):7–16

    Google Scholar 

  74. Lee MR, Chen TT (2012) Revealing research themes and trends in knowledge management: from 1995 to 2010. Knowl-Based Syst 28:47–58

    Google Scholar 

  75. Sedighi M, Jalalimanesh A (2014) Mapping research trends in the field of knowledge management. Malays J Libr Inf Sci 19(1):71–85

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The corresponding author acknowledges the support offered by Ludo Waltman at the time to construct the overlay visualization in VOSviewer. To Clara Calero and Sarah de Rijcke for their useful comments and suggestions during the design phase of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. European Alliance for Innovation, Bratislava, Slovakia

    Carlos Luis González-Valiente

  2. Center for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

    Rodrigo Costas & Ed Noyons

  3. Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia

    Jela Steinerová & Jaroslav Šušol

Authors
  1. Carlos Luis González-Valiente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rodrigo Costas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ed Noyons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jela Steinerová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jaroslav Šušol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Luis González-Valiente.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

González-Valiente, C.L., Costas, R., Noyons, E. et al. Terminological (di) Similarities between Information Management and Knowledge Management: a Term Co-Occurrence Analysis. Mobile Netw Appl 26, 336–346 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-020-01643-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-020-01643-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation