Abstract
Glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK-3β) is implicated in abnormal hyperphosphorylation of the tau protein and its inhibitors may be a promising therapeutic approach for treating Alzheimer’s disease. Here, a series of C-glycosylfavone derivatives as GSK-3β inhibitors was selected to perform two-dimensional quantitative structure activity relationship (2D-QSAR) method and docking analysis. The 2D-QSAR model was generated and validated using a dataset of 23 compounds and a test set of 5 compounds, respectively. The best model selected by the partial-least-squares (PLS) regression method revealed a regression coefficient (r2) value of 0.85 and the mean-square-error (MSE) value of 0.04. The predictive ability and stability of the generated model was verified by external and internal validations, and gave the regression coefficient values of 0.93 and 0.72, respectively. Molecular docking analysis using AutoDock vina was carried out to explain the binding modes of C-glycosylfavone ligands with the GSK-3β receptor. Based on the obtained results, a novel series of C-glycosylfavone derivative was designed and their activity and binding affinity were predicted. The generated work could be helpful for the design and development of novel GSK-3β inhibitors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data of this work is available at https://github.com/elai-ssouq/GSK-3-beta
References
Dokken, B.B., Henriksen, E.J.: Chronic selective glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibition enhances glucose disposal and muscle insulin action in prediabetic obese Zucker rats. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00628.2005
Llorens-Martín, M., Jurado, J., Hernández, F., Ávila, J.: GSK-3β, a pivotal kinase in Alzheimer disease. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 7, 1–11 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2014.00046
Dugo, L., Collin, M., Thiemermann, C.: Glycogen synthase kinase 3β as a target for the therapy of shock and inflammation. Shock 27, 113–123 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.shk.0000238059.23837.68
Woodgett, J.R.: Molecular cloning and expression of glycogen synthase kinase-3/factor A. EMBO J. 9, 2431–2438 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07419.x
Martinez, A., Castro, A., Medina, M.: Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 (GSK-3) and its Inhibitors: Drug Discovery and Development. Wiley, Hoboken (2006)
Soutar, M.P.M., Kim, W.Y., Williamson, R., Peggie, M., Hastie, C.J., McLauchlan, H., Snider, W.D., Gordon-Weeks, P.R., Sutherland, C.: Evidence that glycogen synthase kinase-3 isoforms have distinct substrate preference in the brain. J. Neurochem. 115, 974–983 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06988.x
Busciglio, J., Lorenzo, A., Yeh, J., Yankner, B.A.: β-Amyloid fibrils induce tau phosphorylation and loss of microtubule binding. Neuron 14, 879–888 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(95)90232-5
Acker, B.A., Jacobsen, E.J., Rogers, B.N., Wishka, D.G., Reitz, S.C., Piotrowski, D.W., Myers, J.K., Wolfe, M.L., Groppi, V.E., Thornburgh, B.A., Tinholt, P.M., Walters, R.R., Olson, B.A., Fitzgerald, L., Staton, B.A., Raub, T.J., Krause, M., Li, K.S., Hoffmann, W.E., Hajos, M., Hurst, R.S., Walker, D.P.: 2,3-cpyridine-5-carboxamide as an agonist of the a 7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: in vitro and in vivo activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18, 3611–3615 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.04.070
Ryder, J., Su, Y., Liu, F., Li, B., Zhou, Y., Ni, B.: Divergent roles of GSK3 and CDK5 in APP processing. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 312, 922–929 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.11.014
Lovestone, S., Reynolds, C.H., Latimer, D., Davis, D.R., Anderton, B.H., Gallo, J., Hanger, D., Mulot, S., Marquardt, B., Stabel, S., Woodgett, J.R., Miller, C.C.J.: Alzheimer’s disease-like phosphorylation of the microtubule-associated protein tau by glycogen synthase kinase-3 in transfected mammalian cells. Curr Biol. 4, 1077–1086 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00246-3
Imahori, K.: PDH is inactivated by betaA-induced TPKI-GSK-3beta. Proc. Natl. Acad. 93, 2719–2723 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.7.2719
Pei, J.J., Tanaka, T., Tung, Y.C., Braak, E., Iqbal, K.: Distribution, levels, and activity of glycogen synthase kinase-3 in the Alzheimer disease brain. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 56, 70–78 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1097/00005072-199701000-00007
Hardy, J.: A hundred years of Alzheimer’s disease research. Neuron 52, 3–13 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.016
Leroy, K., Yilmaz, Z., Brion, J.: Increased level of active GSK-3ß in Alzheimer’s disease and accumulation in argyrophilic grains and in neurons at different stages of neurofibrillary degeneration. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 33, 43–55 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2990.2006.00795.x
Liang, Z., Li, Q.X.: Discovery of selective, substrate-competitive, and passive membrane permeable glycogen synthase kinase-3 β inhibitors: synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular modeling of new c-glycosyl flavones. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 9, 1166–1183 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00010
El Aissouq, A., Toufik, H.: QSAR study of isonicotinamides derivatives as Alzheimr’s disease inhibitors using PLS-R and ANN methods. 2019 Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Adv. Comput. Sci. 1–7 (2019). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ISACS48493.2019.9068919
Stitou, M., Toufik, H., Bouachrine, M., Lamchouri, F.: Quantitative structure–activity relationships analysis, homology modeling, docking and molecular dynamics studies of triterpenoid saponins as Kirsten rat sarcoma inhibitors. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2019.1707122
Tropsha, A., Gramatica, P., Gombar, V.K.: The importance of being Earnest : validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models. Mol. Inform. 22, 69–77 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/qsar.200390007
Raghu, T.S., Ramesh, R., Whinston, A.B.: Addressing the homeland security problem: a collaborative decision-making framework. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 56, 310–324 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20123
El Aissouq, A., Toufik, H., Stitou, M., Ouammou, A., Lamchouri, F.: In silico design of novel tetra-substituted pyridinylimidazoles derivatives as c-jun N-terminal kinase-3 inhibitors, using 2D/3D-QSAR studies, molecular docking and ADMET prediction. Int. J. Pept. Res. Ther. 26, 1335–1351 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10989-019-09939-8
Elmchichi, L., Belhassan, A., Lakhlifi, T., Bouachrine, M.: 3D-QSAR study of the chalcone derivatives as anticancer agents. J. Chem. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5268985
Kubinyi, H., Hamprecht, F.A., Mietzner, T.: Three-dimensional quantitative similarity-activity relationships (3D QSiAR) from SEAL similarity matrices. J. Med. Chem. 41, 2553–2564 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1021/jm970732a
Kasmi, R., Hadaji, E., Chedadi, O., El Aissouq, A., Bouachrine, M., Ouammou, A.: Of CDK (anticancer activity) with an application of the molecular docking method. Heliyon. 6, e04514 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04514
Goudzal, A., El Aissouq, A., El Hamdani, H., Ouammou, A.: Materials today: proceedings QSAR modeling, molecular docking sudies and ADMET prediction on a series of henylaminopyrimidine-(thio)urea derivatives as CK2 inhibitors. Mater. Today Proc. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.044
Gramatica, P.: Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external. QSAR Comb. Sci. 26, 694–701 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/qsar.200610151
Bertrand, J.A., Thieffine, S., Vulpetti, A., Cristiani, C., Valsasina, B., Knapp, S., Kalisz, H.M., Flocco, M.: Structural characterization of the GSK-3b active site using selective and non-selective ATP-mimetic inhibitors. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 393–407 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2003.08.031
Morris, G.M., Huey, R., Lindstrom, W., Sanner, M.F., Belew, R.K., Goodsell, D.S., Olson, A.J.: Software news and updates AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 2785–2791 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc
Trott, O., Olson, A.J.: Software news and update AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 455–461 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc
Petitjean, M.: Applications of the radius-diameter diagram to the classification of topological and geometrical shapes of chemical compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 32, 331–337 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1021/ci00008a012
Wildman, S.A., Crippen, G.M.: Prediction of physicochemical parameters by atomic contributions. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 39, 868–873 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1021/ci990307l
Hari, N.S., Moorthy, N., Ramos, M.J., Fernandes, P.A.: Prediction of the relationship between the structural features of andrographolide derivatives and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity: a quantitative structure-activityrelationship (QSAR) study. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 26, 78–87 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3109/14756361003724760
Hall, L.H., Mohney, B.: The electrotopological state: an atom index for QSAR. Mol. Inform. 51, 43–51 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1002/qsar.19910100108
Kitchen, D.B., Decornez, H., Furr, J.R., Bajorath, J.: Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 4 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1549
Acknowledgment
The authors want to thank the Moroccan Association of Theoretical Chemistry (MATC) for its relevant help regarding to the Software.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any study with human or animal subjects.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
El Aissouq, A., Chedadi, O., Kasmi, R. et al. Molecular Modeling Studies of C-Glycosylfavone Derivatives as GSK-3β Inhibitors Based on QSAR and Docking Analysis. J Solution Chem 50, 808–822 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-021-01083-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-021-01083-6