Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development as Happiness: The Subjective Perception of Happiness and UNDP’s Analysis of Poverty, Wealth and Development

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines to what extent the concept of happiness is complementary to the United Nations Development Program's (UNDP) human development approach in the evaluation of poverty, wealth and development. The deconstruction of UNDP's discourse on and its measurement of these concepts show that its perspective is highly arbitrary. Poverty is exclusively defined as lack and state of ill-being, inferior to wealth regarded as a state of abundance and well-being. Development then becomes a teleological process trying to promote well-being through abundance. Yet, this external perspective of UNDP on well-being is questioned by the subjective perception of the individuals themselves. Happiness studies—which define happiness as the degree to which an individual judges the overall quality of his life-as-a-whole favorably—prove that higher levels of UNDP's development indicators are not necessarily better for subjective well-being. Despite methodological and conceptual problems, happiness studies discover that the individuals' perception of poverty, wealth and development can differ considerably from UNDP's perspective. Increased income, better objective health and higher levels of education do not automatically lead to greater happiness. Furthermore, additional dimensions essential for human happiness are detected by the research, yet not taken into account by UNDP. A country ranking comparison between the two approaches confirms the different visions of well-being. The integration of a happiness indicator in its analysis of poverty, wealth and development is thus indispensable for UNDP in order to correct its analytical and also practical approach to development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This comment was made in 2001 by a man affected by a local development project in the periphery of the city Sucre in Bolivia.

  2. Jean-Daniel Rainhorn in his presentation in the margins of the seminar ‘Le défi social du développement, mondialisation, croissance, pauvreté et inégalités’, Institut Universitaire d’Etudes de Développement, Geneva, 9 February 2006.

  3. The HDI country ranking of the year 2005 provides the necessary data for the UNDP ranking (UNDP 2005, pp. 219–222). As far as the happiness ranking is concerned, this essay uses the data accumulated by Ruut Veenhoven published on the World Database of Happiness (Veenhoven 2006).

References

  • Alesina A., et al. (2001). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans different from Americans? Working Paper 8198 (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge).

  • Anand, S., & Sen, A. (2000). The income component of the human development index. Journal of Human Development, 1(1), 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, S., & Sen, A. (1994). Human development index: Methodology and measurement, Occasional Papers (Human Development Report Office, New York).

  • Association Redefining Progress, What’s wrong with the GDP as Measure of Progress, retrieved 1 December 2005 on http://www.rprogress.org/newprograms/sustIndi/gpi/whatswrong.shtml.

  • Bardhan K., & Klasen S. (2000). On UNDP’s revision to the gender-related development index. Journal of Human Development, 1(2), 191–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner, P. (2000). L’Euphorie perpétuelle—Essai sur le devoir de bonheur. Paris: Grasset et Fascelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1981). The sense of well-being in America—Recent patterns and trends. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, C. W. (2000). Measurement tools and the quality of life. San Francisco: Redefining Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, C. W. et al. (1995). ‘If the GDP is up, why is America down? The Atlantic Monthly, 276(4), 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener E. (2005). ‘Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being’ (SINET, University of Illinois).

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., et al. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). ‘Beyond money—toward an economy of well-being’. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 27, 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111(473), 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2001). Happiness and economics; How the economy and institutions affect well-being. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2003). Testing theories of happiness, Working Paper Series, n 147. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zürich.

  • Fukuda-Parr, S. (2002). Rescuing the human development from the HDI: Reflections on a New Agenda, retrieved 17 March 2006 on http://www.nu.or.cr/pnud/docs/fukuda-parr2.pdf.

  • Gasper, D. (2004). Human well-being: Concepts and conceptualizations, discussion document n 2004/06. Helsinki: United Nations University (UNU) & World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. (2004). Globalization, poverty, inequality, and insecurity: some insights from the economics of happiness; UNU/WIDER conference ‘The impact of globalization on the World’s poor’, Helsinki, 29/30 October 2004. Helsinki: UNU/WIDER.

  • Grillo, R. D., & Stirrat R. L. (1997). Discourse of development—Anthropological perspectives. Oxford and New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halis, A. (1994). A means to closing gaps: Disaggregated human development index, Occasional Paper 18, retrieved 20 January 2005 on http://hdr.undp.org/docs/publications/ocational_papers/oc18a.htm.

  • Heady, B., & Wearing, A. (1988). The sense of relative superiority—central to well-being. Social Indicators Research, 20(5), 497–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national Variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. (1997). The inequality-adjusted human development index: A constructive proposal. World Development, 25(8), 1283–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Oragnisation (ILO) (2005). Socioeconomic security for a better World. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., et al. (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  • Karma U., & Karma G. (Eds.) (2004). Gross national happiness and development. Thimphu, Bhutan: The Centre for Bhutan Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, A. (1991). The human development index: Handle with care. Population and Development Review, 17, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R. E. (2000). Diminishing returns to income, companionship and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(1), 103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R. (2005). Happiness—lessons from a New Science. New York: Penguin Press.

  • Neumeyer, E. (2001). The human development index and sustainability: A constructive proposal. Ecological Economics, 39(1), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcmahon D. M. (2006). Happiness—a history. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noorbakhsh, F. (1998). A modified human development index. World Development, 26(3), 517–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouweneel, P. (2002). Social security and well-being of the unemployed in 42 nations. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(2), 167–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, T. et al. (2005). Measuring the quality of life across countries—a sensitivity analysis of well-being indices. Research Article n° 2005/06 (UNU/WIDER, Helsinki).

  • Rojas, M. (2004). Well-being and the complexity of poverty—a subjective well-being approach, Research Article n° 2004/29 (UNU/WIDER, Helsinki).

  • Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryten, J. (2000). Should there be a HDI? Conference IASO ‘Statistics, development and human rights’, Montreux, September 2000, retrieved 15 January 2005 on www.portal-stat.admin.ch/iaos2000/ryten_final_paper.doc.

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: ford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strack, F. et al. (1991). Subjective well-being—an interdisciplinary perspective. Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stutzer, A. (2004). The role of income aspirations in individual happiness, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, n° 54, pp. 89–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP, Human Development Report (2005) (Oxford University Press, New York).

  • Veenhoven, R. (2004). Subjective measures of well-being, discussion Article n° 2004/07. Helsinki: UNU/WIDER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Boston and Lancaster: Reidel, Dordrecht.

  • Veenhoven, R. (1991). Is happiness relative? Social Indicators Research, 24(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2006). Average happiness in 91 nations 1995–2005, World Database of Happiness, RankReport 2006–1, retrieved 4 May 2006 on http://www.worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Schimmel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schimmel, J. Development as Happiness: The Subjective Perception of Happiness and UNDP’s Analysis of Poverty, Wealth and Development. J Happiness Stud 10, 93–111 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-007-9063-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-007-9063-4

Keywords

Navigation