Skip to main content

The Relevance of Happiness: Choosing Between Development Paths in Latin America

  • Chapter
Handbook of Happiness Research in Latin America

Abstract

This chapter argues for a happiness conception of well-being. It states that the dominant income-based conception of well-being is very limited and it neglects relevant aspects in people’s experience of being well. The subjective well-being (happiness) approach is explained and its relevance in the development debate is shown. The debate about the procurement of development is not just about instruments and strategies but, fundamentally, about what the final goals in a society are. The paper states that a developed society is one where citizens are satisfied with their lives. An illustration from the Latin American region is used to show the relevance of measuring happiness and incorporating it as final aim.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It could also be that income allows people to give market value to those commodities that are of value to their life.

  2. 2.

    The information from the Gallup Poll was provided by the Inter-American Development Bank as part of the background work made by the author in the project ‘Measuring Quality of Life in Latin America’. The author expresses his gratitude to both the Gallup Corporation and the Inter-American Development Bank.

  3. 3.

    See Rojas (2012b) for an in-depth study of subjective well-being in Latin America.

Bibliography

  • Argyle, M. (2002). The psychology of happiness. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becchetti, L., & Santoro, M. (2007). The wealth-unhappiness paradox: A relational goods/Baumol disease explanation. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of happiness (pp. 239–261). Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. (2011). The politics of happiness: What government can learn from the new research on well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Oswald, J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. Economic Journal, 104, 648–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Senik, C. (2011). Will GDP growth increase happiness in developing countries? IZA Discussion Papers 5595, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). Bonn: Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooker, K., & Near, J. (1998). Happiness and satisfaction: Measures of affect and cognition? Social Indicators Research, 44, 195–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella, R., Haisken-De New, J., & Macculloch, R. (2007). Happiness adaptation to income and to status in an individual panel. Working Papers 13159. NBER. Cambridge, Massachusets: United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. (2000). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohmen, J. (2003). Philosophers on the “Art-of-Living”. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth enhance the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (1995). Will rising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 27(1), 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (2005). Building a better theory of well-being. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness: Framing the analysis (pp. 29–65). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2004). Global judgments of subjective well-being: Situational variability and long-term stability. Social Indicators Research, 65, 245–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estes, J. (1984). The social progress of nations. University of Michigan, Michigan: United States

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A. (2002). Subjective questions to measure welfare and well-being. Discussion Paper TI 2002-020/3. Tinbergen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 11, 641–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. (2005). Does absolute income matter? In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics & happiness: Framing the analysis (pp. 65–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110, 918–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, N., & Rojas, M. (2001). Economic theory and subjective well-being: Mexico. Social Indicators Research, 53(3), 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C., & Pettinato, S. (2004). Happiness & hardship; opportunity and insecurity in new market economies. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinde, B. (2002). Darwinian happiness. Evolution as a guide for living and understanding human behavior. Princeton: Darwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gui, B., & Sugden, R. (2005). Economics and social interaction: Accounting for interpersonal relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haybron, D. (2003). What do we want from a theory happiness? Metaphilosophy, 34(3), 305–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leite Mota, G. (2007). Why should happiness have a role in welfare economics? Happiness versus orthodoxy and capabilities. Working paper No. 253. FEP. Universidade do Porto, Porto: Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. (1985). Multiple discrepancy theory. Social Indicators Research, 16, 347–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, J. (1997). Subjective well-being and economic performance. The Economic Journal, 197, 1815–1831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parens, E. (1998). Enhancing human traits: Ethical and social implications. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postlewaite, A. (1998). The social basis of interdependent preferences. European Economic Review, 42, 779–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Praag, V., & Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A. (2004). Happiness quantified: A satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Praag, V., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51, 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugno, M. (2007). The subjective well-being paradox: A suggested solution based on relational goods. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of happiness (pp. 263–288). Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2006). Well-being and the complexity of poverty: A subjective well-being approach. In M. McGillivray & M. Clarke (Eds.), Understanding human well-being (pp. 182–206). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2007). The complexity of well-being: A life-satisfaction conception and a domains-of-life approach. In I. Gough & A. McGregor (Eds.), Researching well-being in developing countries: From theory to research (pp. 259–280). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2008). Experienced poverty and income poverty in Mexico: A subjective well-being approach. World Development, 36(6), 1078–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2011). Income, happiness, and beyond. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6(3), 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2012a). Panorama Económico de América Latina. In M. Puchet, M. Rojas, R. Salazar, G. Valenti, & F. Valdés (Eds.), América latina: Problemas centrales y oportunidades promisorias. México: FLACSO-México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2012b). Bienestar Subjetivo en América Latina. In M. Puchet, M. Rojas, R. Salazar, G. Valenti, & F. Valdés (Eds.), América latina: Problemas centrales y oportunidades promisorias. México: FLACSO-México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M., & Veenhoven, R. (2013). Contentment and affect in the estimation of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 110(2), 415–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1991). Evaluating one’s life: A judgment model of subjective well-being. In F. Strack et al. (Eds.), Subjective well-being. An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 27–48). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. C. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, United Nations University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stutzer, A. (2004). The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54, 89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1987). Cultural bias in ratings of perceived life quality. Social Indicators Research, 18, 329–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1991). Questions on happiness: Classical topics, modern answers, blind spots. In F. Strack et al. (Eds.), Subjective well-being. An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 7–26). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2003). Arts-of-living. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2009). How do we assess how happy we are? In A. Dutt & B. Radcliff (Eds.), Happiness, economics and politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariano Rojas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rojas, M. (2016). The Relevance of Happiness: Choosing Between Development Paths in Latin America. In: Rojas, M. (eds) Handbook of Happiness Research in Latin America. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7203-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7203-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-7202-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-7203-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics