Abstract
This chapter argues for a happiness conception of well-being. It states that the dominant income-based conception of well-being is very limited and it neglects relevant aspects in people’s experience of being well. The subjective well-being (happiness) approach is explained and its relevance in the development debate is shown. The debate about the procurement of development is not just about instruments and strategies but, fundamentally, about what the final goals in a society are. The paper states that a developed society is one where citizens are satisfied with their lives. An illustration from the Latin American region is used to show the relevance of measuring happiness and incorporating it as final aim.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It could also be that income allows people to give market value to those commodities that are of value to their life.
- 2.
The information from the Gallup Poll was provided by the Inter-American Development Bank as part of the background work made by the author in the project ‘Measuring Quality of Life in Latin America’. The author expresses his gratitude to both the Gallup Corporation and the Inter-American Development Bank.
- 3.
See Rojas (2012b) for an in-depth study of subjective well-being in Latin America.
Bibliography
Argyle, M. (2002). The psychology of happiness. London: Routledge.
Becchetti, L., & Santoro, M. (2007). The wealth-unhappiness paradox: A relational goods/Baumol disease explanation. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of happiness (pp. 239–261). Cheltenham: Elgar.
Bok, D. (2011). The politics of happiness: What government can learn from the new research on well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Clark, A., & Oswald, J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. Economic Journal, 104, 648–659.
Clark, A., & Senik, C. (2011). Will GDP growth increase happiness in developing countries? IZA Discussion Papers 5595, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). Bonn: Germany.
Clark, A., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.
Crooker, K., & Near, J. (1998). Happiness and satisfaction: Measures of affect and cognition? Social Indicators Research, 44, 195–224.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
Di Tella, R., Haisken-De New, J., & Macculloch, R. (2007). Happiness adaptation to income and to status in an individual panel. Working Papers 13159. NBER. Cambridge, Massachusets: United States.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.
Diener, E., & Suh, E. (2000). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Press.
Dohmen, J. (2003). Philosophers on the “Art-of-Living”. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 351–371.
Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth enhance the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Easterlin, R. (1995). Will rising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 27(1), 35–48.
Easterlin, R. (2005). Building a better theory of well-being. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness: Framing the analysis (pp. 29–65). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2004). Global judgments of subjective well-being: Situational variability and long-term stability. Social Indicators Research, 65, 245–277.
Estes, J. (1984). The social progress of nations. University of Michigan, Michigan: United States
Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A. (2002). Subjective questions to measure welfare and well-being. Discussion Paper TI 2002-020/3. Tinbergen Institute.
Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 11, 641–659.
Frank, R. (2005). Does absolute income matter? In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics & happiness: Framing the analysis (pp. 65–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110, 918–938.
Fuentes, N., & Rojas, M. (2001). Economic theory and subjective well-being: Mexico. Social Indicators Research, 53(3), 289–314.
Graham, C., & Pettinato, S. (2004). Happiness & hardship; opportunity and insecurity in new market economies. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Grinde, B. (2002). Darwinian happiness. Evolution as a guide for living and understanding human behavior. Princeton: Darwin Press.
Gui, B., & Sugden, R. (2005). Economics and social interaction: Accounting for interpersonal relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haybron, D. (2003). What do we want from a theory happiness? Metaphilosophy, 34(3), 305–329.
Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.
Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Leite Mota, G. (2007). Why should happiness have a role in welfare economics? Happiness versus orthodoxy and capabilities. Working paper No. 253. FEP. Universidade do Porto, Porto: Portugal
Michalos, A. (1985). Multiple discrepancy theory. Social Indicators Research, 16, 347–413.
Oswald, J. (1997). Subjective well-being and economic performance. The Economic Journal, 197, 1815–1831.
Parens, E. (1998). Enhancing human traits: Ethical and social implications. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Postlewaite, A. (1998). The social basis of interdependent preferences. European Economic Review, 42, 779–800.
Praag, V., & Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A. (2004). Happiness quantified: A satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Praag, V., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51, 29–49.
Pugno, M. (2007). The subjective well-being paradox: A suggested solution based on relational goods. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of happiness (pp. 263–288). Cheltenham: Elgar.
Rojas, M. (2006). Well-being and the complexity of poverty: A subjective well-being approach. In M. McGillivray & M. Clarke (Eds.), Understanding human well-being (pp. 182–206). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Rojas, M. (2007). The complexity of well-being: A life-satisfaction conception and a domains-of-life approach. In I. Gough & A. McGregor (Eds.), Researching well-being in developing countries: From theory to research (pp. 259–280). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rojas, M. (2008). Experienced poverty and income poverty in Mexico: A subjective well-being approach. World Development, 36(6), 1078–1093.
Rojas, M. (2011). Income, happiness, and beyond. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6(3), 265–276.
Rojas, M. (2012a). Panorama Económico de América Latina. In M. Puchet, M. Rojas, R. Salazar, G. Valenti, & F. Valdés (Eds.), América latina: Problemas centrales y oportunidades promisorias. México: FLACSO-México.
Rojas, M. (2012b). Bienestar Subjetivo en América Latina. In M. Puchet, M. Rojas, R. Salazar, G. Valenti, & F. Valdés (Eds.), América latina: Problemas centrales y oportunidades promisorias. México: FLACSO-México.
Rojas, M., & Veenhoven, R. (2013). Contentment and affect in the estimation of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 110(2), 415–431.
Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1991). Evaluating one’s life: A judgment model of subjective well-being. In F. Strack et al. (Eds.), Subjective well-being. An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 27–48). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. C. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, United Nations University.
Stutzer, A. (2004). The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54, 89–109.
Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Veenhoven, R. (1987). Cultural bias in ratings of perceived life quality. Social Indicators Research, 18, 329–334.
Veenhoven, R. (1991). Questions on happiness: Classical topics, modern answers, blind spots. In F. Strack et al. (Eds.), Subjective well-being. An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 7–26). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Veenhoven, R. (2003). Arts-of-living. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 373–384.
Veenhoven, R. (2009). How do we assess how happy we are? In A. Dutt & B. Radcliff (Eds.), Happiness, economics and politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rojas, M. (2016). The Relevance of Happiness: Choosing Between Development Paths in Latin America. In: Rojas, M. (eds) Handbook of Happiness Research in Latin America. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7203-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7203-7_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-7202-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-7203-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)