Skip to main content
Log in

Compressive-shear fracture model of the phase-field method coupled with a modified Hoek–Brown criterion

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a compressive-shear fracture model of the phase-field method is proposed to simulate the compressive-shear failure behaviours of pre-cracked rock materials and investigate their fracture mechanisms. In the proposed model, a modified Hoek–Brown criterion is incorporated into the driving term in the evolution equation of the phase field to control the crack phase field. Rock-like specimens containing single flaw and double flaws were used to validate the performance of the proposed numerical model in capturing compressive-shear fractures. The numerical results were in good agreement with the experimental observations. Subsequently the effects of flaw geometries, i.e. flaw inclination angle, spacing and continuity, on the cracking behaviours and mechanical properties of rock-like specimens containing double parallel flaws were investigated. Typical shear cracks, such as coplanar or quasi-coplanar secondary cracks and oblique secondary cracks as well as coalescence types of different shear cracks, were captured. The mechanical properties were also strongly related to the flaw geometry. These performances indicated that the proposed numerical model has ability to simulate compressive-shear cracks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambati M, Gerasimov T, De Lorenzis L (2015a) Phase-field modeling of ductile fracture. Comput Mech 55:1017–1040

  • Ambati M, Gerasimov T, De Lorenzis L (2015b) A review on phase-field models of brittle fracture and a new fast hybrid formulation. Comput Mech 55:383–405

  • Ambati M, Kruse R, De Lorenzis L (2016) A phase-field model for ductile fracture at finite strains and its experimental verification. Comput Mech 57:149–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amor H, Marigo JJ, Maurini C (2009) Regularized formulation of the variational brittle fracture with unilateral contact: numerical experiments. J Mech Phys Solids 57:1209–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armero F, Garikipati K (1996) An analysis of strong discontinuities in multiplicative finite strain plasticity and their relation with numerical simulation of strain localization in solids. Int J Solids Struct 33(20–22):2863–2885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belytschko T, Lin JI (1987) A three-dimensional impact-penetration algorithm with erosion. Int J Impact Eng 5(1–4):111–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobet A, Einstein HH (1998) Fracture coalescence in rock-type materials under uniaxial and biaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35(7):863–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borden MJ, Verhoosel CV, Scott MA, Hughes TJ, Landis CM (2012) A phase-field description of dynamic brittle fracture. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 217:77–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (2000) Numerical experiments in revisited brittle fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 48:797–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (2008) The variational approach to fracture. J Elast 91:5–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Rabczuk T, Bordas SPA, Liu GR, Zeng KY, Kerfriden P (2012) Extended finite element method with edge-based strain smoothing (esm-xfem) for linear elastic crack growth. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 209:250–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt E (2012) The Hoek–Brown failure criterion. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:981–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (1998) Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem. J Mech Phys Solids 46:1319–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fries TP, Belytschko T (2010) The extended/generalized finite element method: an overview of the method and its applications. Int J Numer Meth Eng 84(3):253–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami S, Anitescu C, Chakraborty S, Rabczuk T (2020) Transfer learning enhanced physics informed neural network for phase-field modeling of fracture. Theor Appl Fract Mech 106:102447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haeri H, Sarfarazi V, Hedayat A (2016) Suggesting a new testing device for determination of tensile strength of concrete. Struct Eng Mech 60(6):939–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofacker M, Miehe C (2012) Continuum phase field modeling of dynamic fracture: variational principles and staggered FE implementation. Int J Fract 178:113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofacker M, Miehe C (2013) A phase field model of dynamic fracture: robust field updates for the analysis of complex crack patterns. Int J Numer Meth Eng 93:276–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang YH, Yang SQ, Zhao J (2016) Three-dimensional numerical simulation on triaxial failure mechanical behavior of rock-like specimen containing two unparallel fissures. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(12):4711–4729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GR, Stryk RA (1987) Eroding interface and improved tetrahedral element algorithms for high-velocity impact computations in three dimensions. Int J Impact Eng 5(1–4):411–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn C, Müller R (2008) A phase field model for fracture. Proc Appl Math Mech 8:10223–10224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn C, Müller R (2010) A continuum phase field model for fracture. Eng Fract Mech 77:3625–3634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin P, Wong RHC, Tang CA (2015) Experimental study of coalescence mechanisms and failure under uniaxial compression of granite containing multiple holes. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 77:313–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miehe C, Mauthe S (2016) Phase field modeling of fracture in multi-physics problems. Part III. Crack driving forces in hydro-poro-elasticity and hydraulic fracturing of fluid-saturated porous media. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 304:619–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miehe C, Hofacker M, Welschinger F (2010a) A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:2765–2778

  • Miehe C, Welschinger F, Hofacker M (2010b) Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: variational principles and multi-field FE implementations. Int J Numer Meth Eng 83:1273–1311

  • Miehe C, Hofacker M, Schänzel LM, Aldakheel F (2015a) Phase field modeling of fracture in multi-physics problems. Part II. Coupled brittle-to-ductile failure criteria and crack propagation in thermo-elastic-plastic solids. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 294:486–522

  • Miehe C, Mauthe S, Teichtmeister S (2015b) Minimization principles for the coupled problem of Darcy-Biot-type fluid transport in porous media linked to phase field modeling of fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 82:186–217

  • Miehe C, Schänzel LM, Ulmer H (2015c) Phase field modeling of fracture in multi-physics problems. Part I. Balance of crack surface and failure criteria for brittle crack propagation in thermo-elastic solids. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 294:449–485

  • Moës N, Belytschko T (2002) Extended finite element method for cohesive crack growth. Eng Fract Mech 69(7):813–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver J (1996) Modeling strong discontinuities in solid mechanics via strain softening constitutive equations part I and II. Int J Numer Meth Eng 39:3575–3623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park CH, Bobet A (2009) Crack coalescence in specimens with open and closed flaws: a comparison. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(5):819–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagong M, Bobet A (2002) Coalescence of multiple flaws in a rock-model material in uniaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(2):229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarfarazi V, Haeri H (2016) A review of experimental and numerical investigations about crack propagation. Comput Concrete 18(2):235–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang LF, Zhou XP (2020) Phase field model for simulating the fracture behaviors of some disc-type specimens. Eng Fract Mech 226:106870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T, Ye X, Liu ZL, Chu DY, Zhuang Z (2019) Modeling the dynamic and quasi-static compression-shear failure of brittle materials by explicit phase field method. Comput Mech 64(6):1537–1556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei MD, Dai F, Xu NW, Zhao T (2018a) Experimental and numerical investigation of cracked chevron notched Brazilian disc specimen for fracture toughness testing of rock. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 41(1):197–211

  • Wei MD, Dai F, Liu Y, Xu NW, Zhao T (2018b) An experimental and theoretical comparison of CCNBD and CCNSCB specimens for determining mode I fracture toughness of rocks. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 41(5):1002–1018

  • Wong RHC, Chau KT (1998) Crack coalescence in a rock-like material containing two cracks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35(2):147–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang SQ (2011) Crack coalescence behavior of brittle sandstone samples containing two coplanar fissures in the process of deformation failure. Eng Fract Mech 78(17):3059–3081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang SQ, Jing HW (2011) Strength failure and crack coalescence behavior of brittle sandstone samples containing a single fissure under uniaxial compression. Int J Fract 168(2):227–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Lu YQ, Wang QZ (2017) Measurement of dynamic fracture propagation toughness of rock and observation of dynamic arrest phenomenon using P-CCNBD specimens. Rock Soil Mech 38(11):3095–3105

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Wang LF, Gao MZ (2020) Experimental and numerical study of the influence of prefabricated crack width on the fracture toughness of NSCB specimens. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53:5133–5154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou XP, Zhang JZ, Wong LNY (2018) Experimental study on the growth, coalescence and wrapping behaviors of 3D cross-embedded flaws under uniaxial compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51(5):1379–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou SW, Zhuang XY, Rabczuk T (2019a) Phase-field modeling of fluid-driven dynamic cracking in porous media. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 350:169–198

  • Zhou SW, Zhuang XY, Rabczuk T (2019b) Phase field modeling of brittle compressive-shear fractures in rock-like materials: a new driving force and a hybrid formulation. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 355:729–752

  • Zhou XP, Jia ZM, Berto F (2019c) Simulation of cracking behaviours in interlayered rocks with flaws subjected to tension using a phase-field method. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 42(8):1679–1698

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51839009, 51679017) and the Graduate Scientific Research and Innovation Foundation of Chongqing, China (Grant No. CYB20030).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-Ping Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jia, ZM., Zhou, XP. & Berto, F. Compressive-shear fracture model of the phase-field method coupled with a modified Hoek–Brown criterion. Int J Fract 229, 161–184 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-021-00546-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-021-00546-7

Keywords

Navigation