Abstract
The human–land relationship changes with the development of human society. In the contemporary context in which human activities dominate this relationship, revealing the spatial correlation between human activities and the natural environment provides a bridge to understanding and coordinating the human–land relationship. Currently, it is important to maintain the balance between humans and the environment. To measure the role of human activities in this relationship, this study took China as an example to explore spatial patterns through an indicator system and wavelet analysis at the city level in 2015, and a spatial deviation model to depict the relationship. The study revealed the following results: (1) The spatial pattern of human activity effects was bounded by the Hu Huanyong Line: The west side is a low-intensity area, and the east side was a medium- to high-intensity concentrated distribution area. The human activity scale was decreasing in the east, central area and west; the human activity structure declines from the metropolitan area to the core edge; and the high-value area of human activity is distributed as scattered points with the metropolitan area as the core. (2) Wavelet analysis results revealed that the spatial heterogeneity of each area on the east side of the Hu Huanyong Line showed the pattern of east > central > southwest > northeast, which indicates that the effects of human activities in the northeast are weakening, while those in the southwest are strengthening. Human activity effects on the east side of the Hu Huanyong Line had multiscale features, with the main characteristic scales being 60,000 km2, 150,000 km2, 300,000 km2 and 600,000 km2, which roughly corresponded to multiple cities, provinces, urban agglomerations and regions, respectively. (3) The overall pattern of the relationship between human activities and the natural environment was more consistent. The spatial deviation showed that the 500 m altitude contour < the 800 mm precipitation contour < the 1500 m altitude contour < the 0 °C temperature contour. These findings revealed that human activities were more inclined to agglomerate in areas with low altitude and high precipitation. The research framework used here can provide suggestions and methods for quantitative research on the human–land relationship, and the research results can provide useful information for sustainable development and construction of an ecological civilization.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
25 October 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01904-0
References
Biswas, A., & Si, B. C. (2011). Application of continuous wavelet transform in examining soil spatial variation: A review. Mathematical Geosciences, 43(3), 379–396.
Beijing Normal University Economic and Resource Management Institute, etc. (2017). 2016 China green development index report-regional comparison (pp. 2–16). Beijing Normal University Publishing Group.
Buckley, R., Zhou, R., & Zhong, L. S. (2016). How pristine are China’s parks? Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 136.
Dodds, W. K., Perkin, J. S., & Gerken, J. E. (2013). Human impact on freshwater ecosystem services: A global perspective. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(16), 9061–9068.
Fan, J. (2014). Frontier exploration of the sustainable process and pattern of human-earth systems. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(8), 1060–1068.
Fan, J., Xu, Y., Wang, C. S., et al. (2015). The ecological and environmental effects of human activities in Tibet in the past half century. Science Bulletin, 60(32), 3057–3066.
Fan, J. (2018). “Human-earth systems” are the theoretical basis for comprehensive research on the formation and evolution of geographic patterns. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(4), 597–607.
Galvani, A. P., Bauch, C. T., Anand, M., et al. (2016). Human-environment interactions in population and ecosystem health. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(51), 14502–14506.
Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press.
Halpern, B. S., Frazier, M., Potapenko, J., et al. (2015). Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world’s ocean. Nature Communications, 6, 7615.
Han, Z., & Cui, B. S. (2016). Development of an integrated stress index to determine multiple anthropogenic stresses on macrophyte biomass and richness inponds. Ecological Engineering, 90, 151–162.
Harden, C. P. (2012). Framing and reframing questions of human-environment interactions. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(4), 737–747.
He, B. J., Zhao, D. X., Zhu, J., et al. (2018). Promoting and implementing urban sustainability in China: An integration of sustainable initiatives at different urban scales. Habitat International, 82, 83–93.
He, B. J., Wan, J. S., Liu, H. M., et al. (2021). Localized synergies between heat waves and urban heat islands: Implications on human thermal comfort and urban heat management. Environmental Research, 193, 110584.
Hu, S. L., Yu, B., & Zhuo, R. R. (2020). The spatial relationship between human activities and natural environment in the continent of China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(12), 3935–3943.
Hu, Y. F., & Xu, Z. Y. (2014). The characteristic scale and multi-scale coupling relationship between the terrain and vegetation index of the Mongolian Plateau. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 34(12), 1511–1517.
Klein-Banai, C., & Theis, T. L. (2011). An urban university’s ecological footprint and the effect of climate change. Ecological Indicators, 11(3), 857–860.
Kovarik, J. L., & Van Beynen, P. E. (2015). Application of the karst disturbance index as a raster-based model in a developing country. Applied Geography, 63, 396–407.
Krausmann, F., Erb, K. H., Gingrich, S., et al. (2013). Global human appropriation of net primary production doubled in the 20th century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(25), 10324–10329.
Krugman, P. (1993). First nature, second nature, and metropolitan location. Journal of Regional Science, 33(2), 129–144.
Li, S. C., Gao, W. M., Zhou, Q. F., et al. (2006). Multi-scale spatial correlation analysis of NDVI and terrain factors based on wavelet transform. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 12, 4198–4203.
Li, S. C., Zhao, Z. Q., & Gao, J. B. (2008). Recognition and location of ecological geographic boundaries based on spatial wavelet transform. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 9, 4313–4322.
Li, J. Y., Zhao, Y., Xu, Q. H., et al. (2014). Human influence as a potential source of bias in pollen-based quantitative climate reconstructions. Quaternary Science Reviews, 99, 112–121.
Li, L., Yang, N., Li, J., et al. (2021). Exploring the interactive coupled relationship between urban construction and resource environment in Wuhan, China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 11179–11200.
Li, Y., & Tang, Q. (2018). A review of the research methods of human-land relationship and the regional system of human-land relationship in China. Geographical Research, 37(8), 1655–1670.
Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., et al. (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317(5844), 1513–1516.
Liu, S. L., Liu, L. M., Wu, X., et al. (2018). Quantitative evaluation of human activity intensity on the regional ecological impact studies. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 8(19), 797–6809.
Liu, T. (2011). Research on the similarity relationship and calculation model of space group (group) targets. Wuhan University.
Liu, T., Du, Q. Y., & Mao, H. C. (2012). Research on the calculation model of similarity of spatial line group targets. Journal of Wuhan University (information Science Edition), 37(8), 992–995.
Liu, Y. (2018). On the characteristics of the new era of the evolution of China’s human-land relationship: The preface to the special edition of “China’s human-land relationship.” Geographical Research, 37(8), 1477–1484.
Lu, D. D. (2002). Theoretical research on the “human-earth systems” of geography. Geographical Research, 2, 135–145.
Lu, D. D., Wang, Z., Feng, Z. M., et al. (2016). Academic debate on “whether the Hu Huanyong Line can break through.” Geographical Research, 35(5), 805–824.
Magalhaes, J. L. L., Lopes, M. A., & De Queiroz, H. L. (2015). Development of a flooded forest anthropization index (FFAI) applied to amazonian areas under pressure from different human activities. Ecological Indicators, 48, 440–447.
National Development and Reform Commission International Cooperation Center. (2016). Research on China’s regional opening-up index (pp. 77–81). People’s Publishing House.
Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., et al. (2015). The trajectory of the anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98.
Su, C. H., Fu, B. J., Wei, Y. P., et al. (2012). Ecosystem management based on ecosystem services and human activities: A case study in the Yanhe watershed. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 17–32.
Turner, B. L., II., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., et al. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(14), 8074–8079.
Turner, B. L., II., Matsond, P. A., & McCarthye, J. J. (2003). Illustrating the coupled human- environment system for vulnerability analysis: Three case studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(14), 8080–8085.
Van Beynen, P., & Townsend, K. (2005). A disturbance index for karst environments. Environmental Managemen, 36(1), 101–116.
Wang, Y., Li, H. Y., & Yu, H. (2018). The spatial pattern and evolution characteristics of green development in China’s provinces. China Population, Resources and Environment, 28(10), 96–104.
Wang, Z., Le, Q., & Wu, J. (2016). Theoretical geography (pp. 272–278). Science Press.
Wu, C. J. (1991). Study on the core of geography: Human-earth systems. Economic Geography, 3, 1–6.
Xu, Y., Xu, X., & Tang, Q. (2016). Human activity intensity of land surface: Concept, methods and application in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26(9), 1349–1361.
Yang, J., Wan, Y. C., Xiu, C. L., et al. (2020). Optimizing local climate zones to mitigate urban heat island effect in human settlements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 123767.
Yang, J., Ren, J. Y., Sun, D. Q., et al. (2021). Understanding land surface temperature impact factors based on local climate zones. Sustainable Cities and Society, 69, 102818.
Yang, Y., Li, X. Y., Dong, W., et al. (2019). Assessing China’s human-environment relationship. Journal of Geographical Sciences., 29(8), 1261–1282.
Yu, B., Luo, J., & Zeng, J. X. (2016). Spatial changes and governance in contemporary Chinese villages and towns (pp. 84–93). Science Press.
Zhang, L., Dzakpasu, M., Chen, R., et al. (2017). Validity and utility of ecological footprint accounting: A state-of-the-art review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 32, 411–416.
Zhang, W., Zhou, Y. Y., & Xie, S. X. (2013). Analysis on the pattern and difference of low-carbon green development in Chinese cities: Taking the top 110 cities above prefecture-level GDP as an example. World Geographical Research, 22(4), 134–142.
Zhao, J. M., Miao, C. H., & Jiang, H. N. (2015). Spatial econometric analysis of China’s GDP deviation. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 35(5), 515–520.
Zhou, T. Y., & Kuang, J. W. (2015). China urban innovation report (pp. 94–101). Social Sciences Archives Press.
Zhu, H. J. (2016). Geographical thinking and practice (pp. 12–15). Science Press.
Funding
The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.41671179).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: funding note has been corrected.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, S., Yu, B., Luo, S. et al. Spatial pattern of the effects of human activities on the land surface of China and their spatial relationship with the natural environment. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 10379–10401 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01871-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01871-6