Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Human activity intensity of land surface: Concept, methods and application in China

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human activity intensity is a synthesis index for describing the effects and influences of human activities on land surface. This paper presents the concept of human activity intensity of land surface and construction land equivalent, builds an algorithm model for human activity intensity, and establishes a method for converting different land use/cover types into construction land equivalent as well. An application in China based on the land use data from 1984 to 2008 is also included. The results show that China’s human activity intensity rose slowly before 2000, while rapidly after 2000. It experienced an increase from 7.63% in 1984 to 8.54% in 2008. It could be generally divided into five levels: Very High, High, Medium, Low, and Very Low, according to the human activity intensity at county level in 2008, which is rated by above 27%, 16%–27%, 10%–16%, 6%–10%, and below 6%. China’s human activity intensity was spatially split into eastern and western parts by the line of Helan Mountains- Longmen Mountains-Jinghong. The eastern part was characterized by the levels of Very High, High, and Medium, and the levels of Low and Very Low were zonally distributed in the mountainous and hilly areas. In contrast, the western part was featured by the Low and Very Low levels, and the levels of Medium and High were scattered in Gansu Hexi Corridor, the east of Qinghai, and the northern and southern slopes of Tianshan Mountains in Xinjiang.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barry R G, 2003. Mountain cryospheric studies and the WCRP climate and cryosphere (CliC) project. Journal of Hydrology, 282(1–4): 177–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan Jie, Li Pingxing, 2009. The scientific foundation of major function oriented zoning in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 19(5): 515–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fresco LO, Leemans R, Van Zeijl-Rozema AE, 1996. Land use and cover change (LUCC) open science meeting Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 29–31 January 1996. Land Use Policy, 13(4): 332–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Peng, Niu Xiang, Wang Bing et al., 2015. Land use changes and its driving forces in hilly ecological restoration area based on GIS and RS of northern China. Scientific Reports, 5: 11038.doi: 10.1038/srep11038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Office of the State Council (GOSC), 2010. ([2010] No.46). Major Functional Area Planning in China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graetz D, 1993. Land cover: Trying to make the task tractable! In: Proceeding of the Workshop on Global Land Use/Cover Modelling. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberl H, Erb K H, Krausmann F et al., 2007. Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth’s terrestrial ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(31): 12942–12947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou Lizhu, Feng Shaoyuan, Ding Yueyuan et al., 2006. Runoff-rainfall relationship for multilayer infiltration systems under artificial rainfalls. Transactions of the CSAE, 22(9):100–105. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Zhibin, He Xingyuan, Li Yuehui et al., 2007. Human activity intensity and its spatial distribution pattern in upper reach of Minjiang River. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 26(4): 539–543. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC, 2014. Climate Change: Synthesis Report. Working Groups I, II and III Contribution to the 5th Assessment Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger J, 2003. The International Human Dimensions Programme on global environmental change (IHDP). Global Environmental Change, 13(1): 69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leemans R, Asrar G, Busalacchi A et al., 2009. Developing a common strategy for integrated global change research and outreach: The Earth System Science Partnership (ESSP). Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1(1):4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Xiangyun, Wang Lixin, Zhang Yushu et al., 2004. Analysis of roles of human activities in land desertification in arid area of Northwest China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 24(1): 68–75. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Xiubin, 1996. A review of the international researches on land use/cover change. Acta Geographica Sinica, 51(6): 553–557. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Jiyuan, Deng Xiangzheng, 2009. Development of research method of LUCC spatio-temporal process. Chinese Science Bulletin, 54(21): 3251–3258. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Yanhua, Ge Quansheng, Fang Xiuqi et al., 2006. Global environmental change and the national security of China. Advance in Earth Sciences, 21(4): 346–351. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Zhenhuan, Li You, Peng Jian, 2011. Progress and perspective of the research on hydrological effects of urban impervious surface on water environment. Progress in Geography, 30(3): 275–281. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Olivieri I, 1999. Diversitas: An international programme of biodiversity science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14(1): 2–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauser W, Klepper G, Rice M et al., 2013. Transdisciplinary global change research: The co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(3/4): 420–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGill B, 2015. Biodiversity: Land use matters. Nature, 520(7545): 38–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miler R B, 1994. Interactions and collaboration in global change across the social and natural sciences. IMBIO, 23(1): 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mottet A, Ladet S, Coque N et al., 2006. Agricultural land-use change and its drivers in mountain landscapes: A case study in the Pyrenees. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 114(2–4): 296–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelorosso R, Leone A, Boccia L, 2009. Land cover and land use change in the Italian central Apennines: A comparison of assessment methods. Applied Geography, 29(1):35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees W E, 2001. Ecological footprint, concept of. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, 2: 229–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekiya A, Okamoto S, 2010. Evaluation of carbon dioxide equivalent values for greenhouse gases: CEWN as a new indicator replacing GWP. Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, 131(3): 364–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • She D, Gao X, Fang K, 2014. Measurement of soil sorptivity rate under different land uses by disc infiltrometer. Transactions of the CSAE, 30(18): 151–158. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi Peijun, Li Ning, Ye Qian et al., 2009. Research on global environmental change and integrated disaster risk governance. Advance in Earth Sciences, 24(4): 428–435. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang Huajun, Wu Wenbin, Yang Peng et al., 2009. Recent progresses of land use and land cover change (LUCC) models. Acta Geographica Sinica, 64(4): 456–468. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner II B L, Lambin EF, Reenberg A, 2007. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(52): 20666–20671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner II B L, Skole D, Sanderson S et al., 1995. Land-use and land-cover change science/research plan. IGBP Report No.35 and HDP Report No.7. Stockholm: IGBP.

    Google Scholar 

  • US-SGCR/CENR. Our changing plant, the FY 1996 U.S. global change research program. Washington, D.C.: US-GCRIO, 1996.

  • Vitousek P M, Mooney H A, Lubchenco J et al., 1997. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277(5325): 494–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Rees W E, 1997. Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: Economics from an ecological footprint perspective. Ecological Economics, 20(1): 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Guisheng, Xie Yaowen, Wang Xueqiang, 2013. Evaluation on human activity in the middle reaches of Heihe River in historical period: A case study on the Ming Dynasty, Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China. Journal of Desert Research, 33(4): 1225–1234. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Hongjie, Li Xianwen, Shi Xuezheng et al., 2003. Distribution of soil nutrient under different land use and relationship between soil nutrient and soil granule composition. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 17(2): 44–46, 50. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Jinzhe, Zhang Guanghui, Nie Zhenlong et al., 2009. Quantitative assessment of human activity intensity in Hutuohe catchment. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 23(10): 41–44. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen Ying, 1998. Preliminary discussion on the method of quantitative assessment of human activity intensity. Impact of Science on Society, 4: 55–60. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Chuanjun, Guo Huancheng, 1994. Chinese Land Use. Beijing: Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Zhigang, Zhuang Dafang, Yang Lin, 2009. Construction and application of regional quantitative model of human activity intensity. Journal of Geo-information Science, 11(4): 452–460. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye Duzheng, Fu Congbin, Ji Jinjun et al., 2001. Orderly human activities and subsistence environment. Advance in Earth Sciences, 16(4): 453–460. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Weiqing, Wang Yujie, Hu Haibo et al., 2014. Soil water infiltration characteristics analysis under different vegetation on the hilly ground of Yangtze River Delta. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 45(2): 345–351. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Cuiyun, Wang Zhao, 2004. Quantitative assessment of human activity intensity in the Heihe catchment. Advance in Earth Sciences, 19(Suppl.): 386–390. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Wenwu, Tian Yaping, Zou Jun et al., 2010. Spatial simulation of human activity intensity in hilly red soil region of southern China: A case study in Hengyang basin, Hunan Province. Journal of Geo-information Science, 12(5): 628–633. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Chunyang, Li Fang, Li Shuhua, 2009. Research on the influence of different pavement structures in landscape path on rainfall infiltration process. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 3: 91–97. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Huiyi, Li Xiubin, 2003. Discussion on the index method of regional land use change. Acta Geographica Sinica, 58(5): 643–650. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang Dafang, Liu Jiyuan, 1997. Study on the model of regional differentiation of land use degree in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 12(2): 105–111. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing, 100101, China

    Yong Xu, Xiaoren Xu & Qing Tang

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Xiaoren Xu

Authors
  1. Yong Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoren Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qing Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qing Tang.

Additional information

Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41171449, No.41301121, No.41430636; The Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.KZZD-EW-06-01

Xu Yong, Professor, specialized in human-environment interactions and regional development.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Y., Xu, X. & Tang, Q. Human activity intensity of land surface: Concept, methods and application in China. J. Geogr. Sci. 26, 1349–1361 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1331-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1331-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation