Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Climate change impacts and adaptations for wheat employing multiple climate and crop modelsin Pakistan

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comparing outputs of multiple climate and crop models is an option to assess the uncertainty in simulations in a changing climate. The use of multiple wheat models under five plausible future simulated climatic conditions is rarely found in literature. CERES-Wheat, DSSAT-Nwheat, CROPSIM-Wheat, and APSIM-Wheat models were calibrated with observed data form eleven sowing dates (15 October to 15 March) of irrigated wheat trails at Faisalabad, Pakistan, to explore close to real climate changing impacts and adaptations. Twenty-nine GCM of CMIP5 were used to generate future climate scenarios during 2040–2069 under RCP 8.5. These scenarios were categorized among five climatic conditions (Cool/Wet, Cool/Dry, Hot/Wet, Hot/Dry, Middle) on the basis of monthly changes in temperature and rainfall of wheat season using a stretched distribution approach (STA). The five GCM at Faisalabad and Layyah were selected and used in the wheat multimodels set to CO2 571 ppm. In the future, the temperature of both locations will elevate 2–3 °C under the five climatic conditions, although Faisalabad will be drier and Layyah will be wetter as compared with baseline conditions. Climate change impacts were quantified on wheat sown on different dates, including 1 November, 15 November, and 30 November which showed average reduction at semiarid and arid environment by 23.5%, 19.8%, and 31%, respectively. Agronomic and breeding options offset the climate change impacts and also increased simulated yield about 20% in all climatic conditions. The number of GCMs was considerably different in each quadrate of STA, showing the uncertainty in possible future climatic conditions of both locations. Uncertainty among wheat models was higher at Layyah as compared with Faisalabad. Under Hot/Dry and Hot/Wet climatic conditions, wheat models were the most uncertain to simulate impacts and adaptations. DSSAT-Nwheat and APSIM-Wheat were the most and least sensitive to changing temperature among years and climatic conditions, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad A et al (2015) Chapter 7: Impact of climate change on the rice-wheat cropping system of Pakistan. In: Hillel D, Rosenzweig C, (eds) Handbook of Climate Change and Agro-Ecosystems, vol 3. Imperial College Press and The American Society of Agronomy, pp 219–258

  • Asseng S, Foster I, Turner NC (2011) The impact of temperature variability on wheat yields. Glob Chang Biol 17:997–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asseng S et al (2013) Uncertainty in simulating wheat yields under climate change. Nat Clim Chang 3:827–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craufurd PQ, Vadez V, Jagadish SVK, Prasad PVV, Zaman-Allah M (2013) Crop science experiments designed to inform crop modeling. Agric For Meteorol 170:8–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewert F (2012) Adaptation: opportunities in climate change? Nat Clim Chang 2:153–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfray HCJ et al (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327:812–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howden SM, Soussana JF, Tubiello FN, Chhetri N, Dunlop M, Meinke H (2007) Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:19691–19696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson IN, Ruane AC, Winter JM, McDermid SP (2015) Chapter 3: AgMIP climate data and scenarios for integrated assessment. In: Hillel D, Rosenzweig C (eds) Handbook of climate change and agro-ecosystems, vol 3. Imperial College Press and the American Society of Agronomy, pp 45–78

  • Hussain J, Khaliq T, Ahmad A, Akhter J, Asseng S (2018) Wheat responses to climate change and its adaptations: a focus on arid and semi-arid environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-018-0074-2

  • IPCC (2013) Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

  • Iqbal MF, Hussain M, Ali MA, Waqar MQ, Hussain F, Aslam S (2015) A review: flare up of green leaf hopper in early transplanted super fine rice. Int J Adv Res Biol Sci 2(1):98–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Martre P et al (2015) Multimodel ensembles of wheat growth: many models are better than one. Glob Chang Biol 21(2):911–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei EE, Webber H, Gaiser T, Naab J, Ewert F (2015) Heat stress in cereals: mechanisms and modelling. Eur J Agron 64:98–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie JT, Singh U, Godwin DC, Bowen WT(1998) Cereal growth, development and yield. Pages 79–98 in G.Y. Tsuji, G. Hoogenboom, and P.K. Thornton, editors. Understanding options for agricultural production. Kluwer academic

  • Rosenzweig C et al (2013) The agricultural model intercomparison and improvement project (AgMIP): protocols and pilot studies. Agric For Meteorol 170:166–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stocker TF, Dahe Q, Plattner G (2013) Climate change .The physical science basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers (IPCC-2013)

  • Sultana H, Ali N, Iqbal MM, Khan AM (2009) Vulnerability and adaptability of wheat production in different climatic zones of Pakistan under climate change scenarios. Clim Chang 94(1–2):123–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design bull. Am Meteorol Soc 93:485–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton PK, Jones PG, Alagarswamy G, Andresen J, Herrero M (2010) Adapting to climate change: agricultural system and household impacts in East Africa. Agric Syst 103:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah A, Ahmad A, Khaliq T, Akhtar J (2016) Recognizing production options for pearl millet in Pakistan under changing. J Integr Agric 15:60345–60347

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project and its leaders C. Rosenzweig from NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and Columbia University (USA), J. Jones from University of Florida (USA) for suggesting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamshad Hussain.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hussain, J., Khaliq, T., Asseng, S. et al. Climate change impacts and adaptations for wheat employing multiple climate and crop modelsin Pakistan. Climatic Change 163, 253–266 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02855-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02855-7

Keywords

Navigation