Abstract
Does responsible leadership matter when assembling an inclusive supply chain at the Base-of-the-Pyramid (BOP)? Current literature implicitly assumes that it does not. BOP scholars initially focused on the importance of shaping innovative and disruptive offerings, with radically improved price–performance ratios. Subsequent studies tended to focus on barriers to implementation of large-scale ventures at the BOP. Their common characteristic was the fact that the attributes and roles of the individuals involved were deemed unimportant. If the opportunity was there, provided barriers were removed and the right value proposition was offered, the inclusive venture should take off. We evaluate three cases of leaders who succeeded in building inclusive ventures at the BOP, in contexts marked by institutional voids—where formal markets were weakly structured or nonexistent. Building a viable business under those circumstances entailed two tasks: imagining what is possible and then turning that vision into a reality. We found that, in carrying out those tasks, individuals do matter. Sampled cases show that working with nontraditional partners in inclusive supply chains requires more than aligning material incentives. Our analysis suggests that responsible leadership (RL) with a strong ethical foundation can provide powerful leverage to ensure buy-in and commitment from the various actors involved. We show how RL can impact organizations and external stakeholders through positive upward spirals. Our analysis contributes to the literature on BOP and RL by confirming, extending, and challenging existing knowledge. We propose two novel attributes (catalyst and social innovator) and argue that context matters, influencing how RL is operationalized and defined. Understanding the critical role of RL in the construction of inclusive supply chains adds a critical missing link that sheds light into the micro level of new business creation, development, and consolidation at the BOP.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“This new regulation fueled incidents with farmers, who accused the government of damaging the current scheme to develop the guayusa value chain” (Jaén and Auletta, 2017, p. 14).
A skeptical reader may question the validity of this proof quote insofar that it does not point specifically to the leader studied. However, the role of corporate leaders in shaping the organizational agenda around sustainability, embedding sustainability to stakeholders in organizational values, culture, and practices, is widely accepted (Stubbs and Cocklin 2008). This issue is addressed in the section under the heading “From the leader, to the organization and beyond.”
Mr. Gage was an American citizen committed to the well-being of Ecuadorian native communities, and Mr. Pryor an Argentine citizen working with subsistence farmers in Ecuador in Brazil, in addition to Argentina.
References
Anderson, J., & Markides, C. (2007). Strategic innovation at the base of the pyramid. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(1), 83–88.
Austin, J., Márquez, P., Reficco, E., Berger, G., Fedato, C., Fischer, R. M., et al. (2007). Building new business value chains with low income sectors in Latin America. In K. Rangan, J. Quelch, G. Herrero, & B. Barton (Eds.), Business solutions for the global poor: Creating social and economic value (pp. 193–206). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Austin, J., & Reficco, E. (2009). Corporate social entrepreneurship. Harvard Business School Working Paper, Special Is(09–101), 86–92. WorkingPaper 09-101.
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001.
Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.441.
Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1993). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks: sage.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
Berger, G., & Lomé, M. (2018). Guayaki. SEKN Case Collection, SKE171.
Berger, R., Choi, C. J., & Kim, J. B. (2011). Responsible leadership for multinational enterprises in bottom of pyramid countries: The knowledge of local managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0736-x.
Bergman, M. M. (2010). Hermeneutic content analysis: Textual and audiovisual analysis within a mixed methods framework. Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 379–396). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
BevNET. (2016). Runa Revamp—Co-Founder Discusses New Look. BevNET.com. Retrieved Jan 3, 2017 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRbG3V6r-aw&t=323s.
Boal, K. B., & Hooijberg, R. (2000). Strategic leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 515–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00057-6.
Bocken, N. M. P., Rana, P., & Short, S. W. (2015). Value mapping for sustainable business thinking. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 32(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2014.1000399.
Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039.
Boiral, O., Cayer, M., & Baron, C. M. (2009). The action logics of environmental leadership: A developmental perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9784-2.
Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007.
Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085301.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004.
Burack, E. H. (1999). Spirituality in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(4), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534819910282126.
Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (Eds.). (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (1st ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
CECODES. (2015, December 10). Wok, cocina con conciencia. Consejo Empresarial Colombiano Para El Desarrollo Sostenible (CECODES).
Chen, Y. S. (2008). The driver of green innovation and green image—green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, e531–e543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9522-1.
Ciulla, J. B. (2005). The state of leadership ethics and the work that lies before us. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(4), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2005.00414.x.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x.
Collins, D. (2010). Designing ethical organizations for spiritual growth and superior performance: An organization systems approach. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 7(2), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766081003746414.
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 22, 10.
Cornejo, D. (2013). Una red picante (pp. 86–88). Mayo: América Economía.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches.
Deckers, C., Daza, D., & Escobar, S. (2015). Wok, modelo exitoso de ventajas sostenibles. Retrieved Mar 3, 21019 from https://sebpartners.co/2015/07/11/wok-modelo-exitoso-de-ventajas-sostenibles-2/.
Dees, G. (1998). The meaning of “social entrepreneurship.”https://entrepreneurship.duke.edu/news-item/the-meaning-of-social-entrepreneurship/.
Dulewicz, V., & Higgs, M. (2005). Assessing leadership styles and organisational context. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940510579759.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
Elkington, J., & Hartigan, P. (2008). The power of unreasonable people: How social entrepreneurs create markets that change the world. Harvard: Harvard Business Review Press.
Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., et al. (2017). Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified perspective for creation of sustainable business models: Sustainable business models. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(5), 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1939.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2003). Positive emotions and upward spirals in organizations. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (1st ed., pp. 163–175). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2002). Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological Science, 13(2), 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00431.
Freeman, R. E., & Auster, E. R. (2011). Values, authenticity, and responsible leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(S1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1022-7.
Gage, T. (2017). Fully alive: Using the lessons of the amazon to live your mission in business and life. New York: Atria Books.
Gage, T. (2019). Tyler Gage, Co-Founder of RUNA and Managing Director at TERRAFERTIL. Linkedin. Retrieved Jun 27, 2019 from https://www.linkedin.com/in/tyler-gage-377a454/.
George, J. M. (1995). Leader positive mood and group performance: The case of customer service. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(9), 778–794. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01775.x.
Giacalone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2003). Right from wrong: The influence of spirituality on perceptions of unethical business activities. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024767511458.
Gond, J.-P., Igalens, J., Swaen, V., & El Akremi, A. (2011). The human resources contribution to responsible leadership: An exploration of the CSR–HR interface. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(S1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1028-1.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1970). The servant as leader. Robert K Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership.
Gull, G. A., & Doh, J. (2004). The “transmutation” of the organization: Toward a more spiritual workplace. Journal of Management Inquiry, 13(2), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492604265218.
Halme, M., Lindeman, S., & Linna, P. (2012). Innovation for inclusive business: Intrapreneurial bricolage in multinational corporations. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 743–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01045.x.
Isaacson, W. (2012). The real leadership lessons of Steve Jobs. Harvard Business Review, 90(4), 92–146.
Jaén, M. H., & Auletta, N. (2017). Runa: Modeling a Sustainable Business in the Amazon. CLADEA-BALAS case consortium, SKE157-PDF-ENG.
Jaén, M. H., & Cifuentes, O. (2018). Liderar responsablemente negocios inclusivos: Más allá de la pasión y la voluntad. https://observatorioscala.uniandes.edu.co/images/2018/PDF/liderazgo-responsable-Oct-31-.pdf. Accessed 4 Oct 2019.
Jenkins, B., & Ishikawa, E. (2010). Scaling up inclusive business: Advancing the knowledge and action agenda (p. 50). International Finance Corporation and the CSR Initiative at the Harvard Kennedy School.
Karakas, F. (2010). Spirituality and performance in organizations: A literature review. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0251-5.
Karakas, F., & Sarigollu, E. (2013). The role of leadership in creating virtuous and compassionate organizations: Narratives of Benevolent leadership in an Anatolian Tiger. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 663–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1691-5.
Karakas, F., & Sarigollu, E. (2019). Spirals of spirituality: A qualitative study exploring dynamic patterns of spirituality in Turkish Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(3), 799–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3619-y.
Lapadat, J. C. (2010). Thematic Analysis. In A. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Latif, R. (2017). Runa Hires Galindez as CEO, Gage Takes Role as Chairman. BEVNET Magazine, April. Retrieved Aug 6, 2019 from https://www.bevnet.com/news/2017/runa-hires-galindez-ceo-gage-takes-role-chairman.
Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Key informant. Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Lobo, I. D., Reficco, E., & Rueda, A. (2014). Wok: A sustainable restaurant chain? (ISSN 2322-9330, p. Case # AN0003). CLADEA-BALAS Case Consortium.
Lodge, G. (2002). The Corporate Key: Using big business to fight global poverty | foreign affairs. Foreign Affairs, July/August.
London, T., & Hart, S. L. (2004). Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: Beyond the transnational model. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 350–370.
Maak, T. (2007). Responsible leadership, stakeholder engagement, and the emergence of social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9510-5.
Maak, T. (2008). Undivided corporate responsibility: towards a theory of corporate integrity. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9891-0.
Maak, T., & Pless, N. (2006a). Responsible leadership: A relational approach. In T. Maak & N. Pless (Eds.), Responsible leadership (pp. 33–53). London: Routledge.
Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006b). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society: A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9047-z.
Maak, T., & Stoetter, N. (2012). Social entrepreneurs as responsible leaders: ‘Fundación Paraguaya’ and the case of Martin Burt. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1417-0.
MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue. University of Notre Dame Press. https://undpress.nd.edu/9780268035044/after-virtue/
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.006.
Mair, J., Martí, I., & Ganly, K. (2007). Institutional voids as spaces of opportunity. European Business Forum, 31, 34–39.
Mair, J., Martí, I., & Ventresca, M. J. (2012). Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 819–850. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0627.
Maritz, R., Pretorius, M., & Plant, K. (2011). Exploring the interface between strategy-making and responsible leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(S1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1024-5.
Márquez, P., Reficco, E., & Berger, G. (2010). Conclusions: Developing inclusive business. In P. Márquez, E. Reficco, & G. Berger (Eds.), Socially inclusive business: Engaging the poor through market initiatives in Iberoamerica (pp. 295–326). Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Melé, D. (2012). The firm as a “community of persons”: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1051-2.
Melé, D., Argandoña, A., & Sanchez-Runde, C. (2011). Facing the crisis: Toward a new humanistic synthesis for business. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0743-y.
Mendoza, X., & Vernis, A. (2008). The changing role of governments and the emergence of the relational state. Corporate Governance, 8(4), 389–396.
Miska, C., & Mendenhall, M. E. (2018). Responsible leadership: A mapping of extant research and future directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(1), 117–134.
Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sanders, B. (2007). Social Innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated [Working Paper]. https://eureka.sbs.ox.ac.uk/761/.
Olsen, M., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). Bottom-of-the-pyramid: Organizational barriers to implementation. California Management Review, 51(4), 100–125.
Ortiz, A. (2015). Taking control of the public sphere by manipulating civil society: The citizen revolution in Ecuador. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 98, 29–48.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Pearce, C. L., & Manz, C. C. (2011). Leadership Centrality and Corporate Social Ir-responsibility (CSIR): The potential ameliorating effects of self and shared leadership on CSIR. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 563–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0828-7.
Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41, 56–65.
Phills, J. A., Jr., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. D. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation (pp. 34–43). Fall: Stanford Social Innovation Review.
Pless, N. (2007). Understanding responsible leadership: Role identity and motivational drivers: The case of dame Anita Roddick, founder of the body shop. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9518-x.
Pless, N., & Maak, T. (2004). Building an inclusive diversity culture: Principles, processes and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-9465-8.
Pless, N., & Maak, T. (2009). Responsible leaders as agents of world benefit: learnings from “project ulysses”. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(S1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9947-1.
Pless, N., & Maak, T. (2011). Responsible leadership: Pathways to the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(S1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1114-4.
Prabhu, G. N. (1999). Social entrepreneurial leadership. Career Development International, 4(3), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620439910262796.
Prahalad, C. (2005a). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Philadelphia: Wharton School Publishing.
Prahalad, C. (2005b). The innovation sandbox. Strategy+Business, 44, 1–10.
Prahalad, C., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the World’s Poor, Profitably. Harvard Business Review, 80, 48–57.
Pratt, M. G. (2008). Fitting oval pegs into round holes. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107303349.
ProColombia. (2018, August). Fogón Colombia: Cocinando juntos por la paz. Retrieved Jul 4, 2019 from https://www.colombia.co/cultura-de-colombia/cocinando-juntos-por-la-paz-fogon-colombia/.
Reficco, E., & Gutiérrez, R. (2016). Organizational ambidexterity and the elusive quest for successful implementation of BoP ventures. Organization & Environment, 29(4), 461–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026616643136.
Reficco, E., Gutiérrez, R., Jaén, M. H., & Auletta, N. (2018). Collaboration mechanisms for sustainable innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 1170–1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.043.
Reficco, E., & Márquez, P. (2012). Inclusive Networks for Building BOP Markets. Business & Society, 51(3), 512–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650309332353.
Rozuel, C., & Kakabadse, N. (2010). Ethics, spirituality and self: Managerial perspective and leadership implications. Business Ethics: A European Review, 19(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2010.01603.x.
Runa. (n.d.). Runa tribe. Retrieved May 2, 2015 from https://runa.org/community/#RunaTribe.
Runa Foundation. (2015). Runa Foundation annual report. Retrieved Sept 6, 2019 from https://fundacionruna.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Annual-Report-2014.pdf.
Russo, M., & Crooke, M. (2016). Guayakí: Securing supplies, strengthening the mission. Oikos Free Case Collection. Retrieved Nov 2, 2019 from https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/050d0c_6367ea4ee72342a0bfd9c8d273adbcfe.pdf.
Santos, F. (2013). The rise of the social intrapreneur. INSEAD Knowledge, 86(May), 19. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab1422.
Simanis, E. (2011). Needs, needs everywhere, but not a BoP market to tap. In T. London & S. L. Hart (Eds.), Next generation business strategies for the base of the pyramid: New approaches for building mutual value. Upper Saddle River: FT Press.
Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sag.
Steyrer, J. (1998). Charisma and the archetypes of leadership. Organization Studies, 19(5), 807–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069801900505.
Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model”. Organization & Environment, 21(2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608318042.
Taborda, C. (2017, May 3). La lección del limón en Wok. El Espectador. Retrieved Aug 6, 2019 from https://www.elespectador.com/noticias/medio-ambiente/la-leccion-del-limon-en-wok-articulo-692112.
Turker, D., & Altuntas Vural, C. (2017). Embedding social innovation process into the institutional context: Voids or supports. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.019.
Villegas, B. (2016, October 2). Conference on Wok’s case. In CLADEA Conference. Retrieved Jul 17, 2019 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4aU6ncmTNw.
Voegtlin, C. (2011). Development of a scale measuring discursive responsible leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(S1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1020-9.
Voegtlin, C., Patzer, M., & Scherer, A. G. (2012). Responsible leadership in global business: A new approach to leadership and its multi-level outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0952-4.
Waldman, D. (2011). Moving forward with the concept of responsible leadership: Three caveats to guide theory and research. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(S1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1021-8.
Waldman, D., & Balven, R. M. (2014). Responsible leadership: Theoretical issues and research directions. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2014.0016.
Waldman, D., & Galvin, B. M. (2008). Alternative perspectives of responsible leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 37(4), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.07.001.
Walsh, J. (2003). Social issues and management: Our lost cause found. Journal of Management, 29(6), 859–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00082-5.
Wiengarten, F., Lo, C. K. Y., & Lam, J. Y. K. (2017). How does sustainability leadership affect firm performance? The choices associated with appointing a chief officer of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2666-5.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zimbardo, P. (2007). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. New York: Random House Publishing Group.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank our Research Associates María Carina Monroy, and Oliver García, for their unwavering and relentless commitment to the success of this project. In addition, the authors would like to acknowledge and thank SEKN members (www.sekn.org), who have contributed to our fieldwork altruistically and collaboratively. Having such a supportive network has boosted the quality of our work. Finally, we would like to acknowledge the excellent work done by the Editor and the blind reviewers, whose thoughtful comments and suggestions helped us to improve our manuscript substantially. Of course, any mistakes or omissions remain our sole responsibility as authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Complete List of Interviewees
WOK | RUNA | GUAYAKI |
---|---|---|
Founding Entrepreneurs (× 2) | Founding Entrepreneur and Partner | Founding Entrepreneur and Partner (× 3) |
Operations Manager | Foundation Director | Foundation Director |
Administrative Manager | Ecuadorian Exports Promotion Agency Representative | Regional Director |
Store Manager | Kichwa Farmers Association Representative | Organizational Consultant |
Administrative Clerk | Development Bank of Latin America (CAF) Officer in Ecuador | Sales VP |
Procurement Manager | ||
Financial Manager | ||
Quality Manager | ||
Service Manager | ||
Suppliers (× 2) | ||
Workers (× 3) | ||
Organizational Consultant | ||
Note: The number between parentheses denotes that for those positions, more than one interview was held. |
Appendix 2: Responsible Leadership Roles: Analysis of Villegas and Prior
Responsible Leadership Roles | Benjamin Villegas (Wok) | Alex Prior (Guayaki) |
---|---|---|
Leader as Steward | Villegas: “Unrestrained growth is incompatible with Wok's concept. It may be good for others, but not for us! In fact, if today we decided to open 10 new restaurants in a year, we probably couldn't because of the limits imposed by the environment and by our community-based procurement model. It's not like opening one more McDonald and carbon-copying a successful model. That's part of Wok's essence” (Reficco et al. 2018, 1180). Villegas has led Wok steadily forward, in pursuit of his vision of sustainability: For nineteen years, this Asian food restaurant chain has worked towards becoming a sustainable business (Taborda 2017) | “For Pryor, mere conservation was not enough. He saw himself as a steward of the environment. Combining this revelation with their belief that a market-oriented solution could expand the forest, the group tried to fashion a way to address these social and environmental ills using business principles. Constructing a business model to expand forests called 'market-driven restoration,' they fashioned a set of principles that would guide Guayakí’s approach to doing good by doing well” (Russo and Crooke 2016, p. 1) |
Leader as Visionary | Villegas: “Wok is a right for everyone... because food isn’t the only important aspect of our business: our employees, providers, and clients are our allies, and the environment is our home” (CECODES 2015) | Pryor: “We set as our mission for the year 2020 to restore 80 thousand hectares and a thousand families. 200 thousand acres” (Berger and Lomé 2018). “What is the vision of Guayaki: through the global culture of yerba mate, we shall be able to generate more ecosystems and more communities.” (Personal interview) “We measure success by the acres of rainforest protected and reforested, the number of native communities assisted with a sustainable livelihood, and the contentment and inspiration of our employees” (Russo and Crooke 2016, p. 6) |
Leader as Servant | Villegas: “True health involves, first and foremost, respect—respecting people, customers, suppliers, the community and the environment.... Wok used to pay Red de Frío 57% over average market prices and nearly ten times as much as intermediaries’” (Personal interview). “Villegas shows a sense of responsibility and belonging towards Colombia and the poor local communities and multiple stakeholders that participate in his business. He was able to recognize and respect and tend to the various needs of his stakeholders and followers while mobilizing the stakeholders towards a common goal of a ‘healthy restaurant.’ He showed authentic willingness and desire to support others and to care for their interests and needs” (Jaén and Cifuentes 2018) | Pryor: “Basically, it is about talking to the producers so as to understand their needs and find a solution together. But it was not easy at first to propose this form of work to the small yerba growers, as they were used to having rules imposed on them by intermediaries” (Berger and Lomé 2018, p. 3). “Whenever I approached a community, my method has always been to collaborate and co-create” (Personal interview) |
Leader as Coach | Wok Restaurant Manager: “I wouldn't know how to begin expressing my gratitude to my bosses, as they have always been eager to lend their ears and see how we were doing. They knew they had to be close to their employees and to make sure they were comfortable in this company, and to follow up on any issue that came up. I had never had anything similar in my previous jobs” (Personal interview) | N/A |
Leader as Architect | Villegas was the architect of ethical and inclusive organizational policies. “Wok pays community fishers about 10 times their best foregone alternative, and offers customers lower prices for better perceived quality, while respecting restrictions in fish supply dictated by biological imperatives (in ways the rest of the industry largely neglects). Yet, their community-based fish supply chain substantially improved their margins. For example, the new model almost doubled the margin of contribution of a tuna sushi order (from about 35% to 67%), a most popular product... Wok's representative products is sold 24% below competitors' prices, despite a market which considers Wok's offering as being of higher quality... This deliberate policy was founded on respect for customers and the value they would capture as they patronize Wok. In the words of Wok's CEO, “it's about pricing responsibly to make the business viable with reasonable margins. We try to be respectful and fair, heeding Wok's market conditions and costs rather than competition drivers” (Reficco et al. 2018, p. 1180) | Pryor made sure that management systems and incentives pursued goals aligned with sustainability: “We measure success by the acres of rainforest protected and reforested, the number of native communities assisted with a sustainable livelihood, and the contentment and inspiration of our employees” (Personal interview) |
Leader as Storyteller and Meaning Enabler | “My philosophy was that food should be affordable for many people... As Wok's first menu stated 'because food is everyone's right’... The vision of MundoWok... is that of a purer and healthier world... this is the vision we have for the company and we communicate it to our employees... The Wok logo is a star, which communicates care for the fisheries, for our trees, our mountains, our agricultural lands” (Villegas 2016) | Pryor: “We want consumers to know that, when they purchase Guayakí products, they are boosting the demand for a product that makes renewable resource management sustainable, not only for the rainforest but also for the communities living there” (Personal interview) |
Leader as Change Agent | In 2015, Villegas was one of the signatories of Fogón Colombia, with other professional cooks, a manifesto which took various bold public positions. “We understand cooking as an instrument of education and awareness of society. From there we want to influence and coordinate our lines of action with different levels of society and the State.... We want to engage and participate in the national agenda on the following topics... We are committed to protect, document, use, and disseminate the inventory of seeds and vernacular products that today tend to disappear due to the implementation of questionable economic policies.... The existence of child hunger and malnutrition as a result of unbalanced economic policies is inadmissible. No more Colombians starving... Our environment is everything and we want to protect it” (ProColombia 2018) | “We organized meetings and invited opinion and local leaders—such as local administration officials or members from the Brazilian equivalent to Argentina’s National Farming Technology Institute (INTA, for its Spanish acronym). Every workshop was different, so we invited a large variety of people: academics, business leaders, people from NGOs—like Brazil’s O Boticario or the local equivalents of the Wildlife Conservation Society or The Nature Conservancy. The excuse for the invitation was, of course, yerba mate trade” (Personal interview) |
Leader as Networker | Villegas understood leadership as a platform for inclusion through which he could weave relationships, in which he positioned himself as equal. Villegas and his team created “Wok World” as a space that served to strengthen the relationships between providers, employees, and clients by holding cooking events and conferences (Lobo et al. 2014) | Pryor: “I continued coordinating the annual workshops myself. We set the date and then, together, we convened key people to participate. We work sharing strengths, opportunities, challenges, and dreams. Then we work in small groups that may be related to topics such as ‘gender’, ‘quality’, ‘production’, ‘youth’. There are materials such as cards, markers, playdough, and suddenly someone says, “I start”, and the ideas, the drawings, the words begin to come out. With all that material then we covered the corridors of the city hall. And from there, things that are the result of the common denominator are triggered. If I have to think about how we started doing it, I think it was something I learned experientially in my years in California, from the community decision-making culture: if we make a mistake, we're all wrong together. You know, that in the communities was quite countercultural!” (Personal interview) |
Leader as social innovator | Villegas led the creation of broad-based coalitions of multiple stakeholders: fisherman and farming communities and associations, not-for-profit NGOs, for-profit enterprises, and public agencies (Reficco et al. 2018, p. 1173). He went to great lengths to educate the public in responsible consumption, even at the risk of alienating customers and losing sales. Commenting on Villega's policy, his partner Ricardo Macías, stated: “A marketing expert would say, ‘you’ve made a mistake, because you are losing sales,’ but I think that our message goes beyond selling.... From a marketing standpoint, this is a weird strategy. On the one hand, we wondered if it was wise to jeopardize our sales, but, on the other, we were certain this was the right way to go about it” (Personal interview) | Pryor: “Our business model is a market-driven restoration one. Success measurements for this scheme take into account three pillars: economic viability, social justice, and environmental care. And we want consumers, for their love of mate, to become the force that guides the market towards conservation and community development by paying a fair-trade price” (Personal interview) |
Leader as Catalyst and an effective rainmaker | “Anyone can have an idea. Even a good one. But not everyone is ready to turn that idea into something real. Something that grows, that involves many people and that continues to make us feel the same passion that we experienced the day that we originally came up with this idea. That’s how Wok began...” (Deckers et al. 2015) | “We were the first to lobby for yerba mate to become a certifiable product within fair trade. Back then there was nothing but banana, coffee, cocoa, and sugar; then, they started to incorporate more. Since there was not enough volume at the international market level, at first, they simply ignored us... Remember: there was no regulation, there was no country in the world with a food code that defined what was an organic product when we started. What is now the IFOAM (International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements) did not exist” (Personal interview) |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jaén, M.H., Reficco, E. & Berger, G. Does Integrity Matter in BOP Ventures? The Role of Responsible Leadership in Inclusive Supply Chains. J Bus Ethics 173, 467–488 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04518-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04518-0