Abstract
On the basis of the seminal work of Kahneman and Tversky Econometrica, 47(2): 263–292 (1979), this research extends the boundaries of prospect theory in investigating determinants and temporal variation of risk-taking in entrepreneurial decisions, such as creating a new business organization or investing a risky business project. The two experimental studies (1) identify entrepreneurial risk-taking in the gain situation and find reversal of risk preference after a dynamic entrepreneurial learning process, indicating that the framing effect of prospect theory in explaining entrepreneurial risk-taking is conditional; (2) instead of weights, subjective judgment of the possibility of success of a risky project (subjective probability) consistently plays central moderating role in entrepreneurial decisions under uncertainty, and (3) the different effects of subjective probability in the two studies reveal that novice decision-makers are more value-driven, whereas experienced decision-makers, particularly under low probability conditions, tend to be more risk averse regardless of the value of a risky project perceived as long as they have a lack of confidence in eventual success.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ács, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Strom, R. J. (Eds.) 2009. Entrepreneurship, growth, and public policy. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Agenor, P.-R. 2017. Caught in the middle? The economics of middle-income traps. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(3): 771–791.
Ahlstrom, D. 2010. Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 10–23.
Ahlstrom, D. 2014. The hidden reason why the first world war matters today: The development and spread of modern management. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 21(1): 201–218.
Ahlstrom, D., & Ding, Z. 2014. Entrepreneurship in China: An overview. International Small Business Journal, 32(6): 610–618.
Ahlstrom, D., Lamond, D., & Ding, Z. 2009. Reexamining some management lessons from military history. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(4): 617–642.
Ahlstrom, D., & Wang, L. C. 2009. Groupthink and France's defeat in the 1940 campaign. Journal of Management History, 15(2): 159–177.
Allais, M. 1953. Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque; critique des postulats et axiomes de l’ecole Americaine’ (the rational man behavior under risk: Criticism of postulates and axioms of the American school). Econometrica, 21(4): 503–546.
Amit, R., Muller, E., & Cockburn, I. 1995. Opportunity costs and entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(2): 95–106.
Arnold, H. J., & Feldman, D. C. 1981. Social desirability response bias in self-report choice situation. Academy management journal, 24: 377–385.
Baron, R., & Ensley, M. D. 2006. Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science, 52(9): 1331–1344.
Baron, R. A. 1999. Counterfactual thinking and venture formation: The potential effects of thinking about “what might have been”. Journal of Business Venturing, 15: 79–91.
Baron, R. A. 2008. The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process. Academy of Management Review, 33(2): 328–340.
Barron, F. H. (1981). Validation and error in multiplicative utility functions: Univ. of Kansas.
Bechara, A. 2004. The role of emotion in decision-making. Brain and Cognition, 55(1): 30–40.
Bell, D. 1982. Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30(5): 961–981.
Birtch, T. A., Au, k. Y.-f., Chiang, F. F. T., & Hofman, P. S. 2018. How perceived risk and return interacts with familism to influence individuals’ investment strategies: The case of capital seeking and capital providing behavior in new venture financing. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(2): 471–500.
Bordley, R., & LiCalzi, M. 2000. Decision analysis using targets instead of utility functions. Decisions in Economics and Finance, 23(1): 53–74.
Bowman, E. H. 1980. A risk/return paradox for strategic management. Sloan Management Review, 21: 17–31.
Bradley, S. W., Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. A. 2011. Swinging a double-edged sword: The effect of slack on entrepreneurial management and growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(5): 537–554.
Brockhaus, R. H. 1980. Risk-taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 23: 509–520.
Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Si, S. 2015. Entrepreneurship, poverty, and Asia: Moving beyond subsistence entrepreneurship. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(1): 1–22.
Burmeister, K., & Schade, C. 2007. Are entrepreneurs' decisions more biased? An experimental investigation of the susceptibility to status quo bias. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(3): 340–362.
Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. 1993. Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision-making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100(3): 432–459.
Busenitz, L. W. 1996. Research on entrepreneurial alertness. Journal of Small Business Management, 34: 35–44.
Caliendo, M., Fossen, F., & Kritikos, A. 2009. Risk attitudes of nascent entrepreneurs–new evidence from an experimentally validated survey. Small Business Economics, 32(2): 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9078-6.
Camerer, C. F., & Weber, M. 1992. Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4): 325–370.
Chattopadhyay, P., Glick, W. H., & Huber, G. P. 2001. Organizational actions in response to threats and opportunities. Academy Management Journal, 44: 937–955.
Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. 2013. The Innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston:Harvard Business Review Press.
Choi, Y., & Shepherd, D. 2004. Entrepreneurs’ Decisions to Exploit Opportunities. Journal of management, 30(3): 377–395.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. 2003. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cramer, J. S., Hartog, J., Jonker, N., & Van Praag, C. M. 2002. Low risk aversion encourages the choice for entrepreneurship: An empirical test of a truism. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48(1): 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00222-0.
Cropanzano, R., Weiss, H., Hale, J., & Reb, J. 2003. The structure of affect: Reconsidering the relationship between negative and positive affectivity. Journal of Management, 29(6): 831–857.
Currim, I. S., & Sarin, R. K. 1984. A comparative evaluation of multiattribute consumer preference models. Management Science, 30(5): 543–561.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York a Grosset / Putnam.
Deci, E. L. 1975. Intrinsic motivation. NY:Plenum Press.
Delmar, F., & Shane, S. 2004. Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3): 385–410.
Denrell, J., & March, J. G. 2001. Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organization science, 12(5): 523–538.
DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Workman, K. 2012. A quasi-experimental study of after-event reviews and leadership development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5): 997–1015.
Dolan, R. J. 2002. Emotion, cognition, and behavior. Science, 298(5596): 1191–1194.
Douglas, M., & Wildavasky, A. 1982. Risk and Culture. Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
Dunbar, R. L. M., & Ahlstrom, D. 1995. Seeking the institutional balance of power: Avoiding the power of a balanced view. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 171–192.
Dutton, J. E., & Jackson, S. E. 1987. Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Academy of Management Review, 12(1): 76–90.
Egan, J. P. 1975. Signal detection theory and ROC analysis. NY:Academic press.
Ellsberg, D. 1961. Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quartely journal of economics, 75(4): 643–699.
Erev, I., & Barron, G. 2005. On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies. Psychological review, 112(4): 912–931.
Estes, W. K. 1950. Toward a statistical theory of learning. Psychological Review, 57(2): 94–107.
Fiegenbaum, A., Hart, S., & Schendel, D. 1996. Strategic reference point theory. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3): 219–235.
Fiegenbaum, A., & Thomas, H. 1988. Attitudes toward risk and the risk-return paradox: Prospect theory explanation. Academy Management Journal, 31: 85–106.
Fox, C. R., & Tversky, A. 1995. Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3): 585–603.
Fredrickson, J. W. 1984. The comprehensiveness of strategic decision processes: Extension, observations, future directions. Academy of Management Journal, 27: 445–466.
Gartner, W. B. 1988. “Who is an entrepreneur?” is a wrong question. American Journal of Small Business, 12(4): 11–32.
Gibb, A. 2002. In pursuit of a new ‘enterprise’ and ‘entrepreneurship’ paradigm for learning: Creative destruction, new values, new ways of doing things and new combinations of knowledge. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(3): 233–269.
Gifford, S. 2003. Risk and uncertainty. In Z. Acs, & D. Audretsch (Eds.). Handbook of entrepreneurship research: An interdisciplinary survey and introduction: 37–52. Amsterdam: Kluwer.
Gorodnichenko, C. Y., & Roland, G. 2017. Culture, institutions, and the wealth of nations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(3): 402–416.
Hayek, F. 1948. Individualism and economic order. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Haynie, J. M., Shepherd, D. A., & McMullen, J. S. 2009. An opportunity for me? The role of resource in opportunity evaluation decision. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3): 337–361.
Heath, C. A., & Tversky, A. 1991. Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4: 4–48.
Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E., & Erev, I. 2004. Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15(8): 534–539.
Hogarth, R. M. 1981. Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics. Psychological Bulletin, 90(2): 197–217.
Ireland, R. D., Hit, M., & Sirmon, D. G. 2003. A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimension. Journal of Management, 29(6): 963–989.
Jawahar, I. M., & McLaughlin, G. L. 2001. Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach. Academy Management Review, 26(3): 397–414.
Jegers, M. 1991. Prospect theory and the risk-return relation: Some Belgien evidence. Academy Management Journal, 34: 215–225.
Jia, J. M., Fischer, G. W., & Dyer, J. 1998. Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of response error: A simulation study. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11(2): 85–105.
Kahneman, D. 2003. A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9): 697–720.
Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. 1993. Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk-taking. Management science, 39(1): 17–31.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2): 263–292.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. 1982. The simulation heuristic. New York:Cambridge Univ. Press, The simulation heuristic.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. 1984. Choices, values, and frames. American psychologists, 39(4): 341–350.
Kaish, S., & Gilad, B. 1991. Characteristics of opportunities search of entrepreneurs versus executives: Sources, interest, general alertness. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(1): 45–61.
Knight, F. H. 1921. Risk, uncertainty and profile. Chicago:Univ. of Chicago Press.
Köllinger, P., Minniti, M., & Schade, C. 2007. "I think I can, I think I can": Overconfidence and entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(4): 502–527.
Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. 1964. Risk-taking: A study in cognition and personality. NY:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Kühberger, A. 1998. The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 75(1): 23–55.
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. 2001. Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1): 146–159.
Li, Y. 2011. Emotions and new venture judgment in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(2): 277–298.
Li, Y., Ashkanasy, N., & Ahlstrom, D. (2010). Complexity Theory and Affect Structure: A Dynamic Approach Modeling Emotional Changes in Organizations. In N. Ashkanasy, W. Zerbe & C. Härtel (Eds.), Research on Emotion in Organizations (pp. 139–165): Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Li, Y., Ashkanasy, N., & Ahlstrom, D. 2014. The rationality of emotions: A hybrid process model of decision-making under uncertainty. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(1): 293–308.
Li, Y., Chun, H., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Ahlstrom, D. 2012. A multi-level study of emergent group leadership: Effects of emotional stability and group conflict. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(2): 351–366.
Liu, Y., Wang, L. C., Zhao, L., & Ahlstrom, D. 2013. Board turnover in Taiwan’s public firms: An empirical study. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(4): 1059–1086.
Loewenstein, G. 2000. Emotions in economic theory and economic behavior. Preferences, Behavior, and Welfare, 90(2): 426–431.
Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision-making: Oxford University Press.
Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. 2001. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2): 267–286.
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. 1982. Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. The Economic Journal, 92(368): 805–824.
March, J., & Shapira, Z. 1987. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33(11): 1404–1418.
March, J. G. 2006. Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic Management Journal, 27(3): 201–214.
McClelland, D. C. 1961. The achieving society. N.J:Van Nostrand.
McInish, T. 1982. Individual investors and risk-taking. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2(2):125–136.
Mcmullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. 2006. Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty on the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy Management Review, 31(1): 132–152.
Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., Ho, K., & Ritov, I. 1997. Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science, 8(6): 423–428.
Minniti, M., & Bygrave, W. 2001. A dynamic model of entrepreneurial learning. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(3): 5–16.
Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, L., Bird, B., Gagio, C. M., McMullen, J. S., Morse, E. A., et al. 2007. The central question in entrepreneurial cognition research 2007. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(1): 1–27.
Murphy, K. R. 1982. Assessing the discriminant validity of regression models of judgments. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17(3): 359–370.
Norton, W., & Moore, W. 2006. The influence of entrepreneurial risk assessment on venture launch or growth decisions. Small Business Economics, 26(3): 215–226.
Ocasio, W. 1995. The enactment of economic adversity: A reconciliation of theories of failure-induced change and threat-rigidity, vol. 17. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
Palich, L. E., & Bagby, D. R. 1995. Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(6): 425–438.
Payne, J. W. 1982. Contingent decision behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 92(2): 382–402.
Pitz, G. F., & Sachs, N. J. 1984. Judgment and decision: Theory and application. Annual Review of Psychology, 35(1): 139–163.
Raghunathan, R., & Pham, M. T. 1999. All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision-making. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 79(1): 56–77.
Rumelt, R. 2011. Good strategy bad strategy: The difference and why it matters. New York: Crown Business
Savage, L. J. 1954. The foundations of statistics. New York:Wiley.
Schade, C. 2009. Entrepreneurial decision making: A paradigm rather than a set of questions. Journal of Business Venturing, 4: 275–294.
Schade, C., & Burmeister, K. 2009. Experiments on entrepreneurial decision-making. Hanover, MA:now Publishers Inc.
Schumpeter, J. A. 1942. Socialism and democracy. NY:Harper.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. 1996. Feelings and phenomenal experiences. NY:Guilford Press.
Shane, S. 2001. Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Management science, 47(2): 205–220.
Shane, S. 2008. The illusions of entrepreneurship: The costly myths that entrepreneurs, investors, and policy makers live by. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
Shanks, R. D., Tunney, R. J., & McCarthy, J. D. 2002. A re-examination of probability matching and rational choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(3): 233–250.
Shanteau, J. C., & Ptacek, C. H. 1983. Role and implications of averaging processes. NY:Lexington Press.
Shapira, Z. 1995. Risk-taking: A managerial perspective. NY:Russell Sage Foundation.
Shaver, K. G., & Scott, L. R. (1991). Person, process, choice: The psychology of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23-.
Shaver, P., Schwartz, D., Kirson, D., & Connor, C. 1987. Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6): 1061–1086.
Shepherd, D. 1999. Venture capitalists assessment of new venture survival. Management science, 45(5): 621–632.
Shepherd, D. A. 2009. From lemons to lemonade: Squeeze every last drop of success out of your mistakes. Philadelphia, NJ:Wharton School Publishing.
Sieck, W. R., Merkle, E. C., & Zandt, T. V. 2007. Option fixation: A cognitive contributor to overconfidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(1): 68–83.
Simon, H. A. 1955. A behavior model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1): 99–118.
Simon, M., Houghton, S. M., & Aquino, K. 2000. Cognitive biases, risk perception and venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2): 113–134.
Sinha, J. 1994. Prospect theory and the risk-return association: Another look. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 24(2): 225–231.
Sitkin, S. B., & Pablo, A. L. 1992. Reconceptualizing and determinants of risk behavior. Academy Management Review, 17(1): 9–38.
Sitkin, S. B., & Weingart, L. R. 1995. Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 1573–1592.
Slovic, P. 1995. The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 50(5): 364–371.
Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. ( 2002). Rational actors or rational fools? Implications of affect heuristic for behavior economics. Cambridge University Press.
Solow, R. M. 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1): 65–94.
Solow, R. M. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3): 312–320.
Taleb, N. (2010). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York: Random House Trade Paperbacks (2e).
Tetlock, P. E., & Gardner, D. 2016. Superforecasting: The art and science of prediction. New York:Broadway Books.
Timmons, J. A. 1994. New venture creation: Entrepreneurship in the 21st century. Homewood:Irwin.
Tong, T. W., Reuer, J. J., & Peng, M. W. 2008. International joint ventures and the value of growth options. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5): 1014–1029.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. 1992. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4): 297–323.
Van Schie, E., & Van Der Pligt, J. 1995. Influencing risk preference in decision-making: The effects of framing and salience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(3): 264–275.
Velamuri, S. R., & Venkataraman, S. 2005. An empirical study of the transition from paid work to self-employment. Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance and Business Ventures, 10(1): 1–16.
Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. 1944. Theory of games and economic behaviour. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
Wang, L. C., Ahlstrom, D., Nair, A., & Hang, R. Z. 2008. Creating globally competitive and innovative products: China's next Olympic challenge. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 73(3): 4–15.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47: 1063–1070.
Wiseman, R. M., & Catanach, A. H. 1997. A longitudinal disaggregation of operational risk under changing regulations: Evidence from the savings and loan industry. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 799–830.
Wu, G., & Gonzalez, R. 1999. Nonlinear decision weights in choice under uncertainty. Management science, 45(1): 74–85.
Yechiam, E., & Busemeyer, J. 2005. Comparison of basic assumptions embedded in learning models for experience-based decision-making. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(3): 387–402.
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the Chinese Nature Science Fund (No. 71371029).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Experiment 1
Scenario: Here is a decision scenario about a start-up business. Please just make a decision based on your own judgment. Note that there is no correct or wrong decision.
Assuming that you are working in a company with a stable salary (US$ 30,000/year), you discover one business opportunity in your work. If you start a firm to realize this opportunity, you can gain US$ 90,000 at the first year if you execute it well and are successful; your gain will be zero if you fail. By your personal investigation, you know the possibility of start-up firm successfully is 33.3%, in other words, you will have one third possibility of success in executing this business opportunity; two third possibilities of failure. You are required to make a decision between the two choices:
-
A: Start up a new firm (33.3% chance of earning US$ 90,000)
-
B: Keep working at the company (certain income of US$ 30,000)___
Before you make the decision, please answer these questions on the below.
Subjective Value:
1. How attractive is this business opportunity for you?
2. How do you desire to realize this business opportunity?
3. What is your preference of this start-up opportunity in comparison to the stable work option?
Weights: 4. How important do you think this business opportunity is for you in comparison to the stable work option?
Subjective Probability:
5. Please estimate the possibility that you can execute this business opportunity successfully.
0 (not at all) | 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% | 100% |
○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ |
You are now asked to make a choice from the two options, please rate your intensity of experienced anxiety, upset, and fear on making this decision.
not at all | little | a little | bit | quite a bit | extremely | |
Fear | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ |
Anxiety | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ |
Upset | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ |
Now, please make a choice between A and B,
-
A: Start up a new firm (33.3% chance of earning US$ 90,000)
-
B: Keep working at the company (certain income of US$ 30,000)
Appendix 2: Experiment 2
Section 1: Introduction
You are a CEO of a company and you have to make 20 decisions on project investment. For each decision you have two choices. One is a certain return and one is a risky choice. A certain choice is denoted with one monetary return, e.g. Project A: $100 K, which means if you invest project A, you will be certain to get a $100 K return. A risky choice is denoted with a range of monetary returns, e.g. Project B: $400 K↔0, which means if you select Project B and it succeeds, you will get a $400 K return; but if this project fails, your gain will be zero.
After you choose between Project A or B, you will be informed whether the project succeeded and the amount of money you received from this investment.
As a CEO you have two goals: (1) make as much money as possible; and (2) make correct decisions in your investments. After the 20 decisions, you will have a break and answer 1 question; then you will make one additional investment decision-making task. Your performance in these decision-making tasks is not related with your ability. Just complete the series of decision-making tasks using your own judgment.
Section 2: Questionnaire (Manipulation Check)
Manipulation check
1. Do you think that the risky choice has many chance of winning?
Section 3: One Addition Decision Making Task
Please make one addition decision. The outcome of this task is very important. Please try your best to make a correct decision.
Please make a choice between:
Section 4: Questionnaires
Immediate Anxiety:
Please describe the intensity of your emotions on making this decision,
not at all | a little | moderately | quite a bit | extremely | |
Fear | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ |
Anxiety | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ |
Upset | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ |
Subjective Value:
As for the risky choice (6900 K↔0), please answer these questions on the below.
-
1.
How attractive is the risky choice for you?
-
2.
How do you desire to choose the risky choice?
-
3.
What is your preference of the risky choice in comparison to the sure return option?
Subjective Probability:
Please estimate the possibility that the risky choice (6900 K↔0) will win.
0 (not at all) | 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% | 100% |
○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ |
Appendix 3
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Y., Ahlstrom, D. Risk-taking in entrepreneurial decision-making: A dynamic model of venture decision. Asia Pac J Manag 37, 899–933 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9631-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9631-7