Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Infrequent STI Testing in New York City Among High Risk Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals Interested In Self- and Partner-Testing

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) remains low among sexual and gender minority populations. We assessed STI testing history using a retrospective survey among 129 HIV-negative cisgender men who have sex with men (cMSM) and transgender women who have sex with men (tWSM) who were at high risk for STI acquisition. All participants were enrolled in a parent study on self- and partner-testing for HIV and syphilis, and reported condomless anal intercourse with multiple partners during the prior 3 months. We additionally used bivariate tests to evaluate participants’ STI testing by their history of using pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). One-in-seven respondents (n = 18) reported having never tested for an STI, one-quarter (n = 33) had not tested in the past year, and two-thirds (n = 83) had never used PrEP. PrEP-naïve respondents were less likely to report recent STI testing (47% vs. 85%). “Routine doctor’s visit” was the most prevalent reason for testing, but was less common among PrEP-naïve respondents (83% vs. 100%). Testing was remarkably low given the sample’s high risk of HIV and STI infection. Findings suggest that STI testing is more frequent among those who have ever used PrEP, but the risk of selection bias warrants evaluation in a larger probability sample.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Reasonable requests for de-identified participant data may be submitted to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Pathela P, Braunstein SL, Schillinger JA, Shepard C, Sweeney M, Blank S. Men who have sex with men have a 140-fold higher risk for newly diagnosed HIV and syphilis compared with heterosexual men in New York City. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndromes. 2011;58:408–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pathela P, Braunstein SL, Blank S, Shepard C, Schillinger JA. The high risk of an HIV diagnosis following a diagnosis of syphilis: a population-level analysis of New York City Men. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61:281–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Sexually transmitted infections national strategic plan for the United States: 2021–2025. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen MS, Council OD, Chen JS. Sexually transmitted infections and HIV in the era of antiretroviral treatment and prevention: the biologic basis for epidemiologic synergy. J Int Aids Soc. 2019;22:e25355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ward H, Rönn M. Contribution of sexually transmitted infections to the sexual transmission of HIV. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2010;5:305–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrow RY, Ahmed F, Bolan GA, Workowski KA. Recommendations for providing quality sexually transmitted diseases clinical services, 2020. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2020;68:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Patton ME, Kidd S, Llata E, Stenger M, Braxton J, Asbel L, et al. Extragenital gonorrhea and chlamydia testing and infection among men who have sex with men—STD surveillance network, United States, 2010–2012. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:1564–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barbee LA, Dhanireddy S, Tat SA, Marrazzo JM. Barriers to bacterial sexually transmitted infection testing of HIV-infected men who have sex with men engaged in HIV primary care. Sex Transm Dis. 2015;42:590–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Preexposure Prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States—2017 update: a clinical practice guideline [Internet]. 2018. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/risk/prep/cdc-hiv-prep-guidelines-2017.pdf. Accessed on 7 Dec 2019

  10. Ong JJ, Fu H, Baggaley RC, Wi TE, Tucker JD, Smith MK, et al. Missed opportunities for sexually transmitted infections testing for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis users: a systematic review. J Int Aids Soc. 2021;24:e25673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization. Guidelines on HIV self-testing and partner notification: supplement to consolidated guidelines on HIV testing services [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. p. 1–82.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Witzel TC, Eshun-Wilson I, Jamil MS, Tilouche N, Figueroa C, Johnson CC, et al. Comparing the effects of HIV self-testing to standard HIV testing for key populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2020;18:381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Balán IC, Lopez-Rios J, Nayak S, Lentz C, Arumugam S, Kutner B, et al. SMARTtest: a smartphone app to facilitate HIV and syphilis self- and partner-testing, interpretation of results, and linkage to care. AIDS Behav. 2019;24:1560–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carballo-Diéguez A, Giguere R, Balán IC, Dolezal C, Brown W, Lopez-Rios J, et al. Few aggressive or violent incidents are associated with the use of HIV self-tests to screen sexual partners among key populations. Aids Behav. 2020;24:2220–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Myers JE, Edelstein ZR, Daskalakis DC, Gandhi AD, Misra K, Rivera AV, et al. Preexposure prophylaxis monitoring in New York City: a public health approach. Am J Public Health. 2018;108:S251–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Balán IC, Lopez-Rios J, Dolezal C, Rael CT, Lentz C. Low sexually transmissible infection knowledge, risk perception and concern about infection among men who have sex with men and transgender women at high risk of infection. Sex Health. 2019;16:580–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Alarcon J, Loeb TB, Hamilton AB, Moss NJ, Curley CM, Zhang M, et al. Barriers to testing for sexually transmitted infections among HIV-serodiscordant couples: the influence of discrimination. Ethnic Dis. 2020;30:261–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fortenberry JD, McFarlane M, Bleakley A, Bull S, Fishbein M, Grimley DM, et al. Relationships of stigma and shame to gonorrhea and HIV screening. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:378–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tilson EC, Sanchez V, Ford CL, Smurzynski M, Leone PA, Fox KK, et al. Barriers to asymptomatic screening and other STD services for adolescents and young adults: focus group discussions. BMC Public Health. 2004;4:21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schumacher C, Wu L, Chandran A, Fields E, Price A, Greenbaum A, et al. Sexually transmitted infection screening among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men prescribed pre-exposure prophylaxis in Baltimore City. Maryland Clin Infect Dis. 2019;71:2637–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kutner BA, Simoni JM, King KM, Goodreau SM, Pala AN, Creegan E, et al. Does stigma toward anal sexuality impede HIV prevention among men who have sex with men in the United States? A structural equation modeling assessment. J Sex Med. 2020;17:477–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Carneiro PB, Westmoreland DA, Patel VV, Grov C. Factors associated with being PrEP-naïve among a U.S. National Cohort of Former-PrEP and PrEP-naïve participants meeting objective criteria for PrEP care. Arch Sex Behav. 2021;50:1793–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Grieb SMD, Shah H, Flores-Miller A, Zelaya C, Page KR. HIV-related stigma among Spanish-speaking Latinos in an emerging immigrant receiving City. J Immigr Minor Healt. 2017;19:868–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Villar-Loubet OM, Vamos S, Jones DL, Lopez E, Weiss SM. A cultural perspective on sexual health: HIV positive and negative monolingual hispanic women in South Florida. Hispanic Heal Care Int. 2011;9:82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Martinez O. HIV-related stigma as a determinant of health among sexual and gender minority Latinxs. HIV Specialist. 2019;11:14–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Morris JL, Lippman SA, Philip S, Bernstein K, Neilands TB, Lightfoot M. Sexually transmitted infection related stigma and shame among African American male youth: implications for testing practices, partner notification, and treatment. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2014;28:499–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. TCC Group. Here I am: a listening initiative with Latinx gay and bisexual men affected by HIV. ViiV healthcare and positive action for Latinx men. New York: TCC Group; 2020. p. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pleuhs B, Quinn KG, Walsh JL, Petroll AE, John SA. Health care provider barriers to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in the United States: a systematic review. Aids Patient Care St. 2020;34:111–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kutner BA, Simoni JM, Aunon FM, Creegan E, Balán IC. How stigma toward anal sexuality promotes concealment and impedes health-seeking behavior in the U.S. among cisgender men who have sex with men. Arch Sex Behav. 2020;50:1651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Traeger MW, Schroeder SE, Wright EJ, Hellard ME, Cornelisse VJ, Doyle JS, et al. Effects of pre-exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus infection on sexual risk behavior in men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67:676–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Traeger MW, Cornelisse VJ, Asselin J, Price B, Roth NJ, Willcox J, et al. Association of HIV preexposure prophylaxis with incidence of sexually transmitted infections among individuals at high risk of HIV infection. JAMA. 2019;321:1380–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zucker J, Carnevale C, Richards P, Slowikowski J, Borsa A, Gottlieb F, et al. Predictors of disengagement in care for individuals receiving pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). J Acquir Immune Defic Syndromes. 2019;81:e104–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rusie LK, Orengo C, Burrell D, Ramachandran A, Houlberg M, Keglovitz K, et al. Preexposure prophylaxis initiation and retention in care over 5 years, 2012–2017: are quarterly visits too much? Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67:283–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pathela P, Braunstein SL, Blank S, Schillinger JA. HIV incidence among men with and those without sexually transmitted rectal infections: estimates from matching against an HIV case registry. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:1203–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Birken SA, Powell BJ, Presseau J, Kirk MA, Lorencatto F, Gould NJ, et al. Combined use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF): a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2017;12:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (5R01HD088156, Principal Investigator: Iván Balán, PhD), the National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH124569, Principal Investigator: Bryan Kutner, PhD, MPH; T32MH019139, Principal Investigator: Theodorus Sandfort, PhD; P30MH043520, Principal Investigator: Robert Remien, PhD), and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K23AI150378 and L30AI133789, Principal Investigator: Jason Zucker, MD; UM1AI069470, Principal Investigator: Magdalena Sobieszczyk).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CL, JL-R, and ICB performed the research. BAK, JZ, and ICB designed the research study. BAK, JZ, CD, and ICB analyzed the data. BAK, JZ, JL-R, CD, CL, and ICB wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iván C. Balán.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors report grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and National Institute of Mental Health during the conduct of the study. No other interests to report.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Ethical Approval

This research project was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the New York State Psychiatric Institute.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kutner, B.A., Zucker, J., López-Rios, J. et al. Infrequent STI Testing in New York City Among High Risk Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals Interested In Self- and Partner-Testing. AIDS Behav 26, 1153–1162 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03468-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03468-6

Keywords

Navigation