Skip to main content
Log in

Event-related delta and theta responses may reflect the valence discrimination in the emotional oddball task

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How emotion and cognition interact is still a matter of debate. Investigation of this interaction in terms of the brain oscillatory dynamics appears to be an essential approach. To investigate this topic, we designed two separate three-stimulus oddball tasks, including emotional stimuli with different valences. Twenty healthy young subjects were included in the study. They completed two tasks, namely: the positive emotional oddball task and the negative emotional oddball task. Each task included the target, non-target, and distractor stimuli. Positive and negative pictures were the target stimuli in the positive and negative emotional oddball task. We asked participants to determine the number of target stimuli in each task. During sessions, EEGs were recorded with 32 electrodes. We found that (negative) target stimuli elicit higher delta (1–3.5 Hz) and theta (4–7 Hz) power responses but not the phase-locking responses compared to (positive) distractor stimuli during the negative oddball task. On the other hand, the same effect was not seen during the positive emotional oddball task. Here, we showed that the valence dimension interacted with the target status. Finally, we summarized our results that the presence of negative distractors attenuated the target effect of the positive stimuli due to the negative bias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BG, TA initiated and planned the study and designed the protocol. BB, BG, TA wrote, reviewed, and edited the paper. TA, HA, YD, CG, ŞK recorded, and BB analyzed the data. BG supervised and controlled the study. All authors contributed to the manuscript revision, read and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahar Güntekin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Editors: Benjamin Straube (University of Marburg), Adrian Wroblewski (University of Marburg); Reviewers: Matthias F. J. Sperl (University of Giessen) and a second researcher who prefers to remain anonymous.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 113 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bölükbaş, B., Aktürk, T., Ardalı, H. et al. Event-related delta and theta responses may reflect the valence discrimination in the emotional oddball task. Cogn Process 24, 595–608 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-023-01158-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-023-01158-w

Keywords

Navigation