Abstract
More than 390 million tons of fossil fuel plastics have been produced in 2022, and plastic pollution has become a major health issue for humans and ecosytems. Fossil fuel plastics are commonly recalcitrant, thus accumulating in the environment. Fossil fuel plastics also contains toxic chemicals that leach out to waters and are ingested by living organisms. Morevover, recent research has revealed that plastic fragmentation has led to an unprecedented global contamination by microplastics and nanoplastics, with yet poorly adverse impacts on life. In this context, bioplastics, that we will refer to as biobased plastics in this contribution, appear as a promising alternative because bioplastics are carbon neutral and most of them are biodegradable. As a consequence, the world bioplastic production has increased from 1.8 million tons in 2021 to 2.22 million tons in 2022. However, the complete degradation of most bioplastics in the environment remains difficult. Here we compare bioplastics with fossil fuel plastics with focus on life cycle assessment, biodegradability and compostability, end-of-life options, fragmentation into microplastics, and microplastic pollution of soil and aquatic systems. Overall, we observe that bioplastics are not necessarily more ecofriendly than fossil fuel plastics. Technical and cost limitations still prevent bioplastics from fully substituting fossil fuel plastics. For instance, there is still no widely accepted methodology to compare the potential environmental footprint between fossil fuel plastics and bioplastics. Some microorganisms can degrade plastics under laboratory conditions, but both fossil fuel plastics and bioplastics degradation can be limited under environmental conditions. End-of-life options for both fossil fuel and bioplastics are similar, except for composting. Both fossil fuel plastics and bioplastics contribute to environmental pollution by forming microplastics and acting as vectors for environmental pollutants. Overall, the study found that bioplastics and fossil fuel plastics have similar negative effects and both are comparable in terms of their vector role, formation of microplastics, and toxicity to biota. To conclude, the common belief that bioplastics have less or no negative impact on the environment may not be entirely accurate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ali W, Ali H, Gillani S, Zinck P, Souissi S (2023) Polylactic acid synthesis, biodegradability, conversion to microplastics and toxicity: a review. Environ Chem Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01564-8
Anderson G, Shenkar N (2021) Potential effects of biodegradable single-use items in the sea: polylactic acid (PLA) and solitary ascidians. Environ Pollut 268:115364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115364
Balestri E, Menicagli V, Vallerini F, Lardicci C (2017) Biodegradable plastic bags on the seafloor: a future threat for seagrass meadows? Sci Total Environ 605–606:755–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.249
Bao R, Pu J, Xie C, Mehmood T, Chen W, Gao L, Lin W, Su Y, Lin X, Peng L (2022) Aging of biodegradable blended plastic generates microplastics and attached bacterial communities in air and aqueous environments. J Hazard Mater 434:128891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128891
Bishop G, Styles D, Lens PNL (2021) Environmental performance comparison of bioplastics and petrochemical plastics: A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) methodological decisions. Resour Conserv Recycl 168:105451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105451
Boots B, Russell CW, Green DS (2019) Effects of microplastics in soil ecosystems: above and below ground. Environ Sci Technol 53:11496–11506. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03304
Černá T, Pražanová K, Beneš H, Titov I, Klubalová K, Filipová A, Klusoň P, Cajthaml T (2021) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon accumulation in aged and unaged polyurethane microplastics in contaminated soil. Sci Total Environ 770:145254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145254
Chia RW, Lee J-Y, Kim H, Jang J (2021) Microplastic pollution in soil and groundwater: a review. Environ Chem Lett 19:4211–4224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01297-6
Commission E (2023) Environmental and economic assessment of plastic waste recycling: a comparison of mechanical, physical, chemical recycling and energy recovery of plastic waste. Publ off Eur Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/0472
Cristina R-C, Rebeca M-F, Marola S-Y, Xosé Antón Á-S (2022) Leaching and bioavailability of dissolved organic matter from petrol-based and biodegradable plastics. Mar Environ Res 176:105607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105607
Cui R, Kwak JI, An Y-J (2022) Acute and multigenerational effects of petroleum- and cellulose-based microfibers on growth and photosynthetic capacity of Lemna minor. Mar Pollut Bull 182:113953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113953
Dhaka V, Singh S, Anil AG, Sunil Kumar Naik TS, Garg S, Samuel J, Kumar M, Ramamurthy PC, Singh J (2022) Occurrence, toxicity and remediation of polyethylene terephthalate plastics. A Review. Environ Chem Lett 20:1777–1800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01384-8
Ding W, Li Z, Qi R, Jones DL, Liu Q, Liu Q, Yan C (2021) Effect thresholds for the earthworm Eisenia fetida: Toxicity comparison between conventional and biodegradable microplastics. Sci Total Environ 781:146884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146884
Fan X, Zou Y, Geng N, Liu J, Hou J, Li D, Yang C, Li Y (2021) Investigation on the adsorption and desorption behaviors of antibiotics by degradable MPs with or without UV ageing process. J Hazard Mater 401:123363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123363
Gong W, Jiang M, Han P, Liang G, Zhang T, Liu G (2019) Comparative analysis on the sorption kinetics and isotherms of fipronil on nondegradable and biodegradable microplastics. Environ Pollut 254:112927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.07.095
González-Pleiter M, Tamayo-Belda M, Pulido-Reyes G, Amariei G, Leganés F, Rosal R, Fernández-Piñas F (2019) Secondary nanoplastics released from a biodegradable microplastic severely impact freshwater environments. Environ Sci Nano 6:1382–1392. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EN01427B
Green DS (2016) Effects of microplastics on European flat oysters, Ostrea edulis and their associated benthic communities. Environ Pollut 216:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.043
Green DS, Boots B, Blockley DJ, Rocha C, Thompson R (2015) Impacts of discarded plastic bags on marine assemblages and ecosystem functioning. Environ Sci Technol 49:5380–5389. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00277
Green DS, Boots B, Sigwart J, Jiang S, Rocha C (2016) Effects of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on a marine ecosystem engineer (Arenicola marina) and sediment nutrient cycling. Environ Pollut 208:426–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.10.010
Jabeen N, Majid I, Nayik GA (2015) Bioplastics and food packaging: a review. Cogent Food Agric 1:1117749. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2015.1117749
Jang FH, Wong C, Choo J, Aun Sia ES, Mujahid A, Müller M (2022) Increased transfer of trace metals and Vibrio sp. from biodegradable microplastics to catfish Clarias gariepinus. Environ Pollut 298:118850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118850
John J, Nandhini AR, Velayudhaperumal Chellam P, Sillanpää M (2022) Microplastics in mangroves and coral reef ecosystems: a review. Environ Chem Lett 20:397–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01326-4
Koskei K, Munyasya AN, Wang Y-B, Zhao Z-Y, Zhou R, Indoshi SN, Wang W, Cheruiyot WK, Mburu DM, Nyende AB, Xiong Y-C (2021) Effects of increased plastic film residues on soil properties and crop productivity in agro-ecosystem. J Hazard Mater 414:125521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125521
Lambert S, Wagner M (2016) Formation of microscopic particles during the degradation of different polymers. Chemosphere 161:510–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.07.042
Liu J, Wang P, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Xu T, Zhang Y, Xi J, Hou L, Li L, Zhang Z, Lin Y (2022) Negative effects of poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) microplastics on Arabidopsis and its root-associated microbiome. J Hazard Mater 437:129294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129294
Magara G, Khan FR, Pinti M, Syberg K, Inzirillo A, Elia AC (2019) Effects of combined exposures of fluoranthene and polyethylene or polyhydroxybutyrate microplastics on oxidative stress biomarkers in the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis). J Toxicol Environ Health A 82:616–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2019.1633451
Magni S, Bonasoro F, Della Torre C, Parenti CC, Maggioni D, Binelli A (2020) Plastics and biodegradable plastics: ecotoxicity comparison between polyvinylchloride and Mater-Bi® micro-debris in a freshwater biological model. Sci Total Environ 720:137602
Market – European Bioplastics (2023) (european-bioplastics.org). Accessed January 2023
Meng F, Yang X, Riksen M, Xu M, Geissen V (2021) Response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) growth to soil contaminated with microplastics. Sci Total Environ 755:142516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142516
Menicagli V, Balestri E, Lardicci C (2019a) Exposure of coastal dune vegetation to plastic bag leachates: A neglected impact of plastic litter. Sci Total Environ 683:737–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.245
Menicagli V, Balestri E, Vallerini F, Castelli A, Lardicci C (2019b) Adverse effects of non-biodegradable and compostable plastic bags on the establishment of coastal dune vegetation: first experimental evidences. Environ Pollut 252:188–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.108
Mohanan N, Montazer Z, Sharma PK, Levin DB (2020) Microbial and enzymatic degradation of synthetic plastics. Front Microbiol 11:580709. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.580709
Nanda S, Patra BR, Patel R, Bakos J, Dalai AK (2022) Innovations in applications and prospects of bioplastics and biopolymers: a review. Environ Chem Lett 20:379–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01334-4
Napper IE, Thompson RC (2019) Environmental deterioration of biodegradable, oxo-biodegradable, compostable, and conventional plastic carrier bags in the sea, soil, and open-air over a 3-year period. Environ Sci Technol 53:4775–4783. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b06984
Naser AZ, Deiab I, Darras BM (2021) Poly (lactic acid)(PLA) and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), green alternatives to petroleum-based plastics: a review. RSC Adv 11:17151–17196. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA02390J
Plastics-the facts (2022) https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-facts-2022/
Qi Y, Beriot N, Gort G, Huerta Lwanga E, Gooren H, Yang X, Geissen V (2020) Impact of plastic mulch film debris on soil physicochemical and hydrological properties. Environ Pollut 266:115097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115097
Schöpfer L, Menzel R, Schnepf U, Ruess L, Marhan S, Brümmer F, Pagel H, Kandeler E (2020) Microplastics effects on reproduction and body length of the soil-dwelling nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Front Environ Sci 8:41. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00041
Shah AA, Hasan F, Hameed A, Ahmed S (2008) Biological degradation of plastics: a comprehensive review. Biotechnol Adv 26:246–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.12.005
Sharma VK, Ma X, Lichtfouse E, Robert D (2022) Nanoplastics are potentially more dangerous than microplastics. Environ Chem Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01539-1
Shi M, Xie Q, Li Z-L, Pan Y-F, Yuan Z, Lin L, Xu X-R, Li H-X (2023) Adsorption of heavy metals on biodegradable and conventional microplastics in the Pearl River Estuary, China. Environ Pollut 322:121158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121158
Straub S, Hirsch PE, Burkhardt-Holm P (2017) Biodegradable and petroleum-based microplastics do not differ in their ingestion and excretion but in their biological effects in a freshwater invertebrate Gammarus fossarum. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:774. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070774
Sun Y, Duan C, Cao N, Ding C, Huang Y, Wang J (2022) Biodegradable and conventional microplastics exhibit distinct microbiome, functionality, and metabolome changes in soil. J Hazard Mater 424:127282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127282
Walker S, Rothman R (2020) Life cycle assessment of bio-based and fossil-based plastic: A review. J Clean Prod 261:121158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121158
Wang J, Coffin S, Sun C, Schlenk D, Gan J (2019) Negligible effects of microplastics on animal fitness and HOC bioaccumulation in earthworm Eisenia fetida in soil. Environ Pollut 249:776–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.102
Wang F, Zhang X, Zhang S, Zhang S, Sun Y (2020) Interactions of microplastics and cadmium on plant growth and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in an agricultural soil. Chemosphere 254:126791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126791
Wei X-F, Bohlén M, Lindblad C, Hedenqvist M, Hakonen A (2021) Microplastics generated from a biodegradable plastic in freshwater and seawater. Water Res 198:117123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117123
Weinstein JE, Dekle JL, Leads RR, Hunter RA (2020) Degradation of bio-based and biodegradable plastics in a salt marsh habitat: another potential source of microplastics in coastal waters. Mar Pollut Bull 160:111518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111518
Yang Y, Li Z, Yan C, Chadwick D, Jones DL, Liu E, Liu Q, Bai R, He W (2022) Kinetics of microplastic generation from different types of mulch films in agricultural soil. Sci Total Environ 814:152572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152572
Yee MS-L, Hii L-W, Looi CK, Lim W-M, Wong S-F, Kok Y-Y, Tan B-K, Wong C-Y, Leong C-O (2021) Impact of microplastics and nanoplastics on human health. Nanomaterials 11:496. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11020496
Yokota K, Mehlrose M (2020) Lake phytoplankton assemblage altered by irregularly shaped PLA body wash microplastics but not by PS calibration beads. Water 12:2650. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092650
Yu H, Shi L, Fan P, Xi B, Tan W (2022) Effects of conventional versus biodegradable microplastic exposure on oxidative stress and gut microorganisms in earthworms: a comparison with two different soils. Chemosphere 307:135940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135940
Zhao L, Rong L, Xu J, Lian J, Wang L, Sun H (2020) Sorption of five organic compounds by polar and nonpolar microplastics. Chemosphere 257:127206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127206
Zhao Z-Y, Wang P-Y, Wang Y-B, Zhou R, Koskei K, Munyasya AN, Liu S-T, Wang W, Su Y-Z, Xiong Y-C (2021) Fate of plastic film residues in agro-ecosystem and its effects on aggregate-associated soil carbon and nitrogen stocks. J Hazard Mater 416:125954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125954
Zhao Y, Jia H, Deng H, Xing W, Feng D, Li J, Ge C, Yu H, Zhang Y, Chen H (2023) Response of earthworms to microplastics in soil under biogas slurry irrigation: Toxicity comparison of conventional and biodegradable microplastics. Sci Total Environ 858:160092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160092
Zimmermann L, Dierkes G, Ternes TA, Völker C, Wagner M (2019) Benchmarking the in vitro toxicity and chemical composition of plastic consumer products. Environ Sci Technol 53:11467–11477. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02293
Zimmermann L, Dombrowski A, Völker C, Wagner M (2020) Are bioplastics and plant-based materials safer than conventional plastics? In vitro toxicity and chemical composition. Environ Int 145:106066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106066
Zuo L-Z, Li H-X, Lin L, Sun Y-X, Diao Z-H, Liu S, Zhang Z-Y, Xu X-R (2019) Sorption and desorption of phenanthrene on biodegradable poly(butylene adipate co-terephtalate) microplastics. Chemosphere 215:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.173
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to Program for Early-Stage Researchers in Lille (PEARL), coordinated by the Foundation I-SITE ULNE, for the funding under the project ‘Assessing the toxicity of plastic fragments on zooplankton ecology via video tracking and behavioral analysis’ TOPAZ. This paper is the contribution to the CPER IDEAL 2021-2027 project funded by the region Hauts-de France, the French government, Europe (FEDER) and IFREMER.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ali, W., Ali, H., Souissi, S. et al. Are bioplastics an ecofriendly alternative to fossil fuel plastics?. Environ Chem Lett 21, 1991–2002 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01601-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01601-6